Whether the second part is true or not is up for debate but that is the counter argument.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4650
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
Whether the second part is true or not is up for debate but that is the counter argument. | ||
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
On August 05 2016 05:56 OuchyDathurts wrote: I believe the meme is something along the lines of Brutal. Savage. Rekt. People like him (rich heir) never go in the specific of the business they invest in. They have countless advisor who evaluate the best way to maximise profit, and then they decide based on the few facts that those advisors gave to him. This is why he is not knowing clearly where they were made, why he seems to be doing what he is criticizing, and this is also why the idea that he worked hard to achieve what he has is a complete fraud. A rich heir making profit is not more difficult than finding a work when you have no degree and no mobility. | ||
OuchyDathurts
United States4588 Posts
| ||
Naracs_Duc
746 Posts
On August 05 2016 06:19 Adreme wrote: The counterargument to the fact that a country like Saudi Arabia is donating money to the foundation is that a lot of what it does is humanitarian work and the people who need that help do not care who funds it. If you are starving you are not picky who is serving you food or who is paying for your clean water you just want those things and an organization that understands that but also does not bend to there whims and wishes is good for the world. Whether the second part is true or not is up for debate but that is the counter argument. Its like its possible that people who do bad things also do good things and the world is filled with complex people and societies whose differences by outsiders is sometimes seen as malevolent or benevolent depending on who is doing the observing. Please don't suggest that people we consider evil can want to do good deeds and that people who do good deeds can sometimes do evil ones as well. How can I paint outsiders as evil if that were the case? | ||
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On August 05 2016 06:39 Naracs_Duc wrote: Its like its possible that people who do bad things also do good things and the world is filled with complex people and societies whose differences by outsiders is sometimes seen as malevolent or benevolent depending on who is doing the observing. Please don't suggest that people we consider evil can want to do good deeds and that people who do good deeds can sometimes do evil ones as well. How can I paint outsiders as evil if that were the case? Well the Saudis donate money to everything. They fund extremism and they fund anyone else they are in bed with. If you can use their resources for good great but you still have to appreciate that you will be indebted to what is a cruel dinosaur regime that is running of the accident that they are sitting on the worlds most important resource. Once it goes its straight up shitscreek. I honestly cant wait for that day, sadly they will send a large part of the world to shit before that happens to them Funding these sort of things is the Saudis way of saying, "here take our money. Now leave us alone and let us do we do," so I dont really blame the Clintons for taking it if it can be used for something good. Otherwise it would just go to funding more Wahabism. | ||
oBlade
United States5294 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Any reports of a “fissure” on the GOP presidential ticket after Indiana Gov. Mike Pence endorsed House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) when Donald Trump refused to do so are lies spread by the “dishonest" media, Donald Trump said Thursday. Trump lavished praise on Pence at a town hall in Portland, Maine and emphasized the “great relationship” they have before saying the governor called him yesterday to ask for his blessing to endorse Ryan. “[Pence] came to me, he called me, because he likes Paul Ryan, Paul Ryan’s a good guy,” Trump began. He shut down mild boos from the crwod at the mention of Ryan’s name by saying, “Nope, he’s a good guy.” “Mike called me, and he said yesterday, ‘Would you mind if I endorsed? I won’t do that if it’s going to cause any complications, I would absolutely not do that,’” Trump said. “He’s the greatest guy, the greatest human being.” The real estate mogul recounted Pence saying: "'I like [Ryan]. He's a friend of mine. Would you mind if I endorsed him? And I will not do it if you say no.'" He continued: “I say, ‘Mike, you like, him, yes. Go ahead and do it, 100 percent.’ And he endorsed him.” Pence’s endorsement of Ryan, which came one day after Trump said he’s “not quite there yet” on an endorsement of the House speaker, was read as a sign of Pence being out of step with his running mate. But Pence denied in a Fox News interview that the endorsement shows he is at all out of sync with the nominee and said he consulted Trump ahead of time. Source | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43797 Posts
On August 05 2016 05:56 OuchyDathurts wrote: I believe the meme is something along the lines of Brutal. Savage. Rekt. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ9_BM5c8Xc Wow. It's just so easy. | ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
Paul Nehlen, the primary challenger of Republican Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, strongly suggested during an interview with Morning Answer Chicago Thursday that the United States should simply kick all Muslims out of the country. Nehlen said the problem with vetting good Muslims from the bad is that they couldn’t be trusted. “Islam is the only major religion that encourages lying,” he argued. “The taqiyya says you have to lie to the infidel, you lie to them if you have to… I mean if they lie, how do you vet something like that?” “So then how do you implement the test that you want to implement?” asked host Dan Proft. “The question is, why do we have Muslims in the country?” Nehlen responded. “How can you possibly vet somebody who lies?” “So are you suggesting that we deport all of the Muslims in the country?” Proft asked. “I’m suggesting we have a discussion about it, that’s for sure,” he responded. An indignant Proft asked Nehlen if he really supported deporting American citizens who hadn’t actually done anything wrong. “Well if somebody supports sharia, that is doing something wrong,” Nehlan said. Source Some context on the person running against Ryan | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States41989 Posts
