EPTAnd I mean the whole community seems to have more fun criticising the game that isnt even out yet than anything else.
At this point, basicly ANYTHING is a good reason not to buy the game. wtf?
D3 Bnet is going the same way as SC2 - Page 12
| Forum Index > Diablo 3 |
|
baba1
Canada355 Posts
And I mean the whole community seems to have more fun criticising the game that isnt even out yet than anything else. At this point, basicly ANYTHING is a good reason not to buy the game. wtf? | ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
On March 23 2012 06:20 baba1 wrote: Jesus fing christ why do I keep reading bad stuff about what was supposed to be the best game ever? And I mean the whole community seems to have more fun criticising the game that isnt even out yet than anything else. At this point, basicly ANYTHING is a good reason not to buy the game. wtf? We ran out of good stuff a few months ago, now we are criticizing the bad in hope that blizzard will take notice and do something about improving them. Just because you criticize something doesn't mean you have to hate it, just that you want it to be better | ||
|
korona
1098 Posts
On March 23 2012 06:20 baba1 wrote: Jesus fing christ why do I keep reading bad stuff about what was supposed to be the best game ever? And I mean the whole community seems to have more fun criticising the game that isnt even out yet than anything else. At this point, basicly ANYTHING is a good reason not to buy the game. wtf? The game itself is promising. But its Bnet portion is another story... | ||
|
kudlaty_true
Poland158 Posts
In the beta there are chat channels right now! Why am I the last one to know  Hope in the final release it'll be in the finel release | ||
|
Trumpet
United States1936 Posts
On March 23 2012 06:20 baba1 wrote: Jesus fing christ why do I keep reading bad stuff about what was supposed to be the best game ever? And I mean the whole community seems to have more fun criticising the game that isnt even out yet than anything else. At this point, basicly ANYTHING is a good reason not to buy the game. wtf? Well, when you have over a decade to get used to every single detail of a game and fall in love with each and every one, every deviation in the next game stands out like a sore thumb. A few of my friends were talking about d3 and the new UI, etc, recently and one of the first things someone asked: "Is there still a gem to activate?" 100% irrelevant aspect to the game that somebody (and probably multiple people) really want to see just for the nostalgia to keep it like d2. | ||
|
empty.bottle
685 Posts
On March 23 2012 06:20 baba1 wrote: Jesus fing christ why do I keep reading bad stuff about what was supposed to be the best game ever? And I mean the whole community seems to have more fun criticising the game that isnt even out yet than anything else. At this point, basicly ANYTHING is a good reason not to buy the game. wtf? The best RPG ever is gonna come out again, sometime in summer :D | ||
|
KiLL_ORdeR
United States1518 Posts
From what I see, blizzard gamers and the communities in general are the best of any gaming community in terms of maturity and constructive talking. Even the B.Net general forums, despite what many people on TL may say, are several steps above any other gaming forum i've seen. The community as a whole is asking for open chat channels. I haven't met a single gamer who says otherwise. Just give them to us! Or give us an extraordinarily articulate reason as to why "[we] really don't want them." If D3 B.Net is not noticeably improved from what it is in SC2, I really don't see myself playing D3 very long after release. Social is everything in online gaming, and, through their actions, Blizzard is actively trying to fail it's customers and community. | ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
On March 23 2012 08:18 KiLL_ORdeR wrote: I don't understand what they're so afraid of with chat channels in B.Net. From what I see, blizzard gamers and the communities in general are the best of any gaming community in terms of maturity and constructive talking. Even the B.Net general forums, despite what many people on TL may say, are several steps above any other gaming forum i've seen. The community as a whole is asking for open chat channels. I haven't met a single gamer who says otherwise. Just give them to us! Or give us an extraordinarily articulate reason as to why "[we] really don't want them." If D3 B.Net is not noticeably improved from what it is in SC2, I really don't see myself playing D3 very long after release. Social is everything in online gaming, and, through their actions, Blizzard is actively trying to fail it's customers and community. I disagree, people get the wrong idea of blizzard gaming community because of how good the mods on TL keep out the trash. The average blizzard game fan is no different than your basic COD/Halo fanboi, in many cases they are one and the same, but I agree with the rest of your post. Blizzard's PR is getting worse everyday. | ||
