EPT
Do you think cercei has more wildfire stored under the city? For some reasons I assumed she used it all for the explosion, but probably you're right and there is much more..
I hope that they don't use the wildfire card too often though
[TV] HBO Game of Thrones - Page 1579
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
All book discussion in this thread is now allowed. | ||
|
VHbb
689 Posts
Do you think cercei has more wildfire stored under the city? For some reasons I assumed she used it all for the explosion, but probably you're right and there is much more.. I hope that they don't use the wildfire card too often though | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On June 30 2016 06:00 VHbb wrote: The one I'm most curious about is littlefinger, we didn't see him very much this season but if there are intricate masterplans to unfold I hope he will be a central part of them Do you think cercei has more wildfire stored under the city? For some reasons I assumed she used it all for the explosion, but probably you're right and there is much more.. I hope that they don't use the wildfire card too often though No need to telegraph the potential plot line so far ahead. As always, less is more. | ||
Nakajin
Canada8989 Posts
On June 30 2016 06:00 VHbb wrote: Do you think cercei has more wildfire stored under the city? For some reasons I assumed she used it all for the explosion, but probably you're right and there is much more.. I hope that they don't use the wildfire card too often though I could see them using wildfire as a mean of confrontation between Jaime and Cercei, somethings like, she try to lure Dany in the city then burn it to the ground and then Jaime kill her, in a mad king recreation. | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On June 30 2016 05:59 Jerubaal wrote: There's an inforgraphic on HBO that all but confirms Rhaegar is Jon's father. Not sure why they kept up the suspense just to ruin it... I don't feel like there was a lot of suspense tbh | ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
On June 30 2016 06:07 The_Red_Viper wrote: I don't feel like there was a lot of suspense tbh Maybe they'll try to surprise us again by having Jon Snow impervious to fire in a clutch situation, like during battle he'll survive a dragon's breath and we'll find out he's dovahkiin (!!!). Jon Snow being the closest thing to a heir to the Targaryen line, he'll somehow stumble upon the throne again. | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On June 30 2016 06:07 The_Red_Viper wrote: I don't feel like there was a lot of suspense tbh If there wasn't, then they fucked up the reveal big time. They didn't say his name at the place where they really should have dropped the megabombs...so ok...you're going to drag it out a little longer...but then you just pretend like we knew about it the whole time. For such a big reveal, there was no real payoff. If I'm a casual GoT watcher, I probably still don't know who the fuck Jon's father is. | ||
|
Hier
2391 Posts
On June 30 2016 06:29 Djzapz wrote: Maybe they'll try to surprise us again by having Jon Snow impervious to fire in a clutch situation, like during battle he'll survive a dragon's breath and we'll find out he's dovahkiin (!!!). Jon Snow being the closest thing to a heir to the Targaryen line, he'll somehow stumble upon the throne again. Just like he was impervious to fire in S1, when he burned his hand. This is Melisandre's ruby all over again. | ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
On June 30 2016 07:17 Hier wrote: Just like he was impervious to fire in S1, when he burned his hand. This is Melisandre's ruby all over again. I read somewhere that Targaryens are not always immune to fire and it's like circumstantial in some ways. So it wouldn't necessarily be a retcon. | ||
|
giftdgecko
United States2126 Posts
On June 30 2016 07:19 Djzapz wrote: I read somewhere that Targaryens are not always immune to fire and it's like circumstantial in some ways. So it wouldn't necessarily be a retcon. That was a contentious point in an episode earlier this season when Dany was fireproof again after GRRM said it was a one time thing. I would be surprised if he was totally immune since Dany's brother wasn't. | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On June 30 2016 06:54 Jerubaal wrote: If there wasn't, then they fucked up the reveal big time. They didn't say his name at the place where they really should have dropped the megabombs...so ok...you're going to drag it out a little longer...but then you just pretend like we knew about it the whole time. For such a big reveal, there was no real payoff. If I'm a casual GoT watcher, I probably still don't know who the fuck Jon's father is. I think the main problem here is that we have never seen Rhaegar, they should have shown him in some Bran vision. Other than that i think it was fine, we heard about him a few times so if you pay attention you absolutely know about him "kidnapping" Lyanna. Then we see Lyanna with a baby, it cuts to Jon. That should be enough tbh | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21738 Posts
On June 30 2016 07:44 The_Red_Viper wrote: I think the main problem here is that we have never seen Rhaegar, they should have shown him in some Bran vision. Other than that i think it was fine, we heard about him a few times so if you pay attention you absolutely know about him "kidnapping" Lyanna. Then we see Lyanna with a baby, it cuts to Jon. That should be enough tbh The big thing missing I guess is the knowledge of how long the war lasted. (9+ months or not) | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9391 Posts
On June 30 2016 07:17 Hier wrote: Just like he was impervious to fire in S1, when he burned his hand. This is Melisandre's ruby all over again. Don't think we should overanalyze what happened in S1 where they were more faithful to the books. In the show I think they are "simpifying" the rule so that targaryens are immune to fire, and we should just ignore what happened in the first few seasons. | ||
zatic
Zurich15345 Posts
| ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13974 Posts
On June 30 2016 13:51 zatic wrote: I don't think there is anything in the show that would make us think all Targaryans are immune to fire. It's really just Dany that is special. The Unburned and all. I do wonder if she would have survived a pot of gold though... | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
shin_toss
Philippines2589 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23268 Posts
 | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
On June 30 2016 15:17 GreenHorizons wrote: I was going to say it before, but I can't hold it in any longer. If it weren't for her age I would say Helen Mirren would have been a better choice for Khalisi hands down. I'm probably weird in that I'd have been totally fine with her playing it even at her age the nudity... | ||
|
Laurens
Belgium4544 Posts
Directors for season 7 announced No Sapochnik  Mylod comes back Ah well | ||
| ||
