On March 15 2014 08:07 zeo wrote: Euromaidan PR is hardly a non-biased source, as for these Prosvita fellows wikipedia says they are some sort of Rusophile organization from Lviv.
So based on that we agree that basically every statement of rt.com has to be disregarded until further investigation, correct?
To be completely fair, RT was always considered as pro-government source. But it seems, they're trying to be better.
If anything, they have shown their true colours in the past few weeks.
On March 15 2014 08:07 zeo wrote: Euromaidan PR is hardly a non-biased source, as for these Prosvita fellows wikipedia says they are some sort of Rusophile organization from Lviv.
So based on that we agree that basically every statement of rt.com has to be disregarded until further investigation, correct?
And every statement that is not from RT should also be disregarded, yes, both should be disregarded.
A very accurate definition of absurdity: you end up with the empty set. This also explains your inferences.
On March 15 2014 08:07 zeo wrote: Euromaidan PR is hardly a non-biased source, as for these Prosvita fellows wikipedia says they are some sort of Rusophile organization from Lviv.
So based on that we agree that basically every statement of rt.com has to be disregarded until further investigation, correct?
And every statement that is not from RT should also be disregarded, yes, both should be disregarded.
A very accurate definition of absurdity: you end up with the empty set. This also explains your inferences.
Maybe i misunderstand, point was to disregard rt.com as well as Euromaidan PR (fair point, i might add). I'm not entirely sure what you mean with absurdity.
That's pic from VK's community it seems. Misanthropic division is part of Right Sector to clarify.
So the Right sector poster is saying looks like we got two of them, everyone ok on our side. Am I reading this right?
Right.
On March 15 2014 08:17 m4ini wrote:
On March 15 2014 08:07 zeo wrote: Euromaidan PR is hardly a non-biased source, as for these Prosvita fellows wikipedia says they are some sort of Rusophile organization from Lviv.
So based on that we agree that basically every statement of rt.com has to be disregarded until further investigation, correct?
To be completely fair, RT was always considered as pro-government source. But it seems, they're trying to be better.
If anything, they have shown their true colours in the past few weeks.
I promise, they're closer to reality than it is when they write about domestic stuff :D
On March 15 2014 08:07 zeo wrote: Euromaidan PR is hardly a non-biased source, as for these Prosvita fellows wikipedia says they are some sort of Rusophile organization from Lviv.
So based on that we agree that basically every statement of rt.com has to be disregarded until further investigation, correct?
And every statement that is not from RT should also be disregarded, yes, both should be disregarded.
A very accurate definition of absurdity: you end up with the empty set. This also explains your inferences.
Maybe i misunderstand, point was to disregard rt.com as well as Euromaidan PR (fair point, i might add). I'm not entirely sure what you mean with absurdity.
The definition of absurdity in logic is a situation which no state of affairs supports; the classical example is `A and Not-A'. If A holds, no state can be a Not-A-state. And if Not-A holds, no state can be an A-state. If you look at the set of remaining states, you'll find it empty. But an empty state supports every sentence, which is why it is absurd. I won't explain why this is the case technically, but it's not intuitively wrong: if the world is absurd, it's fine to say `pigs fly' or `white is black'. No matter what you say holds, because nothing actually holds in an absurd state of affairs. What I then meant by the `inferences' comment is that if Zeo's mental state is `disregard A and disregard not-A' i.e., disregard everything, then he can make any inference he wants.
P.S. I posted Euromaidan PR just to spite Zeo once he started bitching about bias again, despite being the most biased person in this thread. I would generally post that stuff.
That's pic from VK's community it seems. Misanthropic division is part of Right Sector to clarify.
So the Right sector poster is saying looks like we got two of them, everyone ok on our side. Am I reading this right?
Right.
On March 15 2014 08:17 m4ini wrote:
On March 15 2014 08:07 zeo wrote: Euromaidan PR is hardly a non-biased source, as for these Prosvita fellows wikipedia says they are some sort of Rusophile organization from Lviv.
So based on that we agree that basically every statement of rt.com has to be disregarded until further investigation, correct?
To be completely fair, RT was always considered as pro-government source. But it seems, they're trying to be better.
If anything, they have shown their true colours in the past few weeks.
I promise, they're closer to reality than it is when they write about domestic stuff :D
About Harkiv. "Patriots of Ukraine" office was beseiged by "Oplot". Patriots of Ukraine are part of the Right Sector. Oplot was the major anti-Euromaidan organization in Kharkiv for like forever. It's based on a local MMA fight club.
The 2 killed people are believed to be police officers at the moment.
On March 15 2014 08:07 zeo wrote: Euromaidan PR is hardly a non-biased source, as for these Prosvita fellows wikipedia says they are some sort of Rusophile organization from Lviv.
So based on that we agree that basically every statement of rt.com has to be disregarded until further investigation, correct?
