• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:26
CEST 00:26
KST 07:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly4Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard"2ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!26Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters2Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)90
StarCraft 2
General
Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format What's the best tug of war? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard"
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly INu's Battles#18 - Cure, herO, Rogue & ByuN Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Industrial Park New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate
External Content
Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool ASL22 General Discussion
Tourneys
Star Con San Diego 2026 BSL LAN Party - Kraków 29-30 August - OPEN SIGNUPS [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvT advise for noobs Fighting Spirit mining rates Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! Diablo IV
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread 2026-27 Football Thread placeholder TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Games can Help with Majo…
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6360 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2522

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2520 2521 2522 2523 2524 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
MattBarry
Profile Joined March 2011
United States4006 Posts
November 13 2015 04:45 GMT
#50421
On November 13 2015 13:41 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:34 Deathstar wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:26 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:17 Deathstar wrote:
From merriam-webster,

racism:

racial prejudice or discrimination

That is a clear definition. You know what is not a clear definition?

Racism = prejudice + power. The power component is unnecessary on whether you are racist or not.

I think we're a little beyond quoting dictionaries here. However I did look up the word dictionary in merriam-webster and you'll be surprised to learn that in no way does it claim that a dictionary is anything more than a reference book containing information. So, if the dictionary is to be trusted then you could reference a dictionary for information about racism but you should not expect the dictionary to provide you with a clear definition. The dictionary describing itself thinks it doesn't give a clear definition.


The point was that talking about power is not necessary to answering the question of "Is this person a racist". And a dictionary is a good place to start, unless we're going to start making up words now.

How on earth do you think words happen if people don't make them up? English majors don't track them down and capture them for selective breeding and dissemination to society. They don't run wild and they're not a mineral. Every word is made up.

I don't think a majority of white americans recognize the racism=power+prejudice definition. When you start telling someone a word doesn't mean what they and most people they know think it means and start redefining you come across as an arrogant ivory tower jerk who redefines words to suit a narrative. If you actually care about getting through to people, it'd be much more effective to just...not define racism that way and use a different word.
Platinum Support GOD
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24156 Posts
November 13 2015 04:45 GMT
#50422
On November 13 2015 13:36 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 12:58 farvacola wrote:
Self-appointed spokespersonhood on behalf of an entire racial group is a hell of a drug too


I hardly imagine myself as a spokesperson, there are just no other black people around whatsoever (the only other one got fed up and left).

I just can't stand idly by and watch the circle jerk without at least trying to interject some perspective (although I know it mostly falls on deaf ears).

Quite an assumption thinking that everyone here is white.


We've established there aren't any other black people who post in this thread. I'm well aware there are a few non-white posters though.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44203 Posts
November 13 2015 04:47 GMT
#50423
On November 13 2015 13:45 MattBarry wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:41 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:34 Deathstar wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:26 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:17 Deathstar wrote:
From merriam-webster,

racism:

racial prejudice or discrimination

That is a clear definition. You know what is not a clear definition?

Racism = prejudice + power. The power component is unnecessary on whether you are racist or not.

I think we're a little beyond quoting dictionaries here. However I did look up the word dictionary in merriam-webster and you'll be surprised to learn that in no way does it claim that a dictionary is anything more than a reference book containing information. So, if the dictionary is to be trusted then you could reference a dictionary for information about racism but you should not expect the dictionary to provide you with a clear definition. The dictionary describing itself thinks it doesn't give a clear definition.


The point was that talking about power is not necessary to answering the question of "Is this person a racist". And a dictionary is a good place to start, unless we're going to start making up words now.

How on earth do you think words happen if people don't make them up? English majors don't track them down and capture them for selective breeding and dissemination to society. They don't run wild and they're not a mineral. Every word is made up.

I don't think a majority of white americans recognize the racism=power+prejudice definition. When you start telling someone a word doesn't mean what they and most people they know think it means and start redefining you come across as an arrogant ivory tower jerk who redefines words to suit a narrative. If you actually care about getting through to people, it'd be much more effective to just...not define racism that way and use a different word.

