• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:18
CET 12:18
KST 20:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)15Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 103SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1830
StarCraft 2
General
Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets When will we find out if there are more tournament SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list?
Tourneys
SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced WardiTV Winter Cup
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone Potential ASL qualifier breakthroughs?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 SLON Grand Finals – Season 2
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1045 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6263

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6261 6262 6263 6264 6265 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 18:56 GMT
#125241
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
November 18 2016 18:57 GMT
#125242
It's not even identity politics, the key mark of an sjw is someone with a perceived notion of "justice" as a guise for anger and bitterness. A lot of the rhetoric is fueled by jealousy/envy and basically leads to a whole lot of complaining and no action. examples include man hating, hating white people, rich people etc. just look at that new Twitter ban for saying the exact same thing but replacing the word white and black. the message targeting blacks got banned, but not whites.
Question.?
ACrow
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany6583 Posts
November 18 2016 18:58 GMT
#125243
On November 19 2016 03:56 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.

How convenient.

User was temp banned for this post.
Get off my lawn, young punks
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 18:59 GMT
#125244
On November 19 2016 03:55 Nevuk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:18 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Mohdoo wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:14 LegalLord wrote:
I blame Henry Kissinger not endorsing Clinton for her loss. As far as I'm concerned that's as valid a reason for her loss as sexism, Hitler, Darth Vader, Bernie Bros, Comey, Assange, the evil Russians, or racists. They all fail to accept that the candidate herself opened the door to this loss by being terrible.

I kind of want to make a joke about a perceived racist succeeding two black AGs ina row and being held up as someone who will clean up after them. But I can't imagine any such joke would be in good taste.

In testimony before the committee, former colleagues said that Mr. Sessions had referred to the N.A.A.C.P., the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and other civil rights groups as “un-American” and “Communist-inspired.” An African-American federal prosecutor then, Thomas H. Figures, said Mr. Sessions had referred to him as “boy” and testified that Mr. Sessions said the Ku Klux Klan was fine “until I found out they smoked pot.” Mr. Sessions dismissed that remark as a joke.


http://www.nytimes.com/?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&region=TopBar&module=HomePage-Button&pgtype=article

Southerners call everyone "boy." That's certainly not an epithet reserved for black people.

They call everyone in a position lower in society than themselves boy. The implication by always calling black men boy is to explicitly clarify and reinforce their lower social standing. Basically you're trying to argue that southern culture isn't racist.

That's not really true. I have a ton of family in the south and consider myself more of a southerner than anything else regionally. And no, I'm not making an argument as to whether there's racism in the South. I'm only commenting on the usage of the word.
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
November 18 2016 19:00 GMT
#125245
On November 19 2016 03:23 LegalLord wrote:
Just because you don't care about cultural decline doesn't mean others don't. As I've said, explaining this issue is like explaining to an uneducated person why college is important. Nevertheless, culture matters, even if you don't see that it does.

This is why I try to stay out of these discussions, because it's difficult for me to empathize when I can't understand why it matters to people.
Moderator
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 19:10:02
November 18 2016 19:02 GMT
#125246
This column is pretty spot-on on the "identity politics" debate. To a significant extent, the term has been used here and in the public debate by people complaining about positions, arguments and policies designed to help groups that are not specifically white men -- because apparently if those policies and arguments address issues faced by minority groups, they are to be dismissed as "identity politics" distracting from the "real" issues.

