|
|
On April 17 2014 00:19 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2014 00:16 mcc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:08 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:53 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 23:21 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:11 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 22:52 Simberto wrote: Irrelevant. Russia is the one starting a war and invading a country RIGHT NOW. Doesn't matter what others did in the past. Maybe you should be asking which countries funded the coup in Ukraine that started all this in the first place. Countries are allowed to have revolutions. Even if you don't like the result. So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to protest against the non-elected government in Kiev? So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to take government buildings by force and proclaim their independence from the government in Kiev just like the case was in western Ukraine not so long ago? If that were what is happening, yes. I would usually prefer a more peaceful solution (like voting in the elections that were set for may, or demonstrations). However, that is not what is happening. What is happening is russian soldiers taking of the insignia of their uniforms and taking over government buildings. Which is an invasion and not a revolution. A popular revolution is usually something that does not only involve heavily armed young men in camouflage uniforms. That is actually your unsupported claim. How about you watch that video posted just one posting before you? That's kinda more than claiming. I meant the part about it being actually members of Russian military in disguise.
|
On April 17 2014 00:27 Mc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2014 00:19 m4ini wrote:On April 17 2014 00:16 mcc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:08 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:53 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 23:21 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:11 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 22:52 Simberto wrote: Irrelevant. Russia is the one starting a war and invading a country RIGHT NOW. Doesn't matter what others did in the past. Maybe you should be asking which countries funded the coup in Ukraine that started all this in the first place. Countries are allowed to have revolutions. Even if you don't like the result. So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to protest against the non-elected government in Kiev? So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to take government buildings by force and proclaim their independence from the government in Kiev just like the case was in western Ukraine not so long ago? If that were what is happening, yes. I would usually prefer a more peaceful solution (like voting in the elections that were set for may, or demonstrations). However, that is not what is happening. What is happening is russian soldiers taking of the insignia of their uniforms and taking over government buildings. Which is an invasion and not a revolution. A popular revolution is usually something that does not only involve heavily armed young men in camouflage uniforms. That is actually your unsupported claim. How about you watch that video posted just one posting before you? That's kinda more than claiming. We don't really know for sure- Russia could have just as easily trained Russian nationals (militaristic thugs, there are a LOT of them in Russia) or trained Ukranian thugs for the past year. Give them some high tech guns, and boom there you go. Also as I said Yanukovich could have been behind this - w/ Russia's support of course. As to the guy who claimed to be a Russian officer (another video), maybe he was a former officer or just lieing? Obviously, Russians are deeply involved in this unrest but exactly which ones are Russians, which are military, is hard to tell. Maybe, Russia is being 'cautious' and no actual military members are involved. I need harder evidence to be convinced 
Well, there is the famous "flag guy". Also, i said "militia", which is exactly what you're describing. Doesn't make it a protest, still. 
edit, gna, fudge.. deleted that part - i said in a response to zeo "militia" and changed it to not engage into a longer discussion - my bad, you're right.
I meant the part about it being actually members of Russian military in disguise.
While i agree that there so far is no undenyable proof, there's alot of evidence for that out there. I'd say it's more than considerable. These guys in the video definately had military training, even though they look clumsy. Recently. So if they're not russian military in disguise (might very well be), they definately don't act on their own. Don't know where you come from, but feel free to go into the next army store, buy 20 uniforms of russian standards, including assault rifles and radios.
Let me know how it went.
