• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:30
CEST 02:30
KST 09:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare12Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, sOs, Reynor, Solar15[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Unyielding3Official Ladder Map Pool Update (April 28, 2025)17[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Rejuvenation8
Community News
Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A Results (2025)4$1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th]5Clem wins PiG Sty Festival #67Weekly Cups (April 28-May 4): ByuN & Astrea break through1Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game29
StarCraft 2
General
Clem wins PiG Sty Festival #6 How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A Results (2025) Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group B [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group A $1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th] SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed Mutation # 470 Certain Demise Mutation # 469 Frostbite
Brood War
General
(UMS) Artosis vs Ogre Zerg [The Legend Continues] BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games Preserving Battlereports.com
Tourneys
[BSL20] RO32 Group F - Saturday 20:00 CET [BSL20] RO32 Group E - Sunday 20:00 CET [ASL19] Ro8 Day 4 [CSLPRO] $1000 Spring is Here!
Strategy
[G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Nintendo Switch Thread Grand Theft Auto VI Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Elon Musk's lies, propaganda, etc. Ask and answer stupid questions here!
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey Surprisingly good films/Hidden Gems
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
BLinD-RawR 50K Post Watch Party The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Why 5v5 Games Keep Us Hooked…
TrAiDoS
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
Test Entry for subject
xumakis
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11554 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8708

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8706 8707 8708 8709 8710 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
September 11 2017 16:19 GMT
#174141
On September 12 2017 00:58 Nyxisto wrote:
policing by consent and all of this community stuff is only possible if the population is disarmed, because there'll never be mutual trust between police and citizens if the former don't hold the monopoly on force. So in a sense the statement that "police is built through brutal force" is correct, it just happens to be that this should have happened in the abstract.

That's why it's possible for the police in the UK to never shoot a bullet or approach anybody without automatically threatening them.

I'd prefer the population to be armed rather than only the criminals in the population to be armed. It's simply rubbish to assume citizens that exercise their 2nd amendment rights erode mutual trust.

It's no excuse for police training for SWAT style home breaches or the Castile cop.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-11 16:20:46
September 11 2017 16:19 GMT
#174142
On September 12 2017 01:16 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 12 2017 00:58 Mohdoo wrote:
On September 12 2017 00:52 KwarK wrote:
On September 12 2017 00:03 kollin wrote:
On September 11 2017 22:23 Sermokala wrote:
In a non judgemental or demeaning tone, what exactly is "symbolic reperations"? I love never assumed that a literal reperations plan was talked about seriously but I'm hesitant in opening the door to any kind of race based improvement plan. I could see a general agreement that "we all failed to integrate the slaves from the south into the economic political and cultural structure of our nation on an equal standing with any other group we've had done just far" and then embark on a comprehensive plan to better the people who live in ghettos and trailer parks equally based on socioeconomic standing.

Also on an aside a policing who's sole legitimacy is based on brute force? Racist and overly violent I can understand but is this a seriously argument that police only have brute force for legitimacy?

All polices legitimacy is built through brute force. We just don't mind because, ideally, the brute force is used to protect us.

Not really. The police's legitimate use of force comes from accountability and the collective democratic will to imbue them with powers. In theory at least.

That's the point being made. That ideally when a police officer waves you over you should believe that he is doing so in your best interest and in line with the obligations society has placed upon law enforcement officers. Therefore you should happily comply, not out of fear but because his successful job serves your interests. But in reality you comply because you know you will be forced to comply. That reality is a failure of policing.


Add this to the list of reasons being a cop should require a law degree and should be an extremely well paid career.

They don’t need a full blown law degree(they don’t need contracts or bankruptcy law), but they need better training on how law functions. But like all things, there is resistance from police to do that. They also don’t like mandatory requirements that they turn over all evidence collected to the DAs.