Obviously, this is not to say that white men should be ignored by policymakers, or that only policies and ideas helping minorities specifically should be developed and implemented. But it is clear from how the term "identity politics" has been used that it is frequently employed to dismiss and de-legitimize the addressing of issues and concerns faced specifically by minorities.

edit: with regards to the "SJW" discussion, I agree with Nebuchad. While I absolutely disagree with some of the positions taken by some activists and student groups with regards to the expression of contradictory views in an academic setting (this is a broad statement, obviously, which still requires case-by-case analysis), the term has largely been developed and used (including in this thread) to preemptively dismiss perfectly valid voices and arguments on issues of race, gender, religion, etc. -- simply because those voices happen to take positions that go beyond what some (usually reactionary) people are willing to accept as legitimate criticism on those issues.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
November 18 2016 19:02 GMT
#125247
On November 19 2016 04:00 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:23 LegalLord wrote:
Just because you don't care about cultural decline doesn't mean others don't. As I've said, explaining this issue is like explaining to an uneducated person why college is important. Nevertheless, culture matters, even if you don't see that it does.

This is why I try to stay out of these discussions, because it's difficult for me to empathize when I can't understand why it matters to people.

And I'm not sure there is any way to explain why it does matter. I certainly don't know how to do it, at any rate.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
November 18 2016 19:06 GMT
#125248
On November 19 2016 03:59 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:55 Nevuk wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:18 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Mohdoo wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:14 LegalLord wrote:
I blame Henry Kissinger not endorsing Clinton for her loss. As far as I'm concerned that's as valid a reason for her loss as sexism, Hitler, Darth Vader, Bernie Bros, Comey, Assange, the evil Russians, or racists. They all fail to accept that the candidate herself opened the door to this loss by being terrible.

I kind of want to make a joke about a perceived racist succeeding two black AGs ina row and being held up as someone who will clean up after them. But I can't imagine any such joke would be in good taste.

In testimony before the committee, former colleagues said that Mr. Sessions had referred to the N.A.A.C.P., the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and other civil rights groups as “un-American” and “Communist-inspired.” An African-American federal prosecutor then, Thomas H. Figures, said Mr. Sessions had referred to him as “boy” and testified that Mr. Sessions said the Ku Klux Klan was fine “until I found out they smoked pot.” Mr. Sessions dismissed that remark as a joke.


http://www.nytimes.com/?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&region=TopBar&module=HomePage-Button&pgtype=article

Southerners call everyone "boy." That's certainly not an epithet reserved for black people.

They call everyone in a position lower in society than themselves boy. The implication by always calling black men boy is to explicitly clarify and reinforce their lower social standing. Basically you're trying to argue that southern culture isn't racist.

That's not really true. I have a ton of family in the south and consider myself more of a southerner than anything else regionally. And no, I'm not making an argument as to whether there's racism in the South. I'm only commenting on the usage of the word.

It might vary depending on the state. I didn't say it was particularly illspirited, but for instance it is something people say about men younger than themselves pretty frequently, but no one in their right mind would call a judge boy. That's the impression I've gotten from living in KY and visiting SC a lot.

As a side note, I believe sessions that it was a joke about the KKK. It is pretty easy to see it rubbing people the wrong way though.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12379 Posts
November 18 2016 19:11 GMT
#125249
On November 19 2016 03:56 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.


Is this another word with an american definition and a world definition?
No will to live, no wish to die
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 19:12 GMT
#125250
Here's a really good interview of the new liberal bogeyman, Steve Bannon. This section jumped out at me for obvious reasons:

On that precise point, the New York Times, in a widely circulated article, will describe this day at Trump Tower as a scene of “disarray” for the transition team. In fact, it’s all hands on: Mike Pence, the vice president-elect and transition chief, and Reince Priebus, the new chief of staff, shuttling between full conference rooms; Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and by many accounts his closest advisor, conferring in the halls; Sen. Jeff Sessions in and out of meetings on the transition team floor; Rudy Giuliani upstairs with Trump (overheard: “Is the boss meeting-meeting with Rudy or just shooting the shit?”), and Bannon with a long line of men and women outside his corner office. If this is disarray, it’s a peculiarly focused and organized kind.
GoTuNk!
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Chile4591 Posts
November 18 2016 19:12 GMT
#125251
On November 19 2016 02:29 Doodsmack wrote:
And yes, alt right white nationalism is at the core of Trump's support, and perhaps policy, considering the position of Bannon. Bannon's stated world view is one of protecting the supremacy of Judeo-Christian culture.