|
On April 17 2014 00:33 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2014 00:27 Mc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:19 m4ini wrote:On April 17 2014 00:16 mcc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:08 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:53 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 23:21 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:11 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 22:52 Simberto wrote: Irrelevant. Russia is the one starting a war and invading a country RIGHT NOW. Doesn't matter what others did in the past. Maybe you should be asking which countries funded the coup in Ukraine that started all this in the first place. Countries are allowed to have revolutions. Even if you don't like the result. So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to protest against the non-elected government in Kiev? So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to take government buildings by force and proclaim their independence from the government in Kiev just like the case was in western Ukraine not so long ago? If that were what is happening, yes. I would usually prefer a more peaceful solution (like voting in the elections that were set for may, or demonstrations). However, that is not what is happening. What is happening is russian soldiers taking of the insignia of their uniforms and taking over government buildings. Which is an invasion and not a revolution. A popular revolution is usually something that does not only involve heavily armed young men in camouflage uniforms. That is actually your unsupported claim. How about you watch that video posted just one posting before you? That's kinda more than claiming. We don't really know for sure- Russia could have just as easily trained Russian nationals (militaristic thugs, there are a LOT of them in Russia) or trained Ukranian thugs for the past year. Give them some high tech guns, and boom there you go. Also as I said Yanukovich could have been behind this - w/ Russia's support of course. As to the guy who claimed to be a Russian officer (another video), maybe he was a former officer or just lieing? Obviously, Russians are deeply involved in this unrest but exactly which ones are Russians, which are military, is hard to tell. Maybe, Russia is being 'cautious' and no actual military members are involved. I need harder evidence to be convinced  Well, there is the famous "flag guy". Also, i said "militia", which is exactly what you're describing. Doesn't make it a protest, still.  edit, gna, fudge.. deleted that part - i said in a response to zeo "militia" and changed it to not engage into a longer discussion Show nested quote +I meant the part about it being actually members of Russian military in disguise.
While i agree that there so far is no undenyable proof, there's alot of evidence for that out there. I'd say it's more than considerable. These guys in the video definately had military training, even though they look clumsy. Recently. So if they're not russian military in disguise (might very well be), they definately don't act on their own. Don't know where you come from, but feel free to go into the next army store, buy 20 uniforms of russian standards, including assault rifles and radios. Let me know how it went. "What is happening is russian soldiers taking of the insignia of their uniforms and taking over government buildings". It's really hard to tell but I'm leaning towards it being Kremlin sponsored something. It's fucked up as hell what they're doing-- it might be even worse than an outright invasion. With an invasion, you at least admit to the world what you're doing. Here they can pretend to be innocent to pro-Russian idiots, and have their support, while still dividing Ukraine. Also, they are dividing and confusing the West. People know it's Russia, but they can't 100% prove it. Germany can say, but oh "we don't have any proof" while Poland is angry as hell because it's so obvious. Putin is such a brilliant manipulator. His KGB training server him well :/
|
On April 17 2014 00:57 Mc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2014 00:33 m4ini wrote:On April 17 2014 00:27 Mc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:19 m4ini wrote:On April 17 2014 00:16 mcc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:08 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:53 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 23:21 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:11 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 22:52 Simberto wrote: Irrelevant. Russia is the one starting a war and invading a country RIGHT NOW. Doesn't matter what others did in the past. Maybe you should be asking which countries funded the coup in Ukraine that started all this in the first place. Countries are allowed to have revolutions. Even if you don't like the result. So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to protest against the non-elected government in Kiev? So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to take government buildings by force and proclaim their independence from the government in Kiev just like the case was in western Ukraine not so long ago? If that were what is happening, yes. I would usually prefer a more peaceful solution (like voting in the elections that were set for may, or demonstrations). However, that is not what is happening. What is happening is russian soldiers taking of the insignia of their uniforms and taking over government buildings. Which is an invasion and not a revolution. A popular revolution is usually something that does not only involve heavily armed young men in camouflage uniforms. That is actually your unsupported claim. How about you watch that video posted just one posting before you? That's kinda more than claiming. We don't really know for sure- Russia could have just as easily trained Russian nationals (militaristic thugs, there are a LOT of them in Russia) or trained Ukranian thugs for the past year. Give them some high tech guns, and boom there you go. Also as I said Yanukovich could have been behind this - w/ Russia's support of course. As to the guy who claimed to be a Russian officer (another video), maybe he was a former officer or just lieing? Obviously, Russians are deeply involved in this unrest but exactly which ones are Russians, which are military, is hard to tell. Maybe, Russia is being 'cautious' and no actual military members are involved. I need harder evidence to be convinced  Well, there is the famous "flag guy". Also, i said "militia", which is exactly what you're describing. Doesn't make it a protest, still.  edit, gna, fudge.. deleted that part - i said in a response to zeo "militia" and changed it to not engage into a longer discussion I meant the part about it being actually members of Russian military in disguise.
