|
|
|
51523 Posts
On January 14 2011 14:02 DannyJ wrote:What the hell...
![[image loading]](http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/5079/primetimez.png)
|
This was the most entertaining thing on NFL network in a long time.
|
Their reactions were so fake. But funny.
|
On January 15 2011 03:16 Ferrose wrote:
Their reactions were so fake. But funny.
That's just how black people laugh at things, then everyone else starts to act that way to fit in. It's a pretty funny thing to witness, irl.
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
|
|
|
On January 15 2011 03:16 Ferrose wrote:
Their reactions were so fake. But funny.
Why would they fake it if wasn't live and they thought it would be cut? You can hear them joking about how they wished it were live.
|
On January 15 2011 06:50 lolsixtynine wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2011 03:16 Ferrose wrote:
Their reactions were so fake. But funny. Why would they fake it if wasn't live and they thought it would be cut? You can hear them joking about how they wished it were live.
Then there is something wrong with them. Saying "Danny Woodcotton" made them do roflcopters. It was funny, but not so funny that you would laugh like that >.>
|
"Woodcock," actually. That's why it's so funny.
|
On January 15 2011 07:00 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote:
"Woodcock," actually. That's why it's so funny.
Wait what. Okay. I thought he said "Woodcotton."
I guess it's understandable now.
|
I think Fox is a good fit at Denver, especially given who else was available. He's always been a solid defensive coach and they really need help there. They'll probably stick with the 4-3 and if they can get Fairley with the 2nd pick that will be huge. Even if they don't, there are a lot of people they can get to help round off their front seven.
I don't think he would've taken the job if he didn't believe in Tebow either which plays a big role, especially out there. There's a lot of upside in Denver, way more than there ever was in his time at Carolina. I wouldn't say he's the best coach in the world, but he'll do better than Dennison would.
|
Predictions for this weekend? Give scores if you want.
Ravens 13-Steelers 7
Patriots 28-Jets 14
Bears 24-Seahawks 13
Falcons 26-Packers 24
|
On January 15 2011 07:43 Ferrose wrote:
Predictions for this weekend? Give scores if you want.
Ravens 13-Steelers 7
Patriots 28-Jets 14
Bears 24-Seahawks 13
Falcons 26-Packers 24
I agree with all of your predictions. I'm not sure about the scores, but definitely agree with the winners.
I know a lot of people think GB is going to take ATL out, but I think ATL's offense is being underestimated. The Packers have had a very difficult time stopping the run to the left of the field (Matt Forte gashed them all day to the left). Michael Turner is a better HB than Matt Forte is, as a pure runner anyway, and he is going to do damage. If they adjust for it, and bring an 8th and 9th guy down, that's just going to leave them open over the top for Roddy White or Tony G to kill them.
Atlanta has a good enough pass rush to slow the Packers air game down, and their running game is unproven. James Starks looked really good against Philadelphia last weekend, but one game doesn't mean a whole lot, and Philly was pretty banged up for the game. The more I think about that game, the more I start to lean towards Atlanta. I hope I'm wrong, so that, after they win on Sunday, the Bears can play GB for a trip to the big show.
I haven't really believed strongly in the Steelers all year. Their offense has been too anemic at times, and I'm just not sure it's going to show up this weekend. I like the Ravens in another instant classic--it seems like the only thing this match up produces.
Pats should stomp the rowdy Jets into oblivion. Maybe they'll embarrass them so badly that Rex Ryan will actually shut the fuck up for a few minutes.
Bears should handle the Seahawks with ease.. they better handle them with ease.
|
I think that GB-Atl will be a lot like the regular season game. Very close and competitive the entire time.
Ravens-Steelers usually isn't a high scoring game, but is always an amazing game.
I wouldn't be surprised if Pats-Jets is less close than what I said.
And yeah, the Seahawks will definitely look like a 7-9 team without the home field advantage.
I don't expect the Jets to come close, because they can't shut their mouths. Seeing them say all that shit just reminds me of that guy on the Steelers a few years ago who guaransheed a win, then they got stomped like 38-14 or something.
|
I stopped making predictions after going 1-3 last week.
|
I hope Rex Ryan gets destroyed after calling out two future locks for the Hall of Fame.
Matty Ice and Aaron Rogers are both so good. I hope they both have Super Bowl rings in their future.
|
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Packers will win it. I have faith. FAAAIIIITH!
Should be a great game either way.
|
I'm hoping that the Seahawks and the Packers win, so the Seahawks will host the NFC championship game and they will have hosted 2 playoff games lol!
|
I wonder what the spread would be in a Pats vs Seahawks SB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
