• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:17
CEST 13:17
KST 20:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20257Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202576RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced22BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time I offer completely free coaching services Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 629 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 2005

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
darthfoley
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States8003 Posts
May 27 2015 06:10 GMT
#40081
Loved Bernie Sanders' announcement yesterday; he's awesome. Love a good underdog
watch the wall collide with my fist, mostly over problems that i know i should fix
RCMDVA
Profile Joined July 2011
United States708 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-27 12:15:23
May 27 2015 12:15 GMT
#40082
Who says American's don't care about soccer?

Sbrubbles
Profile Joined October 2010
Brazil5776 Posts
May 27 2015 12:34 GMT
#40083
On May 27 2015 21:15 RCMDVA wrote:
Who says American's don't care about soccer?

https://twitter.com/TheJusticeDept/status/603488652564557824


Go USA!
Bora Pain minha porra!
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21668 Posts
May 27 2015 12:39 GMT
#40084
No Blatter tho, feels very meh if you dont even take out the biggest dirtbag.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
RCMDVA
Profile Joined July 2011
United States708 Posts
May 27 2015 12:41 GMT
#40085
Working up the chain to flip them on the boss.
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10700 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-27 13:04:40
May 27 2015 12:53 GMT
#40086
On May 27 2015 21:39 Gorsameth wrote:
No Blatter tho, feels very meh if you dont even take out the biggest dirtbag.


The Sun-King (his nickname here) is above puny laws and ethics...


The Problem is that the Fifa seems to be so corrupt, who is to say that it would get any better whiteout blatter? Chances are it would become even worse.
The only thing that, at this point, could restore the Fifas integrity would be to rebuild it from the ground up, which is not gonna happen.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21668 Posts
May 27 2015 13:04 GMT
#40087
On May 27 2015 21:53 Velr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 27 2015 21:39 Gorsameth wrote:
No Blatter tho, feels very meh if you dont even take out the biggest dirtbag.


The Sun-King (his nickname here) is above puny laws and ethics...


The Problem with the Fifa is... It seems to be so fucking corrupt, who is to say that it would get any better whiteout blatter? Chances are it would become even worse...

Purge and rebuild the entire thing?
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10700 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-27 13:39:19
May 27 2015 13:09 GMT
#40088
See my edit.

Good luck trying that. Some european associatins would probably be on board with that, but would they actually take drastic measures, like boycotting the World Cup? I doubt it.
This would imho be the only action that could spark real change... And Africa/Asia/South America would never ever go with this.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21668 Posts
May 27 2015 13:14 GMT
#40089
On May 27 2015 22:09 Velr wrote:
See my edit.

Good luck trying that. Some european associatins would probably be on board with that but would they actually take drastic measures, like boycotting the world Cup?
Thats imho the only thing that could spark real change... And Africa/Asia/South America would never ever go with this.

I'm not trying to imply it will actually happen but when your dealing with deeprooted corruption that is often the only cure.
Guess we now just hope that some of those charged will break and provide evidence against more members, including Blatter.

Other then the boycott you mentioned, a wholesale arrest of the top layers of Fifa might have the same effect.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
May 27 2015 17:08 GMT
#40090
On May 26 2015 15:11 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 26 2015 14:44 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 14:39 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 26 2015 13:47 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 13:37 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 26 2015 13:23 IgnE wrote:
On May 26 2015 12:58 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 09:43 IgnE wrote:
And I can tell you that it's not because the capitalists were opposed to racist laws. I could make an argument that they fled the south because they were upset that slavery was abolished.

You're right about the term 'brain drain' but the capitalists were in the North and the slave holders didn't like them very much.


. . . ? I'n right about everything. If the subject is capital flight from the reconstruction era south then comments like "the capitalists were in the north" are worse than irrelevant. Stick to chiming in with irrelevancies on topics you something about or make an attempt to understand what the discussion is about.


It's a pattern that has been highlighted several times by several people from a variety of places on the political spectrum. It's a clear and deliberate behavior.

