|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On May 18 2013 02:37 Noro wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 02:19 kwizach wrote:On May 18 2013 01:25 Noro wrote:On May 18 2013 01:04 mcc wrote:On May 18 2013 00:51 Noro wrote:On May 18 2013 00:46 mcc wrote:On May 18 2013 00:44 Noro wrote:On May 18 2013 00:40 mcc wrote:On May 18 2013 00:34 Noro wrote:On May 17 2013 18:02 paralleluniverse wrote: House votes to repeal Obamacare for the 37th time.
This comment is just too funny: [quote] Summary: "WWWAAAAAAAAAAAHH. It's not fair I didn't get a chance to vote to repeal Obamacare!! Let me vote against Obamacare NOW!!" Yeah, voting is a silly thing anyway, lets just do away with the whole institution of democracy and let the President do wahtever he feels like. #seemslegit His issue is that they are not actually voting to change anything, they are just making PR statement for their voters. If you knew pretty well what the outcome would be before casting a ballot, does that make your vote irrelevant? It's the principle of the thing. In America, you have the right to vote, the right to voice an opinion, and the right to "PR statements for voters." The moment when you start dismissing rights because one group thinks it doesn't matter, is a defeat for democracy and the constitution. He is not dismissing their rights, he is ridiculing their motivations and questioning what they are trying to achieve. I'd wager that they are trying to achieve voicing an opinion over a health care plan, which in their opinion, is not a good thing for the country. People are so fast to penalize the other side for wanting to voice opposition, and I am merely remarking that democracy is dependant on understanding what each group wants. If either side is silenced based on what their "motives" are for wanting to vote, then what's the point? They harping on it in every media outlet they have, everyone knows their opinion and they can voice it over and over again. Do they really have to appropriate time of the legislative body to make PR statements instead of actually trying to achieve things. They are not paid to be useless PR machines, they are paid to create legislation. But their motives are a moot point. What you guys should be arguing for is an ammendment to how the Sennate opperates. Yeah voting on something 37 times is probably overkill, but that's a problem with the Sennate as an institution, and yet fingers are pointed at opposing political views instead. If this is the logic being used, why is Obama after 37 votes to repeal still trying to push this agenda? Why is he still trying to push gun legislation or anything else that keeps getting denyed by the Sennate? Because in a democratic society, they have the right to try. And, in turn, people have the right to vote yes or no. It's not the Senate, it's the House. Obama isn't "pushing" anything with regards to the health care law - it's already the law of the land. The gun legislation had a chance to pass, but it didn't, so right now they aren't trying to push it again - they'll wait until they have the votes. The House, meanwhile, voted for the 37 times for a repeal they know has no chance to pass the Senate. Thanks for the clarification on House vs Senate. Show nested quote + Obama is not pushing agenda after 37 votes. Obamacare is already through and is a law. Obama is not pushing his gun proposals over and over again just to make a statement. They have the right to try and I have the right to ridicule them when they show they are more interested in posturing instead of actually doing something constructive.
How can you say that he isn't pushing gun laws to make a statement, when at the same time you're saying it's wrong to keep fighting against Obamacare? Do you not see the hypocracy? Obviously with the partisanship of the the President vs the House, these things aren't going to pass, but of course they are still going to try. Yes you have the right, but I'm merely suggesting that you should consider the fact that this isn't something that is isolated to one party.
They admitted it was posturing. How is being against posturing being against democracy? It's a total non-sequitur. I could just as easily say that YOU are against democracy by asserting we should silence the voices of everyone who disagrees with posturing!
|
On May 18 2013 08:30 kwizach wrote:Screening politically active organizations is normal. What's not normal is screening organizations based on their political affiliation. From what I read in the article, nothing indicates Obama administration officials were aware the latter was going on.
We'll see, from what I heard at the hearings it sounded like there was a lot of we still have to find out. Steven Miller was being very obfuscating and seemed incapable of answering the simplest of yes or no questions.
|
On May 18 2013 04:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 03:28 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 02:18 JonnyBNoHo wrote:US Consumer Sentiment Surges; Leading Indicators Rise ... The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's preliminary reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment rose to 83.7 from 76.4 in April, topping economists' expectations for 78.
It was the highest level since July 2007.
The barometer of current economic conditions jumped to 97.5 from 89.9, the highest since October 2007, while the gauge of consumer expectations gained to 74.8 from 67.8. ...
