• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:22
CEST 20:22
KST 03:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters0Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7
Community News
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)65Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format16[IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend!18Weekly Cups (July 6 - 12): Protoss strike back12BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion8
StarCraft 2
General
How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" [D] Wireframe Casting Removed
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) WardiTV Summer Cup 2026 GSL CK #5 Race War HomeStory Cup 29
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool ASL22 General Discussion Animated Gateway
Tourneys
[IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend! [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story Tennis[sport]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Role of Gaming on Mental Hea…
TrAiDoS
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5028 users

Battlefield 3 - Page 169

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 167 168 169 170 171 491 Next
Expurgate
Profile Joined January 2011
United States208 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-02 22:20:04
October 02 2011 22:17 GMT
#3361
People complaining about not knowing friendlies from hostiles must be blind. Seriously, if you have any amount of visual comprehension at all, it's very, very easy. Even beyond the fact that friendlies have green or blue arrows above their heads, and hostiles have no arrow or a red one,

[image loading]
This is what Russian forces look like.

[image loading]
This is what American forces look like. They do not look the same. They barely even look similar.

They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.
TigerKarl
Profile Joined November 2010
1757 Posts
October 02 2011 22:19 GMT
#3362
[B]
They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.


You will not improve your theory by writing in bold letters.
In the beginning it is impossible to tell friend from foe.
Later it get's easier, mainly because you know where the opponent is coming from.
TigerKarl
Profile Joined November 2010
1757 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-02 22:19:41
October 02 2011 22:19 GMT
#3363
double post removed
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-02 22:21:16
October 02 2011 22:20 GMT
#3364
On October 03 2011 07:08 Phtes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 07:03 Herks wrote:
This game is an abortion compared to the beauty that was Battlefield 1942, and to a lesser extent Battlefield 2. Currently, what you see in beta, is rush mode, which is basically a failed, buggy version of CoD. The Conquest mode, that has all the helo's and tanks should be better, but i'm not holding my breath. I want destroyers and submarines back.

However, the amount of bugs I've seen in beta show that this is game has become the typical rushed out the door EA bullshit. They have completely killed the franchise. It's a shame that they are trying to be a Call of Duty clone, rather than stay true to the original game design that was engaging, unique and super fun.


Basically everyone who is a real BF fans knows not to base the game off rushed, also the testers for Caspian Border said it felt real similar to that of BF2, so I fail to see how it was rushed? All betas have bugs, as well I have yet to encounter anything other than a silly grenade pathing issue.

1 day after the game comes out you can be sure it will get a major patch. It's hardly a CoD Clone, hence all the CoD fanboys complaining

All i miss is the commander, shit like uav's and bombardments is what allowed a team to push forward and defend a position in style. It also lead to lol shit like dropping supplies onto the enemy commanders artillery so it would blow up.
Expurgate
Profile Joined January 2011
United States208 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-02 22:21:32
October 02 2011 22:21 GMT
#3365
On October 03 2011 07:19 TigerKarl wrote:
Show nested quote +
[B]
They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.


You will not improve your theory by writing in bold letters.
In the beginning it is impossible to tell friend from foe.
Later it get's easier, mainly because you know where the opponent is coming from.


It is not a theory, and it's bolded to get people to snap out of their "oh I can't tell people apart it must be the game's fault" funk. If you can't tell two substantially different character models apart, it is your fault. I shudder to think what those people must have though of CS.
T3tra
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States406 Posts
October 02 2011 22:21 GMT
#3366
On October 03 2011 06:15 semantics wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 06:12 Torte de Lini wrote:
On October 03 2011 06:07 Jochan wrote:
I've never played Battlefield before, matter of fact apart from CS 1.6 B3 is my first on-line fps. My friends told me about beta, so I've checked it out.
It's a strange game for me, I love it as much as I hate it. If my walls could understand all the profanity I would probably be smashed by them, however I've already preorded the game just from the beta experience. Yes it's buggy and I don't completely understand the bullets mechanics nor the maps/behavior or them, but it's god damn entertaining for me. I like the fact I am getting better and better and understand it more with each game. And that's only one map.