I miss the days before it was so predictable. Now old One-line Jonny Payroll is as predictable as an episode of Power Rangers.

It's well past time that this guy got banned.


Straight past a failed attempt to dispute the behavior pattern, directly into backseat moderating, impressive.

If you had something of substance to say about the discussion being had than I encourage you to share it, but your typical tangential at best one-liners are way past played out.

What? Making a polite, concise point?


lol riiiight. that's what that was.

Show nested quote +
On May 26 2015 14:44 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 13:23 IgnE wrote:
On May 26 2015 12:58 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 09:43 IgnE wrote:
And I can tell you that it's not because the capitalists were opposed to racist laws. I could make an argument that they fled the south because they were upset that slavery was abolished.

You're right about the term 'brain drain' but the capitalists were in the North and the slave holders didn't like them very much.


. . . ? I'm right about everything. If the subject is capital flight from the reconstruction era south then comments like "the capitalists were in the north" are worse than irrelevant. Stick to chiming in with irrelevancies on topics you know something about or make an attempt to understand what the discussion is about.

The subject of the post I responded to was 'capitalists', not 'capital flight'. You didn't quote another post, so what "it's" was referring to wasn't entirely clear, but you were talking about a 'brain drain' in your previous post, and you were talking about capitalists moving away from the South in the post I quoted.

Anyways, my point was that the slave holders in the South didn't like the whole market capitalism thing going on in the North. + Show Spoiler +
Christian morality is impractical in free society and is the natural morality of slave society. Where all men are equals, all must be competitors, rivals, enemies, in the struggle for life, trying each to get the better of the other. The rich cheapen the wages of the poor; the poor take advantage of the scarcity of labor, and charge exorbitant prices for their work; or, when labour is abundant, underbid and strangle each other in the effort to gain employment. Where any man engaged in business in free society to act upon the principle of the Golden Rule--doing unto others as he would that they should do unto him--his certain ruin would be the consequence.

"Every man for himself'" is the necessary morality of such society, and that is the negation of Christian morality. . . On the other hand, in slave society, . . .it is in general, easy and profitable to do unto others as we would that they should to unto us. There is no competition, no clashing of interests within the family circle, composed of parents, master, husband, children and slaves. . . . When the master punishes his child or his slave for misconduct he obeys the golden rule just as strictly as when he feeds and clothes them. Were the parent to set his chidden free at fifteen years of age to get their living in the world, he would be guilty of crime; and as negroes never become more provident or intellectual than white children of fifteen, it is equally criminal to emancipate them. We are obeying the golden rule in retaining them in bondage, taking care of them in health and sickness, in old age and infancy, and in compelling them to labor. . . .

'Tis the interest of masters to take good care of their slaves, and not cheat them out of their wages, as Northern bosses cheat and drive free labourers. Slaves are most profitable when best treated., free labourers most profitable when worst treated and most defrauded. Hence the relation of the master and slave is a kindly and Christian one; that of free laborer and employer a selfish and inimical one. It is in the interest of the slave to fulfill his duties to his master; for he thereby elicits his attachment, and the better enables him to provide for his (the slave's) wants. Study and analyze as long as [you] please the relations of men . . . in a slave society, and they will be found to be Christian, humane and affectionate, whilst those of free society are anti-Christian, competitive and antagonistic.+ Show Spoiler +
Richmond (Virginia) Examiner, July 17, 1861, as quoted in Fighting Words, a 2004 book by Andrew S. Coopersmith (pp. 49-50)
Moreover, the North, where the industrialists and capitalists mainly were, was very much against slavery.


See, that wasn't so hard. Just do that next time, instead of the one-liner. At least then it will appear to be substantive.

Show nested quote +
Were the parent to set his chidden free at fifteen years of age to get their living in the world, he would be guilty of crime; and as negroes never become more provident or intellectual than white children of fifteen, it is equally criminal to emancipate them.


