GomTV announced new maps for GSTL - Page 18
Forum Index > Community News and Headlines |
Deekin[
Serbia1713 Posts
| ||
Avaloch
241 Posts
Sadly, I doubt this will affect the ladder maps. Hopefully we'll see less bunkers blocking ramps next season @_@ | ||
Winterfrozz
Sweden357 Posts
![]() | ||
Neivler
Norway911 Posts
On February 02 2011 00:01 Avaloch wrote: Sadly, I doubt this will affect the ladder maps. Hopefully we'll see less bunkers blocking ramps next season @_@ Wohoo! Let me guess then. A zerg will win next GSL?? :D | ||
SoleSteeler
Canada5405 Posts
I'm so happy they will use these maps in the GSTL. | ||
Manimal_pro
Romania991 Posts
| ||
RogerX
New Zealand3180 Posts
| ||
droit
United States67 Posts
| ||
HollowLord
United States3862 Posts
But those minor complaints are nothing compared to the praise I have for them experimenting with custom maps, kudos. | ||
DX Raider
United States32 Posts
| ||
onara
Netherlands12 Posts
| ||
mierin
United States4943 Posts
| ||
Fungal Growth
United States434 Posts
Love the idea of changing things up... Would be nice if Gom did this each month to keep the tourny's fresh. Hopefully one of the SC casters reads this thread and does casts on these new maps ASAP. | ||
Smackzilla
United States539 Posts
On February 01 2011 07:21 Lowell wrote: I think youre wrong here. You could be talking about something different, but i just yesterday listened to a state of the game podcast where (i think) kennigit said he talked to blizz about new maps for competitions and the only statement was that blizz is supportive bout custom maps for tournaments. I'm sure blizzard is happy that tournament maps are being made, but did blizzard say they would put tournament maps on the ladder? | ||
Babaganoush
United States626 Posts
On February 01 2011 18:47 Janook wrote: Looks like the people at gomTV dont' understand the Terran race. The sheer size, and how the naturals and 3rds are situated, automatically make these maps difficult for Terran. Considering the current lineup, I'd be more happy if they understood more of the Protoss and Zerg rather than the Terran. TvT is what I'm going to be concerned about - there's a risk of turtling. With the addition of Polt, there is now seventeen Terran in the lineup. Either way - it's good to see the maps removed and those added. I wish Blizzard could learn from these guys... On February 02 2011 03:51 Smackzilla wrote: I'm sure blizzard is happy that tournament maps are being made, but did blizzard say they would put tournament maps on the ladder? What Blizzard really is saying is no, they won't. | ||
Sephy90
United States1785 Posts
| ||
5FDP
Germany44 Posts
Nevertheless, will be awesome to see new strats on new (macro oriantated ?) maps | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On February 01 2011 18:47 Janook wrote: Looks like the people at gomTV dont' understand the Terran race. The sheer size, and how the naturals and 3rds are situated, automatically make these maps difficult for Terran. I think your wrong. Watch the Gisado and terrans are doing just fine on these maps in tvz (don't watch tvp so no comment on that mu). Both are winning about equally and they are macro games not 1 base all ins or anything. Terrans can do it just 90% of them dont' know how because they don't play for the longer game. | ||
UruzuNine
Canada162 Posts
On February 02 2011 04:41 blade55555 wrote: + Show Spoiler + On February 01 2011 18:47 Janook wrote: Looks like the people at gomTV dont' understand the Terran race. The sheer size, and how the naturals and 3rds are situated, automatically make these maps difficult for Terran. I think your wrong. Watch the Gisado and terrans are doing just fine on these maps in tvz (don't watch tvp so no comment on that mu). Both are winning about equally and they are macro games not 1 base all ins or anything. Terrans can do it just 90% of them dont' know how because they don't play for the longer game. As a macro-oriented Terran player, I have to agree with that. Comments saying things like "GOM doesn't understand Terran" or "e z Zerg wins" when the maps have been tested previously for balance -- and the people complaining haven't actually seen the general outcome on these maps in the different matchups -- are incredibly premature. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15391 Posts
On February 02 2011 04:51 UruzuNine wrote: As a macro-oriented Terran player, I have to agree with that. Comments saying things like "GOM doesn't understand Terran" or "e z Zerg wins" when the maps have been tested previously for balance -- and the people complaining haven't actually seen the general outcome on these maps in the different matchups -- are incredibly premature. Yeah, its pretty funny to see people complaining about GOM not understanding the game, when all it does is highlight the fact that they themselves know very little ![]() | ||
| ||