• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:06
CEST 09:06
KST 16:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed11Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll4Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Who will win EWC 2025? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Starcraft in widescreen A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 660 users

Blizzard on 1v1 Balancing and the new patch - Page 73

Forum Index > Community News and Headlines
1732 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 71 72 73 74 75 87 Next
Drunken.Jedi
Profile Joined June 2009
Germany446 Posts
October 08 2010 00:52 GMT
#1441
On October 08 2010 09:26 HiHiByeBye wrote:
Why are they buffing zerg when

in Diamond

49.6% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.

In Plat
47.3% win rate for Protoss when fighting Zerg.
44.5% win for Terran when fighting Zerg.

In gold

49.5% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.



+ the two new maps. Zergs are doing fine?

All those numbers show is that the matchmaking system is working as intended. Even if zerg were at a huge disadvantage, they would still win about half their games because they would simply be matched against protoss and terran player who are so much worse that the skill difference compensates for the imbalance.
Genome852
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States979 Posts
October 08 2010 00:54 GMT
#1442
Was the reaper nerf needed?

With the increase in roach range, reapers will be completely destroyed by a couple of roaches, being unable to attack back / kite unlike now. Reapers are already pretty bad against protoss except in the early-early game, since a single stalker can shut down any form of reaper harass. They are a unit that quickly loses feasibility as the game progresses... making the speed upgrade require a factory seems ridiculous.

Also, supply depot before barracks... ugh.
Darpa
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada4413 Posts
October 08 2010 00:55 GMT
#1443
This depot before rax is really going to hurt against protoss warpgagte in the base strat/cannon rush, second they drop a pylon i throw down a rax and it always finishes before gateway. Often this is before the first depot even goes down. so now im just supposed to wait and lol while he cannon rushes me. Terrible terrible change.

Everything else seems fine tho.
"losers always whine about their best, Winners go home and fuck the prom queen"
SyyRaaaN
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden136 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-08 00:58:03
October 08 2010 00:55 GMT
#1444
Wow. Now I'm starting to get satisfied with Blizzard and Dustin Browder. I was screaming for radical changes and what does he post in that report? Radical changes indeed and explicitly saying that those changes aren't the only ones coming. I cant even believe my eyes when i see people reacting in a negative manner on the supply depot/barracks change. This only further reduces the amount of cheese builds in use thus resulting in a less of a guessing game. You do commit to the cheese/anti-cheese build before you know what your opponent is doing. Cheeses are indeed done blindly and adds to the random factor in every game. This has been one of the most negative things in this game so far since the beta. I will not miss this aspect of the game in the slightest. This change will make the game a lot better, a whole lot better in fact.

Further Blizzard has now effectively moved towards reducing the early game annoyance of reapers. With the depot/rax change cheese builds containing reapers will be gone which excellent of course. Also i think that the factory for the speed upgrade is an excellent change. I will certainly not miss the early speed reapers in early game. But if the unit isn't going to be put into the trash can they have to give it something in return such as a radically lowered build time so that they can be built in acceptable time in mid game for base harassment which i hope will be the main role of the reaper.

My verdict on these preliminary notes are a fat thumbs up although I'm hoping that they will address the epic boredom of Banshees and Void Rays by some tweaks in future patches.

And for the ass sniffers in here who cares about race/rating:

+ Show Spoiler +
I'm a 1500+ diamond Z player who switched to T a week ago who played P in the beta. And yes, i know this is considered to be mid diamond - nothing special.
No Quote
FrostedMiniWeet
Profile Joined July 2009
United States636 Posts
October 08 2010 00:55 GMT
#1445
On October 08 2010 09:47 Stegosaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2010 09:45 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
On October 08 2010 09:42 Stegosaur wrote:
On October 08 2010 09:40 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
On October 08 2010 09:31 Stegosaur wrote:
On October 08 2010 09:18 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
On October 08 2010 09:11 Stegosaur wrote:
As a Zerg player I must say the Roach buff was a good call, they'll be a lot less clunky even with 4 range instead of 3 (which is a 33% upgrade, just to drive home the point). The blinking while in fungal growth thing annoyed me greatly when I've had it happen to me and I guess it's nice.