|
oxxo
988 Posts
| ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
On March 23 2012 11:14 oxxo wrote: B.net is fine. 2.0 is far from as bad as *some* people make it out to be. And old B.net is far from as good as those same people make it out to be (especially). Do you see "bnet 2.0" as an upgrade or a downgrade from it's ~14year old predecessor | ||
|
Alpino
Brazil4390 Posts
On February 07 2012 11:52 jimmyjingle wrote: Today in 2012, you can defeat the end boss without talking to a single person. This This This This This. I remember talking to one of my friends how to make WoW decent again: - No flying mounts. - No dungeon finder. - No raid finder. - No achievements. - Increased difficulty of dungeons. (The way they are now is a bad joke) - No heirlooms. - Pvp rewards are much more difficult to get. - Arena system completely revamped again, only the best players should be able to get the best gear. - Bigger rewards to exploring, grouping and World PvP. | ||
|
penguinking
United States23 Posts
| ||
|
Playguuu
United States926 Posts
The real question though is which game will get guild/clan support first? | ||
|
NeMaTo
United States50 Posts
I mean, why does Blizzard spend time making a patch to make losses invisible to people below master league? Don't they deserve to know where they stand, and see their improvements as master players do? Do they honestly think that hiding the losses in their record encourages them to continue playing? It's just one example. Another one is Facebook integration. Everyone has FB but that doesn't mean they're willing to integrate them with Battle.net. I mean, what incentives are there to do that? So that your non-gaming FB friends know you play a video game? Instead, what they should have included is clan support. And it's nearly impossible to whisper to people not on your friends list. Really? Battle.net 2.0 reminds me too much of XBox LIVE. Well, this is PC gaming. The major difference is that PC gamers have access to their full keyboards. Just add a common command like /w and the problem would be solved. But Blizzard is, for some odd reason, too scared to deviate from the current model, which is designed by people who worked on XBox LIVE. Why would they do that? Because they lost their touch with gamers | ||
|
Glowinglight
United States76 Posts
On March 23 2012 12:41 NeMaTo wrote: Battle.net 2.0 is badly designed on so many levels. Warcraft3 battle.net is the best one they made so far except it has crazy delay and hackers. Starcraft2 battle.net sucks because they tried too hard to appeal to casual gamers without really understanding how gamers feel about their game. I mean, why does Blizzard spend time making a patch to make losses invisible to people below master league? Don't they deserve to know where they stand, and see their improvements as master players do? Do they honestly think that hiding the losses in their record encourages them to continue playing? It's just one example. Another one is Facebook integration. Everyone has FB but that doesn't mean they're willing to integrate them with Battle.net. I mean, what incentives are there to do that? So that your non-gaming FB friends know you play a video game? Instead, what they should have included is clan support. And it's nearly impossible to whisper to people not on your friends list. Really? Battle.net 2.0 reminds me too much of XBox LIVE. Well, this is PC gaming. The major difference is that PC gamers have access to their full keyboards. Just add a common command like /w and the problem would be solved. But Blizzard is, for some odd reason, too scared to deviate from the current model, which is designed by people who worked on XBox LIVE. Why would they do that? Because they lost their touch with gamers Just reminded me how friend lists in diablo 2 were just giant chat rooms with /f m command . I agree they should have common whisper commands like they have in wow where I can just type /w (friend who isn't in the game) | ||
|
socommaster123
United States578 Posts
| ||
|
PhiliBiRD
United States2643 Posts
duh? all blizz games are going this way... just as all other mainstream games are heading in this direction.. once companies get so big they strictly focus on profits. that = fail | ||
|
Kuja
United States1759 Posts
| ||
|
Nilrem
United States3684 Posts
On March 23 2012 13:24 socommaster123 wrote: First Blizzard then MAss Effect 3..... The age of good games is coming to an end folks Disagree, we still do not know how Diablo III will be in the end. Focusing on the game, and not battle.net. | ||
|
ffreakk
Singapore2155 Posts
On March 23 2012 13:24 socommaster123 wrote: First Blizzard then MAss Effect 3..... The age of good games is coming to an end folks I don't know about that. The last game i played was pretty good n satisfying (Devil Survivor 2) | ||
| ||