The Conference Board said on Friday that its Leading Economic Index increased 0.6 percent to 95.0 last month, the highest level since June 2008. LinkPretty damn good given what's going on with our trading partners in Europe. I wonder if those numbers are usually lead or lag indicators of economic activity. Either way, they don't seem "real," or at least important in the current climate. There aren't any reasons for consumer sentiment to rise, apart from getting used to unaltered levels of economic disparity. Incomes haven't risen above their previous highs, underemployment is still ridiculous, housing numbers are erratic, and none of the key drivers of these things are getting any better. This report looks more like sociology and less like economics. It's a leading indicator. I think you're too pessimistic. Income and employment have been steadily improving for years and housing is doing fantastic. Starts are up 13% YoY and prices are up almost 10%. I'm pessimistic because I'm weighing the recovery against what it should be, not what it could be.
Wages are still far below their 2008 highs, but educational attainment is higher than ever. Households have stopped the deleveraging process, but debt levels are still the same. Rumor has it that more Americans are living hand-to-mouth, which would explain the lack of deleveraging. Inflation is still below target, which hints that job growth is stifled. The only bright spots come from company profits and cash reserves, but those won't fuel more recovery in their current state. As for housing, YoY we're doing great because the entire thing collapsed in 2008. Housing prices are now where they were in 1998, which is arguably lower than before the bubble.
The only saving grace of our position is that we aren't in the Eurozone. By all other standards, the economy is still in the crapper and it stopped gaining ground on the potential in 2010.
|
On May 18 2013 09:15 kmillz wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 08:30 kwizach wrote:On May 18 2013 08:10 Sermokala wrote:WASHINGTON (NYT) — The Treasury Department’s inspector general told senior Treasury officials in June 2012 he was auditing the Internal Revenue Service’s screening of politically active organizations seeking tax exemptions, disclosing for the first time on Friday that Obama administration officials were aware of the matter during the presidential campaign year. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/18/us/politics/irs-scandal-congressional-hearings.html?hp&_r=2& Screening politically active organizations is normal. What's not normal is screening organizations based on their political affiliation. From what I read in the article, nothing indicates Obama administration officials were aware the latter was going on. We'll see, from what I heard at the hearings it sounded like there was a lot of we still have to find out. Steven Miller was being very obfuscating and seemed incapable of answering the simplest of yes or no questions. If anyone at any hearing claims to know anything at all about the scandel then they can be pinned for the whole scandel. No one is going to take that much heat for nothing.
|
On May 18 2013 11:29 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 09:15 kmillz wrote:On May 18 2013 08:30 kwizach wrote:On May 18 2013 08:10 Sermokala wrote:WASHINGTON (NYT) — The Treasury Department’s inspector general told senior Treasury officials in June 2012 he was auditing the Internal Revenue Service’s screening of politically active organizations seeking tax exemptions, disclosing for the first time on Friday that Obama administration officials were aware of the matter during the presidential campaign year. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/18/us/politics/irs-scandal-congressional-hearings.html?hp&_r=2& Screening politically active organizations is normal. What's not normal is screening organizations based on their political affiliation. From what I read in the article, nothing indicates Obama administration officials were aware the latter was going on. We'll see, from what I heard at the hearings it sounded like there was a lot of we still have to find out. Steven Miller was being very obfuscating and seemed incapable of answering the simplest of yes or no questions. If anyone at any hearing claims to know anything at all about the scandel then they can be pinned for the whole scandel. No one is going to take that much heat for nothing.
Well it was really frustrating every time he was asked "Do you think that Congress deserves to know about these things?" to which he kept repeating “I did not mislead Congress” or “I answered the questions as they were asked" ironically not answering the question at all.
|
On May 18 2013 02:24 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 00:13 paralleluniverse wrote:On May 18 2013 00:03 Sermokala wrote: so logically what the republicans were doing was forceing the white house to release the correct emails to prove them wrong. Yeah, right. It's so logical, how can anyone deny it. So your logical story is this: Republicans had the emails before the White House released them, and despite them having the emails, they had to force the White House to release the emails which they already had, by publicly releasing the emails with slightly altered content. Make sense. In order for it to be a joke you have to have a punchline. What part about that doesn't make sense to you? Just beacuse you live in a blinkered "lets ignore anything that doesn't prove my ideology" doesn't mean the rest of us do. It doesn't help that the union that services the IRS gives so wildly disproportionaly to anti tea party democrats. People arn't angry that the IRS did something wrong people are angry that the people in the IRS just continued their partisan ways inside the office as they do outside of it. And beacuse Obama wants to just shuffle this under the rug like the other scandels refusing to actually do anything at all about them the shit is just going to keep pileing up for 2014. You thought the tea party was a firestorm of idological fury before? just imagine how strong they're gona be when the government is literally out to get them. You changed the subject.
