• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:23
CEST 11:23
KST 18:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event5Serral wins EWC 202543Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9
Community News
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 193Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4
StarCraft 2
General
Rogue Talks: "Koreans could dominate again" uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Official Ladder Map Pool Update (April 28, 2025)
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays RSL Season 2 Qualifier Links and Dates
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
ASL Season 20 Ro24 Groups Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ StarCraft player reflex TE scores BW General Discussion
Tourneys
KCM 2025 Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Gaming After Dark: Poor Slee…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 584 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7238

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7236 7237 7238 7239 7240 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
March 31 2017 18:32 GMT
#144741
On April 01 2017 02:52 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 00:58 Nevuk wrote:
The Washington Post ran a profile of Karen Pence, the wife of Vice President Mike Pence, on Wednesday. The piece talks about the closeness of the Pences’ relationship, and cites something Pence told The Hill in 2002: Unless his wife is there, he never eats alone with another woman or attends an event where alcohol is being served. (It’s unclear whether, 15 years later, this remains Pence’s practice.) It’s not in the Post piece, but here’s the original quote from 2002: “‘If there's alcohol being served and people are being loose, I want to have the best-looking brunette in the room standing next to me,’ Pence said.”

Some folks—mostly journalists and entertainers on Twitter—have reacted with surprise, anger, and sarcasm to the Pence family rule. Socially liberal or non-religious people may see Pence’s practice as misogynistic or bizarre. For a lot of conservative religious people, though, this set-up probably sounds normal, or even wise. The dust-up shows how radically notions of gender divide American culture.

Pence is not the first contemporary public figure to set these kinds of boundaries around his marriage. He seems to be following a version of the so-called Billy Graham rule, named for the famous evangelist who established similar guidelines for the pastors working in his ministry. In his autobiography, Graham notes that he and his colleagues worried about the temptations of sexual immorality that come from long days on the road and a lot of time away from family. They resolved to “avoid any situation that would even have the appearance of compromise or suspicion.” From that day on, Graham said, he “did not travel, meet, or eat alone with a woman other than my wife.” It was a way of following Paul’s advice to Timothy in the Bible, Graham wrote: to “flee … youthful lusts.”

The Hill article gives more context on how the Pences were thinking about this, at least back in 2002. Pence told the paper he often refused dinner or cocktail invitations from male colleagues, too: “It’s about building a zone around your marriage,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a predatory town, but I think you can inadvertently send the wrong message by being in [certain] situations.”

The 2002 article notes that Pence arrived in Congress a half decade after the 1994 “Republican revolution,” when Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the House. Several congressional marriages, including Gingrich’s, encountered difficulty that year. Pence seemed wary of this. “I’ve lost more elections than I’ve won,” he said. “I’ve seen friends lose their families. I’d rather lose an election.” He even said he gets fingers wagged in his face by concerned Indianans. “Little old ladies come and say, ‘Honey, whatever you need to do, keep your family together,’” he told The Hill.

These comments show that the Pences have a distinctively conservative approach toward family, sex, and gender. This is by no means the way that all Christians, or even all evangelical Christians like the Pences, navigate married life. But traditional religious people from other backgrounds may practice something similar. Many Orthodox Jews follow the laws of yichud, which prohibit unmarried men and women from being alone in a closed room together. Some Muslim men and women also refuse to be together alone if they’re not married. These practices all have different histories and origins, but they’re rooted in the same belief: The sanctity of marriage should be protected, and sexual immorality should be guarded against at all costs.

That idea might seem disorienting to more socially progressive Americans. For one thing, it shows a deep awareness of gender and sexuality: The implication is that temptations to flirt or cheat are present in everyday interactions.

Some journalists on Twitter quickly pointed out that Pence’s rules may function, in practice, to perpetuate professional and political disadvantages against women. If men in power can meet alone with other men but not women, they’ll just keep doing the business of being powerful in an all-male world. And it parallels critiques of the Billy Graham Rule that’ve been leveled within the evangelical community, as well, where it’s also been blamed for subjecting professional relationships to the logic of a sexually permissive society.

Other critics connected these views to Pence’s stance on LGBT issues. When he was governor of Indiana, he presided over a controversial religious-freedom bill that, LGBT advocates claimed, would have allowed business owners to discriminate against them. Pence’s marriage rules implicitly suggest there’s a temptation in being alone with women, but not in being alone with men, which is not the experience of a lot of people, including LGBT Christians.

But it’s also true that these aren’t just rules by, for, and about Mike Pence. This is how he and his wife, together, have chosen to navigate their marriage. That some people are so quick to be angered—and others are totally unsurprised—shows how divided America has become about the fundamental claim embedded in the Pence family rule: that understandings of gender should guide the boundaries around people’s everyday interactions, and protecting a marriage should take precedence over all else, even if the way of doing it seems strange to some, and imposes costs on others.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/karen-pence-is-the-vice-presidents-prayer-warrior-gut-check-and-shield/2017/03/28/3d7a26ce-0a01-11e7-8884-96e6a6713f4b_story.html?utm_term=.ab1c54954ee5


This is interesting. And I mean that in purely a neutral sense.


I'm confused why anybody would be upset by that. I personally wouldn't lead my life that way. My fiancé trusts me and I trust her. But how the Pences arrange their marriage is entirely up to them and if you don't like it, get your nose out of their business...

If you want to be entirely disgusted by media figures, go search "Pence wife filter:verified" of a time a day or two days past to see blue checks calling this unempowering and disgusting, practically misogyny.

Sincere question. How is this different from extreme repressive interpretations of Islam ("Sharia Law!") mocked by people like Mike Pence

@commiegirl1 who knew Mike Pence had uncontrollable sexual compulsions so serious he can't be alone w a woman who's not his wife?


Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
March 31 2017 18:36 GMT
#144742
On April 01 2017 02:22 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 02:05 Danglars wrote:
On April 01 2017 00:18 KwarK wrote:
On April 01 2017 00:13 Danglars wrote:
On March 31 2017 22:06 LightSpectra wrote:
Does anybody still think the whole Russian investigation is just a big waste of time? Sounds like every day we're one step closer to getting a smoking gun.

I'm gonna take some sick pleasure in watching some posters here eat their crow if (when?) it happens.

I'm expecting the smoking gun to be a dripping water pistol. As in, "Ha! Trump's gardener talked to a Russian oligarch about how nice it would be if Trump become president instead of that humorless, shrill hag." I put the great likelihood that nothing happened; we just have a mostly incompetant president that's a fan of Putin, and Russian cyber warfare results that might've pissed of a couple Bernie voters and hithertoo blind media-lovers.

In short, half the Democratic Party and mainstream media are just engaging in public group therapy in the wake of their gal losing by constructing a more satisfying story.

