|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
Leave to the GOP and Reince to finally force (probably threaten) Trump to get his act together because he refused to endorse some people, LOL. Not any of the other insane things he has said or done. No, personal slights to favorite sons is what pushes them over the edge.
Ryan didn't ask, plus these two will be running in four years. So there's that. I admire that Scott Walker went all in for Cruz despite knowing that they both might run again.
|
I wish we had a better system for getting people in office who're just gonna sit down and figure out plans to deal with the problems, factoring in our general ethical/moral beliefs. I mean, it's so easy to get reasonable work done, why they gotta make it so hard and difficult.
I wonder who managed to get Trump to act like that; he's generally been very hard to manage, I'm guessing only his kids could actually do it.
|
On August 06 2016 10:44 Introvert wrote:Leave to the GOP and Reince to finally force (probably threaten) Trump to get his act together because he refused to endorse some people, LOL. Not any of the other insane things he has said or done. No, personal slights to favorite sons is what pushes them over the edge. Ryan didn't ask, plus these two will be running in four years. So there's that. I admire that Scott Walker went all in for Cruz despite knowing that they both might run again.
It does make them look quite petty that they let the man get away with murder multiple times but once he says he might not endorse suddenly they have a problem.
|
I bet trump mentally is rallying around being able to say he is just being sarcastic later
|
United States41991 Posts
On August 06 2016 08:11 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2016 08:01 KwarK wrote:On August 06 2016 08:00 GreenHorizons wrote:On August 06 2016 07:55 Nyxisto wrote: No, alternative medicine is not an option instead of chemotherapy or any diseases that (western) medicine can't handle. That is absolutely ridiculous. There's also no 'balance' to be had in this discussion. To talk to a practionicer of the stuff about its effects makes as much as sense as talking to a Scientology member about Scientology. There's no legitimate alternative medicine community.
Yes, chemotherapy can ruin your quality of life, the advantage is of course that you continue to live. Let's step away from chemo and think for a moment about something like back pain, does that change your opinion? Or do you really think there is nothing in the realm of "alternative medicine" that may work better than the typical xray and opiates most people get in the US? If it works better, great, test it, prove it, turn it into medicine. To both your and Moh's point, sometimes that's easier said than done. Like the medical industry and medical science aren't always aligned. That's why I used the cannabis example in the first place. Point being that sometimes medicine isn't considered "medicine" not because it's not "medicine", but because people don't want it to be seen as medicine. Cannabis is just one we can follow pretty well along it's path to becoming medicine (even if Hillary doesn't believe it yet). Yes but the flaws of the medical industry (of which there are a great many) do nothing to excuse the flaws of the alternative medicine industry (of which there is almost nothing but flaw). Western medicine is far from perfect but that doesn't mean that things excluded from western medicine still merit consideration through any other lens. Things like homeopathy which by definition cannot contain any active ingredient can't somehow latch onto "but medicine doesn't know everything" as if that legitimizes them.
It's like how a failure to prove a negative doesn't equal a positive. You can say that not all medicines are a part of western medicine and I will accept that to be true. But that doesn't mean that any given thing that has been rejected by western medicine deserves consideration. And far too often, especially with groups like the greens, what it comes down to is dangerous levels of ignorance being exploited by charlatans.
|
United States41991 Posts
On August 06 2016 08:17 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2016 08:13 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On August 06 2016 08:11 GreenHorizons wrote:On August 06 2016 08:01 KwarK wrote:On August 06 2016 08:00 GreenHorizons wrote:On August 06 2016 07:55 Nyxisto wrote: No, alternative medicine is not an option instead of chemotherapy or any diseases that (western) medicine can't handle. That is absolutely ridiculous. There's also no 'balance' to be had in this discussion. To talk to a practionicer of the stuff about its effects makes as much as sense as talking to a Scientology member about Scientology. There's no legitimate alternative medicine community.
