EPTRanked matchmaking coming to Dota 2 - Page 63
| Forum Index > Closed |
Please keep the QQ to a minimum if you do not like this update. We are happy to hear your reasoning for not liking a ranked system, but no "OMG VOLVO WHY" posts. | ||
739
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
| ||
|
NeoRussia
Canada381 Posts
On December 25 2013 22:33 Kupon3ss wrote: because everybody thinks that they're above average Isn't everybody here though? wouldn't average be like 3.2k? Also players above 4k still do so many dumb things, I have to agree on that only 5.5k is good thing. Love the mmr system in dota though, if you were actually that good it would take you less than a day to get close to that from 3.2k, for sure. | ||
|
Alur
Denmark3900 Posts
On December 26 2013 05:28 NeoRussia wrote: Isn't everybody here though? wouldn't average be like 3.2k? Also players above 4k still do so many dumb things, I have to agree on that only 5.5k is good thing. Love the mmr system in dota though, if you were actually that good it would take you less than a day to get close to that from 3.2k, for sure. It seems like it takes quite a streak for the uncertainty to ramp up, so you'd have a lot of +25 games. I think 1 day might be a bit optimistic, since it's hard to fit much more than 20 games in a day. | ||
|
makmeatt
2024 Posts
| ||
|
DrPandaPhD
5188 Posts
On December 26 2013 03:39 Andre wrote: Anything below 5,5k is shit. above 5.5k, I am still shit : p got to work on my early game movement so much t_t | ||
|
Alur
Denmark3900 Posts
On December 26 2013 05:39 DrPandaPhD wrote: above 5.5k, I am still shit : p got to work on my early game movement so much t_t Party rating doesn't count! :D | ||
|
Kupon3ss
時の回廊10066 Posts
| ||
|
rudimentalfeelthelov
Finland268 Posts
| ||
|
Treefrog42
United Kingdom36 Posts
On December 26 2013 03:39 Andre wrote: Anything below 5,5k is shit. Well. I was not expecting that. Still, I am pleased with top 10% whatever you say. | ||
|
Gheizen64
Italy2077 Posts
| ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
| ||
|
willstertben
427 Posts
On December 26 2013 08:03 cecek wrote: If you're really stomping games hard, which you should be if you're playing games 1k points below your level, I think the smurf detection will kick in and make you progress much faster. I imagine if a 5k player started playing on a 4k account, he would be back at 5k in under 30 games, easily. Of course I don't have a souce for that. doesn't work like that. there only is smurf detection on the first games on a new account. mmr goes up pretty quickly when you're winning more than losing though! just figure out who to play ranked with and who not to play ranked with when you're in a party. i don't know about solo, haven't finished my calibration games. i wish they would add a solo queue option again. the match making is a lot better now though! i haven't played with people from a certain country that pretty much everybody in eu thinks need a region lock in a long time. in ranked that is. unranked feels like there isn't even a mmr anymore. | ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
On December 26 2013 08:17 willstertben wrote: doesn't work like that. there only is smurf detection on the first games on a new account. mmr goes up pretty quickly when you're winning more than losing though! just figure out who to play ranked with and who not to play ranked with when you're in a party. i don't know about solo, haven't finished my calibration games. i wish they would add a solo queue option again. the match making is a lot better now though! i haven't played with people from a certain country that pretty much everybody in eu thinks need a region lock in a long time. in ranked that is. unranked feels like there isn't even a mmr anymore. How do you know smurf detection only works in the first games? I never seen it mentioned anyway. And you people need to be reasonable... If you region lock the game AND bring back solo queue option just count the amount of separate player pools. Ranked, Unranked. Both divided between solo queue and parties allowed. These region locked. And then divide these into different game modes. Yeah....enjoy your 30 minute wait times to get a decent game going. The high ranked players might not get a game in an hour with that system, or it would match players with ridiculously wide range of skill together. That system is awful. | ||
Excalibur_Z
United States12248 Posts
On December 26 2013 08:17 willstertben wrote: doesn't work like that. there only is smurf detection on the first games on a new account. mmr goes up pretty quickly when you're winning more than losing though! just figure out who to play ranked with and who not to play ranked with when you're in a party. i don't know about solo, haven't finished my calibration games. i wish they would add a solo queue option again. the match making is a lot better now though! i haven't played with people from a certain country that pretty much everybody in eu thinks need a region lock in a long time. in ranked that is. unranked feels like there isn't even a mmr anymore. According to the Valve matchmaking post, if they think your MMR is wildly incorrect they'll reinstate calibration. I think that would probably only happen after a long streak. | ||
|
cecek
Czech Republic18921 Posts
On December 26 2013 09:31 Excalibur_Z wrote: According to the Valve matchmaking post, if they think your MMR is wildly incorrect they'll reinstate calibration. I think that would probably only happen after a long streak. Well yeah, that's the uncertainty stat. We don't know how long it takes to get it triggered. Might be 3 games, might be 20 for what we know. | ||
|
Laserist
Turkey4269 Posts
| ||
|
Bandino
United States342 Posts
On December 26 2013 09:54 Laserist wrote: There is no way to climb up the MMR rating by playing 5th role supports. My supporting is better than my mid or carry but I lose a good percentage of my support games. Fails, feeds, blames etc.. 4K MMR is nowhere near what valve has stated. I've actually found supporting can be a lot more helpful because a lot of players know how to play mid or carry but very few know how to support correctly. Also, generally when supporting I can cause us to win 2 lanes, the lane I'm supporting and mid, as well as disrupting the opponents jungle. Of course this is all anecdotal evidence, but I find that I can win my fair share of games that I play by supporting. | ||
|
Kupon3ss
時の回廊10066 Posts
On December 26 2013 09:54 Laserist wrote: There is no way to climb up the MMR rating by playing 5th role supports. My supporting is better than my mid or carry but I lose a good percentage of my support games. Fails, feeds, blames etc.. 4K MMR is nowhere near what valve has stated. this has been proven false time and time again. Plenty of players have gotten to the top of ladders playing exclusively support. Even players who are not necessarily support players like fear have done it on great success. at the top of the ladder, individual mechanics actually play less of a role while understanding and game sense are even more important | ||
|
FFGenerations
7088 Posts
i am 18-6 (75%) at the moment (stacking with 1 friend), ill report back what my mmr increase is if we win the next game 2928-> 3103-> expect my update to be something like "->FUCK YOU LIFESTEALER" | ||
|
Laserist
Turkey4269 Posts
On December 26 2013 10:28 Kupon3ss wrote: this has been proven false time and time again. Plenty of players have gotten to the top of ladders playing exclusively support. Even players who are not necessarily support players like fear have done it on great success. at the top of the ladder, individual mechanics actually play less of a role while understanding and game sense are even more important You prove my claim false by giving example of a pro player. Well Played! | ||
| ||
