• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:35
CEST 12:35
KST 19:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview25Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates7GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26Code S RO12 Results + RO8 Groups (2025 Season 2)3
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th
Tourneys
Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Cheeseadelphia 2025 - Open Bracket LAN!
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? I made an ASL quiz [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 1
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 26576 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6263

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6261 6262 6263 6264 6265 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 18:56 GMT
#125241
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
November 18 2016 18:57 GMT
#125242
It's not even identity politics, the key mark of an sjw is someone with a perceived notion of "justice" as a guise for anger and bitterness. A lot of the rhetoric is fueled by jealousy/envy and basically leads to a whole lot of complaining and no action. examples include man hating, hating white people, rich people etc. just look at that new Twitter ban for saying the exact same thing but replacing the word white and black. the message targeting blacks got banned, but not whites.
Question.?
ACrow
Profile Joined October 2011
Germany6583 Posts
November 18 2016 18:58 GMT
#125243
On November 19 2016 03:56 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.

How convenient.

User was temp banned for this post.
Get off my lawn, young punks
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 18:59 GMT
#125244
On November 19 2016 03:55 Nevuk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:18 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Mohdoo wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:14 LegalLord wrote:
I blame Henry Kissinger not endorsing Clinton for her loss. As far as I'm concerned that's as valid a reason for her loss as sexism, Hitler, Darth Vader, Bernie Bros, Comey, Assange, the evil Russians, or racists. They all fail to accept that the candidate herself opened the door to this loss by being terrible.

I kind of want to make a joke about a perceived racist succeeding two black AGs ina row and being held up as someone who will clean up after them. But I can't imagine any such joke would be in good taste.

In testimony before the committee, former colleagues said that Mr. Sessions had referred to the N.A.A.C.P., the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and other civil rights groups as “un-American” and “Communist-inspired.” An African-American federal prosecutor then, Thomas H. Figures, said Mr. Sessions had referred to him as “boy” and testified that Mr. Sessions said the Ku Klux Klan was fine “until I found out they smoked pot.” Mr. Sessions dismissed that remark as a joke.


http://www.nytimes.com/?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&region=TopBar&module=HomePage-Button&pgtype=article

Southerners call everyone "boy." That's certainly not an epithet reserved for black people.

They call everyone in a position lower in society than themselves boy. The implication by always calling black men boy is to explicitly clarify and reinforce their lower social standing. Basically you're trying to argue that southern culture isn't racist.

That's not really true. I have a ton of family in the south and consider myself more of a southerner than anything else regionally. And no, I'm not making an argument as to whether there's racism in the South. I'm only commenting on the usage of the word.
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
November 18 2016 19:00 GMT
#125245
On November 19 2016 03:23 LegalLord wrote:
Just because you don't care about cultural decline doesn't mean others don't. As I've said, explaining this issue is like explaining to an uneducated person why college is important. Nevertheless, culture matters, even if you don't see that it does.

This is why I try to stay out of these discussions, because it's difficult for me to empathize when I can't understand why it matters to people.
Moderator
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 19:10:02
November 18 2016 19:02 GMT
#125246
This column is pretty spot-on on the "identity politics" debate. To a significant extent, the term has been used here and in the public debate by people complaining about positions, arguments and policies designed to help groups that are not specifically white men -- because apparently if those policies and arguments address issues faced by minority groups, they are to be dismissed as "identity politics" distracting from the "real" issues.

Obviously, this is not to say that white men should be ignored by policymakers, or that only policies and ideas helping minorities specifically should be developed and implemented. But it is clear from how the term "identity politics" has been used that it is frequently employed to dismiss and de-legitimize the addressing of issues and concerns faced specifically by minorities.

edit: with regards to the "SJW" discussion, I agree with Nebuchad. While I absolutely disagree with some of the positions taken by some activists and student groups with regards to the expression of contradictory views in an academic setting (this is a broad statement, obviously, which still requires case-by-case analysis), the term has largely been developed and used (including in this thread) to preemptively dismiss perfectly valid voices and arguments on issues of race, gender, religion, etc. -- simply because those voices happen to take positions that go beyond what some (usually reactionary) people are willing to accept as legitimate criticism on those issues.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
November 18 2016 19:02 GMT
#125247
On November 19 2016 04:00 TheYango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:23 LegalLord wrote:
Just because you don't care about cultural decline doesn't mean others don't. As I've said, explaining this issue is like explaining to an uneducated person why college is important. Nevertheless, culture matters, even if you don't see that it does.