Okay. I'll let the word catchers know to go back out into the field and find us a new word to refer to it with.

Incidentally a majority of white Americans used to think that laws against interracial marriage weren't racist etc. A system where white Americans exclusively get to define racist systems would be an excellent candidate for that new word, once we've found it.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11586 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-11-13 04:52:07
November 13 2015 04:49 GMT
#50424
On November 13 2015 12:57 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 12:55 Falling wrote:
I've defended in the past the idea that racism is prejudice + power, but I'm not so sure anymore. Or rather, there is an attempt to make the academic separation, but I'm not sure it's how the word 'racism' is used in the vernacular, at least not yet. And until the vernacular has changed, it comes off weird, the idea that in North America, only whites can be racist. I get the distinction intellectually- that there is a distinction between having prejudices and having prejudices and having prejudices with power... but in that case, the difference is power. Prejudice + power = Racism + power.

Because on a visceral level, it feels like it is being said is that North American whites are a special kind of evil. That they are the only ones that can be prejudiced. That is not what is meant, but the prejudice + power = racism formula does tend to put the conversation on very weird footing as people naturally react against the idea that white North Americans are special kind of evil or that African-Americans cannot be prejudiced (which is the meaning most people get, when they hear 'cannot be racist" ...as in that video). Again, I get the academic distinction, but I don't think that's actually how the word is actually used day to day except in certain circles and the corresponding connotation feels intuitively wrong.


White fragility is a hell of a drug.

It has nothing to do with fragility and everything to do with does the descriptor correspond to reality, if not you will get push back. A kumbya narrative of First Nation history (there was no violence until Europeans showed up in North America) will get push back because it seems counter-intuitive to human nature. So too the phrase 'x people group cannot be racist' does not sound like it describes a reality that matches human nature, when racism has tended to mean beliefs that other groups are inferior, which is not an exclusive to white European psyche. I very much agree that there is something fundamentally different between having a racist attitude and systematic racism, but I am starting to lean towards the prejudice formula doesn't actually say what most people mean by 'that's racist.' Let's talk about systematic racism and racism + power, but trying to argue that racism means prejudice + power shifts the entire argument into a very weird space.
Moderator5000 of our finest Taliban warriors have been released! Rise up my brothers. Mashalla! al-Donald ibn-Frederick al-Masih allows it.
MaCRo.gg
Profile Joined June 2015
Korea (South)860 Posts
November 13 2015 04:50 GMT
#50425
On November 13 2015 13:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:36 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 12:58 farvacola wrote:
Self-appointed spokespersonhood on behalf of an entire racial group is a hell of a drug too


I hardly imagine myself as a spokesperson, there are just no other black people around whatsoever (the only other one got fed up and left).

I just can't stand idly by and watch the circle jerk without at least trying to interject some perspective (although I know it mostly falls on deaf ears).

Quite an assumption thinking that everyone here is white.


We've established there aren't any other black people who post in this thread. I'm well aware there are a few non-white posters though.

I am not "white"...
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 13 2015 04:51 GMT
#50426
On November 13 2015 13:34 Deathstar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:26 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:17 Deathstar wrote:
From merriam-webster,

racism:

racial prejudice or discrimination

That is a clear definition. You know what is not a clear definition?

Racism = prejudice + power. The power component is unnecessary on whether you are racist or not.

I think we're a little beyond quoting dictionaries here. However I did look up the word dictionary in merriam-webster and you'll be surprised to learn that in no way does it claim that a dictionary is anything more than a reference book containing information. So, if the dictionary is to be trusted then you could reference a dictionary for information about racism but you should not expect the dictionary to provide you with a clear definition. The dictionary describing itself thinks it doesn't give a clear definition.


The point was that talking about power is not necessary to answering the question of "Is this person a racist". And a dictionary is a good place to start, unless we're going to start making up words now.

People can use term any way they feel like. If someone is so dead set on being about to point at a black person and call them racist, I'm willing to not care and just agree when I would have used bigoted. I really don't care that much and I'm not that invested.

