• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:27
CEST 11:27
KST 18:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
[G] Progamer Settings i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 559 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4937

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4935 4936 4937 4938 4939 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
September 08 2016 20:56 GMT
#98721
"someone who needs to hire a huge team of experts just to be on a level playing field when having a debate with Trump"

straw man

"Why are you even running for president if you don't have an opinoon on anything yourself, and can't do anything yourself?"

straw man

"spending millions of dollars researching the Trump psychology to have a chance in debates"

straw man

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 08 2016 20:56 GMT
#98722
On September 09 2016 05:39 FiWiFaKi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 05:24 Plansix wrote:
There are some significant engineering problems with arming drones that are not freaking huge, so I am not that concerned. The only way they call one of these is if there is also a swat team at the scene.


Mind providing an explanation?

I had a university project to design a self levelling platform and securing mechanism for UAV's. UAV's with a rotor diameter of 50-70cm weighing between 10-25lbs, could easily maneuver with 5-15lb payloads in 40km/hr winds.

In terms of the engineering side of things, they are very stable, it has a stable signal, and it had the payload needed to mount remotely controlled firearms and such. From a practical point of view (them getting shot down and potentially dangerous items could be stolen from them, etc.) is a different matter.

I was referring a mass produced police drone that would be viable to deploy these less than lethal weapons and not be shot down or knocked out of the sky by protesters or whoever they want to use it on. Most drones are not that rugged. The main defense that flying vehicles have is being able to go up really high so we can’t hit them. But that sort of ruins their ability to accurately deploy these weapons at a reasonable cost.

Drones are cool, but we are a long way from sending cool flying robots in with our swat team like the Avengers.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 08 2016 20:59 GMT
#98723
On September 09 2016 05:43 ragz_gt wrote:
???

I sure hope whoever will be making decision for US will have a huge team of experts for anything they do.

Relying on educated people with years of practical knowledge and experience on a subject is for noobs. Better to have your own opinions on the subject, no matter how poorly informed and put those into action.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
September 08 2016 21:01 GMT
#98724
On September 09 2016 05:59 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 05:43 ragz_gt wrote:
???

I sure hope whoever will be making decision for US will have a huge team of experts for anything they do.

Relying on educated people with years of practical knowledge and experience on a subject is for noobs. Better to have your own opinions on the subject, no matter how poorly informed and put those into action.


Also, the decisions that are easy to make don't end up on the president's desk.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15663 Posts
September 08 2016 21:10 GMT
#98725
It is fascinating to infer what people must think the function of a president to be. I feel like the actual role/responsibilities/actions of a president would be a surprise to a lot of people and they may vote based on wildly incorrect perspectives on the role of a president.
FiWiFaKi
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Canada9858 Posts
September 08 2016 21:16 GMT
#98726
On September 09 2016 05:59 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 05:43 ragz_gt wrote:
???

I sure hope whoever will be making decision for US will have a huge team of experts for anything they do.

Relying on educated people with years of practical knowledge and experience on a subject is for noobs. Better to have your own opinions on the subject, no matter how poorly informed and put those into action.


Topics like abortion and gun rights, and whether to help or not to help refugees are not questions that there is consensus on (unless republican and democrat advisors are going to different schools lol).

The main reason is that these issues are ethical issues, not economic issues (sure, they have an economic component, but I'd say that the main component in them is our values and ethics), and I don't need an expert to tell me what my ethics should be.

I've done the analysis quite a few times in the Gun Thread here on TL about why I don't think the cost of gun legalization isn't bad at all, as the number of deaths isn't large, even though it's 3-5x higher per capita than western Europe. And how these costs (to me), are worth the price to my values.

So yes, particular issues, I expect the candidate to not need help with, and expect them to get guidance. That's on economic policy, central bank, foreign relations, regulatory bodies, etc... Talking to the public, debating, having opinions on non-economic issues... Those are all things I expect a candidate to have.
In life, the journey is more satisfying than the destination. || .::Entrepreneurship::. Living a few years of your life like most people won't, so that you can spend the rest of your life like most people can't || Mechanical Engineering & Economics Major
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-08 21:23:01
September 08 2016 21:21 GMT
#98727
On September 09 2016 06:16 FiWiFaKi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 05:59 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 05:43 ragz_gt wrote:
???

