Would you have been happy if Blizzard instead of releasing SC2 released "Starcraft Broodwar 2010" and simply upgraded the graphics of Starcraft Broodwar to current standard and left everything else exactly the same?

Yes

iG.Zeep

Mexico253 Posts

October 08 2010 12:34 GMT

#182

On October 08 2010 18:13 crazeh wrote:

Show nested quote +

That would of been freaking perfect!

raz0rtail

Australia42 Posts

October 08 2010 13:12 GMT

#183

On October 08 2010 18:13 crazeh wrote:

Would you have been happy if Blizzard instead of releasing SC2 released "Starcraft Broodwar 2010" and simply upgraded the graphics of Starcraft Broodwar to current standard and left everything else exactly the same?

No, SCBR user interface is crap compared to SC2. SC2 allows players to spent their apm on other things rather than tedious macro mechanics.

See.Blue

United States2673 Posts

October 08 2010 14:07 GMT

#184

The very fact they care about the community to put something like that out makes me happy. Thanks Blizz!

Kryptonite333

42 Posts

October 08 2010 14:16 GMT

#185

i dont understand, do we have to pay to play sc2 ??

Triscuit

United States722 Posts

October 08 2010 18:15 GMT

#186

Some interesting information, but the rest is fairly typical executive-type stuff. "We're working on it all the time, we will keep working on it all the time."

However, the pro and semi-pro leagues are quite interesting, and that might be the most head-turning information in the whole letter.

Also, I guess they got their answer that, yeah, we really do want chat channels. At least they are listening and are willing to make changes that won't necessarily benefit 90% of players that play SC2. That's awesome.

_minimal_

Greece9 Posts

October 08 2010 18:47 GMT

#187

Kespas acoplisment can't dublicated in the wester world. The wester players they have fiberoptics they have cables modems, T1 lines, adsl, etc so if they wish to play they do it from their homes when they really have nothing else to do.

This why any attempted in the west will simply fail so Kespa dosn't really need Blizzard and this is the funny part i mean they banned Kespas ips to add one more card in their 'nagotiation' table ? This will lead them nowere. Blizzard must pay Kespa Great deal of money couse the show is in korea and will remain there there is no other way.

Hikko

United States1126 Posts

October 09 2010 03:30 GMT

#188

On October 09 2010 03:47 _minimal_ wrote:
Kespas acoplisment can't dublicated in the wester world. The wester players they have fiberoptics they have cables modems, T1 lines, adsl, etc so if they wish to play they do it from their homes when they really have nothing else to do.

This why any attempted in the west will simply fail so Kespa dosn't really need Blizzard and this is the funny part i mean they banned Kespas ips to add one more card in their 'nagotiation' table ? This will lead them nowere. Blizzard must pay Kespa Great deal of money couse the show is in korea and will remain there there is no other way.

I understand that English isn't your primary language, but what you said made no sense

Why would Blizzard pay KeSPA royalties because KeSPA is using Blizzard's product?

How does good internet (which Korea has internally) affect the success or failure of an esports league, and how would bad internet connections be beneficial to a larger league?

_minimal_

Greece9 Posts

October 09 2010 13:28 GMT

#189

I didn't exacly pointed a gun to Blizzards head a bomb will do just fine hehehe in order Sc2 games to be done in Korea i belive Kespas permition is need it so Blizzard Must pay.

This is my hamble opinion.

User was banned for this post.

Tomken

Norway1144 Posts

October 14 2010 06:28 GMT

#190

Well it's a LOT of Koreans that want another company to take over for kespa, but of course it isn't any other that can take over for atm. -_- Gief a company to handle pro leagues and stuff, so SC:BW could keep going for some more years at least!

KeSPA is the main problem.