This is why I try to stay out of these discussions, because it's difficult for me to empathize when I can't understand why it matters to people.

And I'm not sure there is any way to explain why it does matter. I certainly don't know how to do it, at any rate.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
November 18 2016 19:06 GMT
#125248
On November 19 2016 03:59 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:55 Nevuk wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:18 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Mohdoo wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:14 LegalLord wrote:
I blame Henry Kissinger not endorsing Clinton for her loss. As far as I'm concerned that's as valid a reason for her loss as sexism, Hitler, Darth Vader, Bernie Bros, Comey, Assange, the evil Russians, or racists. They all fail to accept that the candidate herself opened the door to this loss by being terrible.

I kind of want to make a joke about a perceived racist succeeding two black AGs ina row and being held up as someone who will clean up after them. But I can't imagine any such joke would be in good taste.

In testimony before the committee, former colleagues said that Mr. Sessions had referred to the N.A.A.C.P., the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and other civil rights groups as “un-American” and “Communist-inspired.” An African-American federal prosecutor then, Thomas H. Figures, said Mr. Sessions had referred to him as “boy” and testified that Mr. Sessions said the Ku Klux Klan was fine “until I found out they smoked pot.” Mr. Sessions dismissed that remark as a joke.


http://www.nytimes.com/?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&region=TopBar&module=HomePage-Button&pgtype=article

Southerners call everyone "boy." That's certainly not an epithet reserved for black people.

They call everyone in a position lower in society than themselves boy. The implication by always calling black men boy is to explicitly clarify and reinforce their lower social standing. Basically you're trying to argue that southern culture isn't racist.

That's not really true. I have a ton of family in the south and consider myself more of a southerner than anything else regionally. And no, I'm not making an argument as to whether there's racism in the South. I'm only commenting on the usage of the word.

It might vary depending on the state. I didn't say it was particularly illspirited, but for instance it is something people say about men younger than themselves pretty frequently, but no one in their right mind would call a judge boy. That's the impression I've gotten from living in KY and visiting SC a lot.

As a side note, I believe sessions that it was a joke about the KKK. It is pretty easy to see it rubbing people the wrong way though.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12081 Posts
November 18 2016 19:11 GMT
#125249
On November 19 2016 03:56 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.


Is this another word with an american definition and a world definition?
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 19:12 GMT
#125250
Here's a really good interview of the new liberal bogeyman, Steve Bannon. This section jumped out at me for obvious reasons:

On that precise point, the New York Times, in a widely circulated article, will describe this day at Trump Tower as a scene of “disarray” for the transition team. In fact, it’s all hands on: Mike Pence, the vice president-elect and transition chief, and Reince Priebus, the new chief of staff, shuttling between full conference rooms; Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and by many accounts his closest advisor, conferring in the halls; Sen. Jeff Sessions in and out of meetings on the transition team floor; Rudy Giuliani upstairs with Trump (overheard: “Is the boss meeting-meeting with Rudy or just shooting the shit?”), and Bannon with a long line of men and women outside his corner office. If this is disarray, it’s a peculiarly focused and organized kind.
GoTuNk!
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
Chile4591 Posts
November 18 2016 19:12 GMT
#125251
On November 19 2016 02:29 Doodsmack wrote:
And yes, alt right white nationalism is at the core of Trump's support, and perhaps policy, considering the position of Bannon. Bannon's stated world view is one of protecting the supremacy of Judeo-Christian culture.


Protecting the right to life, liberty and property, the non-agression principle, free speech, separation of church and state, equality against the law, due process and innocent until proven guilty, small government (or at least not HUGE government). Yes, those are the values many Trump supporters voted for. I like them as well, and consider them superior to other cultures.

It's about values, not race, by the way.

xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 19:15 GMT
#125252
On November 19 2016 04:11 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 03:56 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.


Is this another word with an american definition and a world definition?


