|
On January 25 2019 21:21 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2019 21:15 GoTuNk! wrote:On January 25 2019 20:17 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 25 2019 20:12 Jockmcplop wrote:On January 25 2019 20:09 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 25 2019 20:02 iamthedave wrote: Russia! Defenders of Democracy!
This really is the stuff that makes people nod along when Putin says the West is shit and has no place judging his country. Amazing isn't it? It's like people are waking up today barely acknowledging if at all that in inexplicable unison there was a "popular" uprising, some nobody that happened to be super US and neoliberal capitalism friendly appointed himself president and without a moment of hesitation or the slightest questioning by any corporate media a near complete bipartisan wave jumped in line behind Trump and his proclamation that there was a new leader of Venezuela and would no longer recognize the democratically elected leader who was experiencing a coup for "democracy". Like holy shit people. Is everyone really going to pretend that's not easily the biggest scandal of the Trump era? Isn't this like exactly what happened with the failed Chavez coup, except he was also arrested? Yeah the US sponsored coup attempt against the previously democratically elected leader (Chavez) was actually moderately more successful. The opposition party in Venezuela just got duped by Trump and because Maduro isn't a bloodthirsty dictator like many US allies, he's unlikely to have them all killed for treason. Oh and Bush wasn't considered a complete dipshit at that point vs Trump who's already floating around 36% approval. Plus after 9/11 it wasn't so ridiculous for people to jump behind Bush vs behind Trump potentially starting a war in Latin America. People really need to slow down, take a breath, and really let it soak in what it means that they so easily jumped behind (or turned a largely blind eye to) Trump and the CIA orchestrating (in the haphazardly shitty way you have to expect from Trump) the replacement of a democratically elected leader and the media's unquestioning stenography of propaganda. I hear the UK is having some leadership issues, maybe Trump and the CIA can help name a new leader for you guys too. When the army is killing workers, does it still count as a proletariat revolution? Remember you're talking to a Black guy in the US. If BLM killed as many people /cops/soldiers as the protesters in Venezuela the FBI would have kicked down my door and dragged me out a long time ago and I'm not even part of BLM.
Making up excuses for the killing of civilians by the army crooks. Lovely. Guess at least you are honest about it; this is what hardcore socialists actually think. It is ok for the government to murder it's own citizens if it's suits their political side, and because the US something.
|
On January 25 2019 21:26 GoTuNk! wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2019 21:21 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 25 2019 21:15 GoTuNk! wrote:On January 25 2019 20:17 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 25 2019 20:12 Jockmcplop wrote:On January 25 2019 20:09 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 25 2019 20:02 iamthedave wrote: Russia! Defenders of Democracy!
This really is the stuff that makes people nod along when Putin says the West is shit and has no place judging his country. Amazing isn't it? It's like people are waking up today barely acknowledging if at all that in inexplicable unison there was a "popular" uprising, some nobody that happened to be super US and neoliberal capitalism friendly appointed himself president and without a moment of hesitation or the slightest questioning by any corporate media a near complete bipartisan wave jumped in line behind Trump and his proclamation that there was a new leader of Venezuela and would no longer recognize the democratically elected leader who was experiencing a coup for "democracy". Like holy shit people. Is everyone really going to pretend that's not easily the biggest scandal of the Trump era? Isn't this like exactly what happened with the failed Chavez coup, except he was also arrested? Yeah the US sponsored coup attempt against the previously democratically elected leader (Chavez) was actually moderately more successful. The opposition party in Venezuela just got duped by Trump and because Maduro isn't a bloodthirsty dictator like many US allies, he's unlikely to have them all killed for treason. Oh and Bush wasn't considered a complete dipshit at that point vs Trump who's already floating around 36% approval. Plus after 9/11 it wasn't so ridiculous for people to jump behind Bush vs behind Trump potentially starting a war in Latin America. People really need to slow down, take a breath, and really let it soak in what it means that they so easily jumped behind (or turned a largely blind eye to) Trump and the CIA orchestrating (in the haphazardly shitty way you have to expect from Trump) the replacement of a democratically elected leader and the media's unquestioning stenography of propaganda. I hear the UK is having some leadership issues, maybe Trump and the CIA can help name a new leader for you guys too. When the army is killing workers, does it still count as a proletariat revolution? Remember you're talking to a Black guy in the US. If BLM killed as many people /cops/soldiers as the protesters in Venezuela the FBI would have kicked down my door and dragged me out a long time ago and I'm not even part of BLM. Making up excuses for the killing of civilians by the army crooks. Lovely. Guess at least you are honest about it; this is what hardcore socialists actually think. It is ok for the government to murder it's own citizens if it's suits their political side, and because the US something.
