| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
Please title all your posts and rehost all images on Imgur | ||
|
Sapaio
Denmark2037 Posts
On October 27 2021 06:43 Manit0u wrote: Yes, series will be a BG spin-off. Ohh I thought the plan was a series version of the book. And also make a movie version. + Show Spoiler + After the movie not capturing the essence of Bene Gesserit very good and over emotional. Dissopointed HBO plan to make a spin off about them. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
https://apnews.com/article/prop-gun-shooting-alec-baldwin-halyna-hutchins-e6b4d769e5df47ee0c23d4ad69f1992d | ||
|
polgas
Canada1765 Posts
| ||
|
Sapaio
Denmark2037 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17641 Posts
On October 28 2021 13:38 Sapaio wrote: I find it incredibly reading about Rust, it's like a soap opera. The thing that seems most incredible is that crew according to reports should have used the movie guns for target practice with live amo in breaks. Also the live amo was keept close to the movie equipment. If these things are true, and Baldwin have known about it. He has part of the blame maybe also in the courts view. Well, technically there are people on set hired specifically to make sure such things don't happen. If anything they botched the job. I mean you can't really expect actors to check every prop themselves when there's entire teams of people preparing them (although in case of guns that would be advisable). | ||
|
Sapaio
Denmark2037 Posts
On October 29 2021 10:55 Manit0u wrote: Well, technically there are people on set hired specifically to make sure such things don't happen. If anything they botched the job. I mean you can't really expect actors to check every prop themselves when there's entire teams of people preparing them (although in case of guns that would be advisable). I do not blame him as an actor. Baldwin is the executive producer on the movie, so if he noticed the careless and wrong conduct of staff, hired under qualified staff he has some of the fault. | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17641 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States43533 Posts
Everything I’ve read about industry standard for armourers implies that you know when they’re on the set, morning safety meetings on any day with a gun, training, physically having the gun checked by the armourer and prop master in front of the actor who is in turn asked to check it, Perspex screens, non essential crew moved off set, remote cameras. If a gun is on set then everything becomes about the gun. Compare that with Rust and any industry veteran would have noticed it was lax. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14098 Posts
Wrongful death lawsuit wise he and a few others are going to be hugely on the hook for this. | ||
|
KwarK
United States43533 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9768 Posts
Go on, I dare you. | ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
9025 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Uldridge
Belgium5032 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States43533 Posts
On November 04 2021 23:15 Uldridge wrote: I have an exceptionally difficult time parsing your sentence. Could your rephrase that perhaps? Not trying to be an ass, just can't understand what you mean at all lol We don’t know if it was put there hours before the accident or just minutes but we do know that someone decided to put a live round in a gun they knew would be used on set as a prop (someone deliberately did this ridiculously unsafe and stupid thing). Personally I’m on team “this is the fault of the AD”. They found a live gun and negligently brought it onto the scene and gave it to the actor. If they had the expertise to check whether it was live then they negligently failed to do so. If they lacked the expertise to check whether it was live then they negligently failed to take it to the armourer and someone died as a result of their negligence. This wasn’t even the first time this AD had hurt someone by giving an actor a live gun, they were fired from a movie in 2019 for doing this exact same thing. | ||
|
Sapaio
Denmark2037 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States43533 Posts
On November 05 2021 01:35 Sapaio wrote: I don't know if I would trust the armor saying someone else put the live amo in the gun, so she can't be blamed. also isn't it the armors job to make sure nobody does things like that, does she get paid to put guns out of safe in the morning check them and the after days work put guns back in safe with no responsibility in between, do not think so. The gun shouldn’t have been out, for sure, and I do blame the armourer for that. But they didn’t physically issue it to the AD. Whenever you pick up a gun you find lying around you assume responsibility for it. The AD could have found the gun, shouted “what the fuck” and summoned the armourer to the scene to recover the gun and explain themselves. He didn’t. He took responsibility for the gun he found and then issued it to another person with assurances that were relied upon. Once the AD picks up the gun they are willingly taking responsibility for everything that subsequently happens with it. If they’re not comfortable doing that they can summon the expert they employ for this reason. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Sea Dota 2 3247Rain  480Jaedong  343Larva 277Hyun 231Rush 228Mong 201Mini 178ToSsGirL 111Pusan 89[ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
|
The PondCast
HomeStory Cup
Korean StarCraft League
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
WardiTV Invitational
|
|
|
EPT
