• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:49
CEST 01:49
KST 08:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202561RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time EWC 2025 details: $700k total prize; GSL, DH Dallas confirmed Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BITCOIN RECOVERY EXPERT | LOST RECOVERY MASTERS BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 634 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 451

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 449 450 451 452 453 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
September 18 2013 00:46 GMT
#9001
On September 18 2013 08:54 Kiarip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2013 08:39 DoubleReed wrote:
On September 18 2013 07:34 Kiarip wrote:
On September 17 2013 06:44 sam!zdat wrote:
yes kwark thinks that a supply of workers will create its own demand for workers. So therefore there can never be a glut of labor, in the same way that say's law says there can never be a general glut of commodities

no reasonable person has believed says law since the publication of capital vol 1 but liberals can be a bit slow on the uptake


Say's law doesn't work for labor because of the costs of hiring are not only limited to the salary paid to the worker. Also, labor on its own has to bring some kind of value for the employer. If the only value that an employer can receive from a particular person's labor is being brought coffee then that person could possibly snag this job for an appropriate wage of $0.10/hour.


edit: In short, Say's law DOES work.


Say's Law doesn't work for anything. There's no reason to think it does. It's just a economic fallacy.

I am just as confused as sam as to why you are pushing discredited 19th century economics.


How so?

Supply, or existence of a good allows for the marketplace to determine its value, which then establishes a quantifiable demand curve.

Are you suggesting that it works the other way around?

I think it's fine as a general descriptor but not so much as an iron "law".

For example a car company could produce too many cars. Before prices adjust downward the bullwhip effect has already resulted in mass layoffs at the local steel mill. Now no one will buy cars at even the lower price.

Eventually society will pick up the pieces but that's not an impressive statement.
DoubleReed
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States4130 Posts
September 18 2013 00:50 GMT
#9002
On September 18 2013 08:54 Kiarip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2013 08:39 DoubleReed wrote:
On September 18 2013 07:34 Kiarip wrote:
On September 17 2013 06:44 sam!zdat wrote:
yes kwark thinks that a supply of workers will create its own demand for workers. So therefore there can never be a glut of labor, in the same way that say's law says there can never be a general glut of commodities

no reasonable person has believed says law since the publication of capital vol 1 but liberals can be a bit slow on the uptake


Say's law doesn't work for labor because of the costs of hiring are not only limited to the salary paid to the worker. Also, labor on its own has to bring some kind of value for the employer. If the only value that an employer can receive from a particular person's labor is being brought coffee then that person could possibly snag this job for an appropriate wage of $0.10/hour.


edit: In short, Say's law DOES work.


Say's Law doesn't work for anything. There's no reason to think it does. It's just a economic fallacy.

I am just as confused as sam as to why you are pushing discredited 19th century economics.


How so?

Supply, or existence of a good allows for the marketplace to determine its value, which then establishes a quantifiable demand curve.

Are you suggesting that it works the other way around?


Please describe what you think Say's Law is. Because I don't really know what that has to do with it.

(But yes, you can easily say it works the other way around. If people don't demand something, then there won't be 'supply' of it. I don't see many Self-Tar-And-Feather machines being made, do you?)
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 00:59:35
September 18 2013 00:56 GMT
#9003
he means that if a thing exists, it will magically be given a correct price by the market, and will therefore be sold at that price and be exchanged for other products. This is just as stupid as it sounds

edit: really we should all just ignore him. Starting with sam.
shikata ga nai
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 01:20:28
September 18 2013 01:19 GMT
#9004
lel say's law. the basic idea with it is that at any given transaction, the demand and supply are but two sides of the same coin.

but this obviousl ignores time and money, and this means the entire point of macroeconomics. to say it's a 'law' is beyond oblivious and arrogant. it's basically "if we assume time doesn't exist in our economy, then all these problems produced by time won't be there." hue
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 01:49:21
September 18 2013 01:49 GMT
#9005
i mean, go on d3 auction house to see what happens to a supply generated market with no glut. that's some real world shit right there
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 03:04:14
September 18 2013 03:02 GMT
#9006
On September 18 2013 10:19 oneofthem wrote:
lel say's law. the basic idea with it is that at any given transaction, the demand and supply are but two sides of the same coin.

but this obviousl ignores time and money, and this means the entire point of macroeconomics. to say it's a 'law' is beyond oblivious and arrogant. it's basically "if we assume time doesn't exist in our economy, then all these problems produced by time won't be there." hue



Say's law wasn't always called a law and he didn't call it a law, and there aren't any real laws in economics like there are in physics anyways. It was originally called Say's conjecture/formulation, but for some reason it became better known as Say's Law. Law is a misnomer of course.