Yes, chemotherapy can ruin your quality of life, the advantage is of course that you continue to live. Let's step away from chemo and think for a moment about something like back pain, does that change your opinion? Or do you really think there is nothing in the realm of "alternative medicine" that may work better than the typical xray and opiates most people get in the US? If it works better, great, test it, prove it, turn it into medicine. To both your and Moh's point, sometimes that's easier said than done. Like the medical industry and medical science aren't always aligned. That's why I used the cannabis example in the first place. Point being that sometimes medicine isn't considered "medicine" not because it's not "medicine", but because people don't want it to be seen as medicine. Cannabis is just one we can follow pretty well along it's path to becoming medicine (even if Hillary doesn't believe it yet). And that's a fine point, but that's not the original point you were making- that cannabis is either homeopathic or that it's considered "alternative medicine". When do you think cannabis went from being "alternative medicine" to being "medicine"? The moment it passed double blind trials which was probably decades ago. Being legally prescribed doesn't make something medicine imo. Reliably obtaining results in the treatment of specific ailments when accounting for the placebo effect and other variables does. So basically if it works, medicine. If it doesn't work, alternative medicine.
|
things like homeopathy which by definition cannot contain any active ingredient
Huh?
That's not the definition i know, or in fact the one that wikipedia gives you. It's quite nonsense.
Not that i'm necessarily disagreeing with what you're saying, but that's wrong. Doesn't really make it better though, from experience with my small "contacts" to homeopaths in regards to my cluster headaches. It quite literally boiled down to eating flowers.
|
United States41991 Posts
On August 06 2016 13:03 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +things like homeopathy which by definition cannot contain any active ingredient Huh? That's not the definition i know, or in fact the one that wikipedia gives you. It's quite nonsense. Not that i'm necessarily disagreeing with what you're saying, but that's wrong. Doesn't really make it better though, from experience with my small "contacts" to homeopaths in regards to my cluster headaches. It quite literally boiled down to eating flowers. If your homeopath is giving you flowers then they're not giving you a homeopathic remedy. So that's good because homeopathy has to be water, by definition. If it's not pure water then it's not a homeopathic remedy.
Three main logarithmic potency scales are in regular use in homeopathy. Hahnemann created the "centesimal" or "C scale", diluting a substance by a factor of 100 at each stage. The centesimal scale was favored by Hahnemann for most of his life.
A 2C dilution requires a substance to be diluted to one part in 100, and then some of that diluted solution diluted by a further factor of 100.
This works out to one part of the original substance in 10,000 parts of the solution.[85] A 6C dilution repeats this process six times, ending up with the original substance diluted by a factor of 100−6=10−12 (one part in one trillion or 1/1,000,000,000,000). Higher dilutions follow the same pattern.
In homeopathy, a solution that is more dilute is described as having a higher "potency", and more dilute substances are considered by homeopaths to be stronger and deeper-acting.[86] The end product is often so diluted as to be indistinguishable from the diluent (pure water, sugar or alcohol).[10][87][88] There is also a decimal potency scale (notated as "X" or "D") in which the preparation is diluted by a factor of 10 at each stage.[89]
Hahnemann advocated 30C dilutions for most purposes (that is, dilution by a factor of 1060).[9] Hahnemann regularly used potencies up to 300C but opined that "there must be a limit to the matter, it cannot go on indefinitely".[41]:322
In Hahnemann's time, it was reasonable to assume the preparations could be diluted indefinitely, as the concept of the atom or molecule as the smallest possible unit of a chemical substance was just beginning to be recognized.
The greatest dilution reasonably likely to contain even one molecule of the original substance is 12C. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy#Preparations_and_treatment
I'm sorry that your homeopath is deceiving you by giving you actual things instead of the water that you paid for. Clearly you need to find a more trustworthy charlatan and they need to go back to dilution school. But that doesn't mean that I'm wrong. A homeopathic remedy that isn't pure water isn't a homeopathic remedy. What you have is someone cashing in on the homeopathic name to sell their flowers.