But the real meat of this announcement is in the Terran nerfs which, in my opinion, are over the top and incredibly harsh It seems like Blizzard really hates cheese and I have to disagree with that, cheese is good for the game since it makes you actually consider being punished for a sub-optimal build (or just a greedy one) with the threat of your opponent doing something gay.
Not saying that Blizz is removing cheese altogether but it's a slippery slope.


Cheese results in less skilled players defeating more skilled players, and adding an element of chance/randomness to the game, which I completely disagree with. In a game with less cheese, the better player is rewarded more for his skill, and the newby cheeser has to learn how to actually play the game.

Besides, Blizzard rightly wants SC2 to be a spectator sport, and with a large number of cheesey games under 10 minutes, its bad for the game.


Sorry to put it this bluntly but you're simply wrong. While cheese certainly adds a degree of randomness to the game I fail to see how something as basal as a buildorder doesn't? Lesser players could get lucky and score a buildorder win all the time (check out the upset vs Flash), that's just how the game works, especially once you get to the higher levels.

As for cheese not being spectatorfriendly or being something for newbies, you're wrong here too. Spectators eat up cheese, it gets the blood pumping and it results in some of the most memorable games ever:



Yeah, and Idra losing to proxy void rays was really cool too.


That wasn't cheese mate, also I fail to see how this is in any way relevant to the topic at hand.


Proxy void rays isn't cheese? Right, because a Plat player could have executed the exact same build and defeated Idra with it.


I've edited my post to be a bit more elaborate, basically what it says is a buildorder loss isn't cheese and proxy voidrays isn't a 100% bulletproof strategy anyway so I really see no problem here.


Of course proxy voids isn't 100% bulletproof, that's the definition of cheese, rolling the dice, and hoping for a double six. That doesn't mean its not effective at the highest levels, (Zelniq was discussing about how effective it is in a separate thread today). I'm not saying we shouldn't have any cheese whatsoever, it just needs to be reasonably risky, such that its not so prevalent as to become standard. BS and BBS builds currently give great early pressure with relatively little economic sacrifice (thanks to mule).
WLV
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada76 Posts
October 08 2010 00:56 GMT
#1446
i dare any1 to call terran OP now =(
"I am Terran, hear me RAWR!"
TaKemE
Profile Joined April 2010
Denmark1045 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-08 01:00:56
October 08 2010 00:57 GMT
#1447
On October 08 2010 09:52 Drunken.Jedi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2010 09:26 HiHiByeBye wrote:
Why are they buffing zerg when

in Diamond

49.6% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.

In Plat
47.3% win rate for Protoss when fighting Zerg.
44.5% win for Terran when fighting Zerg.

In gold

49.5% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.



+ the two new maps. Zergs are doing fine?

All those numbers show is that the matchmaking system is working as intended. Even if zerg were at a huge disadvantage, they would still win about half their games because they would simply be matched against protoss and terran player who are so much worse that the skill difference compensates for the imbalance.


EDIT -> These numbers take individual player skill into account, which helps to avoid the 50% win/loss percentage effect that the matchmaking system can impart on straight win/loss ratios.
TyrantPotato
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Australia1541 Posts
October 08 2010 00:58 GMT
#1448
im extremely happy they have finally decided to buff zerg.

blizzard is learning.
Forever ZeNEX.
Genome852
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States979 Posts
October 08 2010 00:59 GMT
#1449
On October 08 2010 09:55 SyyRaaaN wrote:
Wow. Now I'm starting to get satisfied with Blizzard and Dustin Browder. I was screaming for radical changes and what does he post in that report? Radical changes indeed and explicitly saying that those changes aren't the only ones coming. I cant even believe my eyes when i see people reacting in a negative manner on the supply depot/barracks change. This only further reduces the amount of cheese builds in use thus resulting in a less of a guessing game. You do commit to the cheese/anti-cheese build before you know what your opponent is doing. Cheeses are indeed done blindly and adds to the random factor in every game. This has been one of the most negative things in this game so far since the beta. I will not miss this aspect of the game in the slightest. This change will make the game a lot better, a whole lot better in fact.

