|
On September 30 2013 23:34 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:33 Musicus wrote:On September 30 2013 23:24 KwarK wrote:On September 30 2013 23:20 Musicus wrote: I can understand how this guy was acquitted, but this can under no circumtances mean that it's generally ok to masturbate in public. What if children are at the scene? It should only be allowed in areas where no children are allowed if anything. At all costs we must keep children from learning they have genitals. That needs to be our number one priority going into legislature. I don't know why you quoted me to express your opinion, but I don't agree with you. I think we need to educate children and be open about topics like this. But that has nothing to do with masturbating in public. Educate children about how masturbation is so shameful that if you do it where anyone could potentially see you're a criminal! Kwark if you're gonna strawman other people's opinions to ridiculous extremes, don't be too surprised when people start talking about how TL mods support sex education via money shot.
|
On September 30 2013 23:23 Dundron2000 wrote: this title is a bit misleading. he wasn't charged with a sex crime because there the prosecution could not prove he was directing his behavior toward someone in the vicinity. he will however probably be charged with "förargelseväckande beteende" which translates roughly as "outrageous public behavior." so keep your pants on, its not legal to masturbate publicly in Sweden, even if you aren't looking someone in the eyes while you're doing it.
Can a mod put this in OP? Or up top?
OP is quite misleading (which is likely due to the linked article).
|
United States42265 Posts
On September 30 2013 23:41 RockIronrod wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:34 KwarK wrote:On September 30 2013 23:33 Musicus wrote:On September 30 2013 23:24 KwarK wrote:On September 30 2013 23:20 Musicus wrote: I can understand how this guy was acquitted, but this can under no circumtances mean that it's generally ok to masturbate in public. What if children are at the scene? It should only be allowed in areas where no children are allowed if anything. At all costs we must keep children from learning they have genitals. That needs to be our number one priority going into legislature. I don't know why you quoted me to express your opinion, but I don't agree with you. I think we need to educate children and be open about topics like this. But that has nothing to do with masturbating in public. Educate children about how masturbation is so shameful that if you do it where anyone could potentially see you're a criminal! Kwark if you're gonna strawman other people's opinions to ridiculous extremes, don't be too surprised when people start talking about how TL mods support sex education via money shot. There are already laws covering that. What this ruling says is that masturbation isn't inherently criminal and I'm absolutely amazed that people are disputing that.
|
On September 30 2013 23:34 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:33 Musicus wrote:On September 30 2013 23:24 KwarK wrote:On September 30 2013 23:20 Musicus wrote: I can understand how this guy was acquitted, but this can under no circumtances mean that it's generally ok to masturbate in public. What if children are at the scene? It should only be allowed in areas where no children are allowed if anything. At all costs we must keep children from learning they have genitals. That needs to be our number one priority going into legislature. I don't know why you quoted me to express your opinion, but I don't agree with you. I think we need to educate children and be open about topics like this. But that has nothing to do with masturbating in public. Educate children about how masturbation is so shameful that if you do it where anyone could potentially see you're a criminal!
People must really hate having discussions with you. You just keep putting words in my mouth and I will not lower myself to this level. Let's stop right here. Have a nice day.
|
On September 30 2013 23:43 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:41 RockIronrod wrote:On September 30 2013 23:34 KwarK wrote:On September 30 2013 23:33 Musicus wrote:On September 30 2013 23:24 KwarK wrote:On September 30 2013 23:20 Musicus wrote: I can understand how this guy was acquitted, but this can under no circumtances mean that it's generally ok to masturbate in public. What if children are at the scene? It should only be allowed in areas where no children are allowed if anything. At all costs we must keep children from learning they have genitals. That needs to be our number one priority going into legislature. I don't know why you quoted me to express your opinion, but I don't agree with you. I think we need to educate children and be open about topics like this. But that has nothing to do with masturbating in public. Educate children about how masturbation is so shameful that if you do it where anyone could potentially see you're a criminal! Kwark if you're gonna strawman other people's opinions to ridiculous extremes, don't be too surprised when people start talking about how TL mods support sex education via money shot. There are already laws covering that. What this ruling says is that masturbation isn't inherently criminal and I'm absolutely amazed that people are disputing that. People are disputing the ability to do so in public in full view of other people, on the flawed notion that this ruling legalised it, mainly based on the idea that a dude jerking it in front of children is pretty fucked up.
|
United States42265 Posts
On September 30 2013 23:44 Musicus wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:34 KwarK wrote:On September 30 2013 23:33 Musicus wrote:On September 30 2013 23:24 KwarK wrote:On September 30 2013 23:20 Musicus wrote: I can understand how this guy was acquitted, but this can under no circumtances mean that it's generally ok to masturbate in public. What if children are at the scene? It should only be allowed in areas where no children are allowed if anything. At all costs we must keep children from learning they have genitals. That needs to be our number one priority going into legislature. I don't know why you quoted me to express your opinion, but I don't agree with you. I think we need to educate children and be open about topics like this. But that has nothing to do with masturbating in public. Educate children about how masturbation is so shameful that if you do it where anyone could potentially see you're a criminal! People must really hate having discussions. You just keep putting words in my mouth and I will not lower myself to this level. Let's stop right here. Have a nice day. You are arguing that there needs to be a law against masturbation in public because a child could passively see it (passively because if the child is intended to see it then it's covered by the law) and you think something bad will come of the child seeing it. You didn't make it clear what bad thing you thought would happen if they learned that sometimes people rub their genitals so I made a guess, maybe you should clear that up. What bad thing do you think will happen if a child sees someone masturbating?
|
On September 30 2013 23:40 TheRealArtemis wrote: Urgh. I feel sometimes societies goes in the wrong direction.