But when we talk about systematic racism in the US, we are referencing a power structure that is overwhelmingly occupied by white people. Not Asians, not Native Americans. White people occupy the majority of positions of power in the US. That is just a fact. So when people talk about racism in the state of Missouri, which has a long history systematic racism, a couple videos of black people being mean other races doesn't disprove the existence of the problem in that state. Or any other state.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
MattBarry
Profile Joined March 2011
United States4006 Posts
November 13 2015 04:51 GMT
#50427
On November 13 2015 13:47 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:45 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:41 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:34 Deathstar wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:26 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:17 Deathstar wrote:
From merriam-webster,

racism:

racial prejudice or discrimination

That is a clear definition. You know what is not a clear definition?

Racism = prejudice + power. The power component is unnecessary on whether you are racist or not.

I think we're a little beyond quoting dictionaries here. However I did look up the word dictionary in merriam-webster and you'll be surprised to learn that in no way does it claim that a dictionary is anything more than a reference book containing information. So, if the dictionary is to be trusted then you could reference a dictionary for information about racism but you should not expect the dictionary to provide you with a clear definition. The dictionary describing itself thinks it doesn't give a clear definition.


The point was that talking about power is not necessary to answering the question of "Is this person a racist". And a dictionary is a good place to start, unless we're going to start making up words now.

How on earth do you think words happen if people don't make them up? English majors don't track them down and capture them for selective breeding and dissemination to society. They don't run wild and they're not a mineral. Every word is made up.

I don't think a majority of white americans recognize the racism=power+prejudice definition. When you start telling someone a word doesn't mean what they and most people they know think it means and start redefining you come across as an arrogant ivory tower jerk who redefines words to suit a narrative. If you actually care about getting through to people, it'd be much more effective to just...not define racism that way and use a different word.

Okay. I'll let the word catchers know to go back out into the field and find us a new word to refer to it with.

Incidentally a majority of white Americans used to think that laws against interracial marriage weren't racist etc. A system where white Americans exclusively get to define racist systems would be an excellent candidate for that new word, once we've found it.

Cute rhetoric. Good luck accomplishing anything when you have a powder keg that derails meaningful discussion and immediately pisses off the opposing side and makes them not want to see your point. Obviously many people will be racist despite your best efforts, but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.
Platinum Support GOD
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24156 Posts
November 13 2015 04:52 GMT
#50428
On November 13 2015 13:50 MaCRo.gg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:36 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 12:58 farvacola wrote:
Self-appointed spokespersonhood on behalf of an entire racial group is a hell of a drug too


I hardly imagine myself as a spokesperson, there are just no other black people around whatsoever (the only other one got fed up and left).

I just can't stand idly by and watch the circle jerk without at least trying to interject some perspective (although I know it mostly falls on deaf ears).

Quite an assumption thinking that everyone here is white.


We've established there aren't any other black people who post in this thread. I'm well aware there are a few non-white posters though.

I am not "white"...


Congratulations!
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Souma
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
November 13 2015 04:52 GMT
#50429
I like this MattBarry guy.

Defending my right to be racist! (kinda not really)
Writer
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44203 Posts
November 13 2015 04:54 GMT
#50430
On November 13 2015 13:51 MattBarry wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:47 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:45 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:41 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:34 Deathstar wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:26 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:17 Deathstar wrote:
From merriam-webster,

racism:

racial prejudice or discrimination

That is a clear definition. You know what is not a clear definition?

Racism = prejudice + power. The power component is unnecessary on whether you are racist or not.

I think we're a little beyond quoting dictionaries here. However I did look up the word dictionary in merriam-webster and you'll be surprised to learn that in no way does it claim that a dictionary is anything more than a reference book containing information. So, if the dictionary is to be trusted then you could reference a dictionary for information about racism but you should not expect the dictionary to provide you with a clear definition. The dictionary describing itself thinks it doesn't give a clear definition.


The point was that talking about power is not necessary to answering the question of "Is this person a racist". And a dictionary is a good place to start, unless we're going to start making up words now.

How on earth do you think words happen if people don't make them up? English majors don't track them down and capture them for selective breeding and dissemination to society. They don't run wild and they're not a mineral. Every word is made up.