Further Blizzard has now effectively moved towards reducing the early game annoyance of reapers. With the depot/rax change cheese builds containing reapers will be gone which excellent of course. Also i think that the factory for the speed upgrade is an excellent change. I will certainly not miss the early speed reapers in early game. But if the unit isn't going to be put into the trash can they have to give it something in return such as a radically lowered build time so that they can be built in acceptable time in mid game for base harassment which i hope will be the main role of the reaper.

My verdict on these preliminary notes are a fat thumbs up although I'm hoping that they will address the epic boredom of Banshees and Void Rays by some tweaks in future patches.

And for the ass sniffers in here who cares about race/rating:

+ Show Spoiler +
I'm a 1500+ diamond Z player who switched to T a week ago who played P in the beta. And yes, i know this is considered to be mid diamond - nothing special.


No one likes getting cheesed, but removing cheese entirely from the game like they're doing with early rax is stupid IMO. Less variety is bad.
tedster
Profile Joined May 2009
984 Posts
October 08 2010 01:01 GMT
#1450
Yo all these balance changes would be more or less unncessesary if defense wasn't so terrible in SC2.

Instead we have hard counters and timing attacks that literally require mass troops to stop in virtually every circumstance, so there's obviously no place for micro units (like current reapers) when the game is supposed to be about two armies slamming into each other in one big dumb fight.
the last wcs commissioner
IVN
Profile Joined October 2010
534 Posts
October 08 2010 01:03 GMT
#1451
On October 08 2010 09:59 Genome852 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2010 09:55 SyyRaaaN wrote:
Wow. Now I'm starting to get satisfied with Blizzard and Dustin Browder. I was screaming for radical changes and what does he post in that report? Radical changes indeed and explicitly saying that those changes aren't the only ones coming. I cant even believe my eyes when i see people reacting in a negative manner on the supply depot/barracks change. This only further reduces the amount of cheese builds in use thus resulting in a less of a guessing game. You do commit to the cheese/anti-cheese build before you know what your opponent is doing. Cheeses are indeed done blindly and adds to the random factor in every game. This has been one of the most negative things in this game so far since the beta. I will not miss this aspect of the game in the slightest. This change will make the game a lot better, a whole lot better in fact.

Further Blizzard has now effectively moved towards reducing the early game annoyance of reapers. With the depot/rax change cheese builds containing reapers will be gone which excellent of course. Also i think that the factory for the speed upgrade is an excellent change. I will certainly not miss the early speed reapers in early game. But if the unit isn't going to be put into the trash can they have to give it something in return such as a radically lowered build time so that they can be built in acceptable time in mid game for base harassment which i hope will be the main role of the reaper.

My verdict on these preliminary notes are a fat thumbs up although I'm hoping that they will address the epic boredom of Banshees and Void Rays by some tweaks in future patches.

And for the ass sniffers in here who cares about race/rating:

+ Show Spoiler +
I'm a 1500+ diamond Z player who switched to T a week ago who played P in the beta. And yes, i know this is considered to be mid diamond - nothing special.


No one likes getting cheesed, but removing cheese entirely from the game like they're doing with early rax is stupid IMO. Less variety is bad.

They are not removing it, just making it more costly for Terrans. The way it ist now, T have (by far) the cheapest way of applying early pressure.

Cheese is supposed to make your eco suffer, and this is and will not be the case for T until the new patch.
preacha
Profile Joined January 2010
Norway210 Posts
October 08 2010 01:03 GMT
#1452
On October 08 2010 08:53 ahcho00 wrote:
chrono boosted a zealot vs 2 rines? who wins. yea i'm pretty sure the protoss were meant to have that constraint because their tier 1 unit is pretty superior to the marine.



you know that you can move you marines?
dont pet a burning dog
FrostedMiniWeet
Profile Joined July 2009
United States636 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-08 01:10:09
October 08 2010 01:04 GMT
#1453
On October 08 2010 09:57 TaKemE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2010 09:52 Drunken.Jedi wrote:
On October 08 2010 09:26 HiHiByeBye wrote:
Why are they buffing zerg when

in Diamond

49.6% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.