Also, say's law doesn't say that supply and demand are two sides of the same coin. If anything that's more of a Keynesian statement.

Say's law clearly does not deny that gluts can occur as a result of overproduction and thus it does take into account the investment necessary for the overproduction to occur (the time and money,) what Say's law denies, however, is that the glut is a result of a lack of demand, because supply is what creates the "demand curve"/consumer interest at various price levels and if the original investment of time and money was misplaced then it is what causes the glut and not some innate lack of demand in a given environment.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
September 18 2013 03:06 GMT
#9007
does this guy make sense to anybody else? This is almost like some kind of political economy madlib generator
shikata ga nai
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 03:13:28
September 18 2013 03:12 GMT
#9008
Supply creates the demand curve and we ought not blame demand is all I could really make out. Oh yeah, and that if its wrong, it's probably Keynesian. There is a dangling "if" there at the end, Kiarip, that seems rather troubling.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13925 Posts
September 18 2013 03:20 GMT
#9009
congrads on the 7k posts farva
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
September 18 2013 03:23 GMT
#9010
On September 18 2013 12:12 farvacola wrote:
Supply creates the demand curve and we ought not blame demand is all I could really make out. Oh yeah, and that if its wrong, it's probably Keynesian. There is a dangling "if" there at the end, Kiarip, that seems rather troubling.


Great.

I said Keynesian once in my post. Where do you get that "if it's wrong it's probably Keynesian?"

Glut is caused by a mis-allocation of resources, is this the statement you're having problem with or what?
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 03:33:55
September 18 2013 03:24 GMT
#9011
On September 18 2013 12:20 Sermokala wrote:
congrads on the 7k posts farva

Thanks, I couldn't have done it without you.

On September 18 2013 12:23 Kiarip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2013 12:12 farvacola wrote:
Supply creates the demand curve and we ought not blame demand is all I could really make out. Oh yeah, and that if its wrong, it's probably Keynesian. There is a dangling "if" there at the end, Kiarip, that seems rather troubling.


Great.

I said Keynesian once in my post. Where do you get that "if it's wrong it's probably Keynesian?"

Glut is caused by a mis-allocation of resources, is this the statement you're having problem with or what?

I got that based on the strange way in which you are defending Say's Law as though it is a defamed sibling. The issue is that you say that Say's Law denies lack of demand as a culpable factor in a glut, and yet you then only say that if a misallocation of resources is in play, that it is the responsible factor. This is basically a tacit denial of the possibility that there could ever be a glut where no apparent misallocation is at work, and I really don't find this likely whatsoever.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
September 18 2013 03:25 GMT
#9012
we're having an amusing pm conversation where he told me I was reading too much marx, and then told me to read marx
shikata ga nai
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
September 18 2013 03:30 GMT
#9013
On September 18 2013 12:25 sam!zdat wrote:
we're having an amusing pm conversation where he told me I was reading too much marx, and then told me to read marx


I assumed you've been reading something other than Capital because you've provided no rebuttals to my arguments and simply acted like a patronizing prick.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 03:43:57
September 18 2013 03:34 GMT
#9014
you realize capital is a book in which marx devotes several pages of his signature scorn towards say's law, right? Which was the original point you were trying to pursue
shikata ga nai
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
September 18 2013 03:38 GMT
#9015
don't have to go on about marx's critique. others like ricardo have made the same point. page 203 of this keen paper

http://keenomics.s3.amazonaws.com/debtdeflation_media/papers/KeenNudgeNudgeWinkWinkSayNoMore.pdf
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
September 18 2013 03:38 GMT
#9016
On September 18 2013 12:34 sam!zdat wrote:
you realize capital is a book in which marx devotes several pages of his signature scorn towards say's law, right? Which was the original point you were trying to pursue


I know that.