While i agree that there so far is no undenyable proof, there's alot of evidence for that out there. I'd say it's more than considerable. These guys in the video definately had military training, even though they look clumsy. Recently. So if they're not russian military in disguise (might very well be), they definately don't act on their own. Don't know where you come from, but feel free to go into the next army store, buy 20 uniforms of russian standards, including assault rifles and radios. Let me know how it went. "What is happening is russian soldiers taking of the insignia of their uniforms and taking over government buildings". It's really hard to tell but I'm leaning towards it being Kremlin sponsored something. It's fucked up as hell what they're doing-- it might be even worse than an outright invasion. With an invasion, you at least admit to the world what you're doing. Here they can pretend to be innocent to pro-Russian idiots, and have their support, while still dividing Ukraine. Also, they are dividing and confusing the West. People know it's Russia, but they can't 100% prove it. Germany can say, but oh "we don't have any proof" while Poland is angry as hell because it's so obvious. Putin is such a brilliant manipulator. His KGB training server him well :/
My position/opinion is kinda clear, i'm pretty convinced that it's not ukrainians on their own.
That's btw why a UN resolution (even though it would get vetoed, obviously) for a peacekeeping mission would be good. If russia vetos a resolution that basically does what they're claiming to do - just without their propagandamachine in between somewhere, not even Merkel could turn a blind eye to that.
|
On April 17 2014 00:33 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2014 00:27 Mc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:19 m4ini wrote:On April 17 2014 00:16 mcc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:08 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:53 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 23:21 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:11 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 22:52 Simberto wrote: Irrelevant. Russia is the one starting a war and invading a country RIGHT NOW. Doesn't matter what others did in the past. Maybe you should be asking which countries funded the coup in Ukraine that started all this in the first place. Countries are allowed to have revolutions. Even if you don't like the result. So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to protest against the non-elected government in Kiev? So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to take government buildings by force and proclaim their independence from the government in Kiev just like the case was in western Ukraine not so long ago? If that were what is happening, yes. I would usually prefer a more peaceful solution (like voting in the elections that were set for may, or demonstrations). However, that is not what is happening. What is happening is russian soldiers taking of the insignia of their uniforms and taking over government buildings. Which is an invasion and not a revolution. A popular revolution is usually something that does not only involve heavily armed young men in camouflage uniforms. That is actually your unsupported claim. How about you watch that video posted just one posting before you? That's kinda more than claiming. We don't really know for sure- Russia could have just as easily trained Russian nationals (militaristic thugs, there are a LOT of them in Russia) or trained Ukranian thugs for the past year. Give them some high tech guns, and boom there you go. Also as I said Yanukovich could have been behind this - w/ Russia's support of course. As to the guy who claimed to be a Russian officer (another video), maybe he was a former officer or just lieing? Obviously, Russians are deeply involved in this unrest but exactly which ones are Russians, which are military, is hard to tell. Maybe, Russia is being 'cautious' and no actual military members are involved. I need harder evidence to be convinced  Well, there is the famous "flag guy". Also, i said "militia", which is exactly what you're describing. Doesn't make it a protest, still.  edit, gna, fudge.. deleted that part - i said in a response to zeo "militia" and changed it to not engage into a longer discussion - my bad, you're right. Show nested quote +I meant the part about it being actually members of Russian military in disguise.
While i agree that there so far is no undenyable proof, there's alot of evidence for that out there. I'd say it's more than considerable. These guys in the video definately had military training, even though they look clumsy. Recently. So if they're not russian military in disguise (might very well be), they definately don't act on their own. Don't know where you come from, but feel free to go into the next army store, buy 20 uniforms of russian standards, including assault rifles and radios. Let me know how it went. I did not claim that they do not have Russian support and/or training, I actually said the opposite. I am saying that there is no evidence that they are part of Russian military.