In Plat
47.3% win rate for Protoss when fighting Zerg.
44.5% win for Terran when fighting Zerg.

In gold

49.5% win rate for Terran when fighting Zerg.



+ the two new maps. Zergs are doing fine?

All those numbers show is that the matchmaking system is working as intended. Even if zerg were at a huge disadvantage, they would still win about half their games because they would simply be matched against protoss and terran player who are so much worse that the skill difference compensates for the imbalance.


Yeah thats 100% true those stats cant be used for anyting with balance.


I'm pretty sure the matchmaking system makes the assumption that the races are balanced, because it doesn't match me against stronger protoss players (I have only lost 2 games to protoss out of 60 1v1's). It does this because I keep losing vs Terrans and Zergs, so my rating stays low. Perhaps I'm just really poor at the other matchups, or really good against toss, but the point is that I have a very high win percentage against protoss because I'm not playing against protoss at my skill level, I'm playing against protoss players at the skill level of the Terran and Zergs I keep losing to. It would be nice if they had ratings per matchup, as I think that would provide more robust statistics that could provide more insights into balance, because as it is right now, my ZvP is simply far superior to my ZvZ and ZvT, and its producing invalid win-rate statistics according to the assumption that me and my enemy are of equal skill when we are not.
FrostedMiniWeet
Profile Joined July 2009
United States636 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-08 01:06:20
October 08 2010 01:05 GMT
#1454
double post, deleted
SyyRaaaN
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden136 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-08 01:10:25
October 08 2010 01:08 GMT
#1455
On October 08 2010 09:59 Genome852 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2010 09:55 SyyRaaaN wrote:
Wow. Now I'm starting to get satisfied with Blizzard and Dustin Browder. I was screaming for radical changes and what does he post in that report? Radical changes indeed and explicitly saying that those changes aren't the only ones coming. I cant even believe my eyes when i see people reacting in a negative manner on the supply depot/barracks change. This only further reduces the amount of cheese builds in use thus resulting in a less of a guessing game. You do commit to the cheese/anti-cheese build before you know what your opponent is doing. Cheeses are indeed done blindly and adds to the random factor in every game. This has been one of the most negative things in this game so far since the beta. I will not miss this aspect of the game in the slightest. This change will make the game a lot better, a whole lot better in fact.

Further Blizzard has now effectively moved towards reducing the early game annoyance of reapers. With the depot/rax change cheese builds containing reapers will be gone which excellent of course. Also i think that the factory for the speed upgrade is an excellent change. I will certainly not miss the early speed reapers in early game. But if the unit isn't going to be put into the trash can they have to give it something in return such as a radically lowered build time so that they can be built in acceptable time in mid game for base harassment which i hope will be the main role of the reaper.

My verdict on these preliminary notes are a fat thumbs up although I'm hoping that they will address the epic boredom of Banshees and Void Rays by some tweaks in future patches.

And for the ass sniffers in here who cares about race/rating:

+ Show Spoiler +
I'm a 1500+ diamond Z player who switched to T a week ago who played P in the beta. And yes, i know this is considered to be mid diamond - nothing special.


No one likes getting cheesed, but removing cheese entirely from the game like they're doing with early rax is stupid IMO. Less variety is bad.


As another poster stated, it's not entirely removed. Versus a 14 hatch Z player you probably can still send out an early scout (before the depot) and building a 11 Barracks near him + a bunker with the same SCV. Thats not a cheese in my book. Thats more of a solid rush based on scouting, not on luck.

