EPT[WoW] Battle for Azeroth - Page 184
| Forum Index > Closed |
BfA Community Links: GP : https://www.worldofwarcraft.com/invite/KKMpKPSlgd?region=EU&faction=Horde TLEUH : https://www.worldofwarcraft.com/invite/v9x5bAF3jD?region=EU&faction=Horde TLEUA : https://www.worldofwarcraft.com/invite/ALwgJnC5Wo?region=EU&faction=Alliance TLNAH : https://www.worldofwarcraft.com/invite/vPrmjJxiVnJ?region=US&faction=Horde TLNAA : https://www.worldofwarcraft.com/invite/YeZj7P0SXLn?region=US&faction=Alliance Bnet: Bnet - https://blizzard.com/invite/amvLM0EubJv On November 03 2016 06:57 GTR wrote: I've created a Google Form/Spreadsheet for people to help add eachother. Hopefully this will makes things easier for us to find people for Mythic+ runs and what not as opposed to sifting through 150+ pages of discussion. Form Spreadsheet If a moderator could add this as a moderator note at the top it'd be appreciated. | ||
NonY
8751 Posts
| ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34500 Posts
| ||
|
NonY
8751 Posts
On October 23 2016 03:04 Firebolt145 wrote: Wait I thought you were MW I play both. I'm usually stuck playing WW actually when I group with friends because I do more damage and our other healers are good enough at healing. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/WQiSNJo.png) from one cast of corrupted bellow oh baby | ||
|
EquilasH
Denmark2142 Posts
Personally I think that it's fairly good but some things have to be changed; I think they should nerf System Shock again from assa Rogue and then give Paladins another talent than the one that cures poison. Also some other changes to prevent hard counters from happening too much. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20323 Posts
Can confirm as of 09/13-2016 that the debuff damage (which previously was 200%) has been lowered to only 50%, making the ticking damage of the five stacks only about 1050k per three seconds, instead of almost 4 million, which it was previously. | ||
|
NonY
8751 Posts
On October 24 2016 01:32 Cyro wrote: Looks like they nerfed the Fired Up debuff from +200% damage taken per stack to +50% damage taken per stack - probably the hardest glory of the legion hero achievement at launch which should now be pretty easy due to more ilvl = more HP and being nerfed so that it's actually survivable instead DPS almost certainly dieing 6 seconds after getting the debuff Yeah I saw that a while ago but never mentioned it here. Basically trivial now, at worst having to bring two healers. | ||
GTR
51521 Posts
GTR#11844 | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On October 23 2016 00:41 Cyro wrote: I've heard that you can queue up researches sometimes in a way that cuts some days off because the research time is decided at the time of the queue even though the second one doesn't start for X days. If you have a 3 day work order then you can queue two up at 3 days each - if you have four days then you can queue 2 up at 4 days each so 3+3 days instead of 3 days then 4 days for example; 4 + 4 days instead of needing the 5'th day for the second research You've actually got it backwards. While research time is determined at the time of the queue, each work order's time to complete is determined independently as if you were starting it right then and there. This is slightly counterproductive because in the X days it takes to complete the first work order a threshold could be passed which makes the second work order take 1 less day. As a result waiting to queue research work orders until the last possible reset can save a couple of days, but even then you'll quickly reach a point where it stops making a difference. Ultimately characters who started late will at best be 5-7 days behind characters who've been researching since the first week. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20323 Posts
Ultimately characters who started late will at best be 5-7 days behind characters who've been researching since the first week. Do you start to get 5-day researches while being several AK's behind? | ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On October 25 2016 01:49 Cyro wrote: Do you start to get 5-day researches while being several AK's behind? So Im testing this now since I just started researching 3 or so weeks ago. (and ive not been keeping up with it till the last 2 weeks) I let researches stack for the last week because I saw it being discussed here so figured it experiment and researched two together. Total research time was 6 days, and I did it on Friday, I got both this morning at the end of the weekend. So not sure if intended or bugged but thats my anecdote. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20323 Posts
| ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
On October 25 2016 01:49 Cyro wrote: Do you start to get 5-day researches while being several AK's behind? Not until you're roughly 1 AK level behind. My DK is roughly 6 days behind my main on AK research with 5-day research times. My other alts are still catching up. | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34500 Posts
| ||
|
daemir
Finland8662 Posts
And now cenarius oh shit, I have no idea what's going on :D | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20323 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/rpAwCRA.png) best bonus roll so far | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34500 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20323 Posts
On October 25 2016 06:05 Firebolt145 wrote: That's making my gf very jealous. It's really, really nice (BIS!) - overall a ~2.5% DPS upgrade (going from 870 to 895 with same trait) but the best couple of legendaries give somewhere around +15% DPS together. I'm really hoping to get one of those soon (killing every raid boss every week, every emissary quest, done 300 mythic+ clears) | ||
micronesia
United States24753 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20323 Posts
On October 25 2016 06:46 micronesia wrote: Do legendary drop odds go up with time or with consecutive missed chances? Only consecutive missed chances but you're looking at a 0.5% drop chance instead of a 0.2% drop chance after a while  | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22065 Posts
The old 'bad luck protection bug' that was active at the start of the expansion gave those who got a legendary a 2nd one very close to 2 weeks after their first drop across many reported cases. I would expect a greater spread if it was based on consecutive missed chance. | ||
| ||
