• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:15
CEST 08:15
KST 15:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation12$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 585 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6197

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6195 6196 6197 6198 6199 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16681 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-11 16:08:02
November 11 2016 16:06 GMT
#123921
On November 12 2016 00:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 00:13 GreenHorizons wrote:
Yeah, no. You got it backwards, if there wasn't an America full of people who would support Trump's campaign persona, we wouldn't have SJW's bringing up gender, race, and sexuality so frequently.

Ok well I can't remember it being as bad as this back in the 90's. People just seemed to get on with their lives back then. My personal opinion much of it is due to the narcissism culture that social media and the internet in general has created.

in social media people seem to just surround themselves with other people who share their opinion. in the pre-internet workplace you are forced to socialize with people who do not share your political views. this helps create dialogue between opposing views.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23173 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-11 16:12:39
November 11 2016 16:10 GMT
#123922
On November 12 2016 01:06 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 00:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
On November 12 2016 00:13 GreenHorizons wrote:
Yeah, no. You got it backwards, if there wasn't an America full of people who would support Trump's campaign persona, we wouldn't have SJW's bringing up gender, race, and sexuality so frequently.

Ok well I can't remember it being as bad as this back in the 90's. People just seemed to get on with their lives back then. My personal opinion much of it is due to the narcissism culture that social media and the internet in general has created.

in social media people seem to just surround themselves with other people who share their opinion. in the pre-internet workplace you are forced to socialize with people who do not share your political views. this helps create dialogue between opposing views.


No, it forced marginalized people to keep their opinions to themselves, like people are complaining about happening to them now. I don't know how many other ways to say this, but what you all are describing isn't new, what's new is sometimes the marginalized person is a white guy with views that used to be mainstream.

EDIT: Oh and it's not only other white guys that can do it to white guys. Sometimes it's a gay woman of color. That last part is certainly new.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
xM(Z
Profile Joined November 2006
Romania5281 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-11 16:27:19
November 11 2016 16:24 GMT
#123923
is it me or you people are describing the exact scenario(marginalization due to outside pressure, by <bullies>) then play a game of "tag I'm it!".
And my fury stands ready. I bring all your plans to nought. My bleak heart beats steady. 'Tis you whom I have sought.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15664 Posts
November 11 2016 16:27 GMT
#123924
If democrats make Dean DNC chair instead of Ellison, they just might lose my vote.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12158 Posts
November 11 2016 16:31 GMT
#123925
Tbh the entire idea of "political correctness" as a criticism needs to be dropped. The things that you are right to criticize for being PC are things that are logically wrong, so you don't need the term PC to criticize them, you just need logic.

If there is something you can't criticize under "logically incorrect", but you can criticize under "politically correct", then it probably doesn't deserve your criticism.
No will to live, no wish to die
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada16681 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-11 16:37:31
November 11 2016 16:33 GMT
#123926
On November 12 2016 01:10 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 01:06 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
On November 12 2016 00:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
On November 12 2016 00:13 GreenHorizons wrote:
Yeah, no. You got it backwards, if there wasn't an America full of people who would support Trump's campaign persona, we wouldn't have SJW's bringing up gender, race, and sexuality so frequently.

Ok well I can't remember it being as bad as this back in the 90's. People just seemed to get on with their lives back then. My personal opinion much of it is due to the narcissism culture that social media and the internet in general has created.

in social media people seem to just surround themselves with other people who share their opinion. in the pre-internet workplace you are forced to socialize with people who do not share your political views. this helps create dialogue between opposing views.


No, it forced marginalized people to keep their opinions to themselves, like people are complaining about happening to them now. I don't know how many other ways to say this, but what you all are describing isn't new, what's new is sometimes the marginalized person is a white guy with views that used to be mainstream.

EDIT: Oh and it's not only other white guys that can do it to white guys. Sometimes it's a gay woman of color. That last part is certainly new.


how many workplaces were you part of in 1990 ? so sitting alone at your computer working solo increases dialogue? the biggest mistake i see my IT consultant colleagues make is not spending enough time with their customers. then they whine how unfair the world is when they lose their customers. they don't even know their own customers.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
CosmicSpiral
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States15275 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-11 16:41:25
November 11 2016 16:36 GMT
#123927
On November 12 2016 01:31 Nebuchad wrote:
Tbh the entire idea of "political correctness" as a criticism needs to be dropped. The things that you are right to criticize for being PC are things that are logically wrong, so you don't need the term PC to criticize them, you just need logic.

If there is something you can't criticize under "logically incorrect", but you can criticize under "politically correct", then it probably doesn't deserve your criticism.