It's 1:100^C. So 30C would be 1 part in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
Oddly enough I actually googled how many molecules there were on earth. While I can't verify the guy's math google told me there were 675,000,100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. That's about a 22C dilution. So once you go beyond 22C then there is less than one molecule of active ingredient per planet sized dose. You could swallow the entire earth and consume less than one molecule of active ingredient. 30C would mean swallowing the earth 10,000,000,000,000,000 times over to get your molecule of active ingredient.
It's just water. There isn't enough matter in the solar system for it not to be water. It is mathematically impossible for homeopathy to be anything but water. If there is something in your water then your homeopath is sabotaging your treatment.
|
On August 06 2016 13:03 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +things like homeopathy which by definition cannot contain any active ingredient Huh? That's not the definition i know, or in fact the one that wikipedia gives you. It's quite nonsense. Not that i'm necessarily disagreeing with what you're saying, but that's wrong. Doesn't really make it better though, from experience with my small "contacts" to homeopaths in regards to my cluster headaches. It quite literally boiled down to eating flowers.
Actually, that is the definition of homeopathy.
People that practice it nowadays mix a lot of different traditions, but homeopathy originated on the premise of "like cures like", where you take what (supposedly) causes the illness, dilute it by multiple orders of magnitude (which makes it so the ingredient is in such small concentrations that it cannot be active or have any effect), and then drink what is essentially just water.
|
On August 06 2016 13:03 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +things like homeopathy which by definition cannot contain any active ingredient Huh? That's not the definition i know, or in fact the one that wikipedia gives you. It's quite nonsense. Not that i'm necessarily disagreeing with what you're saying, but that's wrong. Doesn't really make it better though, from experience with my small "contacts" to homeopaths in regards to my cluster headaches. It quite literally boiled down to eating flowers.
That's actually exactly what homeopathy is...
|
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. — Hillary Clinton is crushing Donald Trump in Michigan and Wisconsin. Yet her running mate Tim Kaine is here anyway, barnstorming the industrial Midwest to shore up support among the white, working-class voters that the Republican nominee desperately needs to win.
Clinton and Kaine are backing off in Colorado and Virginia, pausing ad buys where demographics are tilting the race away from Trump. But Trump is threatening a serious play for voters in this part of the country with visits to Wisconsin Friday and Michigan on Monday — including this city in conservative Western Michigan where the state may be lost and won, top officials in both parties say.
Trump’s claim to expanding the political map rests squarely on his ability to woo blue-collar Democrats. And Kaine — a devoted Catholic father of three who grew up in the Kansas City suburbs — was chosen in part to strengthen the ticket among just these kinds of voters. So far, he’s hammered away at Trump as an outsourcing “you’re fired” candidate with no real policy prescriptions, meticulously explaining Clinton’s plan of building new infrastructure and investing in education.
Attendees at his events in the Rust Belt received him warmly Friday, but some said they were mostly here out of enthusiasm for Clinton rather than Kaine, who remains an unknown in this part of the country.
Clinton’s backers admit to being slightly nervous about how Michigan could play out, and to a lesser extent, Wisconsin. Clinton lost both states to Bernie Sanders in the primary — so Kaine’s Friday visit and a reported swing through Michigan next week by Clinton shows that Democrats aren’t taking any chances as Trump counters their presence with appearances of his own.
Source
|
+ Show Spoiler + this keeps getting funnier and sadder as time goes on.
I'm glad we're talking about homeopathy and how bullshit it is. My family has legitimate arguments about it on facebook and at family meetings.
|
Ah, the good old Western medicine vs alternative medicine debate
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
I've seen enough medicine / medical methodology from other nations to see that the current state of Western medicine isn't the end-all be-all of proper medical care (no shit). The problem is that when there's no proper established structure to this sort of thing, it starts to become dominated by charlatans who are looking to make a profit.
Giving water and selling it as medicine is quite obviously BS though.