|
|
|
On April 17 2014 01:01 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +On April 17 2014 00:57 Mc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:33 m4ini wrote:On April 17 2014 00:27 Mc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:19 m4ini wrote:On April 17 2014 00:16 mcc wrote:On April 17 2014 00:08 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:53 zeo wrote:On April 16 2014 23:21 Simberto wrote:On April 16 2014 23:11 zeo wrote: [quote] Maybe you should be asking which countries funded the coup in Ukraine that started all this in the first place. Countries are allowed to have revolutions. Even if you don't like the result. So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to protest against the non-elected government in Kiev? So the population in Eastern Ukraine is allowed to take government buildings by force and proclaim their independence from the government in Kiev just like the case was in western Ukraine not so long ago? If that were what is happening, yes. I would usually prefer a more peaceful solution (like voting in the elections that were set for may, or demonstrations). However, that is not what is happening. What is happening is russian soldiers taking of the insignia of their uniforms and taking over government buildings. Which is an invasion and not a revolution. A popular revolution is usually something that does not only involve heavily armed young men in camouflage uniforms. That is actually your unsupported claim. How about you watch that video posted just one posting before you? That's kinda more than claiming. We don't really know for sure- Russia could have just as easily trained Russian nationals (militaristic thugs, there are a LOT of them in Russia) or trained Ukranian thugs for the past year. Give them some high tech guns, and boom there you go. Also as I said Yanukovich could have been behind this - w/ Russia's support of course. As to the guy who claimed to be a Russian officer (another video), maybe he was a former officer or just lieing? Obviously, Russians are deeply involved in this unrest but exactly which ones are Russians, which are military, is hard to tell. Maybe, Russia is being 'cautious' and no actual military members are involved. I need harder evidence to be convinced  Well, there is the famous "flag guy". Also, i said "militia", which is exactly what you're describing. Doesn't make it a protest, still.  edit, gna, fudge.. deleted that part - i said in a response to zeo "militia" and changed it to not engage into a longer discussion I meant the part about it being actually members of Russian military in disguise.
While i agree that there so far is no undenyable proof, there's alot of evidence for that out there. I'd say it's more than considerable. These guys in the video definately had military training, even though they look clumsy. Recently. So if they're not russian military in disguise (might very well be), they definately don't act on their own. Don't know where you come from, but feel free to go into the next army store, buy 20 uniforms of russian standards, including assault rifles and radios. Let me know how it went. "What is happening is russian soldiers taking of the insignia of their uniforms and taking over government buildings". It's really hard to tell but I'm leaning towards it being Kremlin sponsored something. It's fucked up as hell what they're doing-- it might be even worse than an outright invasion. With an invasion, you at least admit to the world what you're doing. Here they can pretend to be innocent to pro-Russian idiots, and have their support, while still dividing Ukraine. Also, they are dividing and confusing the West. People know it's Russia, but they can't 100% prove it. Germany can say, but oh "we don't have any proof" while Poland is angry as hell because it's so obvious. Putin is such a brilliant manipulator. His KGB training server him well :/ My position/opinion is kinda clear, i'm pretty convinced that it's not ukrainians on their own. That's btw why a UN resolution (even though it would get vetoed, obviously) for a peacekeeping mission would be good. If russia vetos a resolution that basically does what they're claiming to do - just without their propagandamachine in between somewhere, not even Merkel could turn a blind eye to that. Well I was just nitpicking on the fact that you mentioned "military" once, but you already explained that you're not sure and if it's not military then it's basically militia. I agree with you here. I think we in general agree on everything except some 'minor' details. Yeah UN resolution for peacekeepers would be great (just for sake of Russia vetoing it), I don't know why it hasn't happened yet.
|
Well it was only a day ago that Kiev requested peacekeepers, things don't move that fast in the UN. If there is going to be a vote on it in the SC to embarrass Russia by forcing it to veto that probably won't happen until the middle of next week at the earliest.
|
It was absolutely clear this shenanigan was planned by Russia the moment separatists have entered an opera house instead of local town hall. I also heard today that a call between Russian generals and separatists has been detected, so there you go.
|
On April 17 2014 02:07 darkness wrote: It was absolutely clear this shenanigan was planned by Russia the moment separatists have entered an opera house instead of local town hall. I also heard today that a call between Russian generals and separatists has been detected, so there you go.
It was absolutely clear this shenanigan was planned by Russia the moment separatists have entered an opera house instead of local town hall.
Out of tens of thousands protesting, a tiny group of about 100 people entered the opera house thinking it was a government building. I am sure if you poll people in your city, you'll find some that have no idea where the government buildings are in your city.
I also heard today that a call between Russian generals and separatists has been detected, so there you go.