Admit it, your story is a fantasy you made up to justify their alleged actions to yourself. And it doesn't even make sense.
|
On May 18 2013 08:28 Danglars wrote:But of course, once we raise taxes ... many times more money gets spent! It's really just a huge tax hike with talk about closing the deficit. If passed, Congress is free to just spend many more times the money that's coming in, and increase the federal deficit as they always do. Tax and spend is the name of the game, and Obama's business as usual on that front. Well, I tried closing the deficit, but those mean old Republicans ... ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/gaCYxzV.gif) I hadn't really heard of Congressman Mike Kelly before I read this news article. He grilled the departing IRS commissioner on his failure of responsibility and the ramifications of this scandal. Check out this LINK for the video. Show nested quote +REP. MIKE KELLY (R-PA): This has nothing to do with political parties. This has to do with highly targeted groups. This reconfirms everything the American public believes. This is a huge blow to the faith and trust that the American people have in their government. Is there any limit to the scope where you folks can go? Is there anything at all? Is there any way that we could ask you is there any question that you should have asked?
My goodness. How much money do you have in your wallet? Who do you get emails from? Whose sign do you put up in your front yard? This is a tax question? And you don't think that's intimidating? It's sure as hell intimidating. And I don't know that I got any answers from you today. And I don't know that -- what Mr. George said is great work -- but you know what? There's a heck of a lot more that has to come out in this. Any anybody that sat here today and listened to what you had to say, I am more concerned today than I was before, and the fact that you all can do just about anything you want to anybody?
You know, you can put anybody out of business that you want. Any time you want. I gotta tell you. You could talk about how you're a horribly run organization, if you're on the other side of the fence, you're not giving that excuse. And the IRS comes in, you're not allowed to be shoddy, you're not allowed to be run horribly, you're not allowed to make mistakes, you're not allowed to do one damn thing that doesn't come in compliance, and if you do, you're held responsible right then. I just think the American people have seen what's going on right now in their government. This is absolutely an overreach and this is an outrage for all Americans. The deficit is already fixed. Haven't you heard.
|
I expect that these 3 scandals engulfing the White House will blow over pretty soon. It comes down to the fact that there's no smoking gun (so far). So unless someone uncovers proof of wrongdoing by Obama, these scandals will likely become minor news items over the next month.
Then we'll be back to talking about more mundane things, like sequestration and the debt crisis that keeps not happening.
|
I wonder if the US is going to get up in arms over the Japanese next. I doubt it, but I can see it happening.
|
On May 18 2013 18:24 aksfjh wrote: I wonder if the US is going to get up in arms over the Japanese next. I doubt it, but I can see it happening. What for? Are you talking about the depreciating Yen?
|
On May 18 2013 11:22 aksfjh wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 04:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:On May 18 2013 03:28 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 02:18 JonnyBNoHo wrote:US Consumer Sentiment Surges; Leading Indicators Rise ... The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's preliminary reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment rose to 83.7 from 76.4 in April, topping economists' expectations for 78.
It was the highest level since July 2007.
The barometer of current economic conditions jumped to 97.5 from 89.9, the highest since October 2007, while the gauge of consumer expectations gained to 74.8 from 67.8. ...
The Conference Board said on Friday that its Leading Economic Index increased 0.6 percent to 95.0 last month, the highest level since June 2008. LinkPretty damn good given what's going on with our trading partners in Europe. I wonder if those numbers are usually lead or lag indicators of economic activity. Either way, they don't seem "real," or at least important in the current climate. There aren't any reasons for consumer sentiment to rise, apart from getting used to unaltered levels of economic disparity. Incomes haven't risen above their previous highs, underemployment is still ridiculous, housing numbers are erratic, and none of the key drivers of these things are getting any better. This report looks more like sociology and less like economics. It's a leading indicator. I think you're too pessimistic. Income and employment have been steadily improving for years and housing is doing fantastic. Starts are up 13% YoY and prices are up almost 10%. I'm pessimistic because I'm weighing the recovery against what it should be, not what it could be. Wages are still far below their 2008 highs, but educational attainment is higher than ever. Households have stopped the deleveraging process, but debt levels are still the same. Rumor has it that more Americans are living hand-to-mouth, which would explain the lack of deleveraging. Inflation is still below target, which hints that job growth is stifled. The only bright spots come from company profits and cash reserves, but those won't fuel more recovery in their current state. As for housing, YoY we're doing great because the entire thing collapsed in 2008. Housing prices are now where they were in 1998, which is arguably lower than before the bubble. The only saving grace of our position is that we aren't in the Eurozone. By all other standards, the economy is still in the crapper and it stopped gaining ground on the potential in 2010. Disposable income is near pre-recession levels. Meanwhile, thanks to deleveraging and low rates, debt payments are taking a record low bite out of budgets. That makes for a strong consumer, particularly in regards to housing where affordability is still sky high.
Add to that a shrinking trade deficit and growing government budgets and we should have a pretty good situation going forward.
|
On May 19 2013 01:03 JonnyBNoHo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 11:22 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 04:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:On May 18 2013 03:28 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 02:18 JonnyBNoHo wrote:US Consumer Sentiment Surges; Leading Indicators Rise ... The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's preliminary reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment rose to 83.7 from 76.4 in April, topping economists' expectations for 78.