And every statement that is not from RT should also be disregarded, yes, both should be disregarded.
A very accurate definition of absurdity: you end up with the empty set. This also explains your inferences.
Maybe i misunderstand, point was to disregard rt.com as well as Euromaidan PR (fair point, i might add). I'm not entirely sure what you mean with absurdity.
The definition of absurdity in logic is a situation which no state of affairs supports; the classical example is `A and Not-A'. If A holds, no state can be a Not-A-state. And if Not-A holds, no state can be an A-state. If you look at the set of remaining states, you'll find it empty. But an empty state supports every sentence, which is why it is absurd. I won't explain why this is the case technically, but it's not intuitively wrong: if the world is absurd, it's fine to say `pigs fly' or `white is black'. No matter what you say holds, because nothing actually holds in an absurd state of affairs. What I then meant by the `inferences' comment is that if Zeo's mental state is `disregard A and disregard not-A' i.e., disregard everything, then he can make any inference he wants.
P.S. I posted Euromaidan PR just to spite Zeo once he started bitching about bias again, despite being the most biased person in this thread. I would generally post that stuff.
That's pic from VK's community it seems. Misanthropic division is part of Right Sector to clarify.
So the Right sector poster is saying looks like we got two of them, everyone ok on our side. Am I reading this right?
Right.
On March 15 2014 08:17 m4ini wrote:
On March 15 2014 08:07 zeo wrote: Euromaidan PR is hardly a non-biased source, as for these Prosvita fellows wikipedia says they are some sort of Rusophile organization from Lviv.
So based on that we agree that basically every statement of rt.com has to be disregarded until further investigation, correct?
To be completely fair, RT was always considered as pro-government source. But it seems, they're trying to be better.
If anything, they have shown their true colours in the past few weeks.
I promise, they're closer to reality than it is when they write about domestic stuff :D
Oh god.
Remove evidence from the equation and left is the core religious politics where everything is free for interpretation and everything can be used to support whatever opinion is used in the trenches. It is the perfect environment for propaganda and speculation. As long as nothing goes against anything, everything goes, as you said. It is not non-sense but a terrifying prospect that logic would not be seen as more important than worldview, but it is hardly anything original. Religion and certain ideologies (among them fascism!) has a strict moral code with the ability to superseed logic among some peple.
In this case, I think it is more of a typical internet-thing: Never weaken your narrative! As absurd as his statements may seem, he has been pretty consistent in that area.
On March 15 2014 06:31 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Yeah man, you got to hate those ethnically different people living in their homeland with their free money, yet decide to move to cities as migrant workers living in horrible conditions in the same country. Can't have that! Don't come or else there will be problems.
It was so bad that i almost laughed.
They're ethnically different? Yes, i have nothing against it. They live in their homeland? Yes, i have nothing against it. With their free money? There is a common joke in Russia when we're speaking about regions who're getting 100% donated from budget. Once after Terek's game in RFPL (club from Grozny, capital of Chechnya republic), journalist asked Ramzan Kadyrov (president of Chechnya and Terek as well) about where are they getting money from. You know what did Ramzan answer? "Allah gives money to us".
No, you don't understand. Big amount of those Chechens/Northern Caucasian guys who cause chaos in Moscow and St.Petersburg (there's way less) are kids of senior officials who thinks that they're kings of this land and because of it they can say "fuck the rules i will do like i want". But migrant workers are here as well, and i'm not sure about horrible conditions and do they really care about it because there is law about amount of possible prescribed residents in one flat and it's definitely not 40-50 as much as i know our laws.
I always thought that it's reasonable advice. If you come to work, you at least can understand language and you're peaceful guy, then it's one case.
On this part, i'm with you. Immigration without integration is a stupid thing. And yes, that's a big political problem in germany as well, i suppose it is everywhere. I wouldn't say we don't like "alot of migrants", we just don't like the leeches, as you do, as far as i understood you.
Thank God, someone can understand it and not call me as xenophobic cunt. I'm scared what could happen if it wasn't thread about Ukraine but about something like gay rights lol.
yes but you didn't answer my question.. why do russians think of them as "wild animals" ?
On March 15 2014 06:31 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Yeah man, you got to hate those ethnically different people living in their homeland with their free money, yet decide to move to cities as migrant workers living in horrible conditions in the same country. Can't have that! Don't come or else there will be problems.
It was so bad that i almost laughed.
They're ethnically different? Yes, i have nothing against it. They live in their homeland? Yes, i have nothing against it. With their free money? There is a common joke in Russia when we're speaking about regions who're getting 100% donated from budget. Once after Terek's game in RFPL (club from Grozny, capital of Chechnya republic), journalist asked Ramzan Kadyrov (president of Chechnya and Terek as well) about where are they getting money from. You know what did Ramzan answer? "Allah gives money to us".