No excuses and I don't know what you're referring to specifically (feel free to cite it I am curious). I'm just saying that you present it like it's some unimaginable atrocity when in context/comparison to my own reality, it sounds moderate.
If some innocent peaceful civilians were summarily executed after being forced to dig their own mass grave or something that would be something that would shock me like you seem to think whatever you're talking about should.
|
On January 25 2019 20:17 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2019 20:12 Jockmcplop wrote:On January 25 2019 20:09 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 25 2019 20:02 iamthedave wrote: Russia! Defenders of Democracy!
This really is the stuff that makes people nod along when Putin says the West is shit and has no place judging his country. Amazing isn't it? It's like people are waking up today barely acknowledging if at all that in inexplicable unison there was a "popular" uprising, some nobody that happened to be super US and neoliberal capitalism friendly appointed himself president and without a moment of hesitation or the slightest questioning by any corporate media a near complete bipartisan wave jumped in line behind Trump and his proclamation that there was a new leader of Venezuela and would no longer recognize the democratically elected leader who was experiencing a coup for "democracy". Like holy shit people. Is everyone really going to pretend that's not easily the biggest scandal of the Trump era? Isn't this like exactly what happened with the failed Chavez coup, except he was also arrested? Yeah the US sponsored coup attempt against the previously democratically elected leader (Chavez) was actually moderately more successful. The opposition party in Venezuela just got duped by Trump and because Maduro isn't a bloodthirsty dictator like many US allies, he's unlikely to have them all killed for treason. Oh and Bush wasn't considered a complete dipshit at that point vs Trump who's already floating around 36% approval. Plus after 9/11 it wasn't so ridiculous for people to jump behind Bush vs behind Trump potentially starting a war in Latin America. People really need to slow down, take a breath, and really let it soak in what it means that they so easily jumped behind (or turned a largely blind eye to) Trump and the CIA orchestrating (in the haphazardly shitty way you have to expect from Trump) the replacement of a democratically elected leader and the media's unquestioning stenography of propaganda. I hear the UK is having some leadership issues, maybe Trump and the CIA can help name a new leader for you guys too.
Just send us Obama. He can finish up where David Cameron left off and clean up the Tories.
|
On January 25 2019 04:13 IgnE wrote: yes, his rant about populism and families and how the main conservative emphasis on markets is simply not cutting it I've read his rant a couple times now. He's right insofar as republicans are guilty of being free market oriented to the exclusion of many other important considerations. As I have said many times, republican opposition to Trump's trade policies falls squarely in this category. The problem with Tucker's piece and the reason why it comes off as a "rant" is that he doesn't quite reach the key issue. He very clearly understands that there are problems in the country and that the "traditional" or "standard" GOP platform isn't addressing those problems. In the end, however, all he manages to do is survey the symptoms of the fundamental paradox of classical liberalism without addressing it: how does a free society self-impose civic virtue without relinquishing its freedom? Like Tucker suspects, this is a cultural question as much as it is an economic or political one. In fact, all three elements are inextricably intertwined, which I'm not sure that Tucker fully appreciates.
|
What does the rising rate of unsolved murders and incidents of gun violence mean for BLM?
![[image loading]](https://2378nh2nfow32gm3mb25krmuyy-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Baltimore.png)
Does it matter that murders go unsolved?
How many cops are working on marijuana cases rather than solving violent crimes?
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On January 26 2019 01:24 iamthedave wrote: Just send us Obama. He can finish up where David Cameron left off and clean up the Tories. I'm thinking Nigel Farage is now PM and king of Great Britain.