It was the highest level since July 2007.
The barometer of current economic conditions jumped to 97.5 from 89.9, the highest since October 2007, while the gauge of consumer expectations gained to 74.8 from 67.8. ...
The Conference Board said on Friday that its Leading Economic Index increased 0.6 percent to 95.0 last month, the highest level since June 2008. LinkPretty damn good given what's going on with our trading partners in Europe. I wonder if those numbers are usually lead or lag indicators of economic activity. Either way, they don't seem "real," or at least important in the current climate. There aren't any reasons for consumer sentiment to rise, apart from getting used to unaltered levels of economic disparity. Incomes haven't risen above their previous highs, underemployment is still ridiculous, housing numbers are erratic, and none of the key drivers of these things are getting any better. This report looks more like sociology and less like economics. It's a leading indicator. I think you're too pessimistic. Income and employment have been steadily improving for years and housing is doing fantastic. Starts are up 13% YoY and prices are up almost 10%. I'm pessimistic because I'm weighing the recovery against what it should be, not what it could be. Wages are still far below their 2008 highs, but educational attainment is higher than ever. Households have stopped the deleveraging process, but debt levels are still the same. Rumor has it that more Americans are living hand-to-mouth, which would explain the lack of deleveraging. Inflation is still below target, which hints that job growth is stifled. The only bright spots come from company profits and cash reserves, but those won't fuel more recovery in their current state. As for housing, YoY we're doing great because the entire thing collapsed in 2008. Housing prices are now where they were in 1998, which is arguably lower than before the bubble. The only saving grace of our position is that we aren't in the Eurozone. By all other standards, the economy is still in the crapper and it stopped gaining ground on the potential in 2010. Disposable income is near pre-recession levels. Meanwhile, thanks to deleveraging and low rates, debt payments are taking a record low bite out of budgets. That makes for a strong consumer, particularly in regards to housing where affordability is still sky high. Add to that a shrinking trade deficit and growing government budgets and we should have a pretty good situation going forward. GDP is near pre-recession levels too (actually it's above), but that hasn't stopped it from being much far below potential. Which was his point. Agree with the rest except your point about government spending. Your graph shows that government spending has been reduced and will be lower than 2011 until around 2015.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say. That the economy is recovering? Well that's obvious. That the recovery will speed up. That's consistent with most forecasts, which expects the economy to accelerate in 2014/2015.
|
On May 19 2013 01:15 paralleluniverse wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 01:03 JonnyBNoHo wrote:On May 18 2013 11:22 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 04:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:On May 18 2013 03:28 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 02:18 JonnyBNoHo wrote:US Consumer Sentiment Surges; Leading Indicators Rise ... The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's preliminary reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment rose to 83.7 from 76.4 in April, topping economists' expectations for 78.
It was the highest level since July 2007.
The barometer of current economic conditions jumped to 97.5 from 89.9, the highest since October 2007, while the gauge of consumer expectations gained to 74.8 from 67.8. ...
The Conference Board said on Friday that its Leading Economic Index increased 0.6 percent to 95.0 last month, the highest level since June 2008. LinkPretty damn good given what's going on with our trading partners in Europe. I wonder if those numbers are usually lead or lag indicators of economic activity. Either way, they don't seem "real," or at least important in the current climate. There aren't any reasons for consumer sentiment to rise, apart from getting used to unaltered levels of economic disparity. Incomes haven't risen above their previous highs, underemployment is still ridiculous, housing numbers are erratic, and none of the key drivers of these things are getting any better. This report looks more like sociology and less like economics. It's a leading indicator. I think you're too pessimistic. Income and employment have been steadily improving for years and housing is doing fantastic. Starts are up 13% YoY and prices are up almost 10%. I'm pessimistic because I'm weighing the recovery against what it should be, not what it could be. Wages are still far below their 2008 highs, but educational attainment is higher than ever. Households have stopped the deleveraging process, but debt levels are still the same. Rumor has it that more Americans are living hand-to-mouth, which would explain the lack of deleveraging. Inflation is still below target, which hints that job growth is stifled. The only bright spots come from company profits and cash reserves, but those won't fuel more recovery in their current state. As for housing, YoY we're doing great because the entire thing collapsed in 2008. Housing prices are now where they were in 1998, which is arguably lower than before the bubble. The only saving grace of our position is that we aren't in the Eurozone. By all other standards, the economy is still in the crapper and it stopped gaining ground on the potential in 2010. Disposable income is near pre-recession levels. Meanwhile, thanks to deleveraging and low rates, debt payments are taking a record low bite out of budgets. That makes for a strong consumer, particularly in regards to housing where affordability is still sky high. Add to that a shrinking trade deficit and growing government budgets and we should have a pretty good situation going forward. GDP is near pre-recession levels too (actually it's above), but that hasn't stopped it from being much far below potential. Which was his point. Agree with the rest except your point about government spending. Your graph shows that government spending has been reduced and will be lower than 2011 until around 2015. I'm not sure what you're trying to say. That the economy is recovering? Well that's obvious. That the recovery will speed up. That's consistent with most forecasts, which expects the economy to accelerate in 2014/2015. I stated what I'm trying to say - I think aksfjh is being too pessimistic so I'm giving reasons for optimism.