But we already have more than that. We already have senior members of the Trump campaign talking to Russian intelligence about how if hypothetically something were to happen to damage the Clinton campaign so Trump won then perhaps Trump could do something about those Russian sanctions.

That's our baseline minimum. That's what definitely happened. This shit about a gardener is already completely failing to understand the severity of what happened here. The smoking gun we're missing is personal involvement from Trump and an actual deal being struck, rather than Russia acting independently because they recognize that their interests are better met by Trump than by Clinton.

Nope. Not even severe. You have called ambassadors intelligence operators when it suits yo. You draw hilarity, pardoning Hillary's deletion of emails under active subpoena, but criticizing jokes on how favorable it would be should they be recovered. No, we shall have an investigation given the uproar, with very little hope of finding anything. This notwithstanding what some Hillary shills and partisans will attempt to spin, yourself included. It's pretty ironic how you can't fully comprehend a Juncker joke falling flat, and again remind me you can't call Trump's jokes because it does not suit you.

I almost wish Putin announced the discovery of Hillary's illegally deleted emails, because then I could preserve some sense of respect for arguing a more apropos point and not recognize the Russia-hysteria infecting another.

I don't call Kislyak an intelligence operative, CNN does.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/02/world/sergey-kislyak-russian-ambassador-us-profile/
Show nested quote +
Current and former US intelligence officials have described Kislyak as a top spy and recruiter of spies

You can say they're wrong but this isn't coming from me, this is coming from US intelligence by way of CNN.

My my, who's the ambassador from Russia then, since we cannot address our statesmen, senators, and Presidents to this man who you only design to call spy and spymaster. I tire of your games; you lack only a little reflection to see on how thin foundations your accusations lie, or imbibe something other than the kool aid that's in vogue.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35152 Posts
March 31 2017 18:39 GMT
#144743
On April 01 2017 03:32 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 02:52 Acrofales wrote:
On April 01 2017 00:58 Nevuk wrote:
The Washington Post ran a profile of Karen Pence, the wife of Vice President Mike Pence, on Wednesday. The piece talks about the closeness of the Pences’ relationship, and cites something Pence told The Hill in 2002: Unless his wife is there, he never eats alone with another woman or attends an event where alcohol is being served. (It’s unclear whether, 15 years later, this remains Pence’s practice.) It’s not in the Post piece, but here’s the original quote from 2002: “‘If there's alcohol being served and people are being loose, I want to have the best-looking brunette in the room standing next to me,’ Pence said.”

Some folks—mostly journalists and entertainers on Twitter—have reacted with surprise, anger, and sarcasm to the Pence family rule. Socially liberal or non-religious people may see Pence’s practice as misogynistic or bizarre. For a lot of conservative religious people, though, this set-up probably sounds normal, or even wise. The dust-up shows how radically notions of gender divide American culture.

Pence is not the first contemporary public figure to set these kinds of boundaries around his marriage. He seems to be following a version of the so-called Billy Graham rule, named for the famous evangelist who established similar guidelines for the pastors working in his ministry. In his autobiography, Graham notes that he and his colleagues worried about the temptations of sexual immorality that come from long days on the road and a lot of time away from family. They resolved to “avoid any situation that would even have the appearance of compromise or suspicion.” From that day on, Graham said, he “did not travel, meet, or eat alone with a woman other than my wife.” It was a way of following Paul’s advice to Timothy in the Bible, Graham wrote: to “flee … youthful lusts.”

The Hill article gives more context on how the Pences were thinking about this, at least back in 2002. Pence told the paper he often refused dinner or cocktail invitations from male colleagues, too: “It’s about building a zone around your marriage,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a predatory town, but I think you can inadvertently send the wrong message by being in [certain] situations.”

The 2002 article notes that Pence arrived in Congress a half decade after the 1994 “Republican revolution,” when Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the House. Several congressional marriages, including Gingrich’s, encountered difficulty that year. Pence seemed wary of this. “I’ve lost more elections than I’ve won,” he said. “I’ve seen friends lose their families. I’d rather lose an election.” He even said he gets fingers wagged in his face by concerned Indianans. “Little old ladies come and say, ‘Honey, whatever you need to do, keep your family together,’” he told The Hill.

These comments show that the Pences have a distinctively conservative approach toward family, sex, and gender. This is by no means the way that all Christians, or even all evangelical Christians like the Pences, navigate married life. But traditional religious people from other backgrounds may practice something similar. Many Orthodox Jews follow the laws of yichud, which prohibit unmarried men and women from being alone in a closed room together. Some Muslim men and women also refuse to be together alone if they’re not married. These practices all have different histories and origins, but they’re rooted in the same belief: The sanctity of marriage should be protected, and sexual immorality should be guarded against at all costs.

That idea might seem disorienting to more socially progressive Americans. For one thing, it shows a deep awareness of gender and sexuality: The implication is that temptations to flirt or cheat are present in everyday interactions.

Some journalists on Twitter quickly pointed out that Pence’s rules may function, in practice, to perpetuate professional and political disadvantages against women. If men in power can meet alone with other men but not women, they’ll just keep doing the business of being powerful in an all-male world. And it parallels critiques of the Billy Graham Rule that’ve been leveled within the evangelical community, as well, where it’s also been blamed for subjecting professional relationships to the logic of a sexually permissive society.

Other critics connected these views to Pence’s stance on LGBT issues. When he was governor of Indiana, he presided over a controversial religious-freedom bill that, LGBT advocates claimed, would have allowed business owners to discriminate against them. Pence’s marriage rules implicitly suggest there’s a temptation in being alone with women, but not in being alone with men, which is not the experience of a lot of people, including LGBT Christians.

But it’s also true that these aren’t just rules by, for, and about Mike Pence. This is how he and his wife, together, have chosen to navigate their marriage. That some people are so quick to be angered—and others are totally unsurprised—shows how divided America has become about the fundamental claim embedded in the Pence family rule: that understandings of gender should guide the boundaries around people’s everyday interactions, and protecting a marriage should take precedence over all else, even if the way of doing it seems strange to some, and imposes costs on others.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/karen-pence-is-the-vice-presidents-prayer-warrior-gut-check-and-shield/2017/03/28/3d7a26ce-0a01-11e7-8884-96e6a6713f4b_story.html?utm_term=.ab1c54954ee5


This is interesting. And I mean that in purely a neutral sense.


I'm confused why anybody would be upset by that. I personally wouldn't lead my life that way. My fiancé trusts me and I trust her. But how the Pences arrange their marriage is entirely up to them and if you don't like it, get your nose out of their business...

If you want to be entirely disgusted by media figures, go search "Pence wife filter:verified" of a time a day or two days past to see blue checks calling this unempowering and disgusting, practically misogyny.