Title VII is the major federal anti-discrimination statute in the US that protects people on the basis of things like race, sex, color, religion, and national origin. So really what I'm saying is that "identity politics" is the appeal/pandering to people on the basis of their identity -- race, sex, religion, and sexual orientation -- as opposed to catering to economic interest groups like unions or farmers.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
November 18 2016 19:18 GMT
#125253
The identity politics debate basically has gained prominence since control of the institutions has turned around. Decades ago racists love to use identity politics because they were in control of institutions and thus had a grip on it, nowadays identity is seen as a tool of empowerment for minorities and racists have figured out that the marketplace of ideas and some kind of pseudo-egalitarianism is a way better tool to discriminate. Kind of how leaking tons of bullshit has become a better method of censorship than withholding information. Nothing really has changed, it's just that places have been swapped.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12081 Posts
November 18 2016 19:18 GMT
#125254
On November 19 2016 04:15 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 04:11 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:56 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:54 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:40 xDaunt wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:39 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
On November 19 2016 03:15 Nebuchad wrote:
Meh, fair enough, there are people like that in the thread. I wouldn't have thought that was enough to be a SJW honestly.

Perhaps if you expand the meaning too much, the word will lose its meaning x)

Turning every issue into identity politics poisons the discussion more than most anything else, possibly even more so than assuming the other candidate is corrupt. People generally blame Trump for the poisonous nature of political discourse this time around but on the matter of identity politics you can find no candidate more culpable for that poison than Hillary Clinton.


All right, so let's not turn every issue into identity politics. What would you say are legitimate issues for identity politics?

The one special case that I'd consider would be policies for helping out the black community.


Pretty sure you also advocated identity politics for rural communities recently, wouldn't you say?

"Identity politics" refers to the Title VII classes (race, sex, religion, gender, etc). I wouldn't put rural interests into the same category.


Is this another word with an american definition and a world definition?


Title VII is the major federal anti-discrimination statute in the US that protects people on the basis of things like race, sex, color, religion, and national origin. So really what I'm saying is that "identity politics" is the appeal/pandering to people on the basis of their identity -- race, sex, religion, and sexual orientation -- as opposed to catering to economic interest groups like unions or farmers.


I got your position but I've seen it used in a broader context fairly commonly, so I'm wondering if that's an american vs world thing, cause that's happened before. I just googled it and found wikipedia is on my side (for what it's worth).
"It is capitalism that is incentivizing me to lazily explain this to you while at work because I am not rewarded for generating additional value."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 19:40:37
November 18 2016 19:27 GMT
#125255
Take a look at this Bannon quote from the interview that I cited earlier:

He absolutely — mockingly — rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,” he tells me. “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

In a nascent administration that seems, at best, random in its beliefs, Bannon can seem to be not just a focused voice, but almost a messianic one:

“Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”
....
“I am,” he says, with relish, “Thomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.”
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
November 18 2016 19:28 GMT
#125256
On November 19 2016 04:18 Nyxisto wrote:
The identity politics debate basically has gained prominence since control of the institutions has turned around. Decades ago racists love to use identity politics because they were in control of institutions and thus had a grip on it, nowadays identity is seen as a tool of empowerment for minorities and racists have figured out that the marketplace of ideas and some kind of pseudo-egalitarianism is a way better tool to discriminate. Kind of how leaking tons of bullshit has become a better method of censorship than withholding information. Nothing really has changed, it's just that places have been swapped.


this is somewhat reminiscent of how "states rights" was sometimes used in back in the 50s.

Plenty of people on the right (and left and all over) use what one might well consider identity politics, but it's not acceptable these days to have pro-white/male identity politics (for justifiable historical reasons), so those doing it use another cover.
So there's a mix of people, some who're using it as a cover for racism (usually still a far midler form of racism than that existed historically), and those who're using it for the stated cover reasons (which take on a life of their own, and were after all chosen because they have some validity, so some take them just for that).
This leads to confusion for others cuz it's very hard to tell which people are doing it for the decent reasons and which are doing it for the bad ones.

Generalized accusations of identity politics, while perhaps sometimes justified, are seldom productive, it'd be far better to focus on what the actual specific policies are and go over those.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-18 19:47:15
November 18 2016 19:47 GMT
#125257
On November 19 2016 04:27 xDaunt wrote:
Take a look at this Bannon quote from the interview that I cited earlier:

Show nested quote +
He absolutely — mockingly — rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,” he tells me. “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

In a nascent administration that seems, at best, random in its beliefs, Bannon can seem to be not just a focused voice, but almost a messianic one:

“Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”
....
“I am,” he says, with relish, “Thomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.”