I don't think a majority of white americans recognize the racism=power+prejudice definition. When you start telling someone a word doesn't mean what they and most people they know think it means and start redefining you come across as an arrogant ivory tower jerk who redefines words to suit a narrative. If you actually care about getting through to people, it'd be much more effective to just...not define racism that way and use a different word.

Okay. I'll let the word catchers know to go back out into the field and find us a new word to refer to it with.

Incidentally a majority of white Americans used to think that laws against interracial marriage weren't racist etc. A system where white Americans exclusively get to define racist systems would be an excellent candidate for that new word, once we've found it.

Cute rhetoric. Good luck accomplishing anything when you have a powder keg that derails meaningful discussion and immediately pisses off the opposing side and makes them not want to see your point. Obviously many people will be racist despite your best efforts, but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.

I have no idea what you mean by
but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 13 2015 04:54 GMT
#50431
On November 13 2015 13:52 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:50 MaCRo.gg wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:36 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 12:58 farvacola wrote:
Self-appointed spokespersonhood on behalf of an entire racial group is a hell of a drug too


I hardly imagine myself as a spokesperson, there are just no other black people around whatsoever (the only other one got fed up and left).

I just can't stand idly by and watch the circle jerk without at least trying to interject some perspective (although I know it mostly falls on deaf ears).

Quite an assumption thinking that everyone here is white.


We've established there aren't any other black people who post in this thread. I'm well aware there are a few non-white posters though.

I am not "white"...


Congratulations!

GH, you are dangerously close to the point where I call you out on being a douchebag.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24156 Posts
November 13 2015 04:56 GMT
#50432
On November 13 2015 13:54 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:52 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:50 MaCRo.gg wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:36 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 12:58 farvacola wrote:
Self-appointed spokespersonhood on behalf of an entire racial group is a hell of a drug too


I hardly imagine myself as a spokesperson, there are just no other black people around whatsoever (the only other one got fed up and left).

I just can't stand idly by and watch the circle jerk without at least trying to interject some perspective (although I know it mostly falls on deaf ears).

Quite an assumption thinking that everyone here is white.


We've established there aren't any other black people who post in this thread. I'm well aware there are a few non-white posters though.

I am not "white"...


Congratulations!

GH, you are dangerously close to the point where I call you out on being a douchebag.


I'm dangerously close to caring. This whole thing is absurd.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
November 13 2015 04:58 GMT
#50433
On November 13 2015 13:56 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:54 Plansix wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:52 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:50 MaCRo.gg wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:36 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 12:58 farvacola wrote:
Self-appointed spokespersonhood on behalf of an entire racial group is a hell of a drug too


I hardly imagine myself as a spokesperson, there are just no other black people around whatsoever (the only other one got fed up and left).

I just can't stand idly by and watch the circle jerk without at least trying to interject some perspective (although I know it mostly falls on deaf ears).

Quite an assumption thinking that everyone here is white.


We've established there aren't any other black people who post in this thread. I'm well aware there are a few non-white posters though.

I am not "white"...


Congratulations!

GH, you are dangerously close to the point where I call you out on being a douchebag.


I'm dangerously close to caring. This whole thing is absurd.

Lots of things are, but TL is filled with people of different races and nationalities. So maybe just stick to calling people white that you know are white, rather than assuming people are to gain a quick edge in the argument.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
MattBarry
Profile Joined March 2011
United States4006 Posts
November 13 2015 04:58 GMT
#50434
On November 13 2015 13:54 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:51 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:47 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:45 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:41 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:34 Deathstar wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:26 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:17 Deathstar wrote:
From merriam-webster,

racism:

racial prejudice or discrimination

That is a clear definition. You know what is not a clear definition?

Racism = prejudice + power. The power component is unnecessary on whether you are racist or not.

I think we're a little beyond quoting dictionaries here. However I did look up the word dictionary in merriam-webster and you'll be surprised to learn that in no way does it claim that a dictionary is anything more than a reference book containing information. So, if the dictionary is to be trusted then you could reference a dictionary for information about racism but you should not expect the dictionary to provide you with a clear definition. The dictionary describing itself thinks it doesn't give a clear definition.