Now the software.I don't mind the Origin thingy nor the web browser matchmaking. It was strange for me, but now, when I have some experience with it I must say I like it. As far as the information gathering, spying etc. one must be pretty naive to boycott this unless he is god damn gosu hacker from movies completely off the grid. Nowadays everything gathers information about you and I am pretty sure EA will not get anything that Google or Facebook doesn't already have...


Honestly, CS was my only FPS before. I love Battlefield because of the chaos sometimes. I love knowing I'm in the pit of the battles and bullets flaring past me.

I'm looking forward to the campaign cuz it seems like they are actually trying for once to make one instead of just slapping a few maps against bots and calling that a campaign.

Although ionno what this is a part of but i would think the campaign

Wow. that was fucking intense. They did an amazing job with the sound and the visuals for the dog fights. I'm usually not interested in that kind of stuff at all, but that was really impressive.

So far I'm still liking BC2 better tbh compared to what I've seen in the beta. So I'll have to see quite a bit of gameplay before I buy it.
I need this place like I need a shotgun blast to the face.
Torte de Lini
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany38463 Posts
October 02 2011 22:24 GMT
#3367
On October 03 2011 07:17 Expurgate wrote:
People complaining about not knowing friendlies from hostiles must be blind. Seriously, if you have any amount of visual comprehension at all, it's very, very easy. Even beyond the fact that friendlies have green or blue arrows above their heads, and hostiles have no arrow or a red one,

[image loading]
This is what Russian forces look like.

[image loading]
This is what American forces look like. They do not look the same. They barely even look similar.

They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.


Oh look, helmet-wearing army-looking men with dark green to brown colors and chest packs on both teams.

When you compare them standing up, facing forward and not moving, its easy to compare.

When you're underground in metro where there is little light to help distinguish them and they're on the floor with barely their head showing and/or are running from one area to another in a very fast pace, to differentiate the two is not that easy.

But I'm sure taking all this out of context makes distinguishing the two opposing players easy.
https://twitter.com/#!/TorteDeLini (@TorteDeLini)
Expurgate
Profile Joined January 2011
United States208 Posts
October 02 2011 22:26 GMT
#3368
On October 03 2011 07:20 semantics wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 07:08 Phtes wrote:
On October 03 2011 07:03 Herks wrote:
This game is an abortion compared to the beauty that was Battlefield 1942, and to a lesser extent Battlefield 2. Currently, what you see in beta, is rush mode, which is basically a failed, buggy version of CoD. The Conquest mode, that has all the helo's and tanks should be better, but i'm not holding my breath. I want destroyers and submarines back.

However, the amount of bugs I've seen in beta show that this is game has become the typical rushed out the door EA bullshit. They have completely killed the franchise. It's a shame that they are trying to be a Call of Duty clone, rather than stay true to the original game design that was engaging, unique and super fun.


Basically everyone who is a real BF fans knows not to base the game off rushed, also the testers for Caspian Border said it felt real similar to that of BF2, so I fail to see how it was rushed? All betas have bugs, as well I have yet to encounter anything other than a silly grenade pathing issue.

1 day after the game comes out you can be sure it will get a major patch. It's hardly a CoD Clone, hence all the CoD fanboys complaining

All i miss is the commander, shit like uav's and bombardments is what allowed a team to push forward and defend a position in style. It also lead to lol shit like dropping supplies onto the enemy commanders artillery so it would blow up.


Yeah, I really miss the Commander's functions, but the way he was implemented in BF2 was very sloppy and didn't make a lot of sense. I understand why they took the position out, but it still is a little sad. It's true that it mostly came down to have one guy prone somewhere random on the map, hoping that SpecOps didn't come C4 your stuff.
cabarkapa
Profile Joined November 2009
United States1013 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-02 22:36:40
October 02 2011 22:31 GMT
#3369
On October 03 2011 07:21 Expurgate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 07:19 TigerKarl wrote:
[B]
They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.