No, you don't understand. Big amount of those Chechens/Northern Caucasian guys who cause chaos in Moscow and St.Petersburg (there's way less) are kids of senior officials who thinks that they're kings of this land and because of it they can say "fuck the rules i will do like i want". But migrant workers are here as well, and i'm not sure about horrible conditions and do they really care about it because there is law about amount of possible prescribed residents in one flat and it's definitely not 40-50 as much as i know our laws.
On March 15 2014 06:27 m4ini wrote:
I always thought that it's reasonable advice. If you come to work, you at least can understand language and you're peaceful guy, then it's one case.
On this part, i'm with you. Immigration without integration is a stupid thing. And yes, that's a big political problem in germany as well, i suppose it is everywhere. I wouldn't say we don't like "alot of migrants", we just don't like the leeches, as you do, as far as i understood you.
Thank God, someone can understand it and not call me as xenophobic cunt. I'm scared what could happen if it wasn't thread about Ukraine but about something like gay rights lol.
yes but you didn't answer my question.. why do russians think of them as "wild animals" ?
Not about all. There are a lot of guys in those republics who are good dudes but they're just overshadowed by those as you said "wild animals" who they despise. Some guys from those republics (to be completely fair there are a lot of migrants from Middle Asia as well) don't have any clue how to live in social environment. Classic example of this - they're usually very loud. But if you try to tell them that they're loud - OH BOY + Show Spoiler +
, better for you to be either strong (even if sometimes they have knifes or even pistols but that's rare) and hope that there aren't a lot of his broskies or at least have more friends behind you than he has. Chance that he will understand you and be less loud is very little. And of course, fucking classic example - they think that they can dance their national dance everywhere. In railway stations, on the streets, in metropoliten - everywhere. And just try to stop them lol.
Let's continue on it. Usually you will think that they're very religious as majority of Muslims. NAH DUDE. Even if they have absolutely no clue about Koran/Islam, you can be sure that if you occassionally said something about religion, you will have problems. And that's main case. Those guys can't solve problems with brains. Only brutal strength, even if they're not fit, only fights. + There were a lot of murders/rapes in past few years which were done by those guys, so because of it there are a lot of dudes nowdays who goes to gym 3-4 times per week. It won't help if Caucasian with knife/pistol doesn't like you but at least you can go for a walk with girlfriend without feeling weird.
Also everything is getting exaggerated by Ramzan Kadyrov who basically has to defend his diaspora which was almost destroyed by fans in 2010 if not government there srsly could be genocide after Caucasians killed Spartak Moscow's fan. For example he said that people in Moscow should stop saying that they can't dance on streets because they're not claiming that Moscow's women citizens have to wear veils and guys can't kiss girls because Sharia laws say that it's unacceptable. + They're still not speaking at least mediocre Russian and their kids are getting into Moscow's elite universities with 310 points from 300 available. That's fucking ridiculous because 95% of those kids are getting dropped from 1st semester if not money of their parents and diasporas.
To clarify - i think that every guy, idc what nation/religion is he, who rapes someone, murders or something like that is animal. He's not a human. I hope, you got a general idea.
It is the autobiography of an old school Chechen-Soviet who left his high-paying plastic-surgery career and became a war surgeon during both Russian-Chechen wars. Through this book, you will get to understand Russia, Chechnya and the muslim conflict in a new light.
Conclusions: What is playing out in Crimea and, potentially, in eastern Ukraine, is thus not just proof of Russian hegemonic ambition in post-Soviet Eurasia. It is also an expression of a genuine and serious change that is taking place at the core of Russian politics. Until now, Putin was a bare-knuckled and often confrontational geopolitical player, but -- even invading Georgia -- he retained a clear sense of just how far he could go. Indeed, this was his genius, to know when to play the game and when to break the rules. But Putin today is increasingly a caricature of Putin in his first two terms. He is listening to fewer dissenting voices, allowing less informed discussion of policy options, deliberately narrowing his circle of counselors. Perhaps feeling the chill touch of political, if not physical mortality, he appears not just unwilling but unable to seem to be backing down from a fight, more concerned with short-term bravado than long-term implications. Source.
Reminds me of when they accused President Ilves of lying via twitter.
***
Merkel on Russian counter-sanctions:
German chancellor Merkel, in the context of possible economic retaliation by Russia to putative sanctions, Tuesday said that while German-Russia trade relations are worth €76bn, German-Czech trade is €60bn.“There is a dimension there, but not to such an extent that it would have an impact on Germany’s entire economic engagement." Source.
I always thought that it's reasonable advice. If you come to work, you at least can understand language and you're peaceful guy, then it's one case.
On this part, i'm with you. Immigration without integration is a stupid thing. And yes, that's a big political problem in germany as well, i suppose it is everywhere. I wouldn't say we don't like "alot of migrants", we just don't like the leeches, as you do, as far as i understood you.