To me there is a difference between learning about sex, enjoying sex, and then jacking off/having sex in the wild. What the f*** is the need for it?
So next time I'm in Sweden and I decide to take a walk in Sweden's beautiful nature, I can perhaps expect to see some person moaning in the woods masturbating furiously. Well that's great. Im happy to see the majority of people here think its a tad too much.
What is wrong with seeing a person masturbate?
That there are people that think having sex in the wild is weird, is just mindboogling to me. We did it for thousands of years and a lot of people still do it, and all other animals do it.
Todays society keeps making sex out to be some weird shameful thing and its causing guys and girls in particular to have a very bad relation to masturbating and their body, which can cause a lot of problems throughout a persons life.
If we let children grow up with masturbating being a completely ok thing to do, then we would have a much healthier generation, instead of the plethora of issues teenagers end up having today.
|
On September 30 2013 23:40 TheRealArtemis wrote:Urgh. I feel sometimes societies goes in the wrong direction. To me there is a difference between learning about sex, enjoying sex, and then jacking off/having sex in the wild. What the f*** is the need for it? So next time I'm in Sweden and I decide to take a walk in Sweden's beautiful nature, I can perhaps expect to see some person moaning in the woods masturbating furiously. Well that's great. Im happy to see the majority of people here think its a tad too much. Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:25 NTTemplar wrote:On September 30 2013 23:16 Pandemona wrote: Holy smokes. That is absolutely mind boggling. Sweden why you so silly sometimes "/
Just think about it as a parent, from their perspective. There young daughters ranging from 6-16 walking alone the riverbanks with there friends or whatever and seeing men masturbating (or females) it would scare them for life! Especially if the older generation where the most prolific people to do this. Can't see this doing nothing but harm Sweden's image >.< Why would seeing a man masturbate scare a young girl for life? That makes no sense to me, if that was the case I am pretty sure mankind would have died by now. You don't think it could be harmful for a child to see that? The child could believe that he or she was about to get raped. I would call that a traumatic experience. Children generally don't even understand the concept of rape. Untill they get "the sex talk" or learn about it from other sources sexuality isn't even something that's on their mind. After said sex talk or learning about it from other sources they will know masturbation is a perfectly normal form of release and doesn't do any harm whatsoever.
I wouldn't want to watch it myself, but the notion that it might traumatize children is retarded beyond words.
|
If you see a guy through his window masterbating, this is voyeurism and you can be charged. If a guy masterbate in the street and "forces you" (in a sens) to watch, it's public nudity and it's charged.
So basicly if i understand right, people are talking about removing the charging for people that masturbate in the street ?
|
Aight we're getting into the morality of jerking it in front of kids, I'm out.
|
Scared to go to Sweden x-x It would be really disturbing to have someone try to do that nearby, especially if I was with someone like my younger sister ... I don't get how they can think this is OK. Sweden going a bit overboard with all the freedom stuff in my opinion.
|
I fail to see the problem with this. Sexuality is part of our nature.
|
On September 30 2013 23:40 TheRealArtemis wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:25 NTTemplar wrote: Why would seeing a man masturbate scare a young girl for life? That makes no sense to me, if that was the case I am pretty sure mankind would have died by now. You don't think it could be harmful for a child to see that? The child could believe that he or she was about to get raped. I would call that a traumatic experience.
No I really don't think that would be harmful, seeing a person masturbating and thinking they will be raped? no I really doubt any child would think that, a child isn't thinking they will be raped before they are actually being raped, if they were able to think that, they would be able to distinquish between a person assaulting you and a person just masturbating by themselves.
I however think it is very harmful for a child to see anyone masturbating being punished, putting it in their mind that if they ever do that then they will be punished, so it is a bad bad thing to do.
|
On September 30 2013 23:47 NTTemplar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:40 TheRealArtemis wrote: Urgh. I feel sometimes societies goes in the wrong direction.
To me there is a difference between learning about sex, enjoying sex, and then jacking off/having sex in the wild. What the f*** is the need for it?
So next time I'm in Sweden and I decide to take a walk in Sweden's beautiful nature, I can perhaps expect to see some person moaning in the woods masturbating furiously. Well that's great. Im happy to see the majority of people here think its a tad too much. What is wrong with seeing a person masturbate? That there are people that think having sex in the wild is weird, is just mindboogling to me. We did it for thousands of years and a lot of people still do it, and all other animals do it. Todays society keeps making sex out to be some weird shameful thing and its causing guys and girls in particular to have a very bad relation to masturbating and their body, which can cause a lot of problems throughout a persons life. If we let children grow up with masturbating being a completely ok thing to do, then we would have a much healthier generation, instead of the plethora of issues teenagers end up having today.
