• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:53
CEST 13:53
KST 20:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202519Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder2EWC 2025 - Replay Pack2Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced35BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update Serral wins EWC 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 EWC 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Which platform caters to men's fashion needs? Help: rep cant save Shield Battery Server New Patch [G] Progamer Settings
Tourneys
[BSL] Non-Korean Championship - Final weekend [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Flash @ Namkraft Laddernet …
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 624 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6445

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6443 6444 6445 6446 6447 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
December 18 2016 21:29 GMT
#128881
The only reason Trump questions whether the hacking was really from Russia is because he doesn't want his "win" to look in any way illegitimate. This is just personal ego. Hopefully this is not a preview of the extent to which he's willing to let his ego/temperament influence policy...

Donald Trump's top aides on Sunday said the president-elect isn't ready to accept the finding by intelligence officials that Moscow hacked Democratic emails in a bid to elevate Trump. Even if it's true, they said, Trump still won the White House fair and square.

...

"This whole thing is a spin job," said Trump's incoming chief of staff, Reince Priebus. "And I think what the Democrats ought to do is look in the mirror and face the reality that they lost the election."

...

"Where's the evidence?" asked Kellyanne Conway, another close Trump adviser.

Asked about President Barack Obama's vow to retaliate against the Russians, Conway said: "It seems like the president is under pressure from Team Hillary, who can't accept the election results."


Yahoo
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
December 18 2016 21:54 GMT
#128882
On December 19 2016 05:32 LegalLord wrote:
For the folks here that defend Iraq as better than Libya and Syria for the US, what is the rationale for such a position? Or in other words, what went right in Iraq that went wrong in Syria and Libya?


The invasion, neutering, and initial developments in Iraq was fantastic. About 1-2 weeks of combat followed by taking the capital, followed by now having full reign to search and remove the weapons of mass destruction.

The shit show happened when (a) there were no weapons of mass destruction, (b) it turns out there were a shit tonne of people unable to defend themselves should the US leave, and (c) the inability for the white house to explain how this helped us in Afghanistan.

Those people we found in Iraq would be helpless whether or not we went into Iraq, but out of sight out of mind--Bush and Obama could not turn their backs on them and so what was a 2 week battle turned into a multi-year occupation where the only real answer was to do a full annexation of Iraq and create a safe state for people with western leanings to retreat into, an option that no politician would be brave enough to propose and no civilian would be passionate enough to support.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21676 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-18 22:01:00
December 18 2016 21:59 GMT
#128883
On December 19 2016 06:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2016 05:32 LegalLord wrote:
For the folks here that defend Iraq as better than Libya and Syria for the US, what is the rationale for such a position? Or in other words, what went right in Iraq that went wrong in Syria and Libya?


The invasion, neutering, and initial developments in Iraq was fantastic. About 1-2 weeks of combat followed by taking the capital, followed by now having full reign to search and remove the weapons of mass destruction.

The shit show happened when (a) there were no weapons of mass destruction, (b) it turns out there were a shit tonne of people unable to defend themselves should the US leave, and (c) the inability for the white house to explain how this helped us in Afghanistan.

Those people we found in Iraq would be helpless whether or not we went into Iraq, but out of sight out of mind--Bush and Obama could not turn their backs on them and so what was a 2 week battle turned into a multi-year occupation where the only real answer was to do a full annexation of Iraq and create a safe state for people with western leanings to retreat into, an option that no politician would be brave enough to propose and no civilian would be passionate enough to support.

Your ignoring the guerilla war that happened after the invasion which was a major problem for the US and probably the main reason boots were a non-starter for Syria/Libya.

Just looking at the initial invasion is very short sighted since Iraq never stood a chance there and neither would Libya/Syria.
The US 'only' had several hundred times the military budget. Anything less then a 'fantastic showing' would be a complete embarrassment.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
December 18 2016 22:04 GMT
#128884
On December 19 2016 06:59 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2016 06:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On December 19 2016 05:32 LegalLord wrote:
For the folks here that defend Iraq as better than Libya and Syria for the US, what is the rationale for such a position? Or in other words, what went right in Iraq that went wrong in Syria and Libya?


The invasion, neutering, and initial developments in Iraq was fantastic. About 1-2 weeks of combat followed by taking the capital, followed by now having full reign to search and remove the weapons of mass destruction.