Show nested quote +
Sincere question. How is this different from extreme repressive interpretations of Islam ("Sharia Law!") mocked by people like Mike Pence

@commiegirl1 who knew Mike Pence had uncontrollable sexual compulsions so serious he can't be alone w a woman who's not his wife?



Honest question, how long have you held an unsavory opinion of verified accounts?
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42701 Posts
March 31 2017 18:43 GMT
#144744
On April 01 2017 03:36 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 02:22 KwarK wrote:
On April 01 2017 02:05 Danglars wrote:
On April 01 2017 00:18 KwarK wrote:
On April 01 2017 00:13 Danglars wrote:
On March 31 2017 22:06 LightSpectra wrote:
Does anybody still think the whole Russian investigation is just a big waste of time? Sounds like every day we're one step closer to getting a smoking gun.

I'm gonna take some sick pleasure in watching some posters here eat their crow if (when?) it happens.

I'm expecting the smoking gun to be a dripping water pistol. As in, "Ha! Trump's gardener talked to a Russian oligarch about how nice it would be if Trump become president instead of that humorless, shrill hag." I put the great likelihood that nothing happened; we just have a mostly incompetant president that's a fan of Putin, and Russian cyber warfare results that might've pissed of a couple Bernie voters and hithertoo blind media-lovers.

In short, half the Democratic Party and mainstream media are just engaging in public group therapy in the wake of their gal losing by constructing a more satisfying story.

But we already have more than that. We already have senior members of the Trump campaign talking to Russian intelligence about how if hypothetically something were to happen to damage the Clinton campaign so Trump won then perhaps Trump could do something about those Russian sanctions.

That's our baseline minimum. That's what definitely happened. This shit about a gardener is already completely failing to understand the severity of what happened here. The smoking gun we're missing is personal involvement from Trump and an actual deal being struck, rather than Russia acting independently because they recognize that their interests are better met by Trump than by Clinton.

Nope. Not even severe. You have called ambassadors intelligence operators when it suits yo. You draw hilarity, pardoning Hillary's deletion of emails under active subpoena, but criticizing jokes on how favorable it would be should they be recovered. No, we shall have an investigation given the uproar, with very little hope of finding anything. This notwithstanding what some Hillary shills and partisans will attempt to spin, yourself included. It's pretty ironic how you can't fully comprehend a Juncker joke falling flat, and again remind me you can't call Trump's jokes because it does not suit you.

I almost wish Putin announced the discovery of Hillary's illegally deleted emails, because then I could preserve some sense of respect for arguing a more apropos point and not recognize the Russia-hysteria infecting another.

I don't call Kislyak an intelligence operative, CNN does.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/02/world/sergey-kislyak-russian-ambassador-us-profile/
Current and former US intelligence officials have described Kislyak as a top spy and recruiter of spies

You can say they're wrong but this isn't coming from me, this is coming from US intelligence by way of CNN.

My my, who's the ambassador from Russia then, since we cannot address our statesmen, senators, and Presidents to this man who you only design to call spy and spymaster. I tire of your games; you lack only a little reflection to see on how thin foundations your accusations lie, or imbibe something other than the kool aid that's in vogue.

If I'm following this you started by saying that you think the end game will be that a gardener made small talk. I explained that the problem is already established to be way, way bigger than that. You didn't address the absurdity of your attempt to handwave it away as a non issue involving gardeners at most and claimed that I was making baseless accusations of people being Russian intelligence. I showed a source for that, at which point you accuse me of playing games and of drinking kool-aid.

I really don't think I'm the problem here Danglars. Your interpretation of events is already demonstrably in conflict with reality. This is already bigger than a gardener.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
LightSpectra
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States1483 Posts
March 31 2017 18:47 GMT
#144745
On April 01 2017 03:25 Kickstart wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 03:18 Sandvich wrote:
On April 01 2017 02:52 Acrofales wrote:

I'm confused why anybody would be upset by that. I personally wouldn't lead my life that way. My fiancé trusts me and I trust her. But how the Pences arrange their marriage is entirely up to them and if you don't like it, get your nose out of their business...

Well as they mention in the article, imagine you were a woman pursuing a cause in Indiana. You wouldn't be able to have a business lunch/dinner alone with Pence to try to advance your cause whereas a male in the same situation potentially could.


The underlying reason is a sad sort of commentary as well. The idea that the reason he can't is that the risk of him popping a boner is too high. I think the average person would be able to have a lunch/dinner with someone without that being an issue. It says men are not to be trusted because they can't control themselves and women are too fragile to be allowed to interact with any man without a chaperone.


I think the idea is rather that lots of politicians are caught up in sex scandals, real or imagined, so he's going the extra mile to not ever be in a situation like that.

Makes sense to me. I've been to universities where professors are strictly prohibited from having any one-on-one time with students in rooms without surveillance cameras. It's not that the university thinks all their professors are pervs, but rather such strict regulations remits any liability in case there's an accusation of impropriety.
2006 Shinhan Bank OSL Season 3 was the greatest tournament of all time
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18828 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-31 18:49:19
March 31 2017 18:49 GMT
#144746
Professors and students=/= Pence and all women not his wife
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
LightSpectra
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States1483 Posts
March 31 2017 18:52 GMT
#144747
I'm not seeing a substantial difference there.
2006 Shinhan Bank OSL Season 3 was the greatest tournament of all time
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
March 31 2017 18:54 GMT
#144748
Spicer has completely jumped the shark and it's hard not to conclude, by extension, that the administration has jumped the shark.
Seuss
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States10536 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-31 18:55:00
March 31 2017 18:54 GMT
#144749
On April 01 2017 02:52 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 00:58 Nevuk wrote:
The Washington Post ran a profile of Karen Pence, the wife of Vice President Mike Pence, on Wednesday. The piece talks about the closeness of the Pences’ relationship, and cites something Pence told The Hill in 2002: Unless his wife is there, he never eats alone with another woman or attends an event where alcohol is being served. (It’s unclear whether, 15 years later, this remains Pence’s practice.) It’s not in the Post piece, but here’s the original quote from 2002: “‘If there's alcohol being served and people are being loose, I want to have the best-looking brunette in the room standing next to me,’ Pence said.”

Some folks—mostly journalists and entertainers on Twitter—have reacted with surprise, anger, and sarcasm to the Pence family rule. Socially liberal or non-religious people may see Pence’s practice as misogynistic or bizarre. For a lot of conservative religious people, though, this set-up probably sounds normal, or even wise. The dust-up shows how radically notions of gender divide American culture.

