|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On January 10 2018 19:33 bo1b wrote:Also, why do people insist on shitting on America for it's scientific capabilities when it's produced more rigorous science then all the rest of the modern world combined many times over? Why the elitism?
Like people don't just take a shit on your country for no reason. Would you like me too in the same condescending manner?
This is a few pages ago but I think it deserves mentioning.
Yes, the US has absolutely been, and still is, on the front end of science and research for practically it's entire existence. That's a huge achievement which no one, including me, is denying. The problem has never lied with the researchers, their equipment, methods (For the most part, but this is a huge topic I can get into later if you want), topics or findings. The problem lies squarely on politicians, mostly conservative, who refuses to believe in any of it, and who does everything they can to deny funding to research which might prove them in any way wrong.
My comment on the ignorance of "scientific studies" and "evidence based" isn't directed towards the scientists themselves, but a parody of what literally just happened where the Trump administration banned the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from using those exact phrases, alongside 5 other ones.
|
More cities need to do this. Especially coastal areas.
|
Automation, it seems, would disproportionately affect Trump's voter base; lower wage folks and factory peoples struggling to survive in jobs machines could theoretically do better and more safely if the technology reached an affordable level.
I can see those people resorting to sabotage and destruction of offending machinery. Their lives would almost literally be on the line.
|
That lawsuit is interesting. I wonder if there is precedent from the tobacco industry.
Part of me wishes we couls sue politicians too but i know thats a scary precedent to set and isnt a good idea ;(
|
There's no logic in that when those companies supply fossil fuels and NYC burns them to create electricity, or should they sue their own citizens for driving cars?
If you want to levy a global warming penalty on huge companies to offset the cost of and fight climate change it would be for the federal government to do I think.
|
On January 11 2018 02:29 iamthedave wrote: Automation, it seems, would disproportionately affect Trump's voter base; lower wage folks and factory peoples struggling to survive in jobs machines could theoretically do better and more safely if the technology reached an affordable level.
I can see those people resorting to sabotage and destruction of offending machinery. Their lives would almost literally be on the line.
Ive had this discussed in a few innovation classes ive taken. There is a real emphasis on the politics of innovation. For example, if you are an engineer at a big company and want to try/invent something that makes a persons job or expertise obsolete. That person plans to retire in several years and doesnt feel like learning new things and/or fears for their job. The idea being they will fight like hell to delay or sabotage implementation until they retire.
Im sure it happens all over every industry. Its the reality of the environment we live in.
|
The tobacco industry lawsuit hinged on that industry funding and doctoring scientific evidence to lie to the public about how addictive nicotine was. Considering the amount of anti climate change research the oil industry funded over the years, I think the lawsuit might have legs. But I would love a bunch of rulings that resulted in companies backing away from that style “research”. It is really terrible for science and the public as a whole for them to keep doing that.
|
On January 11 2018 02:31 oBlade wrote:There's no logic in that when those companies supply fossil fuels and NYC burns them to create electricity, or should they sue their own citizens for driving cars? If you want to levy a global warming penalty on huge companies to offset the cost of and fight climate change it would be for the federal government to do I think.
I thought about this but the lawsuit directly states that these Companies knew the effects and misled the public.
So really the crime isnt the warming but the misinformation campaign when they knew the truth the whole time.
If you look at that line of reasoning the lawsuit has a chance imo.
|
Any what about every other company that had an effect on climate change? And what percentage of effect did these specific companies have, do they pay for that %?
It sounds stupid to me. Yes we should hold companies responsible if they try to perpetuate lies about their product but there are better ways then a state suing a select group of polluters
|
|
On January 11 2018 02:46 Gorsameth wrote: Any what about every other company that had an effect on climate change? And what percentage of effect did these specific companies have, do they pay for that %?
It sounds stupid to me. Yes we should hold companies responsible if they try to perpetuate lies about their product but there are better ways then a state suing a select group of polluters What are those better ways?
|
On January 11 2018 02:49 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2018 02:46 Gorsameth wrote: Any what about every other company that had an effect on climate change? And what percentage of effect did these specific companies have, do they pay for that %?
It sounds stupid to me. Yes we should hold companies responsible if they try to perpetuate lies about their product but there are better ways then a state suing a select group of polluters What are those better ways? Federal instead of state for one, tho that requires a functional government.
Increased taxation for 'polluting' industries is also probably a good idea.
|
|
I still don't understand the point of retiring if it is just that you're scared of losing. What do you have to lose by trying? I can't imagine they have so much data of such quality that they are like "No, for real, you actually have a 0% chance of winning".
Sure am curious what they define as "winnable".
|
I think it's clear then that those folks aren't retiring based on electoral probabilities.
|
On January 11 2018 03:11 Mohdoo wrote:I still don't understand the point of retiring if it is just that you're scared of losing. What do you have to lose by trying? I can't imagine they have so much data of such quality that they are like "No, for real, you actually have a 0% chance of winning". Sure am curious what they define as "winnable".
Running a campaign is a lot of work. It's just not worth putting in the effort without a good chance of winning.
|
On January 11 2018 03:00 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2018 02:49 farvacola wrote:On January 11 2018 02:46 Gorsameth wrote: Any what about every other company that had an effect on climate change? And what percentage of effect did these specific companies have, do they pay for that %?