That's a good first step, but even then police can still selectively enforce the law pretty heavily. It's hard to argue an absolute strictness would be anything but a disaster, but highly subjective enforcement is pretty detrimental too.
Logo
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15466 Posts
September 11 2017 16:24 GMT
#174143
On September 12 2017 01:16 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 12 2017 00:58 Mohdoo wrote:
On September 12 2017 00:52 KwarK wrote:
On September 12 2017 00:03 kollin wrote:
On September 11 2017 22:23 Sermokala wrote:
In a non judgemental or demeaning tone, what exactly is "symbolic reperations"? I love never assumed that a literal reperations plan was talked about seriously but I'm hesitant in opening the door to any kind of race based improvement plan. I could see a general agreement that "we all failed to integrate the slaves from the south into the economic political and cultural structure of our nation on an equal standing with any other group we've had done just far" and then embark on a comprehensive plan to better the people who live in ghettos and trailer parks equally based on socioeconomic standing.

Also on an aside a policing who's sole legitimacy is based on brute force? Racist and overly violent I can understand but is this a seriously argument that police only have brute force for legitimacy?

All polices legitimacy is built through brute force. We just don't mind because, ideally, the brute force is used to protect us.

Not really. The police's legitimate use of force comes from accountability and the collective democratic will to imbue them with powers. In theory at least.

That's the point being made. That ideally when a police officer waves you over you should believe that he is doing so in your best interest and in line with the obligations society has placed upon law enforcement officers. Therefore you should happily comply, not out of fear but because his successful job serves your interests. But in reality you comply because you know you will be forced to comply. That reality is a failure of policing.


Add this to the list of reasons being a cop should require a law degree and should be an extremely well paid career.

They don’t need a full blown law degree(they don’t need contracts or bankruptcy law), but they need better training on how law functions. But like all things, there is resistance from police to do that. They also don’t like mandatory requirements that they turn over all evidence collected to the DAs.


Part of my reason for wanting them to have a law degree is a filtration process to get people from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Simply put, current day cops come from too low on the ladder in my eyes.
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9616 Posts
September 11 2017 16:32 GMT
#174144
if you're requiring a law degree i think you're vastly limiting the socioeconomic climate of police officers relative to what exists today. and quickly, since you're already cutting anyone who can't get a degree be it due to price or intelligence

and i mean talk about distrust. there's already a perception that the police are outsiders among marginalized groups. you'd exacerbate that ten fold this way.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
September 11 2017 16:33 GMT
#174145
law degree is too much; but there is a problem with a disconnect between the kind of people who want to become cops, and the kind of people the public would want to be cops.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
September 11 2017 16:34 GMT
#174146
A lot of research shows better educated police officers leads to less discrimination in practice - I believe that's a big reason why joining the police in the UK now requires a degree level qualification.
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9616 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-11 16:48:05
September 11 2017 16:40 GMT
#174147
yea it's certainly hard to argue against having the best and brightest carry guns and enforce law. i just have a harder time seeing it executed, and seeing it succeed. at least here in the states.

the only way i'd see it going well is having the force subsidize the education. and that's far too much spending for americans, giving away tuition is a big no-no for some reason.

edit:: hmm apparently TFA isn't what i thought it was, i might be confusing it for some other academic subsidy program.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 11 2017 16:40 GMT
#174148
A four year degree with continued training is sufficient. I believe being a police officer should be just as burdensome as being a teacher.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18820 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-11 16:42:50
September 11 2017 16:41 GMT
#174149
I see the solution to encouraging better police cadet qualifications as being part and parcel with revising our high school-into-college transition system. The incentives are all over the place and its startlingly obvious that we are not doing enough to make police work and other less academic, yet publicly essential jobs attractive. In terms of personal anecdote, the cops with associates degrees have bigger chips on their shoulder than those without.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Trainrunnef
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States599 Posts
September 11 2017 16:44 GMT
#174150
On September 12 2017 01:40 Plansix wrote:
A four year degree with continued training is sufficient. I believe being a police officer should be just as burdensome as being a teacher.