Protecting the right to life, liberty and property, the non-agression principle, free speech, separation of church and state, equality against the law, due process and innocent until proven guilty, small government (or at least not HUGE government). Yes, those are the values many Trump supporters voted for. I like them as well, and consider them superior to other cultures.

It's about values, not race, by the way.

xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 19:15 GMT
#125252
On November 19 2016 04:11 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:56 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.


Is this another word with an american definition and a world definition?


Title VII is the major federal anti-discrimination statute in the US that protects people on the basis of things like race, sex, color, religion, and national origin. So really what I'm saying is that "identity politics" is the appeal/pandering to people on the basis of their identity -- race, sex, religion, and sexual orientation -- as opposed to catering to economic interest groups like unions or farmers.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
November 18 2016 19:18 GMT
#125253
The identity politics debate basically has gained prominence since control of the institutions has turned around. Decades ago racists love to use identity politics because they were in control of institutions and thus had a grip on it, nowadays identity is seen as a tool of empowerment for minorities and racists have figured out that the marketplace of ideas and some kind of pseudo-egalitarianism is a way better tool to discriminate. Kind of how leaking tons of bullshit has become a better method of censorship than withholding information. Nothing really has changed, it's just that places have been swapped.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12379 Posts
November 18 2016 19:18 GMT
#125254
On November 19 2016 04:15 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 04:11 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:56 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.


Is this another word with an american definition and a world definition?


Title VII is the major federal anti-discrimination statute in the US that protects people on the basis of things like race, sex, color, religion, and national origin. So really what I'm saying is that "identity politics" is the appeal/pandering to people on the basis of their identity -- race, sex, religion, and sexual orientation -- as opposed to catering to economic interest groups like unions or farmers.


I got your position but I've seen it used in a broader context fairly commonly, so I'm wondering if that's an american vs world thing, cause that's happened before. I just googled it and found wikipedia is on my side (for what it's worth).
No will to live, no wish to die
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 19:40:37
November 18 2016 19:27 GMT
#125255
Take a look at this Bannon quote from the interview that I cited earlier:

He absolutely — mockingly — rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,” he tells me. “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

In a nascent administration that seems, at best, random in its beliefs, Bannon can seem to be not just a focused voice, but almost a messianic one:

“Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”
....
“I am,” he says, with relish, “Thomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.”
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
November 18 2016 19:28 GMT
#125256
On November 19 2016 04:18 Nyxisto wrote:
The identity politics debate basically has gained prominence since control of the institutions has turned around. Decades ago racists love to use identity politics because they were in control of institutions and thus had a grip on it, nowadays identity is seen as a tool of empowerment for minorities and racists have figured out that the marketplace of ideas and some kind of pseudo-egalitarianism is a way better tool to discriminate. Kind of how leaking tons of bullshit has become a better method of censorship than withholding information. Nothing really has changed, it's just that places have been swapped.


this is somewhat reminiscent of how "states rights" was sometimes used in back in the 50s.

Plenty of people on the right (and left and all over) use what one might well consider identity politics, but it's not acceptable these days to have pro-white/male identity politics (for justifiable historical reasons), so those doing it use another cover.
So there's a mix of people, some who're using it as a cover for racism (usually still a far midler form of racism than that existed historically), and those who're using it for the stated cover reasons (which take on a life of their own, and were after all chosen because they have some validity, so some take them just for that).
This leads to confusion for others cuz it's very hard to tell which people are doing it for the decent reasons and which are doing it for the bad ones.

Generalized accusations of identity politics, while perhaps sometimes justified, are seldom productive, it'd be far better to focus on what the actual specific policies are and go over those.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 19:47:15
November 18 2016 19:47 GMT
#125257
On November 19 2016 04:27 xDaunt wrote:
Take a look at this Bannon quote from the interview that I cited earlier:

Show nested quote +
He absolutely — mockingly — rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,” he tells me. “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

In a nascent administration that seems, at best, random in its beliefs, Bannon can seem to be not just a focused voice, but almost a messianic one:

“Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”
....
“I am,” he says, with relish, “Thomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.”