@GH: The reason this stuff isn't "controversial" is because the decision itself is popular with all the right parties. This just reminds me of that "part of the Trump resistance" NYT piece - yeah, he does a lot of all the right things, it's just he's not very "presidential" or something of the sort. But when he does something like this, it's not really a problem, because it's the "right" course of action. I suppose we could feign outrage that Democrats don't stand against it, but it's neither news nor a surprise.
|
|
So 3 weeks of government funding to allow for the negotiation of an immigration deal, and a threat to declare the national emergency if the deal doesn't get done. Getting a deal done that includes meaningful border security seems like a pipe dream given the position that the democrats have taken.
|
Well at least we're no longer actively undermining border security by not paying federal employees. I don't think a deal on border security is a pipe dream. I don't know exactly what the Democrat position is, but the president's "7 billion for wall or nothing" doesn't seem very productive. Guess we'll have to see what happens from here. I think Venezuela deserves more attention now that the government is reopened.
|
On January 26 2019 05:09 Starlightsun wrote: Well at least we're no longer actively undermining border security by not paying federal employees. I don't think a deal on border security is a pipe dream. I don't know exactly what the Democrat position is, but the president's "7 billion for wall or nothing" doesn't seem very productive. Guess we'll have to see what happens from here. I think Venezuela deserves more attention now that the government is reopened. The only positive sign here is that the 3-week delay apparently was requested by a bipartisan group of legislators who think that they can get something done as opposed to this interim deal being Trump's idea.
|
It’s the same rigmarole 3 weeks later, or executive action. No way does Pelosi allow a breakaway group of congresspeople to sign a CR with border wall funding after Trump shows he’s willing to sign funding bills without it. She knows what Republican caving looks like from wining her gavel during George W Bush’s tenure.
|
Oh, Trump caved. I'm shocked, shocked, I tells ya. XDaunt had me convinced entirely.
|
How in the world are people so misinformed about Venezuela?
I've been reading people talk about election observers. They have no clue what they are talking about.
Venezuela's elections are more legitimate than US elections. Maduro invited UN observers (and had other international observers), but the opposition said they didn't want a legit election, they literally refused to participate in democracy, refused international observers, then instigated a coup right after.
“The vote took place peacefully and without problems… the vote reflects the will of [Venezuelan] citizens,” declared CEELA President Nicanor Moscoso during a press conference Monday morning.
The CEELA delegation was comprised of 1300 international observers, including former Colombian Electoral Court President Guillermo Reyes, ex-president of the Honduran Supreme Electoral Court, Augusto Aguilar, and former Peruvian electoral magistrate Gastón Soto.
According to the body’s report, the vote was held under conditions of “total normality” and the right to a secret ballot was “guaranteed”.
venezuelanalysis.com
This would be like if Democrats decided Russia's influence (nothing compared to US influence in Venezuela) made the election illegitimate and instead of Mueller, we just refused international observers (the US already does this in most elections) and Chuck Schumer appointed himself President, then a bunch of European countries just stop recognizing Trump as president despite him winning the election and Schumer refusing to participate.
The US is one of the last countries that has any room to talk about the legitimacy of elections and clearly most people have no idea what they are talking about and are repeating western propaganda uncritically.
The Guardian did a "both sides" type article that should help people understand some of the misinformation they've been repeating or other aspects they were ignorant of or ignoring. This is from 2017.
There’s a reason the rightwing opposition boycotted Sunday’s election and calls for street protests – it can’t mount a credible bid for government
There are other reasons not to trust the opposition: it hasn’t backed its claims with impartial evidence, and it had no neutral observers overlooking its own elections. Still, it stands by its claim to have obtained some 37% of the vote against the assembly.
The rightwing opposition can’t rally a majority beyond the middle-upper classes even while many Venezuelans, especially the poorer, suffer from very real shortages and economic hardship. Why? There’s only one sensible answer: the majority of them fear the return of the rightwing to power more than the alleged incompetence of Maduro. They know that if the current opposition leadership comes to power, backed by the likes of Trump and the notorious former Colombian president Álvaro Uribe Vélez, the result would be austerity and most likely a civil war as devastating as that of neighbouring Colombia.
www.theguardian.com
The idea that the opposition and the US are trying to "restore democracy" takes a level of ignorance about the coup I can't believe isn't laughed into humiliating oblivion.
In case people prefer western sources.
Venezuela opposition asks U.N. not to send observers to May vote
On January 26 2019 02:45 IgnE wrote:What does the rising rate of unsolved murders and incidents of gun violence mean for BLM? + Show Spoiler +Does it matter that murders go unsolved? How many cops are working on marijuana cases rather than solving violent crimes?