As for government spending my point was that it is now increasing so what was a headwind is now a tailwind - good news going forward. Same story as housing. Housing is still far, far below peak output yet rapid improvement is still a positive going forward.
|
On May 18 2013 17:26 paralleluniverse wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 02:24 Sermokala wrote:On May 18 2013 00:13 paralleluniverse wrote:On May 18 2013 00:03 Sermokala wrote: so logically what the republicans were doing was forceing the white house to release the correct emails to prove them wrong. Yeah, right. It's so logical, how can anyone deny it. So your logical story is this: Republicans had the emails before the White House released them, and despite them having the emails, they had to force the White House to release the emails which they already had, by publicly releasing the emails with slightly altered content. Make sense. In order for it to be a joke you have to have a punchline. What part about that doesn't make sense to you? Just beacuse you live in a blinkered "lets ignore anything that doesn't prove my ideology" doesn't mean the rest of us do. It doesn't help that the union that services the IRS gives so wildly disproportionaly to anti tea party democrats. People arn't angry that the IRS did something wrong people are angry that the people in the IRS just continued their partisan ways inside the office as they do outside of it. And beacuse Obama wants to just shuffle this under the rug like the other scandels refusing to actually do anything at all about them the shit is just going to keep pileing up for 2014. You thought the tea party was a firestorm of idological fury before? just imagine how strong they're gona be when the government is literally out to get them. You changed the subject. Admit it, your story is a fantasy you made up to justify their alleged actions to yourself. And it doesn't even make sense. It makes complete sense your the one thats utterly irrational and fails to even consider anything that doesn't agree with you. For fucks sake at least say why you think it doesn't make sense.
You didn't hear about the altered republican emails before the cbs story broke out and neither did I. No one even knew that there was another set of emails until after the white house release theirs. Theres no logic that dictates that the second source released of a document must inherently be the legitimate document. The only difference is that obama released one and the republicans had a different copy that they were filing around. You're being completely unreasonable about a complete non issue thats going to go away about a scandal that isn't going away.
|
On May 19 2013 01:03 JonnyBNoHo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 11:22 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 04:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:On May 18 2013 03:28 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 02:18 JonnyBNoHo wrote:US Consumer Sentiment Surges; Leading Indicators Rise ... The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's preliminary reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment rose to 83.7 from 76.4 in April, topping economists' expectations for 78.
It was the highest level since July 2007.
The barometer of current economic conditions jumped to 97.5 from 89.9, the highest since October 2007, while the gauge of consumer expectations gained to 74.8 from 67.8. ...
The Conference Board said on Friday that its Leading Economic Index increased 0.6 percent to 95.0 last month, the highest level since June 2008. LinkPretty damn good given what's going on with our trading partners in Europe. I wonder if those numbers are usually lead or lag indicators of economic activity. Either way, they don't seem "real," or at least important in the current climate. There aren't any reasons for consumer sentiment to rise, apart from getting used to unaltered levels of economic disparity. Incomes haven't risen above their previous highs, underemployment is still ridiculous, housing numbers are erratic, and none of the key drivers of these things are getting any better. This report looks more like sociology and less like economics. It's a leading indicator. I think you're too pessimistic. Income and employment have been steadily improving for years and housing is doing fantastic. Starts are up 13% YoY and prices are up almost 10%. I'm pessimistic because I'm weighing the recovery against what it should be, not what it could be. Wages are still far below their 2008 highs, but educational attainment is higher than ever. Households have stopped the deleveraging process, but debt levels are still the same. Rumor has it that more Americans are living hand-to-mouth, which would explain the lack of deleveraging. Inflation is still below target, which hints that job growth is stifled. The only bright spots come from company profits and cash reserves, but those won't fuel more recovery in their current state. As for housing, YoY we're doing great because the entire thing collapsed in 2008. Housing prices are now where they were in 1998, which is arguably lower than before the bubble. The only saving grace of our position is that we aren't in the Eurozone. By all other standards, the economy is still in the crapper and it stopped gaining ground on the potential in 2010. Disposable income is near pre-recession levels. Meanwhile, thanks to deleveraging and low rates, debt payments are taking a record low bite out of budgets. That makes for a strong consumer, particularly in regards to housing where affordability is still sky high. Add to that a shrinking trade deficit and growing government budgets and we should have a pretty good situation going forward. Disposable income is still below pre-recession levels, while GDP is above. Private consumer debt went down slightly since the recession started, but is still higher than ever before, and consumers have stopped deleveraging. If we're to believe recent reports about education, people are investing in education instead of homes for the long term, betting on better/higher income jobs, but that is far from the case. We're setting ourselves up for another round of deleveraging in the near future.