It sounds stupid to me. Yes we should hold companies responsible if they try to perpetuate lies about their product but there are better ways then a state suing a select group of polluters What are those better ways? Federal instead of state for one, tho that requires a functional government. Increased taxation for 'polluting' industries is also probably a good idea.
I think that would work for polluting companies but the teeth of this lawsuit is the misinformation campaign when they knew the effects of their product. The lies and cover up are the issues, not just the polluting.
|
On January 11 2018 03:13 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +On January 11 2018 03:11 Mohdoo wrote:I still don't understand the point of retiring if it is just that you're scared of losing. What do you have to lose by trying? I can't imagine they have so much data of such quality that they are like "No, for real, you actually have a 0% chance of winning". Sure am curious what they define as "winnable". Running a campaign is a lot of work. It's just not worth putting in the effort without a good chance of winning.
Fair enough. I am sure "former congressman" is pretty decent on a job application. Why take a 30% chance at winning when you've got a 100% chance at making a shit load of money doing consulting or something.
|
LOS ANGELES (AP) — U.S. immigration agents descended on dozens of 7-Eleven stores before dawn Wednesday to open employment audits and interview workers in what officials described as the largest operation against an employer under Donald Trump’s presidency.
Agents targeted about 100 stores nationwide, broadening an investigation that began with a 4-year-old case against a franchisee on New York’s Long Island. The audits could lead to criminal charges or fines over the stores’ hiring practices.
The action appears to open a new front in Trump’s sharp expansion of immigration enforcement, which has already brought a 40 percent increase in deportation arrests and plans to spend billions of dollars on a border wall with Mexico. Hardliners have been pressing for a tougher stance on employers.
Derek Benner, a top official at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told The Associated Press that Wednesday’s operation was “the first of many” and “a harbinger of what’s to come” for employers. He said there would be more employment audits and investigations, though there is no numerical goal.
“This is what we’re gearing up for this year and what you’re going to see more and more of is these large-scale compliance inspections, just for starters. From there, we will look at whether these cases warrant an administrative posture or criminal investigation,” said Benner, acting head of ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations, which oversees cases against employers.
“It’s not going to be limited to large companies or any particular industry, big medium and small,” he said. “It’s going to be inclusive of everything that we see out there.”
7-Eleven Stores Inc., based in Irving, Texas, with more than 8,600 stores in the U.S., didn’t immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
Though agents arrested 21 people suspected of being in the country illegally during Wednesday’s sweep, the action was aimed squarely at management.
Illegal hiring is rarely prosecuted, partly because investigations are time-consuming and convictions are difficult to achieve because employers can claim they were duped by fraudulent documents or intermediaries. Administrative fines are discounted by some as a business cost.
George W. Bush’s administration aggressively pursued criminal investigations against employers in its final years with dramatic pre-dawn shows of force and large numbers of worker arrests. In 2008, agents arrived by helicopter at the Agriprocessors meatpacking plant in Postville, Iowa, and detained nearly 400 workers. Last month, Trump commuted the 27-year prison sentence of Sholom Rubashkin, former chief executive of what was the nation’s largest kosher meatpacking operation.
Barack Obama’s administration more than doubled employer audits to more than 3,100 a year in 2013, shunning Bush’s flashier approach. John Sandweg, an acting ICE director under Obama, said significant fines instilled fear in employers and draining resources from other enforcement priorities.
Trump is pursuing “its own kind of unique strategy” tied to its broader emphasis on fighting illegal immigration, including enforcement on the border, Benner said. Some workers may get arrested in the operations but authorities are targeting employers because they are job magnets for people to come to the country illegally.
“We need to make sure that employers are on notice that we are going to come out and ensure that they’re being compliant,” Benner said “For those that don’t, we’re going to take some very aggressive steps in terms of criminal investigations to make sure that we address them and hold them accountable.”
Wednesday’s operation resulted from a 2013 investigation that resulted in charges against nine 7-Eleven franchisees and managers in New York and Virginia. Eight have pleaded guilty and were ordered to pay more than $2.6 million in back wages, and the ninth was arrested in November.
In the 2013 investigations, managers used more than 25 stolen identities to employ at least 115 people in the country illegally, knowing they could pay below minimum wage, according to court documents. The documents say 7-Eleven corporate office does automated payroll, requiring franchisees provide employee names and Social Security numbers to pay workers through direct deposit or check.
The 7-Eleven stores served on Wednesday will be required to produce documents showing they required work authorization, which Benner said will become more common. Audits may lead to criminal charges or administrative penalties.
In Los Angeles’ Koreatown, seven agents arriving in three unmarked cars closed a store for 20 minutes to explain the audit to the only employee there, a clerk with a valid green card. Agents, wearing blue jackets marked ICE, told arriving customers that the store was closed briefly for a federal inspection. A driver delivering cases of beer was told to wait in the parking lot.
The manager was in Bangladesh and the owner, reached by phone, told the clerk to accept whatever documents were served. Agents said they would return Tuesday for employment records they requested.
Neither 7-Eleven nor was its parent company, Seven & i Holding Co. based in Tokyo, was charged in that case.
“Just as the IRS performs audits of people all the time of their tax returns, the same purpose here is to ensure a culture of compliance in this area,” he said.
Source
|
Front runner against him was a justice democrat. Looks like he's all set now.
|
|
|
|