[TI5] Main Event Day 6 - Page 287
Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
A few USA chants are fine but please don't do it too much. Stop the stupid USA arguments, thanks. On another note, CDEC flairs are now live. Sorry about the delay on that. | ||
shad2810
Malaysia2682 Posts
| ||
Shaella
United States14827 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:43 FiWiFaKi wrote: From the research I've done, this seems far from the truth. from the research i've done you're a nerd roasted. | ||
Masamune
Canada3401 Posts
| ||
phantomlancer23
730 Posts
| ||
blobrus
4297 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:41 Yuna wrote: Won't DK just get crushed by storm? It's more about the instant blink stun he can put out. | ||
thiagoop
Brazil365 Posts
| ||
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40190 Posts
| ||
eieio
United States14512 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:44 shad2810 wrote: Can we have some nahaz stats here? every game where Aui has played Naga for EG it has started as a support Naga | ||
FuzzyJAM
Scotland9300 Posts
| ||
dutchfriese
2554 Posts
I can name any hero in the game and you'd still say food for clock | ||
![]()
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:43 dutchfriese wrote: Slark was always going on ES + Gyro, so no that wasn't the case at all. Right, that's the point though. When you have Slark everyone else has to play super tight and you can only take defensive fights exposing a core as bait because if you spread out your engagement, Slark can cut backline heroes once they get vision of your team. If they have a Sven, Sven doesnt have the mobility to cut backline heroes, so that frees up EG to go for more proactive engagements such as using the Clock to do something other than blocking Lesh out of fights, and not having to force baits. It's not so straightforward as to say "if they have Sven instead of Slark they get a kill in this kind of engagement" because the entire way EG uses their team to approach fights changes when it's Sven instead of Slark. | ||
y3gz
Brazil14 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:42 ampson wrote: CDEC gonna try to gangbang Sumail mid. Otherwise he will just style all over a DK. Yeah, but im afraid they wont be able to contest the stacks that EG is probably going if they pressure him mid. Overall, i dont think EG is gonna have the damage to break a PL, DK and Clock line-up. Especially if DK gets just the basic.. | ||
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
like you have a laner who actually wrecks storm consistently (way more consistently than qop) and instead you put a dk there to just give sumail freefarm | ||
![]()
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:44 shad2810 wrote: Can we have some nahaz stats here? Getting 30 cs is better than only getting 29 cs | ||
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:44 FuzzyJAM wrote: Honestly though, imagine if CDEC still had Maybe. Exactly my thoughts every 2 minutes of watching CDEC play, I guess agressif alone is enough for second place, too bad. | ||
pajoondies
United States316 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:45 dutchfriese wrote: I can name any hero in the game and you'd still say food for clock it's kinda true for most heroes that don't have good escape abilities, Aggresif lived through cog/ skywrath ulti and gyro damage quite a few times in that game because of his ulti | ||
ForTehDarkseid
8139 Posts
Tusk is fun. He is overpowered, but he is fun. Same thing with QoP and Space Cow, I guess. | ||
eieio
United States14512 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:45 MoonBear wrote: Getting 30 cs is better than only getting 29 cs report LL staff for memeing honestly | ||
Frazzlehoon
United States3455 Posts
| ||
![]()
Elyvilon
United States13143 Posts
On August 09 2015 10:45 MoonBear wrote: Getting 30 cs is better than only getting 29 cs what if some of the 30 cs are jungle creeps but the 29 cs are all lane creeps | ||
| ||