I sure hope whoever will be making decision for US will have a huge team of experts for anything they do.

Relying on educated people with years of practical knowledge and experience on a subject is for noobs. Better to have your own opinions on the subject, no matter how poorly informed and put those into action.


Topics like abortion and gun rights, and whether to help or not to help refugees are not questions that there is consensus on (unless republican and democrat advisors are going to different schools lol).

The main reason is that these issues are ethical issues, not economic issues (sure, they have an economic component, but I'd say that the main component in them is our values and ethics), and I don't need an expert to tell me what my ethics should be.

I've done the analysis quite a few times in the Gun Thread here on TL about why I don't think the cost of gun legalization isn't bad at all, as the number of deaths isn't large, even though it's 3-5x higher per capita than western Europe. And how these costs (to me), are worth the price to my values.

So yes, particular issues, I expect the candidate to not need help with, and expect them to get guidance. That's on economic policy, central bank, foreign relations, regulatory bodies, etc... Talking to the public, debating, having opinions on non-economic issues... Those are all things I expect a candidate to have.

You just named three issues where their is solid information that experts can provide information that never makes it to the political arena. None of which are ethical. Reducing access to abortions is a public health risk for example. And outlawing them will not reduce the number of women getting them, only make them far less safe. If you think the guns thread is providing you with solid, fact based information on gun violence, you might need to look little farther. Like beyond the internet.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
FiWiFaKi
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Canada9858 Posts
September 08 2016 21:22 GMT
#98728
On September 09 2016 06:10 Mohdoo wrote:
It is fascinating to infer what people must think the function of a president to be. I feel like the actual role/responsibilities/actions of a president would be a surprise to a lot of people and they may vote based on wildly incorrect perspectives on the role of a president.


What is it in your opinion?

-He's the figurehead of the USA
-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter)
-Decides on foreign relations + war
-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with

Are the primary roles, besides secondary stuff like giving speeches for why what congress is doing is important, and why you should support it, etc.
In life, the journey is more satisfying than the destination. || .::Entrepreneurship::. Living a few years of your life like most people won't, so that you can spend the rest of your life like most people can't || Mechanical Engineering & Economics Major
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42555 Posts
September 08 2016 21:23 GMT
#98729
On September 09 2016 05:30 Plansix wrote:
They will never replace helicopters. Their ability to stay airborne is limited by battery life and they don’t provide the same amount of information to the user. They will have roles, but police use helicopters for things that drones can’t do, like cover huge areas.

Plus they last longer.

Disagree 110%. A helicopter can provide far, far less information that a drone swarm with self flying and pack coordination AI, neither of which is particularly far-fetched. A helicopter is also hugely limited by cost which rule out the use of it in most situations simply because there are more situations that would benefit from a helicopter than there are helicopters, so in most cases the choice is between no helicopter or the drones. The cost and the fact that it's manned, not to mention the fuel, insurance and pilot related expenses, also force the user to be extremely cautious.

I don't think it's at all unlikely that we'll see police controlled drone swarms operated remotely from a central hub that are capable of flying autonomously, tracking a target (including route mapping and obstacle avoidance while following the target) and basic problem solving if instructed to get a closer shot or different angle or whatever.

The comparison isn't between a helicopter and a drone. It's been a helicopter or a thousand drones. Helicopters had a lot of advantages when cameras were giant bulky things, when flying required a pilot and when data transmission was most easily done by having an officer on board look out the window, see where the guy was and encode that using words transmitted over a radio. Autonomous flying is a thing now, cameras can be mounted on tiny drones and you can feed a shitton of live video feeds direct to a command centre remotely.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
FiWiFaKi
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Canada9858 Posts
September 08 2016 21:26 GMT
#98730
On September 09 2016 06:21 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 06:16 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 09 2016 05:59 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 05:43 ragz_gt wrote:
???