That is pretty funny though. It's crazy to me, people that said stuff like that were actually taken seriously by people. To defend that kind of stupidity with Christianity takes a special person too. Not sad I missed those years in history.

Everyone does 'one liner' posts on occasion. You do too sometimes. I also make very substantial posts here.

Grow up.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
May 27 2015 17:32 GMT
#40091
Got this off of Twitter:

[image loading]

Answer: + Show Spoiler +
The 300X figure is from the average of CEO pay at the largest 300 or so firms that the ALF-CIO, or whoever else does the math, has data for. In other words it's the average pay of something like the top 2% of of CEOs (or less, depending on data availability), rather than CEOs as a whole.


Just thought it was neat.
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
May 27 2015 17:37 GMT
#40092
Is this only income or also capital gains? Most Ceo's don't even pay themselves a salary. I'm pretty sure your average ceo makes 'a little' more than 170k
puerk
Profile Joined February 2015
Germany855 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-27 17:57:04
May 27 2015 17:50 GMT
#40093
On May 28 2015 02:37 Nyxisto wrote:
Is this only income or also capital gains? Most Ceo's don't even pay themselves a salary. I'm pretty sure your average ceo makes 'a little' more than 170k

No no no you are not supposed to talk about CEOs paying themselfs because their pay is decided by a totally independent rational board driven only by market forces.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-27 18:31:17
May 27 2015 18:30 GMT
#40094
On May 28 2015 02:08 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 26 2015 15:11 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 26 2015 14:44 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 14:39 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 26 2015 13:47 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 13:37 GreenHorizons wrote:
On May 26 2015 13:23 IgnE wrote:
On May 26 2015 12:58 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 09:43 IgnE wrote:
And I can tell you that it's not because the capitalists were opposed to racist laws. I could make an argument that they fled the south because they were upset that slavery was abolished.

You're right about the term 'brain drain' but the capitalists were in the North and the slave holders didn't like them very much.


. . . ? I'n right about everything. If the subject is capital flight from the reconstruction era south then comments like "the capitalists were in the north" are worse than irrelevant. Stick to chiming in with irrelevancies on topics you something about or make an attempt to understand what the discussion is about.


It's a pattern that has been highlighted several times by several people from a variety of places on the political spectrum. It's a clear and deliberate behavior.

I miss the days before it was so predictable. Now old One-line Jonny Payroll is as predictable as an episode of Power Rangers.

It's well past time that this guy got banned.


Straight past a failed attempt to dispute the behavior pattern, directly into backseat moderating, impressive.

If you had something of substance to say about the discussion being had than I encourage you to share it, but your typical tangential at best one-liners are way past played out.

What? Making a polite, concise point?


lol riiiight. that's what that was.

On May 26 2015 14:44 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 13:23 IgnE wrote:
On May 26 2015 12:58 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 26 2015 09:43 IgnE wrote:
And I can tell you that it's not because the capitalists were opposed to racist laws. I could make an argument that they fled the south because they were upset that slavery was abolished.

You're right about the term 'brain drain' but the capitalists were in the North and the slave holders didn't like them very much.


. . . ? I'm right about everything. If the subject is capital flight from the reconstruction era south then comments like "the capitalists were in the north" are worse than irrelevant. Stick to chiming in with irrelevancies on topics you know something about or make an attempt to understand what the discussion is about.

The subject of the post I responded to was 'capitalists', not 'capital flight'. You didn't quote another post, so what "it's" was referring to wasn't entirely clear, but you were talking about a 'brain drain' in your previous post, and you were talking about capitalists moving away from the South in the post I quoted.

Anyways, my point was that the slave holders in the South didn't like the whole market capitalism thing going on in the North. + Show Spoiler +
Christian morality is impractical in free society and is the natural morality of slave society. Where all men are equals, all must be competitors, rivals, enemies, in the struggle for life, trying each to get the better of the other. The rich cheapen the wages of the poor; the poor take advantage of the scarcity of labor, and charge exorbitant prices for their work; or, when labour is abundant, underbid and strangle each other in the effort to gain employment. Where any man engaged in business in free society to act upon the principle of the Golden Rule--doing unto others as he would that they should do unto him--his certain ruin would be the consequence.

