EPTlol
doesn't make kat good unfortunately
League of Legends - Page 136
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Brees
Marshall Islands3404 Posts
lol doesn't make kat good unfortunately | ||
|
iccup
6 Posts
| ||
|
the presses
1 Post
| ||
|
bellweather
United States404 Posts
| ||
|
G0dly
United States450 Posts
I go with AS/AD, but does anybody have any opinions? | ||
|
DanceCommander
United States1808 Posts
On April 13 2010 11:11 iccup wrote: hey guys i'm the owner of the popular starcraft private server iCCup. i don't play this game much but i heard a great player can do well with anyone? or something along those lines. i suggest we stop the presses. On April 13 2010 11:20 the presses wrote: i heard we should stop me? something about good players doing well with anyone. jesus christ GOLD | ||
|
geegee1
United States618 Posts
On April 13 2010 10:50 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote: It's fucking sarcasm, jesus christ. All of those heroes except maybe alistar after the nerf are very top tier. I can't tell if you're trolling or just plain stupid. You don't know your ELO bracket unless you go to the mIRC channel and ask for it, or you can just estimate it by playing games with people who are known top 500 players. Also you should assume that you need around 300+ wins with a 60% winrate to be in the "high ELO" bracket. 200+ with 60% or 300+ with 50-55% gets you into the "good ELO" bracket and anything under that is "Feeders and noobs". For example, I know that you're in the "feeders and noobs" bracket by how you talk about how win/loss doesn't matter. oh shit I CAN TOTALLY TELL SARCASM ON THE INTERNETZ and on the top 500 just no. its been outdated. its not even reliable anymore. dude you dont even know how much you are gaining or losing just because someone has this amount of winrate or that amount doesnt tell you shit. so im 480-387 so using your awesome logic im high elo. | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
| ||
|
ZERG_RUSSIAN
10417 Posts
On April 13 2010 11:57 geegee1 wrote: oh shit I CAN TOTALLY TELL SARCASM ON THE INTERNETZ and on the top 500 just no. its been outdated. its not even reliable anymore. dude you dont even know how much you are gaining or losing just because someone has this amount of winrate or that amount doesnt tell you shit. so im 480-387 so using your awesome logic im high elo. If you're too stupid to identify a list of top tier characters I don't think you're a good player regardless of what your elo is, but if you are 480-387 and you're queuing vs good players than maybe you are high elo. YOU MIGHT BE. So what if the top 500 is outdated? You're not saying IM IN TEH TOP 500 CUZ I PLAY VS _____. It's more like "oh, I saw that guy on a high elo list, i might be getting into the upper brackets". If you queue against players that you see on phreak's stream, you're probably high ELO. It's a fucking estimation, not a hard science, and either way you know where you stand in terms of ELO by your winrate vs good players. In case you didn't know, winning and losing directly influences your ELO. | ||
|
rredtooth
5461 Posts
| ||
|
iccup
6 Posts
On April 13 2010 12:16 HeavOnEarth wrote: on behalf of iccup, i would like to say:nah too easy + Show Spoiler + your mom is too easy | ||
|
Mogwai
United States13274 Posts
On April 13 2010 11:37 G0dly wrote: so i've been having an argument with my friend over whether AP TF is better than AS/AD TF I go with AS/AD, but does anybody have any opinions? welllllll, AP is ok in the context of being hybridish (sheen -> GRB -> Lich Bane or Triforce), but I personally think going straight AS/AD is more focused and generally better. The AP/hybrid builds still burst pretty well, but with stacked deck, TF has become a pretty respectable ranged DPS carry that offers some unique map control so I don't stray from going LW/Starks -> IE/BC with him anymore. EDIT: Sarcasm fight! EDIT: Pokey, I beat up on a scrubby game with the build you suggested with Kennen and it was pretty fun. Good looks, I guess I didn't realize how much I needed to invest in HP with him, but it played out pretty well (7/2/7 or something). I dunno, he still feels pretty underwhelming to me, but he can be a lot of fun. | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
On April 13 2010 12:54 iccup wrote: on behalf of iccup, i would like to say: + Show Spoiler + your mom is too easy touche sir | ||
|
g1rg10
Italy186 Posts
Is that any good any good of a setup? What should be changing? | ||
|
oberon
United States1320 Posts
On April 13 2010 10:23 redtooth wrote: He has the secret rune no one else has? He uses her fifth skill? Clearly, she can be played at a high level. It may be harder to play her than, say, Tristana, but she's not inherently bad.lolololol takashi is the one exception to the kat rule. and haunting guise is amazing. they took away useless mini-regen, gave it health, ap, and mPen. what more can you ask for? it's still cheap too (still 1337 right?). It just looks like a bad Rylai's to me. Rylai's is 700 for 20 AP and a CC on all your spells. Haunting guise is 575 for 20 magic pen and spell vamp. The 20 AP on Rylai's is worth at least 400 (the only way to get it cheaper is with mejai's), so you're paying 300 for an excellent passive. Guise is giving you a good passive and a mediocre one for 575. Plus, efficiency per item slot is MUCH better with Rylai's (obviously, since it uses better base items). Maybe I'm underestimating magic pen? Fiddle's one of my mains, so I could just try it I guess. | ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
| ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
| ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
| ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
| ||
|
hazed
United States42 Posts
BTW me = COMEGETATASTE | ||
| ||