The point was that talking about power is not necessary to answering the question of "Is this person a racist". And a dictionary is a good place to start, unless we're going to start making up words now.

How on earth do you think words happen if people don't make them up? English majors don't track them down and capture them for selective breeding and dissemination to society. They don't run wild and they're not a mineral. Every word is made up.

I don't think a majority of white americans recognize the racism=power+prejudice definition. When you start telling someone a word doesn't mean what they and most people they know think it means and start redefining you come across as an arrogant ivory tower jerk who redefines words to suit a narrative. If you actually care about getting through to people, it'd be much more effective to just...not define racism that way and use a different word.

Okay. I'll let the word catchers know to go back out into the field and find us a new word to refer to it with.

Incidentally a majority of white Americans used to think that laws against interracial marriage weren't racist etc. A system where white Americans exclusively get to define racist systems would be an excellent candidate for that new word, once we've found it.

Cute rhetoric. Good luck accomplishing anything when you have a powder keg that derails meaningful discussion and immediately pisses off the opposing side and makes them not want to see your point. Obviously many people will be racist despite your best efforts, but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.

I have no idea what you mean by
Show nested quote +
but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.

I'll try to explain it more clearly. "White people can't be racist" is a very provocative statement because the people saying it know the average joe doesn't know about the racism=power+prejudice concept. Or perhaps I'm being too assuming in thinking they know the average person doesn't know. Regardless, it's a very inflammatory statement. You piss people off and immediately make them feel as though they're under attack for being white. People aren't going to listen to your excellent points about the systemic racism minorities face if they feel as though you're demonizing them.
Platinum Support GOD
Souma
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
November 13 2015 04:58 GMT
#50435
Honestly call it what you want so long as I can still make fun of my friends and they can make fun of me on the basis of race. That's what's really important.
Writer
MaCRo.gg
Profile Joined June 2015
Korea (South)860 Posts
November 13 2015 05:01 GMT
#50436
On November 13 2015 13:52 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:50 MaCRo.gg wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:36 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
On November 13 2015 12:58 farvacola wrote:
Self-appointed spokespersonhood on behalf of an entire racial group is a hell of a drug too


I hardly imagine myself as a spokesperson, there are just no other black people around whatsoever (the only other one got fed up and left).

I just can't stand idly by and watch the circle jerk without at least trying to interject some perspective (although I know it mostly falls on deaf ears).

Quite an assumption thinking that everyone here is white.


We've established there aren't any other black people who post in this thread. I'm well aware there are a few non-white posters though.

I am not "white"...


Congratulations!


You really sound like you want some sort of praise for posting as an African-American.
Stop playing into the stereotype.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44203 Posts
November 13 2015 05:03 GMT
#50437
On November 13 2015 13:58 MattBarry wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:54 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:51 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:47 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:45 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:41 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:34 Deathstar wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:26 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:17 Deathstar wrote:
From merriam-webster,

racism:

racial prejudice or discrimination

That is a clear definition. You know what is not a clear definition?

Racism = prejudice + power. The power component is unnecessary on whether you are racist or not.

I think we're a little beyond quoting dictionaries here. However I did look up the word dictionary in merriam-webster and you'll be surprised to learn that in no way does it claim that a dictionary is anything more than a reference book containing information. So, if the dictionary is to be trusted then you could reference a dictionary for information about racism but you should not expect the dictionary to provide you with a clear definition. The dictionary describing itself thinks it doesn't give a clear definition.


The point was that talking about power is not necessary to answering the question of "Is this person a racist". And a dictionary is a good place to start, unless we're going to start making up words now.

How on earth do you think words happen if people don't make them up? English majors don't track them down and capture them for selective breeding and dissemination to society. They don't run wild and they're not a mineral. Every word is made up.

I don't think a majority of white americans recognize the racism=power+prejudice definition. When you start telling someone a word doesn't mean what they and most people they know think it means and start redefining you come across as an arrogant ivory tower jerk who redefines words to suit a narrative. If you actually care about getting through to people, it'd be much more effective to just...not define racism that way and use a different word.