Pence is not the first contemporary public figure to set these kinds of boundaries around his marriage. He seems to be following a version of the so-called Billy Graham rule, named for the famous evangelist who established similar guidelines for the pastors working in his ministry. In his autobiography, Graham notes that he and his colleagues worried about the temptations of sexual immorality that come from long days on the road and a lot of time away from family. They resolved to “avoid any situation that would even have the appearance of compromise or suspicion.” From that day on, Graham said, he “did not travel, meet, or eat alone with a woman other than my wife.” It was a way of following Paul’s advice to Timothy in the Bible, Graham wrote: to “flee … youthful lusts.”

The Hill article gives more context on how the Pences were thinking about this, at least back in 2002. Pence told the paper he often refused dinner or cocktail invitations from male colleagues, too: “It’s about building a zone around your marriage,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a predatory town, but I think you can inadvertently send the wrong message by being in [certain] situations.”

The 2002 article notes that Pence arrived in Congress a half decade after the 1994 “Republican revolution,” when Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the House. Several congressional marriages, including Gingrich’s, encountered difficulty that year. Pence seemed wary of this. “I’ve lost more elections than I’ve won,” he said. “I’ve seen friends lose their families. I’d rather lose an election.” He even said he gets fingers wagged in his face by concerned Indianans. “Little old ladies come and say, ‘Honey, whatever you need to do, keep your family together,’” he told The Hill.

These comments show that the Pences have a distinctively conservative approach toward family, sex, and gender. This is by no means the way that all Christians, or even all evangelical Christians like the Pences, navigate married life. But traditional religious people from other backgrounds may practice something similar. Many Orthodox Jews follow the laws of yichud, which prohibit unmarried men and women from being alone in a closed room together. Some Muslim men and women also refuse to be together alone if they’re not married. These practices all have different histories and origins, but they’re rooted in the same belief: The sanctity of marriage should be protected, and sexual immorality should be guarded against at all costs.

That idea might seem disorienting to more socially progressive Americans. For one thing, it shows a deep awareness of gender and sexuality: The implication is that temptations to flirt or cheat are present in everyday interactions.

Some journalists on Twitter quickly pointed out that Pence’s rules may function, in practice, to perpetuate professional and political disadvantages against women. If men in power can meet alone with other men but not women, they’ll just keep doing the business of being powerful in an all-male world. And it parallels critiques of the Billy Graham Rule that’ve been leveled within the evangelical community, as well, where it’s also been blamed for subjecting professional relationships to the logic of a sexually permissive society.

Other critics connected these views to Pence’s stance on LGBT issues. When he was governor of Indiana, he presided over a controversial religious-freedom bill that, LGBT advocates claimed, would have allowed business owners to discriminate against them. Pence’s marriage rules implicitly suggest there’s a temptation in being alone with women, but not in being alone with men, which is not the experience of a lot of people, including LGBT Christians.

But it’s also true that these aren’t just rules by, for, and about Mike Pence. This is how he and his wife, together, have chosen to navigate their marriage. That some people are so quick to be angered—and others are totally unsurprised—shows how divided America has become about the fundamental claim embedded in the Pence family rule: that understandings of gender should guide the boundaries around people’s everyday interactions, and protecting a marriage should take precedence over all else, even if the way of doing it seems strange to some, and imposes costs on others.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/karen-pence-is-the-vice-presidents-prayer-warrior-gut-check-and-shield/2017/03/28/3d7a26ce-0a01-11e7-8884-96e6a6713f4b_story.html?utm_term=.ab1c54954ee5


This is interesting. And I mean that in purely a neutral sense.


I'm confused why anybody would be upset by that. I personally wouldn't lead my life that way. My fiancé trusts me and I trust her. But how the Pences arrange their marriage is entirely up to them and if you don't like it, get your nose out of their business...


The problem is the rule affects not just the Pences' marriage, but also the ability of any women on his staff to simply do their jobs. Nor is this rule limited to Pence, it extends throughout congress. There was a good article in the Altantic about this back in 2015:

In an anonymous survey of female staffers conducted by National Journal in order to gather information on the difficulties they face in a male-dominated industry, several female aides reported that they have been barred from staffing their male bosses at evening events, driving alone with their congressman or senator, or even sitting down one-on-one in his office for fear that others would get the wrong impression. … These policies, while not prevalent, exist in multiple offices — and they may well run afoul of employment discrimination laws.

… Male staffers said they’d also seen some female aides barred from solo meetings with the boss, and that they benefited in some instances from the exclusion of their female colleagues in high-level meetings, at receptions with major Washington powerbrokers, and just in earning a little more face time with their bosses.

For these women, the lack of access has meant an additional hurdle in their attempts to do their jobs, much less further their own careers.


So the rule causes harm even if none is intended.
"I am not able to carry all this people alone, for they are too heavy for me." -Moses (Numbers 11:14)
Kickstart
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States1941 Posts
March 31 2017 18:55 GMT
#144750
Not attacking Pence really, his life and relationship he can do as he wishes if that is what works best for them. My issue is with the underlying religious reasoning. That the risk of temptation is too high and to be avoided.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-31 19:01:57
March 31 2017 18:58 GMT
#144751
Huh, I wonder where the lawsuits are then; I'd guess congress simply exempted itself from some of the discrimination laws.
and of course suing congresspeople gotta be bad for your career and hard to win, what with half of em being lawyers.


I wonder if there's any way ot handle the issue of unintended discrimination in who gets elected. probably not any good ways.

How to handle discrimination re presidential appointments is a question worthy of some serious thought though, might be able to figure something out on that.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18828 Posts
March 31 2017 19:21 GMT
#144752
One way or another, when a woman cannot meet with the Vice President of the United States one-on-one because he either A) cannot control his sexual appetite or B) is observing his and his wife's religious/gender views, something should seem off. Add in the fact that many conservative male politicians adhere to this view and its suddenly not all that surprising that they'd come up with stuff like legitimate rape.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
March 31 2017 19:23 GMT
#144753
On April 01 2017 03:39 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 03:32 Danglars wrote:
On April 01 2017 02:52 Acrofales wrote:
On April 01 2017 00:58 Nevuk wrote:
The Washington Post ran a profile of Karen Pence, the wife of Vice President Mike Pence, on Wednesday. The piece talks about the closeness of the Pences’ relationship, and cites something Pence told The Hill in 2002: Unless his wife is there, he never eats alone with another woman or attends an event where alcohol is being served. (It’s unclear whether, 15 years later, this remains Pence’s practice.) It’s not in the Post piece, but here’s the original quote from 2002: “‘If there's alcohol being served and people are being loose, I want to have the best-looking brunette in the room standing next to me,’ Pence said.”

Some folks—mostly journalists and entertainers on Twitter—have reacted with surprise, anger, and sarcasm to the Pence family rule. Socially liberal or non-religious people may see Pence’s practice as misogynistic or bizarre. For a lot of conservative religious people, though, this set-up probably sounds normal, or even wise. The dust-up shows how radically notions of gender divide American culture.