You will not improve your theory by writing in bold letters.
In the beginning it is impossible to tell friend from foe.
Later it get's easier, mainly because you know where the opponent is coming from.


It is not a theory, and it's bolded to get people to snap out of their "oh I can't tell people apart it must be the game's fault" funk. If you can't tell two substantially different character models apart, it is your fault. I shudder to think what those people must have though of CS.

It looks like the Americans would mainly be distinguished by a slightly lighter color and a lack of masks. At least in CS, the terrorists had unique models that weren't just generic army men variations. In game it might be harder to tell them apart rather than looking at two crisp pictures for comparison. I won't say it's hard to tell the difference, just that they are similar enough as to where some people could easily get confused. But as you mentioned, it might not even be necessary to notice the differences if you just go off of whether they have an arrow of their head or not, or what color the arrow is.

Also I would like to agree that with enough playtime, the models should become easily distinguishable to the player. It can probably just be a bit frustrating for some new players, and it's not really a good reason to make it out to be a bad game for that reason. I don't know what people are expecting when they get a game like this. Unless the russians should be wearing fuzzy caps, and Americans should be wearing overalls and straw hats.
Jaehoon - Master strategist
Expurgate
Profile Joined January 2011
United States208 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-02 22:33:43
October 02 2011 22:31 GMT
#3370
On October 03 2011 07:24 Torte de Lini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 07:17 Expurgate wrote:
People complaining about not knowing friendlies from hostiles must be blind. Seriously, if you have any amount of visual comprehension at all, it's very, very easy. Even beyond the fact that friendlies have green or blue arrows above their heads, and hostiles have no arrow or a red one,

[image loading]
This is what Russian forces look like.

[image loading]
This is what American forces look like. They do not look the same. They barely even look similar.

They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.


Oh look, helmet-wearing army-looking men with dark green to brown colors and chest packs on both teams.

When you compare them standing up, facing forward and not moving, its easy to compare.

When you're underground in metro where there is little light to help distinguish them and they're on the floor with barely their head showing and/or are running from one area to another in a very fast pace, to differentiate the two is not that easy.

But I'm sure taking all this out of context makes distinguishing the two opposing players easy.


RU forces wear dark green and shadow blue. US forces wear khaki and tan.

RU forces have masks. US forces, except for Recon, have exposed faces.

I don't know what to tell you. When I started playing the game, I too had a hard time telling people apart. Then I spent some time learning what each team looks like. Now it's incredibly obvious. Hence: if you can't distinguish between them, it's not the game's fault.

Why does everyone think it's ok nowadays to conflate their lack of experience with a flaw in the game itself? It's the same attitude that leads to "everything that beats me is overpowered." If you have issues with distinguishing between teams, put in some time to ensure that you can recognize them both.

The only confusion I encounter these days is between RU and US recon, mostly because of the masks. Even then, it only takes a fraction of a second to figure out based on profile which team they belong to. Oh, and there's STILL the colored arrows, in case you're totally lost.


On October 03 2011 07:31 cabarkapa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 07:21 Expurgate wrote:
On October 03 2011 07:19 TigerKarl wrote:
[B]
They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.


You will not improve your theory by writing in bold letters.
In the beginning it is impossible to tell friend from foe.
Later it get's easier, mainly because you know where the opponent is coming from.


It is not a theory, and it's bolded to get people to snap out of their "oh I can't tell people apart it must be the game's fault" funk. If you can't tell two substantially different character models apart, it is your fault. I shudder to think what those people must have though of CS.

It looks like the Americans would mainly be distinguished by a slightly lighter color. At least in CS, the terrorists had unique models that weren't just generic army men variations. In game it might be harder to tell them apart rather than looking at two crisp pictures for comparison. I won't say it's hard to tell the difference, just that they are similar enough as to where some people could easily get confused. But as you mentioned, it might not even be necessary to notice the differences if you just go off of whether they have an arrow of their head or not, or what color the arrow is.