It should also apply retroactively, none of this grandfathered in bullshit. you have 8 years to get a 4 year degree or you are out of the force with no pension.
I am, therefore I pee
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
September 11 2017 16:45 GMT
#174151
Some states require a 4 year degree. I think most used to but did away with it when they couldn't get enough officers.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18820 Posts
September 11 2017 16:46 GMT
#174152
Requiring a 4 year degree without addressing the ever-growing higher ed bubble and all the shit that'll fly when it pops is to put the cart before the horse.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-11 16:48:52
September 11 2017 16:47 GMT
#174153
On September 12 2017 01:44 Trainrunnef wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 12 2017 01:40 Plansix wrote:
A four year degree with continued training is sufficient. I believe being a police officer should be just as burdensome as being a teacher.



It should also apply retroactively, none of this grandfathered in bullshit. you have 8 years to get a 4 year degree or you are out of the force with no pension.

I wish you luck with that hard line stance, since police unions exist. But in general I agree. I think a more productive metric is for departments to want over half their force to have 4 year degrees in 8 years, by whatever means necessary.

On September 12 2017 01:46 farvacola wrote:
Requiring a 4 year degree without addressing the ever-growing higher ed bubble and all the shit that'll fly when it pops is to put the cart before the horse.

Which comes first, the great amazon strike or the higher ed implosion?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
September 11 2017 16:49 GMT
#174154
On September 12 2017 01:40 brian wrote:
yea it's certainly hard to argue against having the best and brightest carry guns and enforce law. i just have a harder time seeing it executed, and seeing it succeed. at least here in the states.

the only way i'd see it going well is having the force subsidize the education. and that's far too much spending for americans, giving away tuition is a big no-no for some reason.

a little Teach for America but for cops.

The way we do it in the UK is primarily through an apprenticeship scheme, with the money coming from a levy on businesses with (I think) over £3m per year spent on salaries. It means police officers can study for a policing degree while working and earning money too.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42251 Posts
September 11 2017 16:50 GMT
#174155
On September 12 2017 01:44 Trainrunnef wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 12 2017 01:40 Plansix wrote:
A four year degree with continued training is sufficient. I believe being a police officer should be just as burdensome as being a teacher.



It should also apply retroactively, none of this grandfathered in bullshit. you have 8 years to get a 4 year degree or you are out of the force with no pension.

I see a lot of criticism of police pensions and I want to remind everyone that they're not an unearned benefit. They're part of the compensation package that the police receive for labour already performed. Pensions aren't a conditional bonus at the end of a career, they're the product of a career of mandatory payroll deductions. Saying "out with no pension" is as realistic as saying "out, and also we're seizing your 401k". If an employee is vested into a pension scheme then they get the pension.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-11 16:57:25
September 11 2017 16:55 GMT
#174156
On September 12 2017 01:19 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 12 2017 00:58 Nyxisto wrote:
policing by consent and all of this community stuff is only possible if the population is disarmed, because there'll never be mutual trust between police and citizens if the former don't hold the monopoly on force. So in a sense the statement that "police is built through brutal force" is correct, it just happens to be that this should have happened in the abstract.

That's why it's possible for the police in the UK to never shoot a bullet or approach anybody without automatically threatening them.

I'd prefer the population to be armed rather than only the criminals in the population to be armed. It's simply rubbish to assume citizens that exercise their 2nd amendment rights erode mutual trust.

It's no excuse for police training for SWAT style home breaches or the Castile cop.


Most people aren't criminals and most interactions involving the police probably also do not involve dangerous criminals. But if you're in a place where everybody could be armed and has the means to kill you, your first thought as a police officer will not be to "serve and protect" and engage people like citizens, they'll engage them like they're dangerous.

The fact that you immediately draw the attention to "armed criminals" shows how deep this goes instinctively. The permanent threat thinking is so baked in that everything involving police matters automatically involves 'criminals' and danger and the need to protect yourself.

And of course a widespread presence of guns indicates a lack of trust. That's why guns exist, they're tools to kill and nothing else. Carrying them around at all times doesn't exactly scream trust.