The shit show happened when (a) there were no weapons of mass destruction, (b) it turns out there were a shit tonne of people unable to defend themselves should the US leave, and (c) the inability for the white house to explain how this helped us in Afghanistan.

Those people we found in Iraq would be helpless whether or not we went into Iraq, but out of sight out of mind--Bush and Obama could not turn their backs on them and so what was a 2 week battle turned into a multi-year occupation where the only real answer was to do a full annexation of Iraq and create a safe state for people with western leanings to retreat into, an option that no politician would be brave enough to propose and no civilian would be passionate enough to support.

Your ignoring the guerilla war that happened after the invasion which was a major problem for the US and probably the main reason boots were a non-starter for Syria/Libya.

Just looking at the initial invasion is very short sighted since Iraq never stood a chance there and neither would Libya/Syria.
The US 'only' had several hundred times the military budget. Anything less then a 'fantastic showing' would be a complete embarrassment.


I did not ignore the guerilla war.

The initial reason for Iraq was to remove WMD's. They got to Iraq, got to the supposed locations of WMDs, and found jack shit. Next step of that plan is to leave. Invasion done, 3-8 weeks tops.

Instead we stayed. Since we stayed guerilla warfare could happen. They can't guerilla war us if our troops are back in american soil. But since we stayed and since we were trying to leave them with a stable system we ended up spending years and years sending troops to sit around and be shot at for months at a time.
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21676 Posts
December 18 2016 22:14 GMT
#128885
On December 19 2016 07:04 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2016 06:59 Gorsameth wrote:
On December 19 2016 06:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On December 19 2016 05:32 LegalLord wrote:
For the folks here that defend Iraq as better than Libya and Syria for the US, what is the rationale for such a position? Or in other words, what went right in Iraq that went wrong in Syria and Libya?


The invasion, neutering, and initial developments in Iraq was fantastic. About 1-2 weeks of combat followed by taking the capital, followed by now having full reign to search and remove the weapons of mass destruction.

The shit show happened when (a) there were no weapons of mass destruction, (b) it turns out there were a shit tonne of people unable to defend themselves should the US leave, and (c) the inability for the white house to explain how this helped us in Afghanistan.

Those people we found in Iraq would be helpless whether or not we went into Iraq, but out of sight out of mind--Bush and Obama could not turn their backs on them and so what was a 2 week battle turned into a multi-year occupation where the only real answer was to do a full annexation of Iraq and create a safe state for people with western leanings to retreat into, an option that no politician would be brave enough to propose and no civilian would be passionate enough to support.

Your ignoring the guerilla war that happened after the invasion which was a major problem for the US and probably the main reason boots were a non-starter for Syria/Libya.

Just looking at the initial invasion is very short sighted since Iraq never stood a chance there and neither would Libya/Syria.
The US 'only' had several hundred times the military budget. Anything less then a 'fantastic showing' would be a complete embarrassment.


I did not ignore the guerilla war.

The initial reason for Iraq was to remove WMD's. They got to Iraq, got to the supposed locations of WMDs, and found jack shit. Next step of that plan is to leave. Invasion done, 3-8 weeks tops.

Instead we stayed. Since we stayed guerilla warfare could happen. They can't guerilla war us if our troops are back in american soil. But since we stayed and since we were trying to leave them with a stable system we ended up spending years and years sending troops to sit around and be shot at for months at a time.

The question asked by LegalLord was about how the situation in Iraq was handled compared to Syria/Libya. Not some mythical scenario where the US went around creating power vacuums at random.

PS.
In your scenario ISIS would probably be a successfully established Kalifaat in Iraq, not at war in Syria and free to concentrate its resources on attacking the hated West. An actual downgrade to the current situation where their resources are tied up and being bled dry.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
mahrgell
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Germany3943 Posts
December 18 2016 22:15 GMT
#128886
On December 19 2016 07:04 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2016 06:59 Gorsameth wrote:
On December 19 2016 06:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On December 19 2016 05:32 LegalLord wrote:
For the folks here that defend Iraq as better than Libya and Syria for the US, what is the rationale for such a position? Or in other words, what went right in Iraq that went wrong in Syria and Libya?


The invasion, neutering, and initial developments in Iraq was fantastic. About 1-2 weeks of combat followed by taking the capital, followed by now having full reign to search and remove the weapons of mass destruction.