Political correctness isn't about the the substance of an issue or logical form of its rationale.

On November 12 2016 01:02 GreenHorizons wrote:
EDIT: I'd even suggest that the "narcissism culture" is more accurately reflected by those who see SJW's as some significant burden on their existence


If there is such a thing as a "narcissism culture" (which would be almost impossible to perceive since personality disorders, by definition, are categorized as deviations from the standard), both sides are equally guilty of participating in it.
WriterWovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23173 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-11 16:50:56
November 11 2016 16:38 GMT
#123928
On November 12 2016 01:33 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 01:10 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 12 2016 01:06 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
On November 12 2016 00:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
On November 12 2016 00:13 GreenHorizons wrote:
Yeah, no. You got it backwards, if there wasn't an America full of people who would support Trump's campaign persona, we wouldn't have SJW's bringing up gender, race, and sexuality so frequently.

Ok well I can't remember it being as bad as this back in the 90's. People just seemed to get on with their lives back then. My personal opinion much of it is due to the narcissism culture that social media and the internet in general has created.

in social media people seem to just surround themselves with other people who share their opinion. in the pre-internet workplace you are forced to socialize with people who do not share your political views. this helps create dialogue between opposing views.


No, it forced marginalized people to keep their opinions to themselves, like people are complaining about happening to them now. I don't know how many other ways to say this, but what you all are describing isn't new, what's new is sometimes the marginalized person is a white guy with views that used to be mainstream.

EDIT: Oh and it's not only other white guys that can do it to white guys. Sometimes it's a gay woman of color. That last part is certainly new.


how many workplaces were you part of in 1990 ?


90? not many unless you count hanging out with my dad at work. I also didn't work in 50's, but I don't need to, to know it was a racist and sexist environment for many people.

But what's your point?

EDIT: If your point was that sitting in front of a computer doesn't build dialogue, that's a matter of who and where you chooses to engage. But you can also sit in front of a computer and not interact with anyone. I was pointing out that merely working with people with different political opinions didn't/doesn't mean you're forced to have reasonable dialogue.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12158 Posts
November 11 2016 16:40 GMT
#123929
On November 12 2016 01:36 CosmicSpiral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 01:31 Nebuchad wrote:
Tbh the entire idea of "political correctness" as a criticism needs to be dropped. The things that you are right to criticize for being PC are things that are logically wrong, so you don't need the term PC to criticize them, you just need logic.

If there is something you can't criticize under "logically incorrect", but you can criticize under "politically correct", then it probably doesn't deserve your criticism.


Political correctness isn't about the the substance of an issue or logical form of its rationale.


Can you bring up a single case where political correctness was a problem that you couldn't have solved with logic?
No will to live, no wish to die
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6204 Posts
November 11 2016 16:44 GMT
#123930
On November 12 2016 01:06 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 00:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
On November 12 2016 00:13 GreenHorizons wrote:
Yeah, no. You got it backwards, if there wasn't an America full of people who would support Trump's campaign persona, we wouldn't have SJW's bringing up gender, race, and sexuality so frequently.

Ok well I can't remember it being as bad as this back in the 90's. People just seemed to get on with their lives back then. My personal opinion much of it is due to the narcissism culture that social media and the internet in general has created.

in social media people seem to just surround themselves with other people who share their opinion. in the pre-internet workplace you are forced to socialize with people who do not share your political views. this helps create dialogue between opposing views.

In the pre internet age this existed as well. In The Netherlands for example we had a thing called 'de verzuiling' where every group of people would have their own party, news papers, tv etc. It seems we're partly going back to such a thing. I don't think it's because of the internet.
CosmicSpiral
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States15275 Posts
November 11 2016 16:46 GMT
#123931
On November 12 2016 01:40 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 01:36 CosmicSpiral wrote:
On November 12 2016 01:31 Nebuchad wrote:
Tbh the entire idea of "political correctness" as a criticism needs to be dropped. The things that you are right to criticize for being PC are things that are logically wrong, so you don't need the term PC to criticize them, you just need logic.

If there is something you can't criticize under "logically incorrect", but you can criticize under "politically correct", then it probably doesn't deserve your criticism.


Political correctness isn't about the the substance of an issue or logical form of its rationale.


Can you bring up a single case where political correctness was a problem that you couldn't have solved with logic?


Benedict Cumberbatch using the word 'colored' instead of 'black' when describing actors.
WriterWovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muß man schweigen.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15664 Posts
November 11 2016 16:47 GMT
#123932
On November 12 2016 01:46 CosmicSpiral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 01:40 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 12 2016 01:36 CosmicSpiral wrote:
On November 12 2016 01:31 Nebuchad wrote:
Tbh the entire idea of "political correctness" as a criticism needs to be dropped. The things that you are right to criticize for being PC are things that are logically wrong, so you don't need the term PC to criticize them, you just need logic.