And the trust issue extends into the other direction as well. To be wiling to give up the right to use force citizens need to be able to trust the government with it.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18820 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-11 17:03:50
September 11 2017 17:00 GMT
#174157
The problem with public sector pensions as I see it isn't that pensions are earned or unearned, it's that many pension funds were/are mismanaged, unlucky, subject to "creative" public accounting that undermined their payout potential, or a combination of the three. Further, many public sector retirement funds do stupid shit like start/prolong hopeless derivatives suits that only get asshole lawyers rich. This is why the Detroit bankruptcy case is so fascinating if you dig into its details; the insane things that account administrators and politicians did with retirement funds required virtually dead-even balancing of pensioner's rights against those of operational creditors, and in the end, it was impossible for the pensioners to avoid a pretty significant haircut in order for the city to stay afloat.

Folks like to pretend otherwise, but let's be real, there are easily two dozen or so metropolitan areas that are facing or will face similar public debt problems.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-11 17:12:33
September 11 2017 17:09 GMT
#174158
my problem with public sector pensions (sometimes); they're given overly generous benefits, without requiring that all the money necessary to pay them are put in NOW. So it ends up with a huge future liability without properly budgeting for the needs for it; and tha twon't come due until current politicians have left office.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
September 11 2017 17:28 GMT
#174159
On September 12 2017 01:55 Nyxisto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 12 2017 01:19 Danglars wrote:
On September 12 2017 00:58 Nyxisto wrote:
policing by consent and all of this community stuff is only possible if the population is disarmed, because there'll never be mutual trust between police and citizens if the former don't hold the monopoly on force. So in a sense the statement that "police is built through brutal force" is correct, it just happens to be that this should have happened in the abstract.

That's why it's possible for the police in the UK to never shoot a bullet or approach anybody without automatically threatening them.

I'd prefer the population to be armed rather than only the criminals in the population to be armed. It's simply rubbish to assume citizens that exercise their 2nd amendment rights erode mutual trust.

It's no excuse for police training for SWAT style home breaches or the Castile cop.


Most people aren't criminals and most interactions involving the police probably also do not involve dangerous criminals. But if you're in a place where everybody could be armed and has the means to kill you, your first thought as a police officer will not be to "serve and protect" and engage people like citizens, they'll engage them like they're dangerous.

The fact that you immediately draw the attention to "armed criminals" shows how deep this goes instinctively. The permanent threat thinking is so baked in that everything involving police matters automatically involves 'criminals' and danger and the need to protect yourself.

And of course a widespread presence of guns indicates a lack of trust. That's why guns exist, they're tools to kill and nothing else. Carrying them around at all times doesn't exactly scream trust.

And the trust issue extends into the other direction as well. To be wiling to give up the right to use force citizens need to be able to trust the government with it.

Hardly. You presume both that police must be dolts and that citizens do not know how the fuck to lawfully carry a gun. Well, with your ridiculous presuppositions, I can see how you'd arrive at your conclusion.

Secondly, nope for why I "immediately draw the attention to." You said "if the population is disarmed." You cannot actually mean that, because criminals that already don't legally own a gun will also not be disarmed when you disarm the law-abiding.

Thirdly, the "widespread presence of guns" indicates a responsible attitude towards self defense and the deterrence of crime. The "lack of trust" bit is nothing more than a propaganda line. Talk to some actual gun owners. Don't let the internet or politically opposed groups rule your understanding of the issue. Police aren't somehow doomed to antagonistic relationships simply because of the second amendment.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Trainrunnef
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States599 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-11 17:37:38
September 11 2017 17:36 GMT
#174160
On September 12 2017 02:28 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 12 2017 01:55 Nyxisto wrote:
On September 12 2017 01:19 Danglars wrote:
On September 12 2017 00:58 Nyxisto wrote:
policing by consent and all of this community stuff is only possible if the population is disarmed, because there'll never be mutual trust between police and citizens if the former don't hold the monopoly on force. So in a sense the statement that "police is built through brutal force" is correct, it just happens to be that this should have happened in the abstract.