The trade deficit gains are being fueled mostly by a glut in oil inventories (due to weakness especially in the EU) as well as a drop in US oil consumption. Exports are still declining, just not as fast as imports. This is probably seasonally related, but the outlook behind the numbers points to this as a coming trend.
Housing indicators are going to continually improve until they hit an income/debt barrier (which is likely to happen sooner than later). At that point, incomes will HAVE to rise, but if unemployment/underemployment is still high, that's not going to happen. We need the unemployment numbers to come down, which either requires businesses to spend their cash piles or the government to reverse most of the austerity they've committed to.
As for paralleluniverse, we've been hearing that recovery is 2-3 years away since 2010. The issue seems to be that we assume it will just happen on its own because we've been good or something. We see the same projections for Ireland, but nothing happens. I don't see things returning to normal without course corrections, like the Japanese have started doing.
|
|
On May 19 2013 06:23 aksfjh wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 01:03 JonnyBNoHo wrote:On May 18 2013 11:22 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 04:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:On May 18 2013 03:28 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 02:18 JonnyBNoHo wrote:US Consumer Sentiment Surges; Leading Indicators Rise ... The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's preliminary reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment rose to 83.7 from 76.4 in April, topping economists' expectations for 78.
It was the highest level since July 2007.
The barometer of current economic conditions jumped to 97.5 from 89.9, the highest since October 2007, while the gauge of consumer expectations gained to 74.8 from 67.8. ...
The Conference Board said on Friday that its Leading Economic Index increased 0.6 percent to 95.0 last month, the highest level since June 2008. LinkPretty damn good given what's going on with our trading partners in Europe. I wonder if those numbers are usually lead or lag indicators of economic activity. Either way, they don't seem "real," or at least important in the current climate. There aren't any reasons for consumer sentiment to rise, apart from getting used to unaltered levels of economic disparity. Incomes haven't risen above their previous highs, underemployment is still ridiculous, housing numbers are erratic, and none of the key drivers of these things are getting any better. This report looks more like sociology and less like economics. It's a leading indicator. I think you're too pessimistic. Income and employment have been steadily improving for years and housing is doing fantastic. Starts are up 13% YoY and prices are up almost 10%. I'm pessimistic because I'm weighing the recovery against what it should be, not what it could be. Wages are still far below their 2008 highs, but educational attainment is higher than ever. Households have stopped the deleveraging process, but debt levels are still the same. Rumor has it that more Americans are living hand-to-mouth, which would explain the lack of deleveraging. Inflation is still below target, which hints that job growth is stifled. The only bright spots come from company profits and cash reserves, but those won't fuel more recovery in their current state. As for housing, YoY we're doing great because the entire thing collapsed in 2008. Housing prices are now where they were in 1998, which is arguably lower than before the bubble. The only saving grace of our position is that we aren't in the Eurozone. By all other standards, the economy is still in the crapper and it stopped gaining ground on the potential in 2010. Disposable income is near pre-recession levels. Meanwhile, thanks to deleveraging and low rates, debt payments are taking a record low bite out of budgets. That makes for a strong consumer, particularly in regards to housing where affordability is still sky high. Add to that a shrinking trade deficit and growing government budgets and we should have a pretty good situation going forward. Disposable income is still below pre-recession levels, while GDP is above. Private consumer debt went down slightly since the recession started, but is still higher than ever before, and consumers have stopped deleveraging. If we're to believe recent reports about education, people are investing in education instead of homes for the long term, betting on better/higher income jobs, but that is far from the case. We're setting ourselves up for another round of deleveraging in the near future. The trade deficit gains are being fueled mostly by a glut in oil inventories (due to weakness especially in the EU) as well as a drop in US oil consumption. Exports are still declining, just not as fast as imports. This is probably seasonally related, but the outlook behind the numbers points to this as a coming trend. Housing indicators are going to continually improve until they hit an income/debt barrier (which is likely to happen sooner than later). At that point, incomes will HAVE to rise, but if unemployment/underemployment is still high, that's not going to happen. We need the unemployment numbers to come down, which either requires businesses to spend their cash piles or the government to reverse most of the austerity they've committed to. As for paralleluniverse, we've been hearing that recovery is 2-3 years away since 2010. The issue seems to be that we assume it will just happen on its own because we've been good or something. We see the same projections for Ireland, but nothing happens. I don't see things returning to normal without course corrections, like the Japanese have started doing. You need to check your data. Household debt has been falling. Exports have been booming. I have no idea what "income/debt barrier" you are talking about. As I posted, debt service is at a 30 year low - seems any barrier would be a long way off.