They did say they were going to stop doing their jobs if people made them sad
EDIT: I read the Brookings paper. I hope people realize it's describing Maduro making the election process more like the US as making it worse just fyi.
A town of 10,000 and a city of over 100,000 would potentially have the same number of delegates, theoretically providing pro-Maduro rural districts with a decisive advantage.
Sound familiar to anyone?
Also they mention that the opposition refused to participate in the elections.
The opposition then boycotted the National Constituent Assembly elections
Honorable mention for the UK holding over a billion dollars in Venezuelan gold like that isn't extortion. or preventing them from buying life saving medicine and food.
Glad wikipedia at least changed the whole "we're supporting the coup and have declared this other tool in charge" to "disputed"
Do people know what happened to the piles of gold and cash Saddam had? Any idea where it went? Anyone? Or did it all evaporate?
|
These guys don't mean it when they are talking about the US (and "the left" knows this) but suddenly when they are talking about Venezuela centrists just gobble it up?
“Elliott will be a true asset to our mission to help the Venezuelan people fully restore democracy and prosperity to their country,” Pompeo said in announcing Abrams’ appointment.
Elliot is a convict from the Iran-Contra scandal.
So you have Trump and tapping an Iran-Contra era convict to head up yet another failing Latin America coup and ostensibly liberal people are just floating around trying to legitimize (or ignore) it from the "left" while still trying to maintain their conniption fit about Russia's interference in our election.
He said Abrams would accompany him to the United Nations on Saturday for a Security Council meeting on Venezuela where the U.S. will press other countries to support opposition leader Juan Guaido as the country’s interim head of state.
www.reuters.com
Maduro welcomes the US bringing the issue to the UN.
Maduro said he welcomed a debate over Venezuela’s situation and thanked Pompeo for making the UN request, in a jocular response during a Friday news conference.
“I was about to say to the foreign minister ‘ask for a security council debate,’ (but) Mike Pompeo got ahead of me,” Maduro said. “Thanks, Mike ... We’re going to tell the truth about the articles of the constitution, about the coup.”
Earlier, American diplomats left the U.S. embassy in Caracas in a convoy of vehicles with a police escort en route to the airport, according to a Reuters witness. Maduro, in a fiery speech on Wednesday, broke off diplomatic relations with Washington and ordered the U.S. personnel out within 72 hours.
It's got your typical western bias but even Reuters has to acknowledge this guy's support comes from the petty bourgeoisie in Venezuela, fascists such as Bolsonaro, previous US coup victims and criminals out of the Trump administration, our bipartisan neocons in congress, US media, and anyone gullible enough to support them.
Guaido, who has galvanized Venezuela’s opposition, proclaimed himself interim president on Wednesday during a march of hundreds of thousands in Caracas. He is considering making a request for funds from international institutions including the International Monetary Fund, two people familiar with the talks said on Friday.
However, he still has no control over the Venezuelan state and the military, which has so far remained loyal to Maduro despite a deep economic and political crisis that has sparked mass emigration, with inflation forecast to rise to 10 million percent this year. Guaido has promised future amnesties to military members if they disavow Maduro.
On Friday, Guaido repeated his offer to the armed forces around Venezuela, asking soldiers “to put themselves on the side of the constitution.”
Most Latin American nations have joined the United States in supporting Guaido’s claim on the presidency, although Mexico’s new leftist government has said it would not take sides. Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said on Friday his administration would be willing to mediate.
Guaido said he would reject any negotiations that did not include Maduro’s exit
www.reuters.com
|
Elliot is a surprise. I wonder if he personally got Trump’s attention, or if it was Pompeii, or another administration figure, or one of the vocal Senators on the issue.
It feels like only yesterday when a wealthy Venezuelan could turn on the television to Álo Presidente and discover that his family’s assets had just been seized. Such glowing reports too from the American media and far-left figures. Sometime very close to when the money runs out and industry collapses these governments lose their “true socialism” name and yet again prove that real socialism has never been tried. This is no different. Free healthcare, but your best friend died because it’s impossible for the hospital to get common medications. It’s almost an Eastern European communist vibe.
I didn’t hear much of today’s reporting. Earlier in the week, Maduro ordered the expulsion of our diplomats. Trumps administration, not recognizing Maduro, said he did not have the authority to expel our diplomats. If he takes them captive, it’s Carter’s Iran 2.0. Unresolved questions is how much responsibility the US has if the opposition leader is disappeared or killed.