It was a call between separatists and someone who had a Russian number, nothing else is known as far as I know.
|
I don't think Russia really needed to send troops or incite riots to make the E. Ukraine crisis what it is - the anti-fascist sentiment is pretty strong in East Ukraine. It's more likely that Russia simply put in a token effort to support the anti-govt protesters and they feel more comfortable protesting when they know the Russian army is in position to help them if things get particularly bloody.
|
The real question will be whether Russia will once again not show up.
***
This mirrors the language of the EU meeting. Everybody is waiting for a miracle from tomorrow's 4-way negotiations.
|
***
UN Human Rights report on Ukraine is avaliable here.
Excerpt:
Excessive use of force by the Berkut special police and other security forces led to the radicalisation of the protest movement, the report found. “Violations related to the Maidan protests should be investigated and addressed in order to ensure accountability of perpetrators,” the report states.
Information gathered so far indicates that 121 people were killed in violence between December 2013 and February 2014. Most acts of severe beatings, torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment were reportedly attributed to the Berkut.
The political aspects of recent developments in Crimea, which Mr Šimonović visited on 21 and 22 March, are beyond the report’s scope. However, the report notes that the situation created before and after the referendum of 16 March, which the General Assembly concluded had “no validity”, raised a number of human rights concerns pertaining to freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and other civil and political rights.
The presence of paramilitary and so-called self-defence groups as well as soldiers without insignia, was not conducive to an environment in which the will of voters could be exercised freely, and the UN Human Rights’ Office delegation received many reports of vote rigging.
“A number of measures taken in Crimea are deeply concerning from a human rights perspective,” the report says. These include the introduction of Russian citizenship, making it difficult for those who opt to maintain their Ukrainian citizenship to stay in Crimea. “The current situation also raises concerns with regard to land and property ownership, wages and pensions, health service, labour rights, education and access to justice,” the report adds.
The authorities in Crimea should also publicly condemn all attacks or harassment against human rights defenders, journalists or any members of the political opposition, the report urges, and ensure full accountability for such acts, through prompt, impartial and effective investigations and prosecutions.
It is widely assessed that while there were some attacks against the ethnic Russian community, these were neither systematic nor widespread. There are also allegations that some participants in the protests and clashes in eastern Ukraine were not from the region, and that some had come from the Russian Federation.
|
Christ, Obama may have a limper dick than Neville Chamberlain.
I get that no one wants to go to war over the Ukraine (and neither do I), but at a minimum, Obama needs to come out and signal unequivocally that NATO and the US will use military force if Russia tries any of this bullshit in the Baltic states or anywhere else that is under NATO protection. It's time for him to actually lead on something.
|
Listening to the Russian ambassador say that the Tatars are really happy about Crimea joining Russia really should remind everyone exactly how full of shit he is. They boycotted the referendum, not to mention that as soon as the Russians invaded they started marking the homes and places of business of Tatars and some were burned down. Oh and then there were Tatars who were being kidnapped off the streets and tortured to death.
Russia says one thing at the UN, but at the same time their government puts together declarations of the greatness and superiority of the orthodox people of Russia.
|
On April 17 2014 03:22 LegalLord wrote: I don't think Russia really needed to send troops or incite riots to make the E. Ukraine crisis what it is - the anti-fascist sentiment is pretty strong in East Ukraine. It's more likely that Russia simply put in a token effort to support the anti-govt protesters and they feel more comfortable protesting when they know the Russian army is in position to help them if things get particularly bloody. Ya. The complete lack of violence the last 2 weeks were just an illusion while well coordinated units of identically armed men just happened to decide to start taking over police stations right before the 4 way talks.
|
Is cute how the russian dude is trying to tell the UN council that they're naive.
edit: is it just me or is there a buzzing sound in the background, like a laptop fan or smth?
|
|
|
Russia is full of shit, that is obvious. But what they are doing in terms of international talk is way beyond hypocrisy, it's just unreal. I hope that they will get what they deserve someday, once again.
|
On April 17 2014 07:58 Itachii wrote: Russia is full of shit, that is obvious. But what they are doing in terms of international talk is way beyond hypocrisy, it's just unreal. I hope that they will get what they deserve someday, once again. They'll get to suffer like the ukrainians when they want to get rid of their own dictator. It's eventually going to happen again anyway. They'll even have the same guys that beat shit of out the ukrainians because all the berkut guys now make incredibly loyal putin puppets.
|
|
|
|
|
|