If there is something you can't criticize under "logically incorrect", but you can criticize under "politically correct", then it probably doesn't deserve your criticism.


Political correctness isn't about the the substance of an issue or logical form of its rationale.


Can you bring up a single case where political correctness was a problem that you couldn't have solved with logic?


Benedict Cumberbatch using the word 'colored' instead of 'black' when describing actors.


Which is supposed to be worse? Colored or black? I'm assuming colored, right?
Antyee
Profile Joined May 2011
Hungary1011 Posts
November 11 2016 16:50 GMT
#123933
Black and white are not colors.
And he is right because noone is 000000 or FFFFFF, so everyone is colored.
"My spoon is too big."
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-11 16:51:50
November 11 2016 16:51 GMT
#123934
All in all, I think this was probably the best result possible for actual left leaning people out of the election. Maybe it would have been better if Trump won while the GOP lost the Senate/house, but that's unrealistic.

Trump is forcing a realignment of the Republican party. He is dragging it far to the left on many issues, which is something I noticed way back in January.

If Clinton had won the 2018/2020 elections would almost certainly have been brutal. And it would have entrenched the neoliberals into positions of power in the DNC. Even now they're basically trying to say they did nothing wrong.

The big issue with Trump is climate change from my perspective, but those really should have been tackled by congress. Liberals do themselves no favors by trying to persuade people on the issue by claiming ignorance is the only reason for opposition. People don't like changing. Calling them ignorant doesn't make them think they need to get informed, it makes them think being ignorant is a good thing.

I'm far enough left that I generally just think "pox on both your houses" about both Democrats and Republicans.

We had some truly awful president's during the gilded age. We survived that. The difference between now and then is the the power of the executive branch has greatly expanded due to both democratic and Republican presidents in recent times. It is somewhat amusing to see some liberal columns calling on Obama to end the mass surveillance state before Trump takes power purely for that reason. It wasn't fine for Obama to do it regardless of who his successor was going to be
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15664 Posts
November 11 2016 16:52 GMT
#123935
On November 12 2016 01:50 Antyee wrote:
Black and white are not colors.
And he is right because noone is 000000 or FFFFFF, so everyone is colored.


True, but specifying someone as Asian instead of Korean diminishes the unique identities of various countries. Black people have a very unique identity in American culture, so lumping them together with all the other groups that also suffer from the same systematic difficulties doesn't make sense from a cultural perspective. It is grouping people based on struggle, not based on identity. Being defined by your struggle is kind of fucked up.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23173 Posts
November 11 2016 16:52 GMT
#123936
On November 12 2016 01:50 Antyee wrote:
Black and white are not colors.
And he is right because noone is 000000 or FFFFFF, so everyone is colored.


And if everyone is colored there's no reason to use it as a way to distinguish one actor from another.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
November 11 2016 16:54 GMT
#123937
On November 11 2016 22:21 Kickboxer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2016 21:58 Dan HH wrote:
On November 11 2016 21:53 Kickboxer wrote:
1). I know he's acted wtf? It's not a secret.
2). His astute analysis of the disastrous failure of the progressive left all over the globe is making fun of me? That is an odd way to interpret satire.

Yes, it seems you fell for Poe's Law. What you call an astute analysis is him talking the kind of gibberish Alex Jones and Molyneux do because that's the object of his satire


Ok keep pretending this is true while things keep rolling along these exact same tracks.

From where I stand, he's making fun of you.

The piece and everything in it is not only factually true (these things are happening), it also resonates 100% with myself, many people I know and, apparently, over 50% of the interested electorate in some of the world's most powerful countries.

People just don't talk about it in public because that's literally not safe to do in the current climate. Had I posted this on my Facebook wall, I might have lost clients in real life. It's just not worth the hassle to express my opinion unless it comes perfectly aligned with "ultra-progressive" dogma, some of which I simply, profoundly disagree with. Do you think that is a healthy vibrant climate of progressive discussion?

You guys might think everyone else is stupid, but unfortunately for you democracy is the order of the day and there are masses of people who simply don't share your worldview.