The shit show happened when (a) there were no weapons of mass destruction, (b) it turns out there were a shit tonne of people unable to defend themselves should the US leave, and (c) the inability for the white house to explain how this helped us in Afghanistan.

Those people we found in Iraq would be helpless whether or not we went into Iraq, but out of sight out of mind--Bush and Obama could not turn their backs on them and so what was a 2 week battle turned into a multi-year occupation where the only real answer was to do a full annexation of Iraq and create a safe state for people with western leanings to retreat into, an option that no politician would be brave enough to propose and no civilian would be passionate enough to support.

Your ignoring the guerilla war that happened after the invasion which was a major problem for the US and probably the main reason boots were a non-starter for Syria/Libya.

Just looking at the initial invasion is very short sighted since Iraq never stood a chance there and neither would Libya/Syria.
The US 'only' had several hundred times the military budget. Anything less then a 'fantastic showing' would be a complete embarrassment.


I did not ignore the guerilla war.

The initial reason for Iraq was to remove WMD's. They got to Iraq, got to the supposed locations of WMDs, and found jack shit. Next step of that plan is to leave. Invasion done, 3-8 weeks tops.

Instead we stayed. Since we stayed guerilla warfare could happen. They can't guerilla war us if our troops are back in american soil. But since we stayed and since we were trying to leave them with a stable system we ended up spending years and years sending troops to sit around and be shot at for months at a time.


You make it sound like anyone in the US leadership believed there were any WMD...
It was fully known that all the cited sources were fabricated.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
December 18 2016 22:32 GMT
#128887
On December 19 2016 07:15 mahrgell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2016 07:04 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On December 19 2016 06:59 Gorsameth wrote:
On December 19 2016 06:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On December 19 2016 05:32 LegalLord wrote:
For the folks here that defend Iraq as better than Libya and Syria for the US, what is the rationale for such a position? Or in other words, what went right in Iraq that went wrong in Syria and Libya?


The invasion, neutering, and initial developments in Iraq was fantastic. About 1-2 weeks of combat followed by taking the capital, followed by now having full reign to search and remove the weapons of mass destruction.

The shit show happened when (a) there were no weapons of mass destruction, (b) it turns out there were a shit tonne of people unable to defend themselves should the US leave, and (c) the inability for the white house to explain how this helped us in Afghanistan.

Those people we found in Iraq would be helpless whether or not we went into Iraq, but out of sight out of mind--Bush and Obama could not turn their backs on them and so what was a 2 week battle turned into a multi-year occupation where the only real answer was to do a full annexation of Iraq and create a safe state for people with western leanings to retreat into, an option that no politician would be brave enough to propose and no civilian would be passionate enough to support.

Your ignoring the guerilla war that happened after the invasion which was a major problem for the US and probably the main reason boots were a non-starter for Syria/Libya.

Just looking at the initial invasion is very short sighted since Iraq never stood a chance there and neither would Libya/Syria.
The US 'only' had several hundred times the military budget. Anything less then a 'fantastic showing' would be a complete embarrassment.


I did not ignore the guerilla war.

The initial reason for Iraq was to remove WMD's. They got to Iraq, got to the supposed locations of WMDs, and found jack shit. Next step of that plan is to leave. Invasion done, 3-8 weeks tops.

Instead we stayed. Since we stayed guerilla warfare could happen. They can't guerilla war us if our troops are back in american soil. But since we stayed and since we were trying to leave them with a stable system we ended up spending years and years sending troops to sit around and be shot at for months at a time.


You make it sound like anyone in the US leadership believed there were any WMD...
It was fully known that all the cited sources were fabricated.

I disagree; I think some in the US leadership did believe there were WMDs.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
mahrgell
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Germany3943 Posts
December 18 2016 22:44 GMT
#128888
On December 19 2016 07:32 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2016 07:15 mahrgell wrote:
On December 19 2016 07:04 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On December 19 2016 06:59 Gorsameth wrote:
On December 19 2016 06:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On December 19 2016 05:32 LegalLord wrote:
For the folks here that defend Iraq as better than Libya and Syria for the US, what is the rationale for such a position? Or in other words, what went right in Iraq that went wrong in Syria and Libya?


The invasion, neutering, and initial developments in Iraq was fantastic. About 1-2 weeks of combat followed by taking the capital, followed by now having full reign to search and remove the weapons of mass destruction.

The shit show happened when (a) there were no weapons of mass destruction, (b) it turns out there were a shit tonne of people unable to defend themselves should the US leave, and (c) the inability for the white house to explain how this helped us in Afghanistan.