Pence is not the first contemporary public figure to set these kinds of boundaries around his marriage. He seems to be following a version of the so-called Billy Graham rule, named for the famous evangelist who established similar guidelines for the pastors working in his ministry. In his autobiography, Graham notes that he and his colleagues worried about the temptations of sexual immorality that come from long days on the road and a lot of time away from family. They resolved to “avoid any situation that would even have the appearance of compromise or suspicion.” From that day on, Graham said, he “did not travel, meet, or eat alone with a woman other than my wife.” It was a way of following Paul’s advice to Timothy in the Bible, Graham wrote: to “flee … youthful lusts.”

The Hill article gives more context on how the Pences were thinking about this, at least back in 2002. Pence told the paper he often refused dinner or cocktail invitations from male colleagues, too: “It’s about building a zone around your marriage,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a predatory town, but I think you can inadvertently send the wrong message by being in [certain] situations.”

The 2002 article notes that Pence arrived in Congress a half decade after the 1994 “Republican revolution,” when Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the House. Several congressional marriages, including Gingrich’s, encountered difficulty that year. Pence seemed wary of this. “I’ve lost more elections than I’ve won,” he said. “I’ve seen friends lose their families. I’d rather lose an election.” He even said he gets fingers wagged in his face by concerned Indianans. “Little old ladies come and say, ‘Honey, whatever you need to do, keep your family together,’” he told The Hill.

These comments show that the Pences have a distinctively conservative approach toward family, sex, and gender. This is by no means the way that all Christians, or even all evangelical Christians like the Pences, navigate married life. But traditional religious people from other backgrounds may practice something similar. Many Orthodox Jews follow the laws of yichud, which prohibit unmarried men and women from being alone in a closed room together. Some Muslim men and women also refuse to be together alone if they’re not married. These practices all have different histories and origins, but they’re rooted in the same belief: The sanctity of marriage should be protected, and sexual immorality should be guarded against at all costs.

That idea might seem disorienting to more socially progressive Americans. For one thing, it shows a deep awareness of gender and sexuality: The implication is that temptations to flirt or cheat are present in everyday interactions.

Some journalists on Twitter quickly pointed out that Pence’s rules may function, in practice, to perpetuate professional and political disadvantages against women. If men in power can meet alone with other men but not women, they’ll just keep doing the business of being powerful in an all-male world. And it parallels critiques of the Billy Graham Rule that’ve been leveled within the evangelical community, as well, where it’s also been blamed for subjecting professional relationships to the logic of a sexually permissive society.

Other critics connected these views to Pence’s stance on LGBT issues. When he was governor of Indiana, he presided over a controversial religious-freedom bill that, LGBT advocates claimed, would have allowed business owners to discriminate against them. Pence’s marriage rules implicitly suggest there’s a temptation in being alone with women, but not in being alone with men, which is not the experience of a lot of people, including LGBT Christians.

But it’s also true that these aren’t just rules by, for, and about Mike Pence. This is how he and his wife, together, have chosen to navigate their marriage. That some people are so quick to be angered—and others are totally unsurprised—shows how divided America has become about the fundamental claim embedded in the Pence family rule: that understandings of gender should guide the boundaries around people’s everyday interactions, and protecting a marriage should take precedence over all else, even if the way of doing it seems strange to some, and imposes costs on others.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/karen-pence-is-the-vice-presidents-prayer-warrior-gut-check-and-shield/2017/03/28/3d7a26ce-0a01-11e7-8884-96e6a6713f4b_story.html?utm_term=.ab1c54954ee5


This is interesting. And I mean that in purely a neutral sense.


I'm confused why anybody would be upset by that. I personally wouldn't lead my life that way. My fiancé trusts me and I trust her. But how the Pences arrange their marriage is entirely up to them and if you don't like it, get your nose out of their business...

If you want to be entirely disgusted by media figures, go search "Pence wife filter:verified" of a time a day or two days past to see blue checks calling this unempowering and disgusting, practically misogyny.

Sincere question. How is this different from extreme repressive interpretations of Islam ("Sharia Law!") mocked by people like Mike Pence

@commiegirl1 who knew Mike Pence had uncontrollable sexual compulsions so serious he can't be alone w a woman who's not his wife?



Honest question, how long have you held an unsavory opinion of verified accounts?

I don't mind trolls doing their misogynistic BS, they are having their own sort of fun on twitter. But, please, take the search and find these illustrious journalists acting like this is an affront to Pence, his wife, the institution of marriage, or all relations between the sexes. I was ready to believe the backlash to be in response to a couple dumb buzzfeed or Jezebel columnists, but there were more. See for yourself if you're so inclined.
+ Show Spoiler +




This is all out of curiosity if casual observers of the culture wars are shocked at how far these things are taken nowadays.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35152 Posts
March 31 2017 19:35 GMT
#144754
On April 01 2017 04:23 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 03:39 Gahlo wrote:
On April 01 2017 03:32 Danglars wrote:
On April 01 2017 02:52 Acrofales wrote:
On April 01 2017 00:58 Nevuk wrote:
The Washington Post ran a profile of Karen Pence, the wife of Vice President Mike Pence, on Wednesday. The piece talks about the closeness of the Pences’ relationship, and cites something Pence told The Hill in 2002: Unless his wife is there, he never eats alone with another woman or attends an event where alcohol is being served. (It’s unclear whether, 15 years later, this remains Pence’s practice.) It’s not in the Post piece, but here’s the original quote from 2002: “‘If there's alcohol being served and people are being loose, I want to have the best-looking brunette in the room standing next to me,’ Pence said.”

Some folks—mostly journalists and entertainers on Twitter—have reacted with surprise, anger, and sarcasm to the Pence family rule. Socially liberal or non-religious people may see Pence’s practice as misogynistic or bizarre. For a lot of conservative religious people, though, this set-up probably sounds normal, or even wise. The dust-up shows how radically notions of gender divide American culture.

Pence is not the first contemporary public figure to set these kinds of boundaries around his marriage. He seems to be following a version of the so-called Billy Graham rule, named for the famous evangelist who established similar guidelines for the pastors working in his ministry. In his autobiography, Graham notes that he and his colleagues worried about the temptations of sexual immorality that come from long days on the road and a lot of time away from family. They resolved to “avoid any situation that would even have the appearance of compromise or suspicion.” From that day on, Graham said, he “did not travel, meet, or eat alone with a woman other than my wife.” It was a way of following Paul’s advice to Timothy in the Bible, Graham wrote: to “flee … youthful lusts.”