This is one example of the neutered irony that passes for "satire" nowadays. I suppose Colbert resonated with you as well.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12158 Posts
November 11 2016 16:55 GMT
#123938
On November 12 2016 01:46 CosmicSpiral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 01:40 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 12 2016 01:36 CosmicSpiral wrote:
On November 12 2016 01:31 Nebuchad wrote:
Tbh the entire idea of "political correctness" as a criticism needs to be dropped. The things that you are right to criticize for being PC are things that are logically wrong, so you don't need the term PC to criticize them, you just need logic.

If there is something you can't criticize under "logically incorrect", but you can criticize under "politically correct", then it probably doesn't deserve your criticism.


Political correctness isn't about the the substance of an issue or logical form of its rationale.


Can you bring up a single case where political correctness was a problem that you couldn't have solved with logic?


Benedict Cumberbatch using the word 'colored' instead of 'black' when describing actors.


iirc, it was about the word "colored" not having the same meaning in the UK and in the US, right?

If so, the people who thought Cumberbatch was a huge racist were logically wrong, because they didn't understand that Cumberbatch didn't mean what they thought he meant through the usage of the word. And Cumberbatch was then made aware that the word doesn't mean the same thing in the US, he apologized, and I'm sure he'll be aware of that the next time he's in that context.

Don't see the issue here.
No will to live, no wish to die
pmh
Profile Joined March 2016
1352 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-11-11 17:04:42
November 11 2016 16:59 GMT
#123939
On November 12 2016 01:38 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2016 01:33 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
On November 12 2016 01:10 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 12 2016 01:06 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
On November 12 2016 00:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
On November 12 2016 00:13 GreenHorizons wrote:
Yeah, no. You got it backwards, if there wasn't an America full of people who would support Trump's campaign persona, we wouldn't have SJW's bringing up gender, race, and sexuality so frequently.

Ok well I can't remember it being as bad as this back in the 90's. People just seemed to get on with their lives back then. My personal opinion much of it is due to the narcissism culture that social media and the internet in general has created.

in social media people seem to just surround themselves with other people who share their opinion. in the pre-internet workplace you are forced to socialize with people who do not share your political views. this helps create dialogue between opposing views.


No, it forced marginalized people to keep their opinions to themselves, like people are complaining about happening to them now. I don't know how many other ways to say this, but what you all are describing isn't new, what's new is sometimes the marginalized person is a white guy with views that used to be mainstream.

EDIT: Oh and it's not only other white guys that can do it to white guys. Sometimes it's a gay woman of color. That last part is certainly new.


how many workplaces were you part of in 1990 ?


90? not many unless you count hanging out with my dad at work. I also didn't work in 50's, but I don't need to, to know it was a racist and sexist environment for many people.

But what's your point?

EDIT: If your point was that sitting in front of a computer doesn't build dialogue, that's a matter of who and where you chooses to engage. But you can also sit in front of a computer and not interact with anyone. I was pointing out that merely working with people with different political opinions didn't/doesn't mean you're forced to have reasonable dialogue.



Its an interesting theory but it is a bit far sought I think,people are working now just like they where in the 90,s. They still talk with their co-workers.
Internet is so overrated,wikileaks did have influence but reddit and 4chan those sites I don't think hold much influence. The people visiting those sites are often still in college,not even allowed to vote,unemployed,whatever. Someone with a job wont spend 4 hours a day on reddit,not even 10 minutes most likely. They just talk with their co workers "economy is shit" "ya its pretty shitty for me as well"
The ideological democrats,thoose who spread the gospel,they are not that common in workplaces I think. I for one would be very surprised when a co workers starts a discussion with me about how great a certain political party is. Its just not done to talk politics in workplaces and such because there are so many opposing vieuws.
The democrats did make use of the subversive parts of internet just as much as the republicans,more actually. Just look at this thread alone and all the people defending Clinton lol.
I think it is wrong to blame certain aspects of this election on sketchy internet websites where people convince eachoter of how bad Hillary is. It did happen the other way around just as much if not more.
Thinking about it,the places where you could read that trump was not that bad where far less then the places where you could read how awesome Hillary was,i can give countless examples starting with this forum/
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
November 11 2016 17:00 GMT
#123940
[image loading]

The lies continue

User was warned for this post
Question.?
Prev 1 6195 6196 6197 6198 6199 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 205
StarCraft: Brood War
Noble 139
PianO 114
Leta 86
Bale 23
JulyZerg 12
Dota 2
ODPixel175
NeuroSwarm95
League of Legends
JimRising 828
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor113
Other Games
summit1g8706
Stewie2K1051
shahzam755
monkeys_forever480
SortOf54
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick38137
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH366
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• tankgirl 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1244
• Stunt513
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 45m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
6h 45m
Replay Cast
17h 45m
RSL Revival
1d 3h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 9h
OSC
1d 13h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.