What...If anything todays society does the exact opposite. More and more shows are about sex. About public sex on tv, and about learning how to pleasure your partner. The latest show I heard about from the UK (I believe?) is going to be about couples having sex in a big box in the studio, that is sound proof, and you cant look in. then when they are done, they come out and talk about it.
So I don't see where our society says sex is a bad thing. And I personally never said sex was bad. I just find it ridicules that now we cant be anywhere, even in nature, without seeing some 65 old man, janking his dick. I don't want/wish to see another person masturbate. I find it gross if I would ever find such a person while im out walking my dog. Its disturbing.
|
United States42265 Posts
On September 30 2013 23:51 FFW_Rude wrote: If you see a guy through his window masterbating, this is voyeurism and you can be charged. If a guy masterbate in the street and "forces you" (in a sens) to watch, it's public nudity and it's charged.
So basicly if i understand right, people are talking about removing the charging for people that masturbate in the street ? If you're doing it because you get off on people watching you it's still illegal because you're involving them. If you're just doing your own thing, not involving anyone, not harming anyone, who the fuck cares. Now I'm reasonably sure everyone deciding to do it on a street would be the first category but also that most people masturbating or fucking their girlfriends outside are the second category. There is no reason to make a blanket law against the acts themselves when you can distinguish between them.
|
|
United States42265 Posts
On September 30 2013 23:55 TheRealArtemis wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:47 NTTemplar wrote:On September 30 2013 23:40 TheRealArtemis wrote: Urgh. I feel sometimes societies goes in the wrong direction.
To me there is a difference between learning about sex, enjoying sex, and then jacking off/having sex in the wild. What the f*** is the need for it?
So next time I'm in Sweden and I decide to take a walk in Sweden's beautiful nature, I can perhaps expect to see some person moaning in the woods masturbating furiously. Well that's great. Im happy to see the majority of people here think its a tad too much. What is wrong with seeing a person masturbate? That there are people that think having sex in the wild is weird, is just mindboogling to me. We did it for thousands of years and a lot of people still do it, and all other animals do it. Todays society keeps making sex out to be some weird shameful thing and its causing guys and girls in particular to have a very bad relation to masturbating and their body, which can cause a lot of problems throughout a persons life. If we let children grow up with masturbating being a completely ok thing to do, then we would have a much healthier generation, instead of the plethora of issues teenagers end up having today. What...If anything todays society does the exact opposite. More and more shows are about sex. About public sex on tv, and about learning how to pleasure your partner. The latest show I heard about from the UK (I believe?) is going to be about couples having sex in a big box in the studio, that is sound proof, and you cant look in. then when they are done, they come out and talk about it. So I don't see where our society says sex is a bad thing. And I personally never said sex was bad. I just find it ridicules that now we cant be anywhere, even in nature, without seeing some 65 old man, janking his dick. I don't want/wish to see another person masturbate. I find it gross if I would ever find such a person while im out walking my dog. Its disturbing. Seeing someone jacking off and not involving them in any way, just enjoying their body, ought not to do anything to harm a child's sexual development while all those tv shows probably do because they impart value judgements about their material.
Ultimately it comes down to you thinking you have more right to walk your dog than another guy does to touch his dick in the same space. He's happy co-existing but you're not.
|
On September 30 2013 23:55 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:51 FFW_Rude wrote: If you see a guy through his window masterbating, this is voyeurism and you can be charged. If a guy masterbate in the street and "forces you" (in a sens) to watch, it's public nudity and it's charged.
So basicly if i understand right, people are talking about removing the charging for people that masturbate in the street ? If you're doing it because you get off on people watching you it's still illegal because you're involving them. If you're just doing your own thing, not involving anyone, not harming anyone, who the fuck cares. Now I'm reasonably sure everyone deciding to do it on a street would be the first category but also that most people masturbating or fucking their girlfriends outside are the second category. There is no reason to make a blanket law against the acts themselves when you can distinguish between them.
So if you do your own thing by a tree and i stumble accross you. It's fine ? Because i was involved at the time because i saw you. i fail to understand what you want to say
|
On September 30 2013 23:55 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2013 23:51 FFW_Rude wrote: If you see a guy through his window masterbating, this is voyeurism and you can be charged. If a guy masterbate in the street and "forces you" (in a sens) to watch, it's public nudity and it's charged.
So basicly if i understand right, people are talking about removing the charging for people that masturbate in the street ? If you're doing it because you get off on people watching you it's still illegal because you're involving them. If you're just doing your own thing, not involving anyone, not harming anyone, who the fuck cares. Now I'm reasonably sure everyone deciding to do it on a street would be the first category but also that most people masturbating or fucking their girlfriends outside are the second category. There is no reason to make a blanket law against the acts themselves when you can distinguish between them. seems like enforcing someone being malicious about it would be fairly difficult. "he looked at me funny while playing with his thing" "no i didn't"
although I guess the same can be said for a bunch of laws.
|
|
|
|
|