EPT
Oblivion was pretty small also, 4,5gb.
Still game looks badass!
Elder Scrolls V - Skyrim - Page 55
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
ArYeS
Slovenia268 Posts
Oblivion was pretty small also, 4,5gb. Still game looks badass! | ||
|
Skilledblob
Germany3392 Posts
On October 26 2011 17:43 Ramong wrote: The land mass might be around Oblivion, but the textures should be 9 times as good  the 6gb scares me a bit too not sure where you get the idea that the textures are so much better. In the end it is still a console port so you cant expect high end graphics from this game. | ||
|
ArYeS
Slovenia268 Posts
| ||
|
Skilledblob
Germany3392 Posts
On October 26 2011 18:30 ArYeS wrote: He was just joking, but we were told that PC version gets higher resolution textures... well I guess we will see when the game is out | ||
|
ZaaaaaM
Netherlands1828 Posts
On October 26 2011 16:45 solidbebe wrote: http://planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/fullstory.php?id=165603 http://www.geforce.com/Optimize/Guides/how-to-build-a-kick-ass-battlefield-3-pc Apparently it still gets about 25 - 30 fps in bf3 so you should be able to run it fine. 25-30 on High in BF3, thats great to hear. Should be able to run skyrim mid/high without too many problems then I guess. Recon that looks better than xbox right? So pc version it is^^ thanks! | ||
|
Coriolis
United States1152 Posts
On October 22 2011 07:40 iloveroo wrote: Since skyrim is coming closer to release, I was wondering is it worth getting the older Elder Scrolls to understand whats going to happen in skyrim, or is it going to be a different story Honestly I would play the elder scrolls backwards. I find it ruins some of the newer games when you play the older ones first. | ||
|
turamn
United States1374 Posts
On October 26 2011 22:07 ZaaaaaM wrote: 25-30 on High in BF3, thats great to hear. Should be able to run skyrim mid/high without too many problems then I guess. Recon that looks better than xbox right? So pc version it is^^ thanks! Honestly, I wouldn't touch Skyrim on a PC with those settings if you have an Xbox as another option. You'll be forced into having the lowest possible graphics and you've got so little RAM and such an old video card that you're most definitely still going to lag and have a shitty experience. | ||
|
Longshank
1648 Posts
On October 26 2011 22:25 Coriolis wrote: Honestly I would play the elder scrolls backwards. I find it ruins some of the newer games when you play the older ones first. I agree with this. Oblivion is a great game but the transition from Morrowind was painful. So many key features, skills and whatnot were removed that it lead to a huge let down initially. It got better with mods though. It's this thing when you expect one thing but get something else. You don't have to go as far back as Daggerfall, it pretty outdated and, while awesome for its time, is too buggy to be enjoyable today. Morrowind and Oblivion are definitely worth playing through. | ||
|
Neeh
Norway458 Posts
| ||
|
Yuljan
2196 Posts
| ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On October 26 2011 23:02 Yuljan wrote: I cant wait such a long time till 11.11.11 :/ Some way to get it before preorder or stuff like that? uhhhhh no? lol. It'll probably get leaked on torrents or something but if you mean legally, of course not. Also lol @ people complaining about the HDD requirement (not on here ofc), as if the game being only 6GB will somehow make it terrible, people have been saying they're cancelling their preorders cause of it lol. I don't see why it makes a difference cause we've seen how the game looks before and it looks great, and if they used some kind of witchery to make the install small as hell I'm cool with that. | ||
|
A x i o M
United States78 Posts
Morrowind and Oblivion were both fantastic games. Loved both of them. Can't wait to see the new graphics engine and the new features for this game. Bethesda always does amazing work. | ||
|
Ramong
Denmark1706 Posts
I was half joking when I said that the textures would be 9 times as good as Oblivion. While I hope they are much better (and someone said something about a texture pack for PC?) I doubt that they are that much better/bigger size, simply because Skyrim have to be playable on the damn consoles. We can also hope that they found a magical compression method that makes a gorgeous and huge game as Skyrim much smaller. I am definably looking forward to Skyrim and won't bash on it before I see it :D | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
| ||
|
Bibdy
United States3481 Posts
| ||
|
Kyhol
Canada2574 Posts
On October 27 2011 02:15 DystopiaX wrote: Yeah I facepalmed when I read that too, some guess file size directly correlates to quality lol That's what my girlfriend tells me... IN BED! | ||
|
ArYeS
Slovenia268 Posts
This means that probably Skyrim uses same texture size as Oblivion, if there is more models in game. If Skyrim would increase texture size by 2, filesize of game would be much highier. But this hardly matters, if textures in oblivion were poorly made and in Skyrim are perfect. Add to calculation new shaders and filesize of 6gb doesn't mean a lot. Still I didn't expect such small size.. we'll see when we get the game, but I don't think they will release texture pack separatly.. | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
| ||
|
hysterial
United States2044 Posts
On October 27 2011 03:27 DystopiaX wrote: Some Bethesda dude on twitter said something about being better at compressing things as wel, who knows. I heard the same story with Dragon Age 2, but I still believe Betheseda is better than that horrid game. | ||
|
Macabre
United States1262 Posts
6 gigs: New engine & we’re much better at compression (art/voice/data). It’s huge yet more optimized than we’ve had before. And faster. 1 hour ago ^ Should clear some thing sup. | ||
| ||