Honestly, the main clue that I run with is whether their face is exposed. Even in low-light conditions, the patch of light color on their face (or dark color, if they're RU) is a huge tell.
heishe
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany2284 Posts
October 02 2011 22:32 GMT
#3371
Is anything wrong with the server browser? I can't join any server since it says that they're all full (which can't be true, I've tried tons).
If you value your soul, never look into the eye of a horse. Your soul will forever be lost in the void of the horse.
soullogik
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1171 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-02 22:32:37
October 02 2011 22:32 GMT
#3372
On October 03 2011 07:20 semantics wrote:
All i miss is the commander, shit like uav's and bombardments is what allowed a team to push forward and defend a position in style. It also lead to lol shit like dropping supplies onto the enemy commanders artillery so it would blow up.


recon has miny uav's they can release, its just not in beta.
they also have laser designated air strikes, also not in beta.

support has mortars, again not in beta.

there will be plenty of commander like stuff in the game, tho i agree, commander was a awesome part of bf2 and it made the game even better.
young ho
Torte de Lini
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany38463 Posts
October 02 2011 22:36 GMT
#3373
On October 03 2011 07:31 Expurgate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 07:24 Torte de Lini wrote:
On October 03 2011 07:17 Expurgate wrote:
People complaining about not knowing friendlies from hostiles must be blind. Seriously, if you have any amount of visual comprehension at all, it's very, very easy. Even beyond the fact that friendlies have green or blue arrows above their heads, and hostiles have no arrow or a red one,

[image loading]
This is what Russian forces look like.

[image loading]
This is what American forces look like. They do not look the same. They barely even look similar.

They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.


Oh look, helmet-wearing army-looking men with dark green to brown colors and chest packs on both teams.

When you compare them standing up, facing forward and not moving, its easy to compare.

When you're underground in metro where there is little light to help distinguish them and they're on the floor with barely their head showing and/or are running from one area to another in a very fast pace, to differentiate the two is not that easy.

But I'm sure taking all this out of context makes distinguishing the two opposing players easy.


RU forces wear dark green and shadow blue. US forces wear khaki and tan.

RU forces have masks. US forces, except for Recon, have exposed faces.

I don't know what to tell you. When I started playing the game, I too had a hard time telling people apart. Then I spent some time learning what each team looks like. Now it's incredibly obvious. Hence: if you can't distinguish between them, it's not the game's fault.

Why does everyone think it's ok nowadays to conflate their lack of experience with a flaw in the game itself? It's the same attitude that leads to "everything that beats me is overpowered." If you have issues with distinguishing between teams, put in some time to ensure that you can recognize them both.

The only confusion I encounter these days is between RU and US recon, mostly because of the masks. Even then, it only takes a fraction of a second to figure out based on profile which team they belong to. Oh, and there's STILL the colored arrows, in case you're totally lost.


Those complaining about the trouble of differentiating players' sides was because there was a bug that didn't show the colored arrows.

As long as the colored arrows are there, there are no complaints.
https://twitter.com/#!/TorteDeLini (@TorteDeLini)
Expurgate
Profile Joined January 2011
United States208 Posts
October 02 2011 22:41 GMT
#3374
On October 03 2011 07:36 Torte de Lini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 07:31 Expurgate wrote:
On October 03 2011 07:24 Torte de Lini wrote:
On October 03 2011 07:17 Expurgate wrote:
People complaining about not knowing friendlies from hostiles must be blind. Seriously, if you have any amount of visual comprehension at all, it's very, very easy. Even beyond the fact that friendlies have green or blue arrows above their heads, and hostiles have no arrow or a red one,

[image loading]
This is what Russian forces look like.

[image loading]
This is what American forces look like. They do not look the same. They barely even look similar.

They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.


Oh look, helmet-wearing army-looking men with dark green to brown colors and chest packs on both teams.

When you compare them standing up, facing forward and not moving, its easy to compare.

When you're underground in metro where there is little light to help distinguish them and they're on the floor with barely their head showing and/or are running from one area to another in a very fast pace, to differentiate the two is not that easy.

