EPTffs
Battlefield Bad Company 2 - Page 5
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Ideas
United States8039 Posts
ffs | ||
|
Shivaz
Canada1783 Posts
| ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
DorF
Sweden961 Posts
| ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
On February 01 2010 10:01 Disregard wrote: The C4 rushes on objectives are terrible, they should really fix that. It's kind of funny loading 6 C4 charges onto the UAV helicopter thing and flying it into the objective and detonating it, or suiciding with a quad laced with C4 but yes it kind of ruins the game when those are easier and quicker than doing things the right way. But then again, if it wasn't for that sort of stuff defending seems way too easy. Most of my teams won't even get to the second set of objectives if I don't C4 rush. They need to lower the amount of C4 people can get or increase the damage that the objectives can take, but then they need to fix the map a bit because it's really not balanced, the 2nd part in particular is just way too easy to defend | ||
|
Tekin
2711 Posts
On February 04 2010 04:20 floor exercise wrote: It's kind of funny loading 6 C4 charges onto the UAV helicopter thing and flying it into the objective and detonating it, or suiciding with a quad laced with C4 but yes it kind of ruins the game when those are easier and quicker than doing things the right way. But then again, if it wasn't for that sort of stuff defending seems way too easy. Most of my teams won't even get to the second set of objectives if I don't C4 rush. They need to lower the amount of C4 people can get or increase the damage that the objectives can take, but then they need to fix the map a bit because it's really not balanced, the 2nd part in particular is just way too easy to defend That reminds me the people that keep rushing with C4 are so gay! 3 C4 can destroy the objective. | ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
snotboogie
Australia3550 Posts
DICE takes a shot at MW2. Fairly lol. | ||
GTR
51295 Posts
| ||
|
ToyotaDemon
Australia150 Posts
On February 28 2010 20:14 GTR wrote: such a shame the game requires a beast of a computer to play at a steady framerate =[ Really? There are some people who are playing the game atm, because some stores broke the street date and they say that the optimization is much better than the beta and that the performance is actually relative to your hardware and not all over the place. | ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
You really don't need a beast PC as long as you turn off some of the post processing shit Once I turned off HSAO and used dx9 mode I could run everything on high at 1920*1200 on my x3 720/4870/4gb which was like a $700 computer over 6 months ago (sc2 beta computer lolol) | ||
|
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
This video is funny, and yet so true. | ||
|
Highways
Australia6098 Posts
I prefer really massive maps and working in small squads. | ||
|
Shivaz
Canada1783 Posts
| ||
|
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
On March 02 2010 11:21 Highways wrote: Can't wait for this game, so sick of Modern Warfare 2. I prefer really massive maps and working in small squads. Same here since each squad can have a role (if all the players cooperate) in what to do. Whether a tank squad can put down suppressing fire on the bomb site while 2 squads go in for the flank on the side. So many possibilities with this game. | ||
|
StayFrosty
Canada743 Posts
Overall though, the game has a very arcadey feel to it and I think, lacks the high degree of realism that they intended to achieve. | ||
|
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
| ||
|
Tekin
2711 Posts
On February 28 2010 20:14 GTR wrote: such a shame the game requires a beast of a computer to play at a steady framerate =[ Not even if you set your settings on low? | ||
|
Taku
Canada2036 Posts
| ||
|
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
1 hour footage of the game. | ||
| ||