The Hill article gives more context on how the Pences were thinking about this, at least back in 2002. Pence told the paper he often refused dinner or cocktail invitations from male colleagues, too: “It’s about building a zone around your marriage,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a predatory town, but I think you can inadvertently send the wrong message by being in [certain] situations.”

The 2002 article notes that Pence arrived in Congress a half decade after the 1994 “Republican revolution,” when Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the House. Several congressional marriages, including Gingrich’s, encountered difficulty that year. Pence seemed wary of this. “I’ve lost more elections than I’ve won,” he said. “I’ve seen friends lose their families. I’d rather lose an election.” He even said he gets fingers wagged in his face by concerned Indianans. “Little old ladies come and say, ‘Honey, whatever you need to do, keep your family together,’” he told The Hill.

These comments show that the Pences have a distinctively conservative approach toward family, sex, and gender. This is by no means the way that all Christians, or even all evangelical Christians like the Pences, navigate married life. But traditional religious people from other backgrounds may practice something similar. Many Orthodox Jews follow the laws of yichud, which prohibit unmarried men and women from being alone in a closed room together. Some Muslim men and women also refuse to be together alone if they’re not married. These practices all have different histories and origins, but they’re rooted in the same belief: The sanctity of marriage should be protected, and sexual immorality should be guarded against at all costs.

That idea might seem disorienting to more socially progressive Americans. For one thing, it shows a deep awareness of gender and sexuality: The implication is that temptations to flirt or cheat are present in everyday interactions.

Some journalists on Twitter quickly pointed out that Pence’s rules may function, in practice, to perpetuate professional and political disadvantages against women. If men in power can meet alone with other men but not women, they’ll just keep doing the business of being powerful in an all-male world. And it parallels critiques of the Billy Graham Rule that’ve been leveled within the evangelical community, as well, where it’s also been blamed for subjecting professional relationships to the logic of a sexually permissive society.

Other critics connected these views to Pence’s stance on LGBT issues. When he was governor of Indiana, he presided over a controversial religious-freedom bill that, LGBT advocates claimed, would have allowed business owners to discriminate against them. Pence’s marriage rules implicitly suggest there’s a temptation in being alone with women, but not in being alone with men, which is not the experience of a lot of people, including LGBT Christians.

But it’s also true that these aren’t just rules by, for, and about Mike Pence. This is how he and his wife, together, have chosen to navigate their marriage. That some people are so quick to be angered—and others are totally unsurprised—shows how divided America has become about the fundamental claim embedded in the Pence family rule: that understandings of gender should guide the boundaries around people’s everyday interactions, and protecting a marriage should take precedence over all else, even if the way of doing it seems strange to some, and imposes costs on others.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/karen-pence-is-the-vice-presidents-prayer-warrior-gut-check-and-shield/2017/03/28/3d7a26ce-0a01-11e7-8884-96e6a6713f4b_story.html?utm_term=.ab1c54954ee5


This is interesting. And I mean that in purely a neutral sense.


I'm confused why anybody would be upset by that. I personally wouldn't lead my life that way. My fiancé trusts me and I trust her. But how the Pences arrange their marriage is entirely up to them and if you don't like it, get your nose out of their business...

If you want to be entirely disgusted by media figures, go search "Pence wife filter:verified" of a time a day or two days past to see blue checks calling this unempowering and disgusting, practically misogyny.

Sincere question. How is this different from extreme repressive interpretations of Islam ("Sharia Law!") mocked by people like Mike Pence

@commiegirl1 who knew Mike Pence had uncontrollable sexual compulsions so serious he can't be alone w a woman who's not his wife?



Honest question, how long have you held an unsavory opinion of verified accounts?

I don't mind trolls doing their misogynistic BS, they are having their own sort of fun on twitter. But, please, take the search and find these illustrious journalists acting like this is an affront to Pence, his wife, the institution of marriage, or all relations between the sexes. I was ready to believe the backlash to be in response to a couple dumb buzzfeed or Jezebel columnists, but there were more. See for yourself if you're so inclined.
+ Show Spoiler +

https://twitter.com/mkhammer/status/847440532506787847


This is all out of curiosity if casual observers of the culture wars are shocked at how far these things are taken nowadays.

Why did I even bother asking...
ThaddeusK
Profile Joined July 2008
United States231 Posts
March 31 2017 19:37 GMT
#144755
On April 01 2017 04:23 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 03:39 Gahlo wrote:
On April 01 2017 03:32 Danglars wrote:
On April 01 2017 02:52 Acrofales wrote:
On April 01 2017 00:58 Nevuk wrote:
The Washington Post ran a profile of Karen Pence, the wife of Vice President Mike Pence, on Wednesday. The piece talks about the closeness of the Pences’ relationship, and cites something Pence told The Hill in 2002: Unless his wife is there, he never eats alone with another woman or attends an event where alcohol is being served. (It’s unclear whether, 15 years later, this remains Pence’s practice.) It’s not in the Post piece, but here’s the original quote from 2002: “‘If there's alcohol being served and people are being loose, I want to have the best-looking brunette in the room standing next to me,’ Pence said.”

Some folks—mostly journalists and entertainers on Twitter—have reacted with surprise, anger, and sarcasm to the Pence family rule. Socially liberal or non-religious people may see Pence’s practice as misogynistic or bizarre. For a lot of conservative religious people, though, this set-up probably sounds normal, or even wise. The dust-up shows how radically notions of gender divide American culture.

Pence is not the first contemporary public figure to set these kinds of boundaries around his marriage. He seems to be following a version of the so-called Billy Graham rule, named for the famous evangelist who established similar guidelines for the pastors working in his ministry. In his autobiography, Graham notes that he and his colleagues worried about the temptations of sexual immorality that come from long days on the road and a lot of time away from family. They resolved to “avoid any situation that would even have the appearance of compromise or suspicion.” From that day on, Graham said, he “did not travel, meet, or eat alone with a woman other than my wife.” It was a way of following Paul’s advice to Timothy in the Bible, Graham wrote: to “flee … youthful lusts.”

The Hill article gives more context on how the Pences were thinking about this, at least back in 2002. Pence told the paper he often refused dinner or cocktail invitations from male colleagues, too: “It’s about building a zone around your marriage,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a predatory town, but I think you can inadvertently send the wrong message by being in [certain] situations.”

The 2002 article notes that Pence arrived in Congress a half decade after the 1994 “Republican revolution,” when Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the House. Several congressional marriages, including Gingrich’s, encountered difficulty that year. Pence seemed wary of this. “I’ve lost more elections than I’ve won,” he said. “I’ve seen friends lose their families. I’d rather lose an election.” He even said he gets fingers wagged in his face by concerned Indianans. “Little old ladies come and say, ‘Honey, whatever you need to do, keep your family together,’” he told The Hill.