His Vatican speech was not just about economic nationalism, it was very much about Judeo-Christian culture. He's not being up front here.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
November 18 2016 19:49 GMT
#125258
On November 19 2016 04:47 Doodsmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 04:27 xDaunt wrote:
Take a look at this Bannon quote from the interview that I cited earlier:

He absolutely — mockingly — rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,” he tells me. “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

In a nascent administration that seems, at best, random in its beliefs, Bannon can seem to be not just a focused voice, but almost a messianic one:

“Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”
....
“I am,” he says, with relish, “Thomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.”


His Vatican speech was not just about economic nationalism, it was very much about Judeo-Christian culture. He's not being up front here.

Your mistake is in thinking that the two are mutually exclusive and in failing to appreciate why he might give a different emphasis at the Vatican than he would elsewhere.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
November 18 2016 19:49 GMT
#125259
This is a long but interesting read about Obama's thoughts on, and reaction to, the election (and beyond):

Obama Reckons with a Trump Presidency
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
November 18 2016 19:53 GMT
#125260
On November 19 2016 04:49 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2016 04:47 Doodsmack wrote:
On November 19 2016 04:27 xDaunt wrote:
Take a look at this Bannon quote from the interview that I cited earlier:

He absolutely — mockingly — rejects the idea that this is a racial line. “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist,” he tells me. “The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f—ed over. If we deliver—” by "we" he means the Trump White House "—we’ll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we’ll govern for 50 years. That’s what the Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It’s not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about.”

In a nascent administration that seems, at best, random in its beliefs, Bannon can seem to be not just a focused voice, but almost a messianic one:

“Like [Andrew] Jackson’s populism, we’re going to build an entirely new political movement,” he says. “It’s everything related to jobs. The conservatives are going to go crazy. I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement.”
....
“I am,” he says, with relish, “Thomas Cromwell in the court of the Tudors.”


His Vatican speech was not just about economic nationalism, it was very much about Judeo-Christian culture. He's not being up front here.

Your mistake is in thinking that the two are mutually exclusive and in failing to appreciate why he might give a different emphasis at the Vatican than he would elsewhere.


I'm saying they aren't mutually exclusive, they're all tied up, and it doesn't make sense for him to say only one applies.
Prev 1 6261 6262 6263 6264 6265 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Bellum Gens Elite
10:00
Stara Zagora 2025 Day 4
Reynor vs ShoWTimELIVE!
Serral vs Lambo
Clem vs Zoun
Bellum Gens Elite1982
ComeBackTV 772
TaKeTV 398
IndyStarCraft 193
3DClanTV 122
Rex89
LiquipediaDiscussion
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #92
CranKy Ducklings38
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Bellum Gens Elite1982
IndyStarCraft 193
Hui .128
Rex 89
EnDerr 25
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 21545
Sea 4220
Bisu 2055
Jaedong 1608
Hyuk 794
BeSt 274
EffOrt 203
Zeus 190
PianO 131
sorry 99
[ Show more ]
Mind 96
Hyun 87
Last 77
Soulkey 73
ZerO 35
Sacsri 22
GoRush 22
Noble 7
ajuk12(nOOB) 6
Dota 2
XcaliburYe657
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1275
byalli322
Super Smash Bros
Westballz12
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor221
Other Games
singsing1634
DeMusliM198
Mew2King177
XaKoH 137
Lowko93
ZerO(Twitch)9
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream6416
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 21
lovetv 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 33
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
SC Evo League
1h 25m
Fire Grow Cup
4h 25m
CSO Contender
6h 25m
BSL: ProLeague
7h 25m
StRyKeR vs MadiNho
Cross vs UltrA
TT1 vs JDConan
Bonyth vs Sziky
Replay Cast
13h 25m
SOOP Global
16h 25m
Creator vs Rogue
Cure vs Classic
SOOP
22h 25m
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
23h 25m
AllThingsProtoss
1d
Fire Grow Cup
1d 4h
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
1d 7h
HBO vs Doodle
spx vs Tech
DragOn vs Hawk
Dewalt vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
1d 13h
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
herO vs TBD
Classic vs TBD
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL Code S
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
2025 GSL S2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.