His Vatican speech was not just about economic nationalism, it was very much about Judeo-Christian culture. He's not being up front here.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 19:49 GMT
#125258
On November 19 2016 04:47 Doodsmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 04:27 xDaunt wrote:
Take a look at this Bannon quote from the interview that I cited earlier:

He absolutely — mockingly — rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,” he tells me. “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

In a nascent administration that seems, at best, random in its beliefs, Bannon can seem to be not just a focused voice, but almost a messianic one:

“Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”
....
“I am,” he says, with relish, “Thomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.”


His Vatican speech was not just about economic nationalism, it was very much about Judeo-Christian culture. He's not being up front here.

Your mistake is in thinking that the two are mutually exclusive and in failing to appreciate why he might give a different emphasis at the Vatican than he would elsewhere.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
November 18 2016 19:49 GMT
#125259
This is a long but interesting read about Obama's thoughts on, and reaction to, the election (and beyond):

Obama Reckons with a Trump Presidency
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
November 18 2016 19:53 GMT
#125260
On November 19 2016 04:49 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 04:47 Doodsmack wrote:
On November 19 2016 04:27 xDaunt wrote:
Take a look at this Bannon quote from the interview that I cited earlier:

He absolutely — mockingly — rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,” he tells me. “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

In a nascent administration that seems, at best, random in its beliefs, Bannon can seem to be not just a focused voice, but almost a messianic one:

“Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”
....
“I am,” he says, with relish, “Thomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.”


His Vatican speech was not just about economic nationalism, it was very much about Judeo-Christian culture. He's not being up front here.

Your mistake is in thinking that the two are mutually exclusive and in failing to appreciate why he might give a different emphasis at the Vatican than he would elsewhere.


I'm saying they aren't mutually exclusive, they're all tied up, and it doesn't make sense for him to say only one applies.
Prev 1 6261 6262 6263 6264 6265 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 77
CranKy Ducklings36
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 166
BRAT_OK 110
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 64194
Calm 2606
Sea 2298
Horang2 1984
Mini 478
Soma 341
firebathero 283
ZerO 269
Snow 268
actioN 247
[ Show more ]
BeSt 227
Mong 200
Hyun 183
Last 182
Shuttle 144
EffOrt 134
Hyuk 130
ggaemo 119
Pusan 115
hero 99
Rush 89
Light 84
Sharp 68
Dewaltoss 66
Mind 45
sorry 42
Killer 38
Nal_rA 37
ZergMaN 34
Barracks 30
NotJumperer 27
Sexy 27
GoRush 21
Noble 17
Terrorterran 16
Icarus 14
ivOry 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
zelot 11
SilentControl 10
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm91
XcaliburYe37
League of Legends
C9.Mang0377
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1523
shoxiejesuss1285
fl0m276
allub233
edward42
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King120
Other Games
summit1g9278
singsing2125
ceh9547
B2W.Neo293
crisheroes244
Sick154
Livibee68
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2372
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 1244
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 7
• Azhi_Dahaki5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1274
• Lourlo825
• Stunt373
• TFBlade208
Upcoming Events
OSC
43m
Jumy vs sebesdes
Nicoract vs GgMaChine
ReBellioN vs MaNa
Lemon vs TriGGeR
Gerald vs Cure
Creator vs SHIN
OSC
1d
All Star Teams
1d 14h
INnoVation vs soO
Serral vs herO
Cure vs Solar
sOs vs Scarlett
Classic vs Clem
Reynor vs Maru
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
All Star Teams
2 days
MMA vs DongRaeGu
Rogue vs Oliveira
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
OSC
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-14
Big Gabe Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W4
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.