| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On October 05 2016 06:25 Titan107 wrote: Don't forget Russia -- or is it North Korea now? CNN propaganda machine is pathetic. cnn isn't a propaganda outlet, so not really sure what you're talking about. unless it's just the general patheticness of CNN, that would make sense. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18191 Posts
On October 05 2016 06:18 LegalLord wrote: Regardless of what comes of this purported leak, this year has been a great reminder of the meaning of "paper trail." These people need a lesson in off-the-books corruption. Well, that's not "regardless of the outcome". If nothing is found, then there's a paper trail showing nothing of note. They only need a lesson if you actually find on-the-books corruption... And that's assuming this is even real. | ||
|
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
According to this NYT guy it's apparently just public stuff lol. The devastating Assange leaks will arrive every minute. Buy his book, it's 40% off | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On October 05 2016 06:31 Acrofales wrote: Well, that's not "regardless of the outcome". If nothing is found, then there's a paper trail showing nothing of note. They only need a lesson if you actually find on-the-books corruption... And that's assuming this is even real. There have been plenty of other shitty leaks so this is just one more in a line of many. | ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
|
Dan HH
Romania9151 Posts
On October 05 2016 06:39 Nevuk wrote: So Guccifer 2.0 basically hacked records that were available to the public and is bragging about how they had very little security on it? We don't know yet, not enough time passed for anyone to sift through all of files he released and check it vs public information | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4376 Posts
On October 05 2016 06:39 Nevuk wrote: So Guccifer 2.0 basically hacked records that were available to the public and is bragging about how they had very little security on it? Email addresses of donors are available to the public? News to me. | ||
|
Titan107
30 Posts
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/breaking-guccifer-2-0-clinton-foundation-docs-show-top-dems-including-nancy-pelosi-funneled-tarp-funds-pacs/ | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On October 05 2016 06:54 Titan107 wrote: I'd say this part of the leak looks like a big deal... http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/breaking-guccifer-2-0-clinton-foundation-docs-show-top-dems-including-nancy-pelosi-funneled-tarp-funds-pacs/ Interesting. | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
Why do all these "leaks" have to be so bush league? If it's a big deal then the material should speak for itself. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
C'mon! Our balls are already so blue! | ||
|
Titan107
30 Posts
On October 05 2016 07:02 WolfintheSheep wrote: Also like how the third column is "Amount of" and is truncated. Because, you know, screenshots are high value real estate, can't add those extra 20 pixels to show what that amount represents. Nope, gotta cut off the context and then describe it outside of the image. Why do all these "leaks" have to be so bush league? If it's a big deal then the material should speak for itself. You're right. It is missing the stamp that says, "CERTIFIED," at the bottom. I swear I saw it there earlier... None the less, the documents are not proven to be true yet, but in a few days time we'll know. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22051 Posts
On October 05 2016 07:02 WolfintheSheep wrote: Also like how the third column is "Amount of" and is truncated. Because, you know, screenshots are high value real estate, can't add those extra 20 pixels to show what that amount represents. Nope, gotta cut off the context and then describe it outside of the image. Why do all these "leaks" have to be so bush league? If it's a big deal then the material should speak for itself. Because there is no smoking gun and you have to fluff it up to keep the drama going before people inevitably realize it is nothing and move on, while leaving behind the tiny sliver in your mind that there was once this shady thing about the Clinton Foundation so that enough of these slivers pile on to created a general feeling of 'scum' without ever having provided anything worth a damn. You know, how the entire 'Hillary is crooked' scenario has gone. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15728 Posts
On October 05 2016 06:54 Titan107 wrote: I'd say this part of the leak looks like a big deal... http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/breaking-guccifer-2-0-clinton-foundation-docs-show-top-dems-including-nancy-pelosi-funneled-tarp-funds-pacs/ Also from that website: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/clinton-campaign-mgr-refuses-condemn-hillary-clintons-death-threat-wikileaks-founder-video/ http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/unreal-corrupt-us-media-totally-ignores-story-bill-clintons-illegitimate-son/ So forgive me for not taking it even remotely seriously. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22051 Posts
On October 05 2016 07:08 xDaunt wrote: https://twitter.com/GUCCIFER_2/status/783425088796364800 C'mon! Our balls are already so blue! Yes, why a server used by the Democratic candidate for campaign documentation contain a folder about the Democratic national Convention. What ever would she have to do there.... plz... We had this same shitshow half a day ago. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On October 05 2016 07:11 Gorsameth wrote: Yes, why a server used by the Democratic candidate for campaign documentation contain a folder about the Democratic national Convention. What ever would she have to do there.... plz... We had this same shitshow half a day ago. Exactly, which is why I'm not getting my panties in a bunch yet. | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On October 05 2016 07:09 Gorsameth wrote: Because there is no smoking gun and you have to fluff it up to keep the drama going before people inevitably realize it is nothing and move on, while leaving behind the tiny sliver in your mind that there was once this shady thing about the Clinton Foundation so that enough of these slivers pile on to created a general feeling of 'scum' without ever having provided anything worth a damn. You know, how the entire 'Hillary is crooked' scenario has gone. Yup...it's all about the slow drip of headlines. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
The PondCast
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
BSL 21
|
|
|
EPT