"Every man for himself'" is the necessary morality of such society, and that is the negation of Christian morality. . . On the other hand, in slave society, . . .it is in general, easy and profitable to do unto others as we would that they should to unto us. There is no competition, no clashing of interests within the family circle, composed of parents, master, husband, children and slaves. . . . When the master punishes his child or his slave for misconduct he obeys the golden rule just as strictly as when he feeds and clothes them. Were the parent to set his chidden free at fifteen years of age to get their living in the world, he would be guilty of crime; and as negroes never become more provident or intellectual than white children of fifteen, it is equally criminal to emancipate them. We are obeying the golden rule in retaining them in bondage, taking care of them in health and sickness, in old age and infancy, and in compelling them to labor. . . .

'Tis the interest of masters to take good care of their slaves, and not cheat them out of their wages, as Northern bosses cheat and drive free labourers. Slaves are most profitable when best treated., free labourers most profitable when worst treated and most defrauded. Hence the relation of the master and slave is a kindly and Christian one; that of free laborer and employer a selfish and inimical one. It is in the interest of the slave to fulfill his duties to his master; for he thereby elicits his attachment, and the better enables him to provide for his (the slave's) wants. Study and analyze as long as [you] please the relations of men . . . in a slave society, and they will be found to be Christian, humane and affectionate, whilst those of free society are anti-Christian, competitive and antagonistic.+ Show Spoiler +
Richmond (Virginia) Examiner, July 17, 1861, as quoted in Fighting Words, a 2004 book by Andrew S. Coopersmith (pp. 49-50)
Moreover, the North, where the industrialists and capitalists mainly were, was very much against slavery.


See, that wasn't so hard. Just do that next time, instead of the one-liner. At least then it will appear to be substantive.

Were the parent to set his chidden free at fifteen years of age to get their living in the world, he would be guilty of crime; and as negroes never become more provident or intellectual than white children of fifteen, it is equally criminal to emancipate them.


That is pretty funny though. It's crazy to me, people that said stuff like that were actually taken seriously by people. To defend that kind of stupidity with Christianity takes a special person too. Not sad I missed those years in history.

Everyone does 'one liner' posts on occasion. You do too sometimes. I also make very substantial posts here.

Grow up.


Yeah, just no one else consistently posts irrelevant one-liners intended to derail discussion. The ratio of substantial to irrelevant one-liners has only gotten worse. Not to mention even your 'substantial' posts are regularly diversions from the larger point being discussed. Then you also act as if the tangential thing you 'proved' wasn't 100% true somehow invalidated the point you strayed from (or you just say it to say it, like your experience with the police which was totally irrelevant to the discussion other than proving the point you were trying to undermine). Or, when you are made to look foolish, (like your whole women dominate payroll kick) you just get pouty and usually resort to personal insults. It's tiresome.

Calling me kid, telling me to grow up, insulting my education, calling me a bigot, saying I hate white people, your monkey remark, the list goes on. It's really old and pathetic.

On May 28 2015 02:32 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Got this off of Twitter:

[image loading]

Answer: + Show Spoiler +
The 300X figure is from the average of CEO pay at the largest 300 or so firms that the ALF-CIO, or whoever else does the math, has data for. In other words it's the average pay of something like the top 2% of of CEOs (or less, depending on data availability), rather than CEOs as a whole.


Just thought it was neat.


Those CEO's need to negotiate with those ladies who dominate payroll better, right Jonny?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Ghostcom
Profile Joined March 2010
Denmark4782 Posts
May 27 2015 19:43 GMT
#40095
^talk about moronic one-liners.... You two really should just ignore each other.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23221 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-27 19:49:28
May 27 2015 19:48 GMT
#40096
On May 28 2015 04:43 Ghostcom wrote:
^talk about moronic one-liners.... You two really should just ignore each other.


