EPTNot sure about you, but I have had group conversations both irl and in a virtual group chat that I would appreciate my boss to not know about, and I believe most of us have had it as well.
Edit: spellign
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7759
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Neneu
Norway492 Posts
Not sure about you, but I have had group conversations both irl and in a virtual group chat that I would appreciate my boss to not know about, and I believe most of us have had it as well. Edit: spellign | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On June 05 2017 20:55 RealityIsKing wrote: His supporters just enjoy seeing him humiliate/trigger his oppositions. A candid admission about the reason Trump has support. | ||
KwarK
United States43534 Posts
On June 05 2017 23:10 Neneu wrote: While they might have bad taste in humor, private messaging between friends is considered public space now? Not sure about you, but I have had group conversations both irl and in a virtual group chat that I would appreciate my boss to not know about, and I believe most of us have had it as well. Edit: spellign I'd recommend not making a facebook page about it and naming that facebook page after your employer then. I can absolutely see why Harvard didn't want it's brand associated with a facebook page declaring itself as being for Harvard admitted people and full of offensive memes. In this instance they did it in a particularly stupid and public way. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
Neneu
Norway492 Posts
On June 05 2017 23:15 KwarK wrote: I'd recommend not making a facebook page about it and naming that facebook page after your employer then. I can absolutely see why Harvard didn't want it's brand associated with a facebook page declaring itself as being for Harvard admitted people and full of offensive memes. In this instance they did it in a particularly stupid and public way. According to the article linked it was a messaging group, not a page. Therefor private. If it was a page, it would be completely understandable. However it is in my opinion not, when it is some people having a private chat through their messaging system. After discovering the messaging group ― which had split off from what one student called a “lighthearted” Facebook chat for admitted students | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15736 Posts
| ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On June 05 2017 21:53 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: He's the one that signed the watered down EO... Oh man. And yesterday I wondered if anyone had told Trump it defanged the refugee parts. I guess nobody did! | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7958 Posts
On June 05 2017 20:55 RealityIsKing wrote: His supporters just enjoy seeing him humiliate/trigger his oppositions. That or his supporters are not reflected enough to think "wait a sec, he is saying to our face he doesn't give a fuck or even believe what he's saying, he's just saying what we applaude to to get elected". But ye, maybe they are super clever and he was just sayin that to infuriate dems and the whole room of course got it. Good one. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On June 06 2017 00:01 Mohdoo wrote: Weird incident. If it really was a messaging group, this is a step too far. Unless it was some kinda 200+ person messaging group somehow. Or if it was named Harvard something. Harvard has a lot of image value to maintain and having some rich shits mucking it up with foul stuff isn't going to be allowed. In the article: Two incoming students told the Crimson the group was at one point called “Harvard memes for horny bourgeois teens.” | ||
|
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
On June 06 2017 00:08 Biff The Understudy wrote: That or his supporters are not reflected enough to think "wait a sec, he is saying to our face he doesn't give a fuck or even believe what he's saying, he's just saying what we applaude to to get elected". But ye, maybe they are super clever and he was just sayin that to infuriate dems and the whole room of course got it. Good one. Never attribute to malice that which is explained sufficiently by stupidity. That would assume a high level of competence on the part of a large number of people, and when it comes to Trump supporters... forget it. I'm actually shocked that people were laughing as he was giving his spiel though. That was a sad moment for any and everyone who bought into his BS. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15736 Posts
Jesus. Begs an interesting question. Let's say someone posts an album of pictures on Facebook titled "my academic career at harvard", and it had a ton of questionable behavior and opinions and dirty memes etc. I wonder how that would go. When is it just doing your stuff, which happens to be at Harvard, and when is it actually Harvard's business? | ||
|
brian
United States9636 Posts
i mean the kid they interviewed only commented under the condition of anonymity. if (s)he can't stand by the things they said i can't feel bad that they had their admission revoked. play stupid games win stupid prizes. i'm not one for internet anonymity to begin with, though. and i'm actually clear on the opposite spectrum from Mohdoo. if i were a huge messaging group i'd lean more towards 'well stupid as as stupid does' but if it's a personal message that got leaked to the admins between friends i'd treat it even more seriously. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15736 Posts
On June 06 2017 00:18 brian wrote: i mean the kid they interviewed only commented under the condition of anonymity. if (s)he can't stand by the things they said i can't feel bad that they had their admission revoked. play stupid games win stupid prizes. i'm not one for internet anonymity to begin with, though. and i'm actually clear on the opposite spectrum from Mohdoo. if i were a huge messaging group i'd lean more towards 'well stupid as as stupid does' but if it's a personal message that got leaked to the admins between friends i'd treat it even more seriously. Wait, what? You're saying a personal message between 2 people, sharing questionable content or making questionable jokes, should be punished? | ||
|
Biff The Understudy
France7958 Posts
On June 06 2017 00:13 NewSunshine wrote: Never attribute to malice that which is explained sufficiently by stupidity. That would assume a high level of competence on the part of a large number of people, and when it comes to Trump supporters... forget it. I'm actually shocked that people were laughing as he was giving his spiel though. That was a sad moment for any and everyone who bought into his BS. To believe that Trump doesn't just say how it went because he would realize how fucking offensive it is to the people who sang those slogans also means RIK hasn't really followed the donald recently. The guy is so candid it borders the grotesque. | ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
(I don't use facebook) Is a message group viewable by anyone or just the name, or what? I'd like to see the exact jokes they got banned for, just because I'm a little bit distrustful of how media would choose to relate some of the borderline content that exists out there. Anyway, sad thing to have ruin what was no doubt a lot of hard work, but hard to feel a ton of sympathy if the description is accurate :/ | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On June 06 2017 00:18 brian wrote: i mean the kid they interviewed only commented under the condition of anonymity. if (s)he can't stand by the things they said i can't feel bad that they had their admission revoked. play stupid games win stupid prizes. More or less my feelings on it. I don't even think these kids had any necessary poor intent - just off color joking. But this is clearly a hard lesson in PR and how people should be conscious of context when they may be representing something other than themselves. On June 06 2017 00:30 Liquid`Jinro wrote: (I don't use facebook) Is a message group viewable by anyone or just the name, or what? I'd like to see the exact jokes they got banned for, just because I'm a little bit distrustful of how media would choose to relate some of the borderline content that exists out there. Anyway, sad thing to have ruin what was no doubt a lot of hard work, but hard to feel a ton of sympathy if the description is accurate :/ I don't really use FB either, but from when I did - you can set group messages to have different privacy settings I believe. From the article, it sounds like this group was a spin off chat from a larger, accepted students group. If it was a spin off chat of people who haven't met each other before, it'd be easy for something like this to reach the wrong ears. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States43534 Posts
It's baffling to me that Trump was tweeting about the London attacks, in which three attackers managed to kill seven people using a van and knives, to bitch about how gun control doesn't help. I can't decide whether I'm more offended by the tactlessness of it or the stupidity. Gun control fucking worked in this instance. They didn't have guns, the police did, just minutes after they started their attack the police showed up and gunned them down. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
At this point they shouldn't even allow him to visit London. He shouldn't want to go either. If he does he will be booed mercilessly. | ||
| ||