On August 06 2016 16:16 OtherWorld wrote: Ah, the good old Western medicine vs alternative medicine debate At least it isn't the pointless racism debate that comes around here every once in a while.
|
I'm sorry that your homeopath is deceiving you by giving you actual things instead of the water that you paid for. Clearly you need to find a more trustworthy charlatan and they need to go back to dilution school.
He's not "my homeopath". But i promise you, if you have a condition as painful as cluster headaches, you grasp every straw. Didn't pay anything btw.
Also, from the same page:
The process of homeopathic dilution results in no objectively detectable active ingredient in most cases, but some preparations (e.g. calendula and arnica creams) do contain pharmacologically active doses.
I take the point of being initially so diluted that there's no active ingredient though, fair enough.
|
On August 06 2016 19:39 m4ini wrote:Show nested quote +I'm sorry that your homeopath is deceiving you by giving you actual things instead of the water that you paid for. Clearly you need to find a more trustworthy charlatan and they need to go back to dilution school. He's not "my homeopath". But i promise you, if you have a condition as painful as cluster headaches, you grasp every straw. Didn't pay anything btw. Also, from the same page: Show nested quote +The process of homeopathic dilution results in no objectively detectable active ingredient in most cases, but some preparations (e.g. calendula and arnica creams) do contain pharmacologically active doses.
the issue is: there is no clear definition of homeopathy as it is a self assigned label of practicioners, there is no independent body overseeing it there is a clear definition of homeopathy by Hahnemann
the cornerstones are: - there are no illnesses and internal causes, just symptoms (§6 Organon der Heilkunst 5th edition) - symptoms are caused by external "Schädlichkeiten" (literally harmfulnesses) (those can be substances of the physical and spiritual realm) upsetting the natural balance of the life force of a body - the impact of such a substance can only by judged by its influence on a healthy individual (now it gets really funky) - a weak physiological condition (remember this means symptom only) is annihilated by effecting a stronger physiological condition of the same type -> this means a cure only works through being similar to the harm
thats why real Homöopathie is supposed to cause an initial worsening of the condition §157-161
regarding the diluting: the proposed mechanism of action is that every part of the body that has tactile innervation is responsive to the active substance and transmits the effect through the body. dilution into a large body of fluid is now supposed to reach more parts in the body at the same time to increase effectiveness
his proposal was that there are diminishing returns i.e. effectiveness of substance is not linear with amount of substance i.e 4 times the substance has 2 times the effectiveness now he applies that to diluting, you can dilute a substance by a factor of ten and only divide your effectiveness by a bit more than 2 on the other hand he proclaims that the benefit of reaching more nerves with the diluted substance (because you can give a larger fluid volume) outgrows the loss from the dilution....
of course this is wrong as the square root of 10 is not ~2 but ~3.16, but even beyond basic math the whole concept of annihilating a symptom by provoking a similiar one and therefore tricking the balance of life force in the body is ridiculous
|
I didn't refute that, i do think homeopaths are quacksalber. It's a bit like doing something even though you know you can't reach the initial goal - like me getting up in the morning. Will never happen properly, still gonna try, the same with the homeopath back then. I was just going to see what they could offer, and he proposed some flowers (or flower-water) that would totally help.
Nevertheless, interesting to read more into that. Bit like Televangelists i suppose.
|
When it comes to America’s military allies, Donald Trump told rally attendees on Friday, “You always have to be prepared to walk.”
Likening military negotiations to his history of business deals, the Republican presidential nominee once again criticized NATO and other military alliances in which he said the U.S. bears too much of the financial burden. In an interview last month with The New York Times, Trump said the U.S. should not come to the defense of its NATO allies if those nations are not meeting their financial contributions to the treaty organization.
At a rally Friday in Des Moines, Iowa, Trump once again said the U.S. should rethink how its military interacts with international partners.
“You always have to be prepared to walk,” Trump said. “You know, Hillary Clinton came out and said, ‘That’s terrible. He’s not going to stick with our allies.’ We’re going to stick, but once the ally hears her dumb talk, because it’s dumb, why would they ever pay?”