|
On May 19 2013 07:37 JonnyBNoHo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 06:23 aksfjh wrote:On May 19 2013 01:03 JonnyBNoHo wrote:On May 18 2013 11:22 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 04:10 JonnyBNoHo wrote:On May 18 2013 03:28 aksfjh wrote:On May 18 2013 02:18 JonnyBNoHo wrote:US Consumer Sentiment Surges; Leading Indicators Rise ... The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's preliminary reading on the overall index on consumer sentiment rose to 83.7 from 76.4 in April, topping economists' expectations for 78.
It was the highest level since July 2007.
The barometer of current economic conditions jumped to 97.5 from 89.9, the highest since October 2007, while the gauge of consumer expectations gained to 74.8 from 67.8. ...
The Conference Board said on Friday that its Leading Economic Index increased 0.6 percent to 95.0 last month, the highest level since June 2008. LinkPretty damn good given what's going on with our trading partners in Europe. I wonder if those numbers are usually lead or lag indicators of economic activity. Either way, they don't seem "real," or at least important in the current climate. There aren't any reasons for consumer sentiment to rise, apart from getting used to unaltered levels of economic disparity. Incomes haven't risen above their previous highs, underemployment is still ridiculous, housing numbers are erratic, and none of the key drivers of these things are getting any better. This report looks more like sociology and less like economics. It's a leading indicator. I think you're too pessimistic. Income and employment have been steadily improving for years and housing is doing fantastic. Starts are up 13% YoY and prices are up almost 10%. I'm pessimistic because I'm weighing the recovery against what it should be, not what it could be. Wages are still far below their 2008 highs, but educational attainment is higher than ever. Households have stopped the deleveraging process, but debt levels are still the same. Rumor has it that more Americans are living hand-to-mouth, which would explain the lack of deleveraging. Inflation is still below target, which hints that job growth is stifled. The only bright spots come from company profits and cash reserves, but those won't fuel more recovery in their current state. As for housing, YoY we're doing great because the entire thing collapsed in 2008. Housing prices are now where they were in 1998, which is arguably lower than before the bubble. The only saving grace of our position is that we aren't in the Eurozone. By all other standards, the economy is still in the crapper and it stopped gaining ground on the potential in 2010. Disposable income is near pre-recession levels. Meanwhile, thanks to deleveraging and low rates, debt payments are taking a record low bite out of budgets. That makes for a strong consumer, particularly in regards to housing where affordability is still sky high. Add to that a shrinking trade deficit and growing government budgets and we should have a pretty good situation going forward. Disposable income is still below pre-recession levels, while GDP is above. Private consumer debt went down slightly since the recession started, but is still higher than ever before, and consumers have stopped deleveraging. If we're to believe recent reports about education, people are investing in education instead of homes for the long term, betting on better/higher income jobs, but that is far from the case. We're setting ourselves up for another round of deleveraging in the near future. The trade deficit gains are being fueled mostly by a glut in oil inventories (due to weakness especially in the EU) as well as a drop in US oil consumption. Exports are still declining, just not as fast as imports. This is probably seasonally related, but the outlook behind the numbers points to this as a coming trend. Housing indicators are going to continually improve until they hit an income/debt barrier (which is likely to happen sooner than later). At that point, incomes will HAVE to rise, but if unemployment/underemployment is still high, that's not going to happen. We need the unemployment numbers to come down, which either requires businesses to spend their cash piles or the government to reverse most of the austerity they've committed to. As for paralleluniverse, we've been hearing that recovery is 2-3 years away since 2010. The issue seems to be that we assume it will just happen on its own because we've been good or something. We see the same projections for Ireland, but nothing happens. I don't see things returning to normal without course corrections, like the Japanese have started doing. You need to check your data. Household debt has been falling. Exports have been booming. I have no idea what "income/debt barrier" you are talking about. As I posted, debt service is at a 30 year low - seems any barrier would be a long way off. http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/z1.pdf
In 2012, households stopped deleveraging.
|
On May 18 2013 17:43 paralleluniverse wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 08:28 Danglars wrote:But of course, once we raise taxes ... many times more money gets spent! It's really just a huge tax hike with talk about closing the deficit. If passed, Congress is free to just spend many more times the money that's coming in, and increase the federal deficit as they always do. Tax and spend is the name of the game, and Obama's business as usual on that front. Well, I tried closing the deficit, but those mean old Republicans ... ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/gaCYxzV.gif) I hadn't really heard of Congressman Mike Kelly before I read this news article. He grilled the departing IRS commissioner on his failure of responsibility and the ramifications of this scandal. Check out this LINK for the video. REP. MIKE KELLY (R-PA): This has nothing to do with political parties. This has to do with highly targeted groups. This reconfirms everything the American public believes. This is a huge blow to the faith and trust that the American people have in their government. Is there any limit to the scope where you folks can go? Is there anything at all? Is there any way that we could ask you is there any question that you should have asked?