I sure hope whoever will be making decision for US will have a huge team of experts for anything they do.

Relying on educated people with years of practical knowledge and experience on a subject is for noobs. Better to have your own opinions on the subject, no matter how poorly informed and put those into action.


Topics like abortion and gun rights, and whether to help or not to help refugees are not questions that there is consensus on (unless republican and democrat advisors are going to different schools lol).

The main reason is that these issues are ethical issues, not economic issues (sure, they have an economic component, but I'd say that the main component in them is our values and ethics), and I don't need an expert to tell me what my ethics should be.

I've done the analysis quite a few times in the Gun Thread here on TL about why I don't think the cost of gun legalization isn't bad at all, as the number of deaths isn't large, even though it's 3-5x higher per capita than western Europe. And how these costs (to me), are worth the price to my values.

So yes, particular issues, I expect the candidate to not need help with, and expect them to get guidance. That's on economic policy, central bank, foreign relations, regulatory bodies, etc... Talking to the public, debating, having opinions on non-economic issues... Those are all things I expect a candidate to have.

You just named three issues where their is solid information that experts can provide information that never makes it to the political arena. If you think the guns thread is providing you with solid, fact based information on gun violence, you might need to look little farther. Like beyond the internet.


If you're suggesting to go live in one of those the crime ridden communities, then I have lived in comparable places.

The democrat leaning "experts" look at the economic costs, the republican leaning ones look at freedoms and constitution. I gave a very fact based analysis of the number of deaths, injuries, and percentages due to criminal activity. Looked at mass homicides, etc.. If you compare these to other causes of death, it's quite small.

If you can't agree that there is no right answer based on a scientific approach at the moment, then this discussion wont go anywhere further.
In life, the journey is more satisfying than the destination. || .::Entrepreneurship::. Living a few years of your life like most people won't, so that you can spend the rest of your life like most people can't || Mechanical Engineering & Economics Major
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-08 21:34:35
September 08 2016 21:26 GMT
#98731
On September 09 2016 06:22 FiWiFaKi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 06:10 Mohdoo wrote:
It is fascinating to infer what people must think the function of a president to be. I feel like the actual role/responsibilities/actions of a president would be a surprise to a lot of people and they may vote based on wildly incorrect perspectives on the role of a president.


What is it in your opinion?

-He's the figurehead of the USA
-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter)
-Decides on foreign relations + war
-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with

Are the primary roles, besides secondary stuff like giving speeches for why what congress is doing is important, and why you should support it, etc.


-He's the figurehead of the USA – Not really, but sure, whatever.

-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter) – Controls every aspect of government not controlled by congress, including the FBI, CIA and NSA. Plus all the non- law enforcement branches.

-Decides on foreign relations + war – Sort of and Not really, no. He can take minor military actions. He cannot go to war on his own. Creates treaties, which must be approved by congress.

-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with – And approves laws presented to him by congress. Can also introduce bills to congress as well.


I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
FiWiFaKi
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Canada9858 Posts
September 08 2016 21:29 GMT
#98732
On September 09 2016 06:23 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 05:30 Plansix wrote:
They will never replace helicopters. Their ability to stay airborne is limited by battery life and they don’t provide the same amount of information to the user. They will have roles, but police use helicopters for things that drones can’t do, like cover huge areas.

Plus they last longer.

Disagree 110%. A helicopter can provide far, far less information that a drone swarm with self flying and pack coordination AI, neither of which is particularly far-fetched. A helicopter is also hugely limited by cost which rule out the use of it in most situations simply because there are more situations that would benefit from a helicopter than there are helicopters, so in most cases the choice is between no helicopter or the drones. The cost and the fact that it's manned, not to mention the fuel, insurance and pilot related expenses, also force the user to be extremely cautious.

I don't think it's at all unlikely that we'll see police controlled drone swarms operated remotely from a central hub that are capable of flying autonomously, tracking a target (including route mapping and obstacle avoidance while following the target) and basic problem solving if instructed to get a closer shot or different angle or whatever.