“Let’s say somebody like Hillary Clinton makes this statement, ‘We will never abandon our allies.’ I think those statements are beautiful. I think they’re great,” Trump said. “One problem: When you go in and say, ‘We will never ever abandon you, but you have to pay us more money,’ they’re going to say, ‘We’re not going to pay you more money if you’re not going to abandon us.’ You always have to be prepared to walk. I don’t think we’d walk. I don’t think it’s going to be necessary. It could be, though.”
Trump’s earlier statements about NATO came amid the Republican National Convention in Cleveland and were nearly unanimously condemned even by members of his own party. Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), a military veteran who has since said he will not vote for Trump, called the Manhattan billionaire’s foreign policy proposals “narcissistic” and “utterly disastrous.” Kinzinger took particular offense to Trump’s suggestion that American soldiers are "some kind of a protection racket that has to be paid to protect our allies, or I’m some kind of a mercenary force.”
At Friday’s rally, Trump highlighted America’s military alliance with Japan as an agreement particularly worthy of ridicule. He said that Japan, a key U.S. ally in the Pacific, should be forced to pay 100 percent of America’s military costs for protecting the island nation, not the roughly 50 percent it pays now.
“You know, we have a treaty with Japan where if Japan is attacked, we have to use the full force and might of the United States,” Trump said. “If we’re attacked, Japan doesn’t have to do anything. They can sit home and watch Sony television. No. What kind of deals are these? Folks, I’m being serious: What kind of deals are these?”
Source
|
Excellent, Trump just keeps doubling down on his abject ignorance when it comes to international military agreements.
|
On August 06 2016 22:26 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:Show nested quote +When it comes to America’s military allies, Donald Trump told rally attendees on Friday, “You always have to be prepared to walk.”
Likening military negotiations to his history of business deals, the Republican presidential nominee once again criticized NATO and other military alliances in which he said the U.S. bears too much of the financial burden. In an interview last month with The New York Times, Trump said the U.S. should not come to the defense of its NATO allies if those nations are not meeting their financial contributions to the treaty organization.
At a rally Friday in Des Moines, Iowa, Trump once again said the U.S. should rethink how its military interacts with international partners.
“You always have to be prepared to walk,” Trump said. “You know, Hillary Clinton came out and said, ‘That’s terrible. He’s not going to stick with our allies.’ We’re going to stick, but once the ally hears her dumb talk, because it’s dumb, why would they ever pay?”
“Let’s say somebody like Hillary Clinton makes this statement, ‘We will never abandon our allies.’ I think those statements are beautiful. I think they’re great,” Trump said. “One problem: When you go in and say, ‘We will never ever abandon you, but you have to pay us more money,’ they’re going to say, ‘We’re not going to pay you more money if you’re not going to abandon us.’ You always have to be prepared to walk. I don’t think we’d walk. I don’t think it’s going to be necessary. It could be, though.”
Trump’s earlier statements about NATO came amid the Republican National Convention in Cleveland and were nearly unanimously condemned even by members of his own party. Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), a military veteran who has since said he will not vote for Trump, called the Manhattan billionaire’s foreign policy proposals “narcissistic” and “utterly disastrous.” Kinzinger took particular offense to Trump’s suggestion that American soldiers are "some kind of a protection racket that has to be paid to protect our allies, or I’m some kind of a mercenary force.”
At Friday’s rally, Trump highlighted America’s military alliance with Japan as an agreement particularly worthy of ridicule. He said that Japan, a key U.S. ally in the Pacific, should be forced to pay 100 percent of America’s military costs for protecting the island nation, not the roughly 50 percent it pays now.
“You know, we have a treaty with Japan where if Japan is attacked, we have to use the full force and might of the United States,” Trump said. “If we’re attacked, Japan doesn’t have to do anything. They can sit home and watch Sony television. No. What kind of deals are these? Folks, I’m being serious: What kind of deals are these?” Source
Apparently you always have to be prepared to walk unless Ryan bullies you into endorsing him
|
|
|
|