Thank God, someone can understand it and not call me as xenophobic cunt. I'm scared what could happen if it wasn't thread about Ukraine but about something like gay rights lol.
Here is the thing. It is not about integration. You don't want inmigrants to integrate from an economic perspective. You want them to come work and leave back to their countries due to homesick. Problems arise when they do not come back and you had failed to integrate those inmigrants because you wanted them temporarily.
Conclusions: What is playing out in Crimea and, potentially, in eastern Ukraine, is thus not just proof of Russian hegemonic ambition in post-Soviet Eurasia. It is also an expression of a genuine and serious change that is taking place at the core of Russian politics. Until now, Putin was a bare-knuckled and often confrontational geopolitical player, but -- even invading Georgia -- he retained a clear sense of just how far he could go. Indeed, this was his genius, to know when to play the game and when to break the rules. But Putin today is increasingly a caricature of Putin in his first two terms. He is listening to fewer dissenting voices, allowing less informed discussion of policy options, deliberately narrowing his circle of counselors. Perhaps feeling the chill touch of political, if not physical mortality, he appears not just unwilling but unable to seem to be backing down from a fight, more concerned with short-term bravado than long-term implications.
I'm very skeptical of articles that try to psychoanalyze leaders. It seems little more than a distraction from rational analysis. Russia (not Putin) is using force because its vital interests are at stake and they feel there's no other way to protect them.
Despite the gas deals and the promised $15bn bailout of Ukraine Russia has little to offer compared to that loose conglomerate of US lead alliance that is anachronistically called 'the west'.
When the EU says that Russia has no veto over Ukraine's future they might as well declare that Russia has no say. There's no way Russia can compete in a 'fair' fight with an economic bloc ten times its size. From Russia's point of view this probably looks like 1990 again. They are being declared irrelevant on the international stage and told that the only way they can exercise some influence through US dominated international institutions.
I always thought that it's reasonable advice. If you come to work, you at least can understand language and you're peaceful guy, then it's one case.
On this part, i'm with you. Immigration without integration is a stupid thing. And yes, that's a big political problem in germany as well, i suppose it is everywhere. I wouldn't say we don't like "alot of migrants", we just don't like the leeches, as you do, as far as i understood you.
Thank God, someone can understand it and not call me as xenophobic cunt. I'm scared what could happen if it wasn't thread about Ukraine but about something like gay rights lol.
Here is the thing. It is not about integration. You don't want inmigrants to integrate from an economic perspective. You want them to come work and leave back to their countries due to homesick. Problems arise when they do not come back and you had failed to integrate those inmigrants because you wanted them temporarily.
So it's our fail? Not guys who can't integrate because they don't want to? Everyone could be glad if no immigrants were there because it would have opened enough work places for everyone to make unemployment = 0, that's the thing. If they can integrate noone is against it, it's not Nazi Germany with Aryan race. And cutest thing of this all.
>> leave back to their countries due to homesick. Nah, they just get citizenship after 5 years that's the thing. There is almost no reason for them to come back because of level of salaries. Thank God, since 2014 they will be forced to pass language exam, probably it will help integration be real.
integration is a bilateral process. Lower level salaries is more fault of the global economy than the Chechnya people. Whose fault is it that Chechnya is part of Russian Federation in the first place? Why do people from the same state have the need to be integrated?
Yes it is your country's fault and responsibility. These "migrants" you descirbe are people who live in the same country as you for crying out loud.
I can't believe that you are complaining that people whose land your country has claimed to have every right to control and do control militarilly, administratively and economically over are coming over to the capital city to work and live there.
The article says that Russia landed troops into the Donetsk province of Ukraine claiming they were securing a gas compressor site "from the possibility of terrorist attacks." The Ukrainian MFA demanded a withdrawal of Russian soldiers from Ukrainian territory.
Official statement in English by the Ukrainian government concerning the new activity by the Russian military:
Statement of the MFA of Ukraine with respect to assault landing of the Russian Armed Forces in the Kherson region on March 15
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine expresses its strong and categorical protest against the landing on March 15, 2014 near the village Strilkove, Kherson region of troops of the Russian Federation Armed Forces in a number of 80 military personnel, and seizure of the village Strilkove with the support of 4 helicopter gunships and 3 armored combat machines.
Ukraine Foreign Ministry declares the military invasion by Russia and demands the Russian side to immediately withdraw its military forces from the territory of Ukraine.
Ukraine reserves the right to use all necessary measures to stop the military invasion by Russia.
The article says that Russia landed troops into the Donetsk province of Ukraine claiming they were securing a gas compressor site "from the possibility of terrorist attacks." The Ukrainian MFA demanded a withdrawal of Russian soldiers from Ukrainian territory.