The comparison isn't between a helicopter and a drone. It's been a helicopter or a thousand drones. Helicopters had a lot of advantages when cameras were giant bulky things, when flying required a pilot and when data transmission was most easily done by having an officer on board look out the window, see where the guy was and encode that using words transmitted over a radio. Autonomous flying is a thing now, cameras can be mounted on tiny drones and you can feed a shitton of live video feeds direct to a command centre remotely.


I completely agree. Drones will very quickly replace drones, the only question is whether we want to let them. Personally I'm not a fan of an entire city being under surveillance 24/7, even at the expense of higher crime rates and whatnot. Maybe I'm just old fashioned, and I prefer something closer to the classic human experience.
In life, the journey is more satisfying than the destination. || .::Entrepreneurship::. Living a few years of your life like most people won't, so that you can spend the rest of your life like most people can't || Mechanical Engineering & Economics Major
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
September 08 2016 21:33 GMT
#98733
On September 09 2016 06:26 FiWiFaKi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 06:21 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:16 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 09 2016 05:59 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 05:43 ragz_gt wrote:
???

I sure hope whoever will be making decision for US will have a huge team of experts for anything they do.

Relying on educated people with years of practical knowledge and experience on a subject is for noobs. Better to have your own opinions on the subject, no matter how poorly informed and put those into action.


Topics like abortion and gun rights, and whether to help or not to help refugees are not questions that there is consensus on (unless republican and democrat advisors are going to different schools lol).

The main reason is that these issues are ethical issues, not economic issues (sure, they have an economic component, but I'd say that the main component in them is our values and ethics), and I don't need an expert to tell me what my ethics should be.

I've done the analysis quite a few times in the Gun Thread here on TL about why I don't think the cost of gun legalization isn't bad at all, as the number of deaths isn't large, even though it's 3-5x higher per capita than western Europe. And how these costs (to me), are worth the price to my values.

So yes, particular issues, I expect the candidate to not need help with, and expect them to get guidance. That's on economic policy, central bank, foreign relations, regulatory bodies, etc... Talking to the public, debating, having opinions on non-economic issues... Those are all things I expect a candidate to have.

You just named three issues where their is solid information that experts can provide information that never makes it to the political arena. If you think the guns thread is providing you with solid, fact based information on gun violence, you might need to look little farther. Like beyond the internet.


If you're suggesting to go live in one of those the crime ridden communities, then I have lived in comparable places.

The democrat leaning "experts" look at the economic costs, the republican leaning ones look at freedoms and constitution. I gave a very fact based analysis of the number of deaths, injuries, and percentages due to criminal activity. Looked at mass homicides, etc.. If you compare these to other causes of death, it's quite small.

If you can't agree that there is no right answer based on a scientific approach at the moment, then this discussion wont go anywhere further.

No, I was suggesting you go find the interviews, reports on how guns end up the hands of criminals and other information on teh subject. This is a better way to become informed than skimming the entrenched gun debate thread where everyone provides information that solely benefits their point in an effort to win the argument on the internet.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TheLordofAwesome
Profile Joined May 2014
Korea (South)2616 Posts
September 08 2016 21:34 GMT
#98734
On September 09 2016 06:26 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 06:22 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:10 Mohdoo wrote:
It is fascinating to infer what people must think the function of a president to be. I feel like the actual role/responsibilities/actions of a president would be a surprise to a lot of people and they may vote based on wildly incorrect perspectives on the role of a president.


What is it in your opinion?

-He's the figurehead of the USA
-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter)
-Decides on foreign relations + war
-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with

Are the primary roles, besides secondary stuff like giving speeches for why what congress is doing is important, and why you should support it, etc.


-He's the figurehead of the USA – Not really, but sure, whatever.

-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter) – Controls every aspect of government not controlled by congress, including the FBI, CIA and NSA. Plus all the non- law enforcement branches.