Okay. I'll let the word catchers know to go back out into the field and find us a new word to refer to it with.

Incidentally a majority of white Americans used to think that laws against interracial marriage weren't racist etc. A system where white Americans exclusively get to define racist systems would be an excellent candidate for that new word, once we've found it.

Cute rhetoric. Good luck accomplishing anything when you have a powder keg that derails meaningful discussion and immediately pisses off the opposing side and makes them not want to see your point. Obviously many people will be racist despite your best efforts, but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.

I have no idea what you mean by
but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.

I'll try to explain it more clearly. "White people can't be racist" is a very provocative statement because the people saying it know the average joe doesn't know about the racism=power+prejudice concept. Or perhaps I'm being too assuming in thinking they know the average person doesn't know. Regardless, it's a very inflammatory statement. You piss people off and immediately make them feel as though they're under attack for being white. People aren't going to listen to your excellent points about the systemic racism minorities face if they feel as though you're demonizing them.

Who claimed that white people can't be racist? I'm sure I didn't. Where are you getting this from?

Seriously, you are having an argument with someone who isn't me but I appear to still be involved. What is going on here?
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Deathstar
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
9150 Posts
November 13 2015 05:05 GMT
#50438
Just because blacks face systemic racism from whites doesn't mean blacks can't be racist. I am referencing the notion that blacks can't be racist, because racism has to do as much about power as prejudice. A notion believed by quite a few people here, and the people in the youtube video earlier.
rip passion
MattBarry
Profile Joined March 2011
United States4006 Posts
November 13 2015 05:06 GMT
#50439
On November 13 2015 14:03 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:58 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:54 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:51 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:47 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:45 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:41 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:34 Deathstar wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:26 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:17 Deathstar wrote:
From merriam-webster,

racism:

racial prejudice or discrimination

That is a clear definition. You know what is not a clear definition?

Racism = prejudice + power. The power component is unnecessary on whether you are racist or not.

I think we're a little beyond quoting dictionaries here. However I did look up the word dictionary in merriam-webster and you'll be surprised to learn that in no way does it claim that a dictionary is anything more than a reference book containing information. So, if the dictionary is to be trusted then you could reference a dictionary for information about racism but you should not expect the dictionary to provide you with a clear definition. The dictionary describing itself thinks it doesn't give a clear definition.


The point was that talking about power is not necessary to answering the question of "Is this person a racist". And a dictionary is a good place to start, unless we're going to start making up words now.

How on earth do you think words happen if people don't make them up? English majors don't track them down and capture them for selective breeding and dissemination to society. They don't run wild and they're not a mineral. Every word is made up.

I don't think a majority of white americans recognize the racism=power+prejudice definition. When you start telling someone a word doesn't mean what they and most people they know think it means and start redefining you come across as an arrogant ivory tower jerk who redefines words to suit a narrative. If you actually care about getting through to people, it'd be much more effective to just...not define racism that way and use a different word.

Okay. I'll let the word catchers know to go back out into the field and find us a new word to refer to it with.

Incidentally a majority of white Americans used to think that laws against interracial marriage weren't racist etc. A system where white Americans exclusively get to define racist systems would be an excellent candidate for that new word, once we've found it.

Cute rhetoric. Good luck accomplishing anything when you have a powder keg that derails meaningful discussion and immediately pisses off the opposing side and makes them not want to see your point. Obviously many people will be racist despite your best efforts, but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.

I have no idea what you mean by
but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.

I'll try to explain it more clearly. "White people can't be racist" is a very provocative statement because the people saying it know the average joe doesn't know about the racism=power+prejudice concept. Or perhaps I'm being too assuming in thinking they know the average person doesn't know. Regardless, it's a very inflammatory statement. You piss people off and immediately make them feel as though they're under attack for being white. People aren't going to listen to your excellent points about the systemic racism minorities face if they feel as though you're demonizing them.

Who claimed that white people can't be racist? I'm sure I didn't. Where are you getting this from?

Seriously, you are having an argument with someone who isn't me but I appear to still be involved. What is going on here?