My goodness. How much money do you have in your wallet? Who do you get emails from? Whose sign do you put up in your front yard? This is a tax question? And you don't think that's intimidating? It's sure as hell intimidating. And I don't know that I got any answers from you today. And I don't know that -- what Mr. George said is great work -- but you know what? There's a heck of a lot more that has to come out in this. Any anybody that sat here today and listened to what you had to say, I am more concerned today than I was before, and the fact that you all can do just about anything you want to anybody?
You know, you can put anybody out of business that you want. Any time you want. I gotta tell you. You could talk about how you're a horribly run organization, if you're on the other side of the fence, you're not giving that excuse. And the IRS comes in, you're not allowed to be shoddy, you're not allowed to be run horribly, you're not allowed to make mistakes, you're not allowed to do one damn thing that doesn't come in compliance, and if you do, you're held responsible right then. I just think the American people have seen what's going on right now in their government. This is absolutely an overreach and this is an outrage for all Americans. The deficit is already fixed. Haven't you heard. Government spending has outpaced inflation by 43% in the last 10 years, and you're okay imagining that new spending measures in the next 10 years will be tame? Excuse me, pardon me, but if everything regarding the deficit is fine, why is Obama's budget raising taxes by $1 trillion dollars? Have we not seen revenues chasing after wildly increasing spending in the last 30 years?
Heck, have we seen a CBO 10-year prediction in the same timeframe be close to accurate?
It's tax and spend: Obama is proposing a $1,000,000,000,000+ tax increase, Congress and the President will follow after with more ways to spend the money.
|
On May 19 2013 08:08 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 17:43 paralleluniverse wrote:On May 18 2013 08:28 Danglars wrote:But of course, once we raise taxes ... many times more money gets spent! It's really just a huge tax hike with talk about closing the deficit. If passed, Congress is free to just spend many more times the money that's coming in, and increase the federal deficit as they always do. Tax and spend is the name of the game, and Obama's business as usual on that front. Well, I tried closing the deficit, but those mean old Republicans ... ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/gaCYxzV.gif) I hadn't really heard of Congressman Mike Kelly before I read this news article. He grilled the departing IRS commissioner on his failure of responsibility and the ramifications of this scandal. Check out this LINK for the video. REP. MIKE KELLY (R-PA): This has nothing to do with political parties. This has to do with highly targeted groups. This reconfirms everything the American public believes. This is a huge blow to the faith and trust that the American people have in their government. Is there any limit to the scope where you folks can go? Is there anything at all? Is there any way that we could ask you is there any question that you should have asked?
My goodness. How much money do you have in your wallet? Who do you get emails from? Whose sign do you put up in your front yard? This is a tax question? And you don't think that's intimidating? It's sure as hell intimidating. And I don't know that I got any answers from you today. And I don't know that -- what Mr. George said is great work -- but you know what? There's a heck of a lot more that has to come out in this. Any anybody that sat here today and listened to what you had to say, I am more concerned today than I was before, and the fact that you all can do just about anything you want to anybody?
You know, you can put anybody out of business that you want. Any time you want. I gotta tell you. You could talk about how you're a horribly run organization, if you're on the other side of the fence, you're not giving that excuse. And the IRS comes in, you're not allowed to be shoddy, you're not allowed to be run horribly, you're not allowed to make mistakes, you're not allowed to do one damn thing that doesn't come in compliance, and if you do, you're held responsible right then. I just think the American people have seen what's going on right now in their government. This is absolutely an overreach and this is an outrage for all Americans. The deficit is already fixed. Haven't you heard. Government spending has outpaced inflation by 43% in the last 10 years, and you're okay imagining that new spending measures in the next 10 years will be tame? Excuse me, pardon me, but if everything regarding the deficit is fine, why is Obama's budget raising taxes by $1 trillion dollars? Have we not seen revenues chasing after wildly increasing spending in the last 30 years? Heck, have we seen a CBO 10-year prediction in the same timeframe be close to accurate? It's tax and spend: Obama is proposing a $1,000,000,000,000+ tax increase, Congress and the President will follow after with more ways to spend the money.
Literally nothing the government will feasibly do short of some change brought on by armed insurrection or something is going to qualify as anything other than "tax and spend" by the talking point metric, so why even talk about it as some political issue that's a valid object of concern for parliamentarianism instead of advocating revolution? That would be more forthright at least.
|
|
|
|