-Decides on foreign relations + war – Sort of and Not really, no. He can take minor military actions. He cannot go to war.

-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with – And approves laws presented to him by congress. Can also introduce bills to congress as well.



Have you read the Constitution?
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
September 08 2016 21:36 GMT
#98735
On September 09 2016 06:26 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 06:22 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:10 Mohdoo wrote:
It is fascinating to infer what people must think the function of a president to be. I feel like the actual role/responsibilities/actions of a president would be a surprise to a lot of people and they may vote based on wildly incorrect perspectives on the role of a president.


What is it in your opinion?

-He's the figurehead of the USA
-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter)
-Decides on foreign relations + war
-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with

Are the primary roles, besides secondary stuff like giving speeches for why what congress is doing is important, and why you should support it, etc.


-He's the figurehead of the USA – Not really, but sure, whatever.

-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter) – Controls every aspect of government not controlled by congress, including the FBI, CIA and NSA. Plus all the non- law enforcement branches.

-Decides on foreign relations + war – Sort of and Not really, no. He can take minor military actions. He cannot go to war.

-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with – And approves laws presented to him by congress. Can also introduce bills to congress as well.




Executive power is no joke either. Lot of discretion on how federal code is enforced.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-08 21:38:11
September 08 2016 21:37 GMT
#98736
On September 09 2016 06:34 TheLordofAwesome wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 06:26 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:22 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:10 Mohdoo wrote:
It is fascinating to infer what people must think the function of a president to be. I feel like the actual role/responsibilities/actions of a president would be a surprise to a lot of people and they may vote based on wildly incorrect perspectives on the role of a president.


What is it in your opinion?

-He's the figurehead of the USA
-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter)
-Decides on foreign relations + war
-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with

Are the primary roles, besides secondary stuff like giving speeches for why what congress is doing is important, and why you should support it, etc.


-He's the figurehead of the USA – Not really, but sure, whatever.

-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter) – Controls every aspect of government not controlled by congress, including the FBI, CIA and NSA. Plus all the non- law enforcement branches.

-Decides on foreign relations + war – Sort of and Not really, no. He can take minor military actions. He cannot go to war.

-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with – And approves laws presented to him by congress. Can also introduce bills to congress as well.



Have you read the Constitution?

That specific section, not in like a decade ago or more. I forgot that the budget is introduced to congress at the president's request, not by the president directly. I stand corrected.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-09-08 23:20:24
September 08 2016 21:38 GMT
#98737
Igne ->
issues with the article, I'm noting things as I go along, so it's more stream of consciousness as I read; here's the article link again for convenience:
http://www.claremont.org/crb/basicpage/the-flight-93-election/

Seems odd to use an obscure pompous latin nom de plume, but doesn't really matter.

The opening paragraphs are ridiculous histrionics; he notes that others may think it histrionic but seems to persist in his claim of that, no matter how objectively silly it is.

then he goes on a long diatribe against conservative thinkers; not entirely without merit, but clearly emblematic of academic spats. He seems to assume his brand of conservatism is the correct one, even though others obviously will disagree with it. his complaint about the disparity in statements vs actions of the severity could be simplified to: politicians exaggerate problem to get votes (or other support, for non-politicians who, I guess, make their money off speaking fees or think tanks or somesuch). He himself is doing this same thing, exaggerating a problem to get whatever he's after (and/or simply not understanding it well).

some sketchy claims about the causation of shifts in crime patterns; which don't seem at all justified by anything.

he choose to assert things as questionable with a clear lack of understanding, or at least of recognition, of them:
" But they don’t dream up inanities like 32 “genders,” elective bathrooms, single-payer, Iran sycophancy, “Islamophobia,” and Black Lives Matter. They merely help ratify them."

then some paranoia and unfounded claims, and/or excessive claims. assertion that all media and universities are corrupt; which is a rather ridiculous overgeneralization, and just ridiculous on its face.

he basically sounds like an extreme far right guy complaining abotu the right for not being far right enough.

his claims of there being a "bipartisan junta" mostly just reek of crazy.

then a paragraph on immigration which has a whole lot of stupid, and doens't relaly connect with reality much.

then another idiot quote:
"The level of unity America enjoyed before the bipartisan junta took over can never be restored."
which shows a complete lack of understanding of the level of unity in american history.