Jonny is the one who suggested women dominated payroll and set wages, I was just making sure that's what he still thought since he never explained how he thinks it works, but seemed sure that a lot of women working in payroll (and his dreadfully misguided notion that wages were determined by payroll, since it says so in the textbook definition probably), meant wages were primarily set by women.

As for ignoring each other, I have tried to get him to agree to that, he's the one who refuses. You want to take a crack at getting him to stop, I'll still honor my offer.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
May 27 2015 20:12 GMT
#40097
The Obama administration announced new clean water rules today that it says will protect sources of drinking water for 117 million Americans, rules welcomed by environmental groups, but bitterly opposed by congressional Republicans and farm state democrats.

The rules clarify which waterways fall under the Clean Water Act.

President Obama, in a statement released by the White House, said that in recent years:

"Court decisions have led to uncertainty and a need for clarification. One in three Americans now gets drinking water from streams lacking clear protection, and businesses and industries that depend on clean water face uncertainty and delay, which costs our economy every day. Too many of our waters have been left vulnerable to pollution. That's why I called on the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to clear up the confusion and uphold our basic duty to protect these vital resources."

The rules have been in the works for some time, and have already drawn opposition from many Republicans in Congress, along with farm groups. The House approved a measure to block the new regulations earlier this month, and a similar bill is pending in the Senate.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-27 20:26:04
May 27 2015 20:22 GMT
#40098
You know how a few pages back I was bitching about the sickness within predatory American consumerism. Watch this.
+ Show Spoiler +

It really is some "only in America" shit. Sure we have payday loans places in England but I'm pretty sure we don't have payday hair shops.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10700 Posts
May 27 2015 20:30 GMT
#40099
That isn't from southpark? O_o
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42655 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-05-27 20:37:28
May 27 2015 20:34 GMT
#40100
On May 28 2015 05:30 Velr wrote:
That isn't from southpark? O_o

http://theweaveloanstore.com/
You will not own the merchandise in The Weave Loan purchase program until the total amount necessary to acquire ownership is paid in full or until you purchase your early purchase option of our program.

HOW IT WORKS:

1. Bring: A Valid ID, Recent Check Stub & Initial Payment and we can get you approved through
our network of lenders for The Weave Loan Program.

2. Don't Settle For Cheap Tangled Bundles, Get Luxury Hair TODAY! Don't let the cost of quality hair stop you from looking fabulous!
IF YOU HAVE A HAIR EMERGENCY AND NEED TO GET TO THE WEAVE LOAN STORE NOW CALL 1-844-WEAVE LOANS (1-844-932-8356)
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Prev 1 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
Spirit vs GeraldLIVE!
Clem vs Krystianer
uThermal vs SKillous
Reynor vs MaNa
Lambo vs TBD
ComeBackTV 1325
RotterdaM1296
IndyStarCraft 469
CranKy Ducklings162
Rex152
3DClanTV 108
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1296
IndyStarCraft 469
Rex 152
ProTech68
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 16923
Horang2 9805
Hyuk 5050
Mini 1167
Hyun 1130
Barracks 1011
BeSt 672
firebathero 516
Larva 488
EffOrt 463
[ Show more ]
Stork 342
Soulkey 207
Last 191
sorry 112
ZerO 94
Noble 54
Free 51
Sacsri 41
Sharp 39
zelot 37
soO 29
Shinee 27
Rush 22
Movie 22
NaDa 19
sSak 19
Sea.KH 13
Icarus 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
yabsab 10
Bale 6
sas.Sziky 4
Dota 2
XcaliburYe596
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K578
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor250
Other Games
gofns14644
B2W.Neo899
Beastyqt680
DeMusliM146
SortOf60
QueenE24
ZerO(Twitch)16
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH388
• StrangeGG 17
• tFFMrPink 10
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3648
• WagamamaTV549
• lizZardDota2252
League of Legends
• Jankos617
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2h 43m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6h 43m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 22h
WardiTV European League
2 days
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.