These comments show that the Pences have a distinctively conservative approach toward family, sex, and gender. This is by no means the way that all Christians, or even all evangelical Christians like the Pences, navigate married life. But traditional religious people from other backgrounds may practice something similar. Many Orthodox Jews follow the laws of yichud, which prohibit unmarried men and women from being alone in a closed room together. Some Muslim men and women also refuse to be together alone if they’re not married. These practices all have different histories and origins, but they’re rooted in the same belief: The sanctity of marriage should be protected, and sexual immorality should be guarded against at all costs.

That idea might seem disorienting to more socially progressive Americans. For one thing, it shows a deep awareness of gender and sexuality: The implication is that temptations to flirt or cheat are present in everyday interactions.

Some journalists on Twitter quickly pointed out that Pence’s rules may function, in practice, to perpetuate professional and political disadvantages against women. If men in power can meet alone with other men but not women, they’ll just keep doing the business of being powerful in an all-male world. And it parallels critiques of the Billy Graham Rule that’ve been leveled within the evangelical community, as well, where it’s also been blamed for subjecting professional relationships to the logic of a sexually permissive society.

Other critics connected these views to Pence’s stance on LGBT issues. When he was governor of Indiana, he presided over a controversial religious-freedom bill that, LGBT advocates claimed, would have allowed business owners to discriminate against them. Pence’s marriage rules implicitly suggest there’s a temptation in being alone with women, but not in being alone with men, which is not the experience of a lot of people, including LGBT Christians.

But it’s also true that these aren’t just rules by, for, and about Mike Pence. This is how he and his wife, together, have chosen to navigate their marriage. That some people are so quick to be angered—and others are totally unsurprised—shows how divided America has become about the fundamental claim embedded in the Pence family rule: that understandings of gender should guide the boundaries around people’s everyday interactions, and protecting a marriage should take precedence over all else, even if the way of doing it seems strange to some, and imposes costs on others.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/karen-pence-is-the-vice-presidents-prayer-warrior-gut-check-and-shield/2017/03/28/3d7a26ce-0a01-11e7-8884-96e6a6713f4b_story.html?utm_term=.ab1c54954ee5


This is interesting. And I mean that in purely a neutral sense.


I'm confused why anybody would be upset by that. I personally wouldn't lead my life that way. My fiancé trusts me and I trust her. But how the Pences arrange their marriage is entirely up to them and if you don't like it, get your nose out of their business...

If you want to be entirely disgusted by media figures, go search "Pence wife filter:verified" of a time a day or two days past to see blue checks calling this unempowering and disgusting, practically misogyny.

Sincere question. How is this different from extreme repressive interpretations of Islam ("Sharia Law!") mocked by people like Mike Pence

@commiegirl1 who knew Mike Pence had uncontrollable sexual compulsions so serious he can't be alone w a woman who's not his wife?



Honest question, how long have you held an unsavory opinion of verified accounts?

I don't mind trolls doing their misogynistic BS, they are having their own sort of fun on twitter. But, please, take the search and find these illustrious journalists acting like this is an affront to Pence, his wife, the institution of marriage, or all relations between the sexes. I was ready to believe the backlash to be in response to a couple dumb buzzfeed or Jezebel columnists, but there were more. See for yourself if you're so inclined.
+ Show Spoiler +

https://twitter.com/mkhammer/status/847440532506787847


This is all out of curiosity if casual observers of the culture wars are shocked at how far these things are taken nowadays.


Honest question, how long have you held an unsavory opinion of verified accounts?
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42701 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-31 19:43:36
March 31 2017 19:42 GMT
#144756
On April 01 2017 04:35 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 04:23 Danglars wrote:
On April 01 2017 03:39 Gahlo wrote:
On April 01 2017 03:32 Danglars wrote:
On April 01 2017 02:52 Acrofales wrote:
On April 01 2017 00:58 Nevuk wrote:
The Washington Post ran a profile of Karen Pence, the wife of Vice President Mike Pence, on Wednesday. The piece talks about the closeness of the Pences’ relationship, and cites something Pence told The Hill in 2002: Unless his wife is there, he never eats alone with another woman or attends an event where alcohol is being served. (It’s unclear whether, 15 years later, this remains Pence’s practice.) It’s not in the Post piece, but here’s the original quote from 2002: “‘If there's alcohol being served and people are being loose, I want to have the best-looking brunette in the room standing next to me,’ Pence said.”

Some folks—mostly journalists and entertainers on Twitter—have reacted with surprise, anger, and sarcasm to the Pence family rule. Socially liberal or non-religious people may see Pence’s practice as misogynistic or bizarre. For a lot of conservative religious people, though, this set-up probably sounds normal, or even wise. The dust-up shows how radically notions of gender divide American culture.

Pence is not the first contemporary public figure to set these kinds of boundaries around his marriage. He seems to be following a version of the so-called Billy Graham rule, named for the famous evangelist who established similar guidelines for the pastors working in his ministry. In his autobiography, Graham notes that he and his colleagues worried about the temptations of sexual immorality that come from long days on the road and a lot of time away from family. They resolved to “avoid any situation that would even have the appearance of compromise or suspicion.” From that day on, Graham said, he “did not travel, meet, or eat alone with a woman other than my wife.” It was a way of following Paul’s advice to Timothy in the Bible, Graham wrote: to “flee … youthful lusts.”

The Hill article gives more context on how the Pences were thinking about this, at least back in 2002. Pence told the paper he often refused dinner or cocktail invitations from male colleagues, too: “It’s about building a zone around your marriage,” he said. “I don’t think it’s a predatory town, but I think you can inadvertently send the wrong message by being in [certain] situations.”

The 2002 article notes that Pence arrived in Congress a half decade after the 1994 “Republican revolution,” when Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the House. Several congressional marriages, including Gingrich’s, encountered difficulty that year. Pence seemed wary of this. “I’ve lost more elections than I’ve won,” he said. “I’ve seen friends lose their families. I’d rather lose an election.” He even said he gets fingers wagged in his face by concerned Indianans. “Little old ladies come and say, ‘Honey, whatever you need to do, keep your family together,’” he told The Hill.

These comments show that the Pences have a distinctively conservative approach toward family, sex, and gender. This is by no means the way that all Christians, or even all evangelical Christians like the Pences, navigate married life. But traditional religious people from other backgrounds may practice something similar. Many Orthodox Jews follow the laws of yichud, which prohibit unmarried men and women from being alone in a closed room together. Some Muslim men and women also refuse to be together alone if they’re not married. These practices all have different histories and origins, but they’re rooted in the same belief: The sanctity of marriage should be protected, and sexual immorality should be guarded against at all costs.