That's why it's possible for the police in the UK to never shoot a bullet or approach anybody without automatically threatening them.

I'd prefer the population to be armed rather than only the criminals in the population to be armed. It's simply rubbish to assume citizens that exercise their 2nd amendment rights erode mutual trust.

It's no excuse for police training for SWAT style home breaches or the Castile cop.


Most people aren't criminals and most interactions involving the police probably also do not involve dangerous criminals. But if you're in a place where everybody could be armed and has the means to kill you, your first thought as a police officer will not be to "serve and protect" and engage people like citizens, they'll engage them like they're dangerous.

The fact that you immediately draw the attention to "armed criminals" shows how deep this goes instinctively. The permanent threat thinking is so baked in that everything involving police matters automatically involves 'criminals' and danger and the need to protect yourself.

And of course a widespread presence of guns indicates a lack of trust. That's why guns exist, they're tools to kill and nothing else. Carrying them around at all times doesn't exactly scream trust.

And the trust issue extends into the other direction as well. To be wiling to give up the right to use force citizens need to be able to trust the government with it.

Hardly. You presume both that police must be dolts and that citizens do not know how the fuck to lawfully carry a gun. Well, with your ridiculous presuppositions, I can see how you'd arrive at your conclusion.

Secondly, nope for why I "immediately draw the attention to." You said "if the population is disarmed." You cannot actually mean that, because criminals that already don't legally own a gun will also not be disarmed when you disarm the law-abiding.

Thirdly, the "widespread presence of guns" indicates a responsible attitude towards self defense and the deterrence of crime. The "lack of trust" bit is nothing more than a propaganda line. Talk to some actual gun owners. Don't let the internet or politically opposed groups rule your understanding of the issue. Police aren't somehow doomed to antagonistic relationships simply because of the second amendment.


They aren't unilaterally aligned either though. I some of the other owners i know are definitely weary of the possibility of other folks carrying, heck its a big factor in why some of us started carrying in the first place. Everyone is a law abiding citizen until they aren't, and it is a difficult assumption to make that everyone with a lawful gun will continue to be a law abiding citizen when pushed to the edge by some situation or another.

My guess is also that that mentality will vary regionally. and isn't just part of propaganda from the left.
I am, therefore I pee
Prev 1 8706 8707 8708 8709 8710 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Circuito Brasileiro de…
19:00
A Decisão - Playoffs D1
davetesta32
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech97
StarCraft: Brood War
sSak 148
Movie 17
Sexy 12
Dota 2
monkeys_forever949
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1025
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe85
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor251
Other Games
summit1g12770
FrodaN2612
shahzam1320
JimRising 329
ViBE232
JuggernautJason62
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1049
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv143
Other Games
BasetradeTV11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• gosughost_ 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler89
League of Legends
• Doublelift5914
Other Games
• Scarra1519
Upcoming Events
Online Event
3h 30m
MaxPax vs herO
SHIN vs Cure
Clem vs MaxPax
ShoWTimE vs herO
ShoWTimE vs Clem
Sparkling Tuna Cup
9h 30m
WardiTV Invitational
10h 30m
AllThingsProtoss
10h 30m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
13h 30m
Chat StarLeague
15h 30m
BSL Season 20
17h 30m
MadiNho vs dxtr13
Gypsy vs Dark
Circuito Brasileiro de…
18h 30m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 9h
BeSt vs Light
Wardi Open
1d 10h
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
1d 23h
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Soulkey
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
ByuN vs Rogue
herO vs Cure
Replay Cast
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Classic vs Reynor
GuMiho vs Maru
The PondCast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
GSL Code S
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Nation Wars Season 2
PiG Sty Festival 6.0
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSLPRO Spring 2025
2025 GSL S1
Heroes 10 EU
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

NPSL S3
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.