And the book by Keynes I sent you does the same. I'm hoping you can also use your own head however.

Tell me which line of argument by either isn't discredited by this most important part of Say's Formulation:

"a glut can take place only when there are too many means of production applied to one kind of product and not enough to another"

farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 03:45:52
September 18 2013 03:41 GMT
#9017
On September 18 2013 12:38 Kiarip wrote:
"a glut can take place only when there are too many means of production applied to one kind of product and not enough to another"

Why?

Edit: Try to use the most simple language possible.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
September 18 2013 03:49 GMT
#9018
On September 18 2013 12:38 Kiarip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2013 12:34 sam!zdat wrote:
you realize capital is a book in which marx devotes several pages of his signature scorn towards say's law, right? Which was the original point you were trying to pursue


I know that.

And the book by Keynes I sent you does the same. I'm hoping you can also use your own head however.

Tell me which line of argument by either isn't discredited by this most important part of Say's Formulation:

"a glut can take place only when there are too many means of production applied to one kind of product and not enough to another"


Do you need the "and" bit? It seems to suggest that a glut in one product can be cleared by producing more of different products. I don't think that's true.

Or is it trying to say that if you have a glut, you should have been producing something else?
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 04:06:17
September 18 2013 03:53 GMT
#9019
On September 18 2013 12:41 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2013 12:38 Kiarip wrote:
"a glut can take place only when there are too many means of production applied to one kind of product and not enough to another"

Why?

Edit: Try to use the most simple language possible.


I posted a direct quote that's part of "Say's Law."


It's saying that a glut is caused by a misallocation of resources.

On September 18 2013 12:49 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2013 12:38 Kiarip wrote:
On September 18 2013 12:34 sam!zdat wrote:
you realize capital is a book in which marx devotes several pages of his signature scorn towards say's law, right? Which was the original point you were trying to pursue


I know that.

And the book by Keynes I sent you does the same. I'm hoping you can also use your own head however.

Tell me which line of argument by either isn't discredited by this most important part of Say's Formulation:

"a glut can take place only when there are too many means of production applied to one kind of product and not enough to another"


Do you need the "and" bit? It seems to suggest that a glut in one product can be cleared by producing more of different products. I don't think that's true.

Or is it trying to say that if you have a glut, you should have been producing something else?


The second is what it's saying.

His argument is basically saying that a perfectly wise businessman will be able to avoid all gluts on the products he produces because regardless of the state of the economy there is going to be some product that's in high demand and he will produce that product and then he will continue to use his perfect-wisdom to buy appropriate resources to produce the next appropriate product to sell.

Therefore it follows that a general glut is impossible.

Of course in Say's times people didn't quite understand the real value of information to economy so the "perfectly wise businessman" isn't realistic with respect to an entire economy but is still quite realistic with respect to a specific sector.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18826 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-18 03:56:48
September 18 2013 03:54 GMT
#9020
On September 18 2013 12:53 Kiarip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 18 2013 12:41 farvacola wrote:
On September 18 2013 12:38 Kiarip wrote:
"a glut can take place only when there are too many means of production applied to one kind of product and not enough to another"

Why?

Edit: Try to use the most simple language possible.


I posted a direct quote that's part of "Say's Law."


It's saying that a glut is caused by a misallocation of resources.

Yes, I know, but I'd like for you to explain why a glut can only take place in the manner described by Say's Law, unless you don't think so yourself.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Prev 1 449 450 451 452 453 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 11m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 181
Dota 2
monkeys_forever642
League of Legends
Grubby4259
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2655
flusha438
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King177
AZ_Axe128
Liquid`Ken43
Other Games
tarik_tv23709
summit1g11470
gofns9396
C9.Mang0215
ViBE155
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick735
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 72
• RyuSc2 44
• davetesta37
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 35
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota23010
League of Legends
• Doublelift4751
• TFBlade561
Other Games
• imaqtpie962
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
10h 11m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
14h 11m
CSO Cup
16h 11m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
18h 11m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 9h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 14h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 18h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.