Am I misunderstanding something? I was under the assumption you were advocating for the "racism=power+prejudice" definition of racism, correct?
Platinum Support GOD
MaCRo.gg
Profile Joined June 2015
Korea (South)860 Posts
November 13 2015 05:07 GMT
#50440
On November 13 2015 14:03 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2015 13:58 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:54 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:51 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:47 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:45 MattBarry wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:41 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:34 Deathstar wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:26 KwarK wrote:
On November 13 2015 13:17 Deathstar wrote:
From merriam-webster,

racism:

racial prejudice or discrimination

That is a clear definition. You know what is not a clear definition?

Racism = prejudice + power. The power component is unnecessary on whether you are racist or not.

I think we're a little beyond quoting dictionaries here. However I did look up the word dictionary in merriam-webster and you'll be surprised to learn that in no way does it claim that a dictionary is anything more than a reference book containing information. So, if the dictionary is to be trusted then you could reference a dictionary for information about racism but you should not expect the dictionary to provide you with a clear definition. The dictionary describing itself thinks it doesn't give a clear definition.


The point was that talking about power is not necessary to answering the question of "Is this person a racist". And a dictionary is a good place to start, unless we're going to start making up words now.

How on earth do you think words happen if people don't make them up? English majors don't track them down and capture them for selective breeding and dissemination to society. They don't run wild and they're not a mineral. Every word is made up.

I don't think a majority of white americans recognize the racism=power+prejudice definition. When you start telling someone a word doesn't mean what they and most people they know think it means and start redefining you come across as an arrogant ivory tower jerk who redefines words to suit a narrative. If you actually care about getting through to people, it'd be much more effective to just...not define racism that way and use a different word.

Okay. I'll let the word catchers know to go back out into the field and find us a new word to refer to it with.

Incidentally a majority of white Americans used to think that laws against interracial marriage weren't racist etc. A system where white Americans exclusively get to define racist systems would be an excellent candidate for that new word, once we've found it.

Cute rhetoric. Good luck accomplishing anything when you have a powder keg that derails meaningful discussion and immediately pisses off the opposing side and makes them not want to see your point. Obviously many people will be racist despite your best efforts, but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.

I have no idea what you mean by
but I know you piss off otherwise reasonable people when you tell them they can't be racist.

I'll try to explain it more clearly. "White people can't be racist" is a very provocative statement because the people saying it know the average joe doesn't know about the racism=power+prejudice concept. Or perhaps I'm being too assuming in thinking they know the average person doesn't know. Regardless, it's a very inflammatory statement. You piss people off and immediately make them feel as though they're under attack for being white. People aren't going to listen to your excellent points about the systemic racism minorities face if they feel as though you're demonizing them.

Who claimed that white people can't be racist? I'm sure I didn't. Where are you getting this from?

Seriously, you are having an argument with someone who isn't me but I appear to still be involved. What is going on here?


Pretty much sounds like FOX's stance on racism.
Yes, it happened it probably is around still and we agree that it is bad.
But why talk about it when we can complain about Obama and highlight bad people like Greg Hardy.
Prev 1 2520 2521 2522 2523 2524 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 34m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft619
SpeCial 95
ViBE55
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2549
Artosis 897
ggaemo 78
Soulkey 78
NaDa 31
yabsab 19
firebathero 0
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm108
League of Legends
Doublelift3796
JimRising 362
Counter-Strike
summit1g6578
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox285
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor226
Other Games
gofns11885
tarik_tv7945
Grubby3341
ToD299
C9.Mang0165
ROOTCatZ147
elazer128
JuggernautJason76
Chillindude18
UpATreeSC11
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1513
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 60
• davetesta23
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 34
• Pr0nogo 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21267
Other Games
• imaqtpie749
• tFFMrPink 15
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
10h 34m
Clem vs ByuN
Rogue vs Lambo
OSC
13h 34m
Online Event
16h 34m
WardiTV Weekly
1d 12h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
INu's Battles
2 days
Cure vs herO
ByuN vs Rogue
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Patches Events
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S3: W4
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E3

Ongoing

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W5
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #2
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Light Tournament 2026
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.