I think the flaws in this quote rather speak for itself:
"The election of 2016 is a test—in my view, the final test—of whether there is any virtù left in what used to be the core of the American nation. If they cannot rouse themselves simply to vote for the first candidate in a generation who pledges to advance their interests, and to vote against the one who openly boasts that she will do the opposite"


so, like I said, a whole lot of drek. well-written drek, but the idea of someone with a rather poor grasp of reality.

PS I know my response isn't that well written.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
FiWiFaKi
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Canada9858 Posts
September 08 2016 21:40 GMT
#98738
On September 09 2016 06:33 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 06:26 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:21 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:16 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 09 2016 05:59 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 05:43 ragz_gt wrote:
???

I sure hope whoever will be making decision for US will have a huge team of experts for anything they do.

Relying on educated people with years of practical knowledge and experience on a subject is for noobs. Better to have your own opinions on the subject, no matter how poorly informed and put those into action.


Topics like abortion and gun rights, and whether to help or not to help refugees are not questions that there is consensus on (unless republican and democrat advisors are going to different schools lol).

The main reason is that these issues are ethical issues, not economic issues (sure, they have an economic component, but I'd say that the main component in them is our values and ethics), and I don't need an expert to tell me what my ethics should be.

I've done the analysis quite a few times in the Gun Thread here on TL about why I don't think the cost of gun legalization isn't bad at all, as the number of deaths isn't large, even though it's 3-5x higher per capita than western Europe. And how these costs (to me), are worth the price to my values.

So yes, particular issues, I expect the candidate to not need help with, and expect them to get guidance. That's on economic policy, central bank, foreign relations, regulatory bodies, etc... Talking to the public, debating, having opinions on non-economic issues... Those are all things I expect a candidate to have.

You just named three issues where their is solid information that experts can provide information that never makes it to the political arena. If you think the guns thread is providing you with solid, fact based information on gun violence, you might need to look little farther. Like beyond the internet.


If you're suggesting to go live in one of those the crime ridden communities, then I have lived in comparable places.

The democrat leaning "experts" look at the economic costs, the republican leaning ones look at freedoms and constitution. I gave a very fact based analysis of the number of deaths, injuries, and percentages due to criminal activity. Looked at mass homicides, etc.. If you compare these to other causes of death, it's quite small.

If you can't agree that there is no right answer based on a scientific approach at the moment, then this discussion wont go anywhere further.

No, I was suggesting you go find the interviews, reports on how guns end up the hands of criminals and other information on teh subject. This is a better way to become informed than skimming the entrenched gun debate thread where everyone provides information that solely benefits their point in an effort to win the argument on the internet.


I didn't go through interviews, but I did start at wikipedia, and followed a lot of the references and where that led me. Anyway, I wont go justify the quality of my arguments I made, but I think they were quality in nature, and I actually received a PM from one TL member thanking me for using a fact-based approach. I'm sure you'd still find issues (July 23rd is when I received it, if you care to go look at where I posted my argument), but anyway, decent quality posts imo.

Also, I think what I expressed is a pretty accurate general summary of what the president does, you just chose to expand on it, and I could expand on what you said if I cared. As for you war argument, I believe that the president can do almost anything he wants with the exception of officially declaring war.

"On at least 125 occasions, the President has acted without prior express military authorization from Congress.[21] These include instances in which the United States fought in the Philippine–American War from 1898–1903, in Nicaragua in 1927, as well as the NATO bombing campaign of Yugoslavia in 1999."