But I'm sure taking all this out of context makes distinguishing the two opposing players easy.


RU forces wear dark green and shadow blue. US forces wear khaki and tan.

RU forces have masks. US forces, except for Recon, have exposed faces.

I don't know what to tell you. When I started playing the game, I too had a hard time telling people apart. Then I spent some time learning what each team looks like. Now it's incredibly obvious. Hence: if you can't distinguish between them, it's not the game's fault.

Why does everyone think it's ok nowadays to conflate their lack of experience with a flaw in the game itself? It's the same attitude that leads to "everything that beats me is overpowered." If you have issues with distinguishing between teams, put in some time to ensure that you can recognize them both.

The only confusion I encounter these days is between RU and US recon, mostly because of the masks. Even then, it only takes a fraction of a second to figure out based on profile which team they belong to. Oh, and there's STILL the colored arrows, in case you're totally lost.


Those complaining about the trouble of differentiating players' sides was because there was a bug that didn't show the colored arrows.

As long as the colored arrows are there, there are no complaints.


Ahh. I haven't encountered that bug. That makes substantially more sense.
Torte de Lini
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany38463 Posts
October 02 2011 22:44 GMT
#3375
On October 03 2011 07:41 Expurgate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 07:36 Torte de Lini wrote:
On October 03 2011 07:31 Expurgate wrote:
On October 03 2011 07:24 Torte de Lini wrote:
On October 03 2011 07:17 Expurgate wrote:
People complaining about not knowing friendlies from hostiles must be blind. Seriously, if you have any amount of visual comprehension at all, it's very, very easy. Even beyond the fact that friendlies have green or blue arrows above their heads, and hostiles have no arrow or a red one,

[image loading]
This is what Russian forces look like.

[image loading]
This is what American forces look like. They do not look the same. They barely even look similar.

They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.


Oh look, helmet-wearing army-looking men with dark green to brown colors and chest packs on both teams.

When you compare them standing up, facing forward and not moving, its easy to compare.

When you're underground in metro where there is little light to help distinguish them and they're on the floor with barely their head showing and/or are running from one area to another in a very fast pace, to differentiate the two is not that easy.

But I'm sure taking all this out of context makes distinguishing the two opposing players easy.


RU forces wear dark green and shadow blue. US forces wear khaki and tan.

RU forces have masks. US forces, except for Recon, have exposed faces.

I don't know what to tell you. When I started playing the game, I too had a hard time telling people apart. Then I spent some time learning what each team looks like. Now it's incredibly obvious. Hence: if you can't distinguish between them, it's not the game's fault.

Why does everyone think it's ok nowadays to conflate their lack of experience with a flaw in the game itself? It's the same attitude that leads to "everything that beats me is overpowered." If you have issues with distinguishing between teams, put in some time to ensure that you can recognize them both.

The only confusion I encounter these days is between RU and US recon, mostly because of the masks. Even then, it only takes a fraction of a second to figure out based on profile which team they belong to. Oh, and there's STILL the colored arrows, in case you're totally lost.


Those complaining about the trouble of differentiating players' sides was because there was a bug that didn't show the colored arrows.

As long as the colored arrows are there, there are no complaints.


Ahh. I haven't encountered that bug. That makes substantially more sense.


yeah, sorry. I thought you were bitching about the above knowing that the arrows sometimes don't show.
https://twitter.com/#!/TorteDeLini (@TorteDeLini)
English
Profile Joined April 2010
United States475 Posts
October 02 2011 22:48 GMT
#3376
The character models aren't easy to distinguish on the fly. It gets easier as you play and get more experienced with the map. The color scheme is a little too similar and you almost have to think about it. Thinking about whether or not on your team wastes a lot of time. Arrows help, just not all the time.

