On January 21 2011 04:04 Taniard wrote: Jinro even said that a six pool and a "nice sign" sound the same. Ha props to GOM though for "warning themselves" and taking measures to fix stuff. Ha so what would happen if GOM ended up breaking another rule and disqualifying themselves? Would GSL get sucked into the Twilight Zone?
Who's " Ha so" ? Is that some korean guy...? cuz you have it in caps in both lines
would he have known if he didn't scout earlier...?
I don't understand why the people think the noise was a problem in this case. This game got won by an accidental misclick. Fitting as how many get lost because of an accidental misclick. Really though, hearing the commentators didn't have any effect on THIS game.
But the issue needs to be fixed.
My biggest question though (after reading 3 pages) is "what is the significance of GOM warning themselves?" It's not like they are going to ban themselves if they get too many warnings right?
On January 21 2011 12:08 dogabutila wrote: My biggest question though (after reading 3 pages) is "what is the significance of GOM warning themselves?" It's not like they are going to ban themselves if they get too many warnings right?
It means that they blame themselves and that Jinro shouldn't be blamed for anything, in a case of something like this someone must be punished/warned and they are warning themselves to just show its their fault not Jinro's.
They put Jinro's interview back up, but you can OBVIOUSLY tell @ 2:44 that they EDITED out the part where Jinro says he could hear the commentators in his booth.
On January 21 2011 13:06 Ctrl W wrote: They put Jinro's interview back up, but you can OBVIOUSLY tell @ 2:44 that they EDITED out the part where Jinro says he could hear the commentators in his booth.
They took the blame for it, last thing they need is someone 4 months from now looking at an interview of a pro player saying some stupid stuff about Jinro getting to X place at this event (hopefully winning)
So ya, editing it out was probably a sound thing for all parties involved.
On January 21 2011 13:06 Ctrl W wrote: They put Jinro's interview back up, but you can OBVIOUSLY tell @ 2:44 that they EDITED out the part where Jinro says he could hear the commentators in his booth.
The players should NEVER be able to see the crowd as well, that's suchhhhh bull****. If you see people getting excited early on, you know cheese is inc. What a dumb system. Face the progamers away or put them in one-way mirrors lawls
On January 21 2011 16:10 SpaceFighting wrote: dont worry guys, they officially warned themselves.. its all gud
howbout they warn themselves about shitty cover-ups and editing interviews?
they clearly don't mean what they said because they're going about this in awfully shady ways. i can't wait til someone observant realizes the crowd is super excited for "no reason" 10 seconds into the game and prepares for a proxy rax/proxy gate/6pool
Would have been better if they had added subtitles explaining the context of the situation in the interview. But at least they are actually addressing the situation.
On January 21 2011 13:06 Ctrl W wrote: They put Jinro's interview back up, but you can OBVIOUSLY tell @ 2:44 that they EDITED out the part where Jinro says he could hear the commentators in his booth.
Solution: put all speakers in front of player booths. If the sound is pointing away from players, they will have much trouble hearing it. Its still possible, but a LOT less likely.
Warned themselves? This accomplishes nothing. Whats going to happen at the next tournament GOMTV broadcasts? I think the players should be required to test out the booth during sound check to see if there is an issue.
On January 21 2011 13:06 Ctrl W wrote: They put Jinro's interview back up, but you can OBVIOUSLY tell @ 2:44 that they EDITED out the part where Jinro says he could hear the commentators in his booth.
On January 21 2011 13:06 Ctrl W wrote: They put Jinro's interview back up, but you can OBVIOUSLY tell @ 2:44 that they EDITED out the part where Jinro says he could hear the commentators in his booth.
Ok so they made a mistake with the boots, but they agreed to the problem, took the blame and promised to fix it. Case closed?
Why on earth would you hide that interview part and create bad press that way? Isn't censorship is so much worse PR than the soundproof mistake itself?
EPT