I imagine he can gain approval for just about any kind of strategic mission and movement of military personnel once approvement for the conflict has gained approval.
In life, the journey is more satisfying than the destination. || .::Entrepreneurship::. Living a few years of your life like most people won't, so that you can spend the rest of your life like most people can't || Mechanical Engineering & Economics Major
TheLordofAwesome
Profile Joined May 2014
Korea (South)2616 Posts
September 08 2016 21:40 GMT
#98739
On September 09 2016 06:37 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 06:34 TheLordofAwesome wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:26 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:22 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:10 Mohdoo wrote:
It is fascinating to infer what people must think the function of a president to be. I feel like the actual role/responsibilities/actions of a president would be a surprise to a lot of people and they may vote based on wildly incorrect perspectives on the role of a president.


What is it in your opinion?

-He's the figurehead of the USA
-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter)
-Decides on foreign relations + war
-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with

Are the primary roles, besides secondary stuff like giving speeches for why what congress is doing is important, and why you should support it, etc.


-He's the figurehead of the USA – Not really, but sure, whatever.

-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter) – Controls every aspect of government not controlled by congress, including the FBI, CIA and NSA. Plus all the non- law enforcement branches.

-Decides on foreign relations + war – Sort of and Not really, no. He can take minor military actions. He cannot go to war.

-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with – And approves laws presented to him by congress. Can also introduce bills to congress as well.



Have you read the Constitution?

That specific section, not in like a decade ago or more. I forgot that the budget is introduced to congress at the president's request, not by the president directly. I stand corrected.

The president cannot introduce any legislation himself. He has to find congressmen to do it for him. Usually though that isn't very hard.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15663 Posts
September 08 2016 21:44 GMT
#98740
On September 09 2016 06:40 TheLordofAwesome wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2016 06:37 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:34 TheLordofAwesome wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:26 Plansix wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:22 FiWiFaKi wrote:
On September 09 2016 06:10 Mohdoo wrote:
It is fascinating to infer what people must think the function of a president to be. I feel like the actual role/responsibilities/actions of a president would be a surprise to a lot of people and they may vote based on wildly incorrect perspectives on the role of a president.


What is it in your opinion?

-He's the figurehead of the USA
-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter)
-Decides on foreign relations + war
-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with

Are the primary roles, besides secondary stuff like giving speeches for why what congress is doing is important, and why you should support it, etc.


-He's the figurehead of the USA – Not really, but sure, whatever.

-Appoints important people in government (hence his values matter) – Controls every aspect of government not controlled by congress, including the FBI, CIA and NSA. Plus all the non- law enforcement branches.

-Decides on foreign relations + war – Sort of and Not really, no. He can take minor military actions. He cannot go to war.

-Veto laws that he doesn't agree with – And approves laws presented to him by congress. Can also introduce bills to congress as well.



Have you read the Constitution?

That specific section, not in like a decade ago or more. I forgot that the budget is introduced to congress at the president's request, not by the president directly. I stand corrected.

The president cannot introduce any legislation himself. He has to find congressmen to do it for him. Usually though that isn't very hard.


I mean, if he's gonna introduce something, it is likely something that will get at least 1 vote. I think it is a fair approximation to say the president is the one doing the introducing.
Prev 1 4935 4936 4937 4938 4939 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 34m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 3379
Shuttle 970
actioN 412
Larva 366
Stork 351
TY 235
Zeus 186
Soma 142
Mini 121
Hyuk 114
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 102
EffOrt 92
Nal_rA 79
PianO 65
sSak 58
Pusan 57
sorry 36
Noble 34
JulyZerg 33
hero 26
Sharp 24
Rush 23
Yoon 22
Sacsri 19
Barracks 12
IntoTheRainbow 8
ivOry 1
Dota 2
Gorgc3790
XaKoH 482
XcaliburYe342
League of Legends
JimRising 517
singsing227
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1175
Other Games
tarik_tv20355
shahzam902
ceh9489
Happy411
Fuzer 258
crisheroes242
monkeys_forever177
Pyrionflax108
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick32732
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH382
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2166
League of Legends
• HappyZerGling95
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
34m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6h 34m
WardiTV European League
6h 34m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
14h 34m
RSL Revival
1d
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.