Those people we found in Iraq would be helpless whether or not we went into Iraq, but out of sight out of mind--Bush and Obama could not turn their backs on them and so what was a 2 week battle turned into a multi-year occupation where the only real answer was to do a full annexation of Iraq and create a safe state for people with western leanings to retreat into, an option that no politician would be brave enough to propose and no civilian would be passionate enough to support.

Your ignoring the guerilla war that happened after the invasion which was a major problem for the US and probably the main reason boots were a non-starter for Syria/Libya.

Just looking at the initial invasion is very short sighted since Iraq never stood a chance there and neither would Libya/Syria.
The US 'only' had several hundred times the military budget. Anything less then a 'fantastic showing' would be a complete embarrassment.


I did not ignore the guerilla war.

The initial reason for Iraq was to remove WMD's. They got to Iraq, got to the supposed locations of WMDs, and found jack shit. Next step of that plan is to leave. Invasion done, 3-8 weeks tops.

Instead we stayed. Since we stayed guerilla warfare could happen. They can't guerilla war us if our troops are back in american soil. But since we stayed and since we were trying to leave them with a stable system we ended up spending years and years sending troops to sit around and be shot at for months at a time.


You make it sound like anyone in the US leadership believed there were any WMD...
It was fully known that all the cited sources were fabricated.

I disagree; I think some in the US leadership did believe there were WMDs.


In pretty much all their presentations used stuff based on Curveball. A guy who was known to be a liar and wannabe, who made up all kind of shit to get asylum in Germany. Everything the guy had said was fabricated.
And this was known for months when the US presented exactly those sketches and quotes in the UN security council.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
December 18 2016 22:52 GMT
#128889
On December 19 2016 07:44 mahrgell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2016 07:32 zlefin wrote:
On December 19 2016 07:15 mahrgell wrote:
On December 19 2016 07:04 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On December 19 2016 06:59 Gorsameth wrote:
On December 19 2016 06:54 Thieving Magpie wrote:
On December 19 2016 05:32 LegalLord wrote:
For the folks here that defend Iraq as better than Libya and Syria for the US, what is the rationale for such a position? Or in other words, what went right in Iraq that went wrong in Syria and Libya?


The invasion, neutering, and initial developments in Iraq was fantastic. About 1-2 weeks of combat followed by taking the capital, followed by now having full reign to search and remove the weapons of mass destruction.

The shit show happened when (a) there were no weapons of mass destruction, (b) it turns out there were a shit tonne of people unable to defend themselves should the US leave, and (c) the inability for the white house to explain how this helped us in Afghanistan.

Those people we found in Iraq would be helpless whether or not we went into Iraq, but out of sight out of mind--Bush and Obama could not turn their backs on them and so what was a 2 week battle turned into a multi-year occupation where the only real answer was to do a full annexation of Iraq and create a safe state for people with western leanings to retreat into, an option that no politician would be brave enough to propose and no civilian would be passionate enough to support.

Your ignoring the guerilla war that happened after the invasion which was a major problem for the US and probably the main reason boots were a non-starter for Syria/Libya.

Just looking at the initial invasion is very short sighted since Iraq never stood a chance there and neither would Libya/Syria.
The US 'only' had several hundred times the military budget. Anything less then a 'fantastic showing' would be a complete embarrassment.


I did not ignore the guerilla war.

The initial reason for Iraq was to remove WMD's. They got to Iraq, got to the supposed locations of WMDs, and found jack shit. Next step of that plan is to leave. Invasion done, 3-8 weeks tops.

Instead we stayed. Since we stayed guerilla warfare could happen. They can't guerilla war us if our troops are back in american soil. But since we stayed and since we were trying to leave them with a stable system we ended up spending years and years sending troops to sit around and be shot at for months at a time.


You make it sound like anyone in the US leadership believed there were any WMD...
It was fully known that all the cited sources were fabricated.

I disagree; I think some in the US leadership did believe there were WMDs.


In pretty much all their presentations used stuff based on Curveball. A guy who was known to be a liar and wannabe, who made up all kind of shit to get asylum in Germany. Everything the guy had said was fabricated.
And this was known for months when the US presented exactly those sketches and quotes in the UN security council.