I actually don't know if that is possible with current BO timings, but thats how "cheeses" should be viable in an RTS imho.
No Quote
Fiel
Profile Joined March 2010
United States587 Posts
October 08 2010 01:09 GMT
#1456
With depot required before rax, will this weaken T's walls therefore making baneling busts more powerful? Some people are going to put 2 depots and 1 rax on narrow chokes.
Pistolfied
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada79 Posts
October 08 2010 01:10 GMT
#1457
They shouldn't make supply a requirement for a rax but instead make a requirement for the addons. Make the engineering bay a requirement for tech labs and reactor cores on barracks and also make factories open up tech labs and reactors (this way a meching terran doesn't need to get an engineering bay if they really don't want to).

This still allows terran to do early marine pushes and also prevents terrans from going mass marauder against protoss. Engineering bays aren't too expensive (125 minerals) so I can't see this killing terran in TvP because they can only make marines for a bit.
Stop saying anywayS, it's anyway, not anyway>>S<<. Anyways is not a word!!!
GrazerRinge
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
999 Posts
October 08 2010 01:11 GMT
#1458
whats next step, blizzard?
Roach can attack air??
"Successful people don't talk much. They listen and take action."
FrostedMiniWeet
Profile Joined July 2009
United States636 Posts
October 08 2010 01:14 GMT
#1459
On October 08 2010 09:59 Genome852 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2010 09:55 SyyRaaaN wrote:
Wow. Now I'm starting to get satisfied with Blizzard and Dustin Browder. I was screaming for radical changes and what does he post in that report? Radical changes indeed and explicitly saying that those changes aren't the only ones coming. I cant even believe my eyes when i see people reacting in a negative manner on the supply depot/barracks change. This only further reduces the amount of cheese builds in use thus resulting in a less of a guessing game. You do commit to the cheese/anti-cheese build before you know what your opponent is doing. Cheeses are indeed done blindly and adds to the random factor in every game. This has been one of the most negative things in this game so far since the beta. I will not miss this aspect of the game in the slightest. This change will make the game a lot better, a whole lot better in fact.

Further Blizzard has now effectively moved towards reducing the early game annoyance of reapers. With the depot/rax change cheese builds containing reapers will be gone which excellent of course. Also i think that the factory for the speed upgrade is an excellent change. I will certainly not miss the early speed reapers in early game. But if the unit isn't going to be put into the trash can they have to give it something in return such as a radically lowered build time so that they can be built in acceptable time in mid game for base harassment which i hope will be the main role of the reaper.

My verdict on these preliminary notes are a fat thumbs up although I'm hoping that they will address the epic boredom of Banshees and Void Rays by some tweaks in future patches.

And for the ass sniffers in here who cares about race/rating:

+ Show Spoiler +
I'm a 1500+ diamond Z player who switched to T a week ago who played P in the beta. And yes, i know this is considered to be mid diamond - nothing special.


No one likes getting cheesed, but removing cheese entirely from the game like they're doing with early rax is stupid IMO. Less variety is bad.


Well, we need to draw the line somewhere, as "variety" in the form of random guessing games is not good for highly competitive gaming. Cheese is ok to an extent, but it needs to take skill to pull off correctly like in BW, and be risky enough that it doesn't become a staple.
DyEnasTy
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States3714 Posts
October 08 2010 01:14 GMT
#1460
Wait, so now terran cant 8 rax or defend cheese without getting a supply depot? That doesnt seem right.
Much better to die an awesome Terran than to live as a magic wielding fairy or a mindless sac of biological goop. -Manifesto7
Prev 1 71 72 73 74 75 87 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 54m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 28381
PianO 391
zelot 234
Backho 162
NaDa 51
Sacsri 36
Sharp 33
Shine 26
JulyZerg 17
Bale 8
[ Show more ]
Hm[arnc] 5
Dota 2
XcaliburYe172
NeuroSwarm107
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1388
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King173
Other Games
summit1g13395
SortOf31
Trikslyr30
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2926
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH396
• OhrlRock 5
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2177
League of Legends
• Stunt463
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
8h 54m
Replay Cast
16h 54m
The PondCast
1d 2h
OSC
1d 5h
WardiTV European League
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Epic.LAN
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CSO Contender
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Online Event
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
6 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.