That idea might seem disorienting to more socially progressive Americans. For one thing, it shows a deep awareness of gender and sexuality: The implication is that temptations to flirt or cheat are present in everyday interactions.

Some journalists on Twitter quickly pointed out that Pence’s rules may function, in practice, to perpetuate professional and political disadvantages against women. If men in power can meet alone with other men but not women, they’ll just keep doing the business of being powerful in an all-male world. And it parallels critiques of the Billy Graham Rule that’ve been leveled within the evangelical community, as well, where it’s also been blamed for subjecting professional relationships to the logic of a sexually permissive society.

Other critics connected these views to Pence’s stance on LGBT issues. When he was governor of Indiana, he presided over a controversial religious-freedom bill that, LGBT advocates claimed, would have allowed business owners to discriminate against them. Pence’s marriage rules implicitly suggest there’s a temptation in being alone with women, but not in being alone with men, which is not the experience of a lot of people, including LGBT Christians.

But it’s also true that these aren’t just rules by, for, and about Mike Pence. This is how he and his wife, together, have chosen to navigate their marriage. That some people are so quick to be angered—and others are totally unsurprised—shows how divided America has become about the fundamental claim embedded in the Pence family rule: that understandings of gender should guide the boundaries around people’s everyday interactions, and protecting a marriage should take precedence over all else, even if the way of doing it seems strange to some, and imposes costs on others.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/karen-pence-is-the-vice-presidents-prayer-warrior-gut-check-and-shield/2017/03/28/3d7a26ce-0a01-11e7-8884-96e6a6713f4b_story.html?utm_term=.ab1c54954ee5


This is interesting. And I mean that in purely a neutral sense.


I'm confused why anybody would be upset by that. I personally wouldn't lead my life that way. My fiancé trusts me and I trust her. But how the Pences arrange their marriage is entirely up to them and if you don't like it, get your nose out of their business...

If you want to be entirely disgusted by media figures, go search "Pence wife filter:verified" of a time a day or two days past to see blue checks calling this unempowering and disgusting, practically misogyny.

Sincere question. How is this different from extreme repressive interpretations of Islam ("Sharia Law!") mocked by people like Mike Pence

@commiegirl1 who knew Mike Pence had uncontrollable sexual compulsions so serious he can't be alone w a woman who's not his wife?



Honest question, how long have you held an unsavory opinion of verified accounts?

I don't mind trolls doing their misogynistic BS, they are having their own sort of fun on twitter. But, please, take the search and find these illustrious journalists acting like this is an affront to Pence, his wife, the institution of marriage, or all relations between the sexes. I was ready to believe the backlash to be in response to a couple dumb buzzfeed or Jezebel columnists, but there were more. See for yourself if you're so inclined.
+ Show Spoiler +

https://twitter.com/mkhammer/status/847440532506787847


This is all out of curiosity if casual observers of the culture wars are shocked at how far these things are taken nowadays.

Why did I even bother asking...

They don't see a link between the facebook outrage on their feeds telling them to
go search "Pence wife filter:verified"
and the increasing disconnect between their political tribe and the "verified". Individual items are viewed in isolation without any awareness that the media people consume is carefully curated before it gets to them. Meta questions like "did you always distrust the verified people?" and "why do you think you dislike them now?" are lost, he can only answer what he saw this morning to make him mad at them. He knows what they did to make him mad, what he doesn't know is why he knows what they did to make him mad and who it benefits.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11350 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-03-31 19:51:42
March 31 2017 19:48 GMT
#144757
On April 01 2017 04:21 farvacola wrote:
One way or another, when a woman cannot meet with the Vice President of the United States one-on-one because he either A) cannot control his sexual appetite or B) is observing his and his wife's religious/gender views, something should seem off. Add in the fact that many conservative male politicians adhere to this view and its suddenly not all that surprising that they'd come up with stuff like legitimate rape.

How do you go from him not wanting to have dinner one on one with a woman other than his wife to him devaluing the word rape? That is such a jump.

In what way is one on one meals required for advancement that could not happen within a small group context?
The underlying idea isn't that you have one meal with a woman and you jump straight into bed. But rather while extra-marital relationships form when the two spend an unhealthy amount of time alone together, it starts somewhere and rather innocuously. This practice attempts to nip in the bud by denying opportunity from the beginning- and given some of the career politicians' histories (dear Billy Clinton or Newt Gingerich), perhaps there's something to it.

It seems that he has counted the cost on this one:

The 2002 article notes that Pence arrived in Congress a half decade after the 1994 “Republican revolution,” when Newt Gingrich was the speaker of the House. Several congressional marriages, including Gingrich’s, encountered difficulty that year. Pence seemed wary of this. “I’ve lost more elections than I’ve won,” he said. “I’ve seen friends lose their families. I’d rather lose an election.” He even said he gets fingers wagged in his face by concerned Indianans. “Little old ladies come and say, ‘Honey, whatever you need to do, keep your family together,’” he told The Hill.

He was willing to lose elections over people getting outraged over his practice... for the sake of his marriage. I highly respect that because it corresponds to my own values.
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
March 31 2017 19:51 GMT
#144758
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23238 Posts
March 31 2017 19:54 GMT
#144759
On April 01 2017 04:51 Doodsmack wrote:
https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/847887264105594880


Well Fox news is abandoning ship, I expect Trump to resign before his term is up for sure now. He's not going to prison under any circumstances, neither is anyone in his administration but he's not making it the full 4.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
March 31 2017 19:57 GMT
#144760
On April 01 2017 04:54 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 01 2017 04:51 Doodsmack wrote:
https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/847887264105594880


Well Fox news is abandoning ship, I expect Trump to resign before his term is up for sure now. He's not going to prison under any circumstances, neither is anyone in his administration but he's not making it the full 4.

Well no way in hell he will resign though, so you'll have to pry the presidency from him with an impeachment proceeding worthy of the gods.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Prev 1 7236 7237 7238 7239 7240 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 41
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 783
Barracks 760
Flash 646
Larva 595
BeSt 306
Stork 254
EffOrt 209
hero 205
ggaemo 172
Killer 154
[ Show more ]
Dewaltoss 122
JulyZerg 75
Soma 72
Noble 17
yabsab 17
IntoTheRainbow 12
Pusan 8
Dota 2
XcaliburYe1156
XaKoH 623
Fuzer 186
League of Legends
JimRising 466
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K781
allub427
Super Smash Bros
Westballz73
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor193
Other Games
summit1g9893
singsing451
SortOf173
EmSc Tv 15
ArmadaUGS15
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick831
BasetradeTV36
EmSc Tv 15
StarCraft 2
EmSc2Tv 15
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
37m
SC Evo League
2h 37m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5h 37m
CSO Cup
6h 37m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 5h
Wardi Open
2 days
RotterdaM Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.