If it wasn’t Trump in the White House, I think the recognition game would enjoy broad support in application of the US’s soft power. They held sham elections (moving hundreds of opposition favored polling stations, clear dominance of Maduro’s people on the electoral council, erasure of the difference between the government and the ruling party in terms of spending government money on a single party’s political campaigns), and this is a good response. Sanctions and more vocal support will hopefully follow to prevent more needless suffering in the once-wealthy nation.
|
On January 26 2019 09:52 Danglars wrote: Elliot is a surprise. I wonder if he personally got Trump’s attention, or if it was Pompeii, or another administration figure, or one of the vocal Senators on the issue.
It feels like only yesterday when a wealthy Venezuelan could turn on the television to Álo Presidente and discover that his family’s assets had just been seized. Such glowing reports too from the American media and far-left figures. Sometime very close to when the money runs out and industry collapses these governments lose their “true socialism” name and yet again prove that real socialism has never been tried. This is no different. Free healthcare, but your best friend died because it’s impossible for the hospital to get common medications. It’s almost an Eastern European communist vibe.
I didn’t hear much of today’s reporting. Earlier in the week, Maduro ordered the expulsion of our diplomats. Trumps administration, not recognizing Maduro, said he did not have the authority to expel our diplomats. If he takes them captive, it’s Carter’s Iran 2.0. Unresolved questions is how much responsibility the US has if the opposition leader is disappeared or killed.
If it wasn’t Trump in the White House, I think the recognition game would enjoy broad support in application of the US’s soft power. They held sham elections (moving hundreds of opposition favored polling stations, clear dominance of Maduro’s people on the electoral council, erasure of the difference between the government and the ruling party in terms of spending government money on a single party’s political campaigns), and this is a good response. Sanctions and more vocal support will hopefully follow to prevent more needless suffering in the once-wealthy nation.
Well it is illegal coup that could spin out into a civil war so Elliot (who looks like a cartoon villain btw), has some experience (not the good kind) in this arena so it makes sense considering Trump's affinity for horrifically brutal leaders.
It feels like only yesterday when a wealthy Venezuelan could turn on the television to Álo Presidente and discover that his family’s assets had just been seized.
That was good actually.
Does this coming from danglars (a Trump supporter who defends the GOP doing much worse) help it click for any of the neolibs?
They held sham elections (moving hundreds of opposition favored polling stations, clear dominance of Maduro’s people on the electoral council, erasure of the difference between the government and the ruling party in terms of spending government money on a single party’s political campaigns)
How can anyone claiming to be anywhere on the left not see that Trump and crew are just as full of it as danglars when they say this coup is
to prevent more needless suffering or restore democracy. Please neolibs don't be so stubborn as to become quite literally Trump supporters in an attempted coup.
EDIT: Are the neolibs supporting Trump or helping him by remaining silent really just imperialists that genuinely think supporting Trump overthrowing a democratically elected leader is good or is supporting Trump overthrowing a democratically elected leader in an illegal coup just collateral damage in their quest to help Trump spread democracy and prosperity for the poor in Latin America with his fascist buddy Bolsonaro?
That the US and international oil companies plan on using their new ownership of Venezuela's resources to help impoverished people? Or is it that neoliberals just don't care that they will exploit the hell out of Venezuelans like xDaunt stated was his position?
EDIT2: I should add a bit about who supposedly liberal people are supporting to handle this US sponsored coup because they hate Maduro so much.
One (Elliot) Abrams specialty was massacre denial. During a Nightline appearance in 1985, he was asked about reports that the US-funded Salvadoran military had slaughtered civilians at two sites the previous summer. Abrams maintained that no such events had occurred. And had the US Embassy and the State Department conducted an investigation? “My memory,” he said, “is that we did, but I don’t want to swear to it, because I’d have to go back and look at the cables.” But there had been no State Department inquiry; Abrams, in his lawyerly fashion, was being disingenuous. Three years earlier, when two American journalists reported that an elite, US-trained military unit had massacred hundreds of villagers in El Mozote, Abrams told Congress that the story was commie propaganda, as he fought for more US aid to El Salvador’s military. The massacre, as has since been confirmed, was real. And in 1993 after a UN truth commission, which examined 22,000 atrocities that occurred during the twelve-year civil war in El Salvador, attributed 85 percent of the abuses to the Reagan-assisted right-wing military and its death-squad allies, Abrams declared, “The Administration’s record on El Salvador is one of fabulous achievement.” Tell that to the survivors of El Mozote.