I'm not going to relitigate a matter that's been over several thousand times already. I'm merely stating my disagreement as I did above.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-18 23:20:44
December 18 2016 23:19 GMT
#128890
What is the point of even disagreeing if you arent interested in discussing why?

Not that I don't understand why you wouldn't want to since it's like a 15 year old topic nearly.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
December 18 2016 23:55 GMT
#128891
On December 19 2016 08:19 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
What is the point of even disagreeing if you arent interested in discussing why?

Not that I don't understand why you wouldn't want to since it's like a 15 year old topic nearly.

because I found the claim somewhere in the questionable to absurd zone, and didn't want it to go uncontested.
Also, by now everyone has heard all the arguments and has generally made up their mind one way or the other. so relitigating it doesn't help, as all the points have already been made.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 18 2016 23:56 GMT
#128892
I believe some of the earlier Wikileaks leaks did suggest that there were concerns about WMDs. It doesn't seem that that was the case among the administration folk who pushed for the intervention; they essentially came to the conclusion well before the WMDs were even the issue. I'm sure it was a concern among the legislators who were needed to build consensus, which was needed to be able to say all around the country to all the critics, "well look at how overwhelming the consensus in Congress was" (I certainly felt constrained by how much I could criticize when given that line).

In all the cases (Iraq Afghanistan Libya Syria), it seems that the US thought that they could disrupt the precarious meta-stability of the situation, then come in and dictate their own terms for how the situation would play out. They also mistook easy, early success in relatively straightforward conventional conflict for the ability to stabilize the situation. The result in Iraq and Afghanistan was brutally expensive war, in Syria and Libya it was a descent into chaos whose consequences are still yet to be properly felt, though perhaps cheaper. But Trump was right: among strategic faults of the US policy in the Middle East, Iraq was something special. It's the biggest mindfuck of a poorly thought out war that we have in this millennia.

Long story short, there is a reason why Iraq is brought up as often as it is. It's a perfect example of a thorough fault in the American approach to Middle Eastern policy, and one that broke its credibility (and the credibility of its regional alliance) in the region.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-19 00:12:01
December 19 2016 00:03 GMT
#128893
I think it should also be mentioned that the guerilla war has basically just morphed into ISIS with the help of some other US allies and enemies (SA funding and Syrian defectors), as there are numerous Iraqi veterans from the invasion involved in that whole ISIS operation, are there not?

And you say that the guerilla war can't hit troops on American soil, but they can. And not only that, they can draw you out to go and fight them on THEIR soil when they do so, which is what got this whole Iraq thing started in the first place which in turn annoyed a whole lot of people who decided to do something about it the minute you guys left.


In the words of Putin at Sochi: Do you realize what you have done?
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
Thieving Magpie
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
United States6752 Posts
December 19 2016 01:10 GMT
#128894
On December 19 2016 09:03 a_flayer wrote:
I think it should also be mentioned that the guerilla war has basically just morphed into ISIS with the help of some other US allies and enemies (SA funding and Syrian defectors), as there are numerous Iraqi veterans from the invasion involved in that whole ISIS operation, are there not?

And you say that the guerilla war can't hit troops on American soil, but they can. And not only that, they can draw you out to go and fight them on THEIR soil when they do so, which is what got this whole Iraq thing started in the first place which in turn annoyed a whole lot of people who decided to do something about it the minute you guys left.


In the words of Putin at Sochi: Do you realize what you have done?


If, after taking Baghdad, 100% of US troops just went back to the US, how do Iraqi rebels shoot them?
Hark, what baseball through yonder window breaks?
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-19 01:21:35
December 19 2016 01:20 GMT
#128895
On December 19 2016 10:10 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2016 09:03 a_flayer wrote:
I think it should also be mentioned that the guerilla war has basically just morphed into ISIS with the help of some other US allies and enemies (SA funding and Syrian defectors), as there are numerous Iraqi veterans from the invasion involved in that whole ISIS operation, are there not?

And you say that the guerilla war can't hit troops on American soil, but they can. And not only that, they can draw you out to go and fight them on THEIR soil when they do so, which is what got this whole Iraq thing started in the first place which in turn annoyed a whole lot of people who decided to do something about it the minute you guys left.


In the words of Putin at Sochi: Do you realize what you have done?


If, after taking Baghdad, 100% of US troops just went back to the US, how do Iraqi rebels shoot them?