I like the way both sides look and would change it very slightly if they do.
Torte de Lini
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany38463 Posts
October 02 2011 22:49 GMT
#3377
Anyone know why I can't play my robot on most grounds?
https://twitter.com/#!/TorteDeLini (@TorteDeLini)
mtn
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
729 Posts
October 02 2011 22:50 GMT
#3378
On October 03 2011 07:17 Expurgate wrote:
People complaining about not knowing friendlies from hostiles must be blind. Seriously, if you have any amount of visual comprehension at all, it's very, very easy. Even beyond the fact that friendlies have green or blue arrows above their heads, and hostiles have no arrow or a red one,

[image loading]
This is what Russian forces look like.

[image loading]
This is what American forces look like. They do not look the same. They barely even look similar.

They have different color palettes, models, and movement styles. You can tell whether a player is RU or US based on the way they sprint. If you think the teams are too hard to tell apart, get your eyes checked.



Yes. Now put these spirits into a Game. Add lighting/shadows, Objects, and Things like Bushes, Trees, and Sucky Map and you won't tell the difference.
Bartuc
Profile Joined October 2010
Netherlands629 Posts
October 02 2011 22:53 GMT
#3379
On October 03 2011 07:11 Torte de Lini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 03 2011 07:09 Bartuc wrote:
Been playing as support, not very good at the game but still enjoying it most of the time. I am using M249 with grip, flash suppressor and ACOG, is quite good for long range suppression and med range murder if properly fired in bursts :-)

I also love planting C4 around the coms as defender, and when enemy team fuses the bomb just pull the trigger and clear them out so the rest of your team can defuse more quickly :-)


How do you get C4? Which class?


It's an unlockable on support class
It is a sign of strength to cry out against fate, rather than to bow one's head and succumb.
Expurgate
Profile Joined January 2011
United States208 Posts
October 02 2011 22:53 GMT
#3380
On October 03 2011 07:48 English wrote:
The character models aren't easy to distinguish on the fly. It gets easier as you play and get more experienced with the map. The color scheme is a little too similar and you almost have to think about it. Thinking about whether or not on your team wastes a lot of time. Arrows help, just not all the time.

I like the way both sides look and would change it very slightly if they do.


I really like the look of both sides. I think if they wanted to make it slightly more obvious, the best way would be to make the shadow blue color of RU camo a little bit brighter. Mostly, it's just something you have to learn, which I consider a good thing.

On October 03 2011 07:49 Torte de Lini wrote:
Anyone know why I can't play my robot on most grounds?


I don't have the robot, but I imagine it's like the T-UGS or the Mobile Spawn, which can only be deployed on ground that's flat and a given distance away from cover.
Prev 1 167 168 169 170 171 491 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
#59
RotterdaM962
TaKeTV 478
TKL 375
IndyStarCraft 195
SteadfastSC193
BRAT_OK 137
ZombieGrub11
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 962
TKL 375
Harstem 210
IndyStarCraft 195
SteadfastSC 193
BRAT_OK 137
RushiSC 72
UpATreeSC 69
MindelVK 15
ZombieGrub11
elazer 6
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 1995
ggaemo 203
firebathero 199
Dewaltoss 152
Free 48
Hyun 32
910 26
Aegong 25
HiyA 25
Bale 21
[ Show more ]
Hm[arnc] 15
IntoTheRainbow 13
Yoon 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Dota 2
420jenkins1776
League of Legends
Trikslyr68
Counter-Strike
FalleN 2549
fl0m1862
x6flipin556
edward284
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor229
Liquid`Hasu140
Other Games
singsing2216
Grubby2202
ceh91022
B2W.Neo320
uThermal251
JuggernautJason70
Livibee67
KnowMe59
QueenE42
Rex16
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2163
BasetradeTV245
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 52
• Reevou 7
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 16
• 80smullet 11
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis4084
• TFBlade867
Other Games
• imaqtpie699
• Shiphtur473
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
1d 5h
The PondCast
1d 15h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 16h
OSC
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
CrankTV Team League
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Clem vs ByuN
Serral vs SHIN
Online Event
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
herO vs Solar
Rogue vs Lambo
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E3

Ongoing

Acropolis #4
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.