But it wasn’t his lies about mass murder that got Abrams into trouble. After a contra resupply plane was shot down in 1986, Abrams, one of the coordinators of Reagan’s pro-contra policy (along with the NSC’s Oliver North and the CIA’s Alan Fiers), appeared several times before Congressional committees and withheld information on the Administration’s connection to the secret and private contra-support network. He also hid from Congress the fact that he had flown to London (using the name “Mr. Kenilworth”) to solicit a $10 million contribution for the contras from the Sultan of Brunei. At a subsequent closed-door hearing, Democratic Senator Thomas Eagleton blasted Abrams for having misled legislators, noting that Abrams’s misrepresentations could lead to “slammer time.” Abrams disagreed, saying, “You’ve heard my testimony.” Eagleton cut in: “I’ve heard it, and I want to puke.” On another occasion, Republican Senator Dave Durenberger complained, “I wouldn’t trust Elliott any further than I could throw Ollie North.”
www.thenation.com
|
Yeah... uhhh... "tough" is one way to describe his systemic denials of horrific human rights abuses, mass slaughters, and drug trafficking to help fund an illegal war.
Seriously liberals (this is coming to the UN so European lefties this applies to you too), speak out against this coup, don't stay silent, DEFINITELY don't help Trump legitimize it.
supporting democracy, liberty & the national interest of the United States.
Don't repeat this lie for them unless you're on their side.
EDIT: Maybe this is one reason Trump conceded to Nancy, she kept nearly all Democrats from even making a peep about this coup (other than statements of support). It was actually workers shutting shit down if you're wondering.
|
Unfortunate that Pelosi didn't credit the workers considering they are the real reason Trump caved. Hopefully people don't just deify her and ignore the workers who stood in solidarity against incompetent government.
|
GH definitely has a point. It seems like he is going very easy on Maduro, but I somehow have the feeling he is trying to cancel out the complete negativity coming from everyone else. And if there would be a more differentiated discourse about the situation he would be more than willing to be more critical of everyone involved. But since he seems to be the lone defender he feels forced to show another aspect which tends to be positive.
There is so little reporting that tries to show Maduros perspective or even mentions different causes for the situation than missmanagement and ciorruption that people should be asking themselves whether this can be the whole explanation. If people spent a fraction of the time they spent on this whole stupid MAGA-Boy situation on informing themselves about Venezuela they might at least see it's not all about Chavez and Maduro firing the wrong people and being utterly corrupt.
|
On January 26 2019 21:14 RolleMcKnolle wrote: GH definitely has a point. It seems like he is going very easy on Maduro, but I somehow have the feeling he is trying to cancel out the complete negativity coming from everyone else. And if there would be a more differentiated discourse about the situation he would be more than willing to be more critical of everyone involved. But since he seems to be the lone defender he feels forced to show another aspect which tends to be positive.
There is so little reporting that tries to show Maduros perspective or even mentions different causes for the situation than missmanagement and ciorruption that people should be asking themselves whether this can be the whole explanation. If people spent a fraction of the time they spent on this whole stupid MAGA-Boy situation on informing themselves about Venezuela they might at least see it's not all about Chavez and Maduro firing the wrong people and being utterly corrupt.
it wasn't all in vain 
Additionally the who's who list of war criminals and just generally deplorable people Trump's been putting in power over his term it's not unreasonable to think Iran could be next if by likely horrific atrocities they brute force a regime change in Venezuela.
EDIT: Extra tidbit Bill Barr, yup, the same one up for AG also advised Bush on Pardons from the Iran Contra scandal.
What that NPR story doesn't tell you (granted it predates this latest development) is just who it is that he pardoned.
Besides Mr. Weinberger, the President pardoned Robert C. McFarlane, the former national security adviser, and Elliott Abrams, the former assistant Secretary of State for Central America. Both officials had pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of withholding information from Congress about support for the contras.
archive.nytimes.com
The archive not quite mentioning the stuff about the US sponsored atrocities he was lying about. They're literally placing people who have helped illegally slaughter women and children, lie about it, and then get the people off who get caught lying and people are talking about literally anything else.
|
|
|
|