"What if they say they don't support Sharia?" "Well how do you check that when Muslims are told to lie if they follow Sharia?" | ||
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On August 05 2016 07:24 KwarK wrote: "What if they say they don't support Sharia?" "Well how do you check that when Muslims are told to lie if they follow Sharia?" Sharia law is like the most bullshit man made construct ever. Thats more Islams fault though so nothing you can do about that. And if we really want to get technical for that moron who just decided what it means Taqiya has a very specific context under which it was used historically to avoid persecution. Its not an ok to you lie so that you can go bomb something. Thats not avoiding persecution. Its generally something that minority muslim communities appeal to. As if someone who wants to do bad things really needs Taqiya as an excuse to lie and cant just lie. | ||
Sermokala
United States13750 Posts
On August 05 2016 06:15 Doodsmack wrote: Or he could not outsource the jobs. Like he wants the companies he tries to shame to do. Good to know he also thinks government can control the economy to the extent that it's not the private sector's fault at all that jobs have been outsourced. It's the government's fault completely, and now that tariffs will be implemented, jobs will obviously come back, because the government is correcting its economy control method. Donald Trump just cares so much about the American worker. Which is why he imports temporary seasonal workers from other countries for his properties LOL. The problem with this is that its trump just taking advantage of the situation. While what hes advocating for is to change the system to make it not advantageous to just outsource the littlest of things. You are bashing him for being a smart businessman and for wanting to change the system that he knows is wrong and can only change by trying to change it. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States41989 Posts
On August 05 2016 07:38 Sermokala wrote: The problem with this is that its trump just taking advantage of the situation. While what hes advocating for is to change the system to make it not advantageous to just outsource the littlest of things. You are bashing him for being a smart businessman and for wanting to change the system that he knows is wrong and can only change by trying to change it. I agree. It's the same reason that he actively minimized his taxes by every means he knew how, legal and, given he refuses to release them, presumably less legal. And I would have done the same in his billionaire shoes. But he is going to get bludgeoned by this shit over and over in the run up to the election. | ||
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
Is business some kind of moral and political vacuum where I can just randomly murder people and nobody cares? | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States41989 Posts
On August 05 2016 07:50 Nyxisto wrote: why is this kind of hypocrisy clever when Trump does it and the primary reason not to vote for Hillary when she does it? Because Trump did it as a private individual and Hillary did it as a public official. But now Trump has blurred the line between his public and private life and the hypocrisy barrier has fallen. He's going to get torn apart on this one by the left. Not that his devotees will care but maybe the moderates might. | ||
m4ini
4215 Posts
On August 05 2016 07:46 KwarK wrote: I agree. It's the same reason that he actively minimized his taxes by every means he knew how, legal and, given he refuses to release them, presumably less legal. And I would have done the same in his billionaire shoes. But he is going to get bludgeoned by this shit over and over in the run up to the election. That's mainly because people have unreasonable expectations of people. Everyone, and i mean everyone, plays the system given the chance. There's no one who pays extra taxes if he somehow can get around it. To attack someone because he's doing the same thing is dumb. That being said, i personally would rather see him say "i know how easy it is to abuse the system, from experience - that's why i know how to change it". Trying to hide the fact makes it shady. And purely the fact that he's trying to hide it. | ||
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
On August 05 2016 07:52 KwarK wrote: Because Trump did it as a private individual and Hillary did it as a public official. But now Trump has blurred the line between his public and private life and the hypocrisy barrier has fallen. He's going to get torn apart on this one by the left. Not that his devotees will care but maybe the moderates might. The whole distinction is schizophrenic. The Bangladeshi kid doesn't care if it gets fucked by public or private business. Both private and public decisions on that scale effect the live of anybody through and through. It's like we're all supposed to collectively turn into sociopaths as long as it's 'business'? When Trump ruined a Scottish windpark project because he just had to build a shitty golf course on the coast does this affect climate change less because it's a private golf course? | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
On August 05 2016 07:58 Nyxisto wrote: The whole distinction is schizophrenic. The Bangladeshi kid doesn't care if it gets fucked by public or private business. Both private and public decisions on that scale effect the live of anybody through and through. It's like we're all supposed to collectively turn into sociopaths as long as it's 'business'? When Trump ruined a Scottish windpark project because he just had to build a shitty golf course on the coast does this affect climate change less because it's a private golf course? Do you really think that Trump, by himself, is managing his fiscal situation ? Really ? I know people with least than 1/1000 the capital Trump own and who pay some guy to manage their wealth. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
| ||