By attempting to radicalise an entire generation of Muslim immigrants to their fundamentalist Wahhabi religion and hitting them (the US soldiers) where it hurts the most.
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 19 2016 01:23 GMT
#128896
US losses are probably better measured in money than casualties. 3000 dead really is not that many, but the costs of Iraq were significant.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
December 19 2016 01:43 GMT
#128897
On December 19 2016 10:10 Thieving Magpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 19 2016 09:03 a_flayer wrote:
I think it should also be mentioned that the guerilla war has basically just morphed into ISIS with the help of some other US allies and enemies (SA funding and Syrian defectors), as there are numerous Iraqi veterans from the invasion involved in that whole ISIS operation, are there not?

And you say that the guerilla war can't hit troops on American soil, but they can. And not only that, they can draw you out to go and fight them on THEIR soil when they do so, which is what got this whole Iraq thing started in the first place which in turn annoyed a whole lot of people who decided to do something about it the minute you guys left.


In the words of Putin at Sochi: Do you realize what you have done?


If, after taking Baghdad, 100% of US troops just went back to the US, how do Iraqi rebels shoot them?


it would be better if you just abandoned this silly line of argument and said iraq was an unequivocal mistake with no chance of victory
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-19 03:47:17
December 19 2016 03:31 GMT
#128898
from my understanding, part of ISIL's strength came from a lot of the saddam aligned folks (some of which werent even necessarily hardcore supporters) who were completely cut out by the al maliki government and decided to go extremist in response. if we hadnt propped up that dickhead, it's possible that sectarian/political/other tensions wouldn't have escalated so badly.

beyond that if things did go to crud, i think the US would have had a much better case for going back IN rather than having stayed put and getting bled by a thousand cuts. US might be more like "okay this is our mess and we need to own it" versus "god we dont want more of our boys getting shot up".

better that it never happened, but even if it did there were many ways it could have been less bad, at least.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 19 2016 03:48 GMT
#128899
lol
President-elect Donald Trump could accomplish "something remarkable" in U.S. foreign policy, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger says.

"Donald Trump is a phenomenon that foreign countries haven't seen. So, it is a shocking experience to them that he came into office. At the same time, extraordinary opportunity," Kissinger said in an interview aired Sunday on CBS' "Face the Nation."

"And I believe he has the possibility of going down in history as a very considerable president."

The new Republican president's "unfamiliar questions" could fill a vacuum left by President Barack Obama, who "basically withdrew" America from international politics, said Kissinger, who served enormous roles under two Republican presidents, Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford.

"Because of the combination of the partial vacuum and the new questions, one could imagine that something remarkable and new emerges out of it," Kissinger said. "I'm not saying it will. I'm saying it's an extraordinary opportunity."

Source
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-12-19 03:49:54
December 19 2016 03:49 GMT
#128900
lots of the ISIS command structure is run by Baathist ex Saddam officers with extensive military experience. The Baathists were ironically a socialist secular group which was largely alienated by the Shiite government backed by the US.

When discussing the Iraq war, people should focus more on the political fallout and not just on the actual military conflict. The backing of a minority government was a large blunder on part of the US.
Prev 1 6443 6444 6445 6446 6447 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 382
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 32025
Horang2 3742
Flash 1680
Jaedong 1020
Bisu 885
Barracks 711
Hyun 700
EffOrt 408
actioN 299
Mini 288
[ Show more ]
Larva 251
Killer 238
Soulkey 204
Last 158
Zeus 125
JYJ120
GuemChi 118
ToSsGirL 112
Snow 111
ZerO 96
Leta 89
Rush 61
sorry 35
Backho 32
Sharp 31
zelot 28
Movie 28
Sacsri 26
sas.Sziky 25
sSak 24
yabsab 23
Icarus 15
Hm[arnc] 14
Noble 13
Shinee 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Aegong 4
[sc1f]eonzerg 1
Dota 2
Gorgc2096
XcaliburYe298
BananaSlamJamma286
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1854
x6flipin616
edward108
Other Games
singsing2008
B2W.Neo694
Fuzer 315
DeMusliM296
Happy250
SortOf81
ToD19
ZerO(Twitch)16
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 70
• davetesta54
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos699
Other Games
• WagamamaTV244
Upcoming Events
OSC
37m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4h 7m
The PondCast
22h 7m
Online Event
1d 4h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs TBD
Online Event
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs TBD
[ Show More ]
OSC
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
Yuqilin POB S2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.