NBA Playoffs 2012 - Page 162
Forum Index > Closed |
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
Holcan
Canada2593 Posts
On May 30 2012 13:36 OneOther wrote: Your original post would be interpreted by anyone as if you were saying both games were blowouts. Posters pointed out that game 1 wasn't. Not to mention it was a dumb post considering many people to in fact find this series entertaining if not more so than ECF, and one game ending in double digits doesn't take away anything from that. If tomorrow's ECF ends in double digit loss for Celtics, are you gonna apologize? ill apologize if the ecf turns into a race to 100, and miami wins in 4 games. because to me, that is not exciting basketball. however the wcf IS a race to 100, and okc is looking like they will get 4-0'd. plus, as long as ed malloy isn't reffing the game, it'll be hard for the c's to get blown out, they play the leagues best defense. | ||
Saeglopur
Canada177 Posts
| ||
XoXiDe
United States620 Posts
Here | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 30 2012 13:26 a176 wrote: exact same shit that happened last year that made okc lose westbrook chucking shots so the offense that had 113.5 ORTG with Westbrook chucking was the problem...and not the defense with Ibaka + Perkins in the game? | ||
Whatson
United States5356 Posts
On May 30 2012 13:54 Ace wrote: so the offense that had 113.5 ORTG with Westbrook chucking was the problem...and not the defense with Ibaka + Perkins in the game? lol Perkins is such a defensive liability against the Spurs, and just sucks against that pick and roll that Parker runs like every freaking play. Doesn't hedge, doesn't help on rotations, just sits in the middle and tries to scare him out of the paint. Parker either pulls from 15 feet if Perkins is sagging off too much or he just weaves around Perkins if he overplays. OKC should think about going small and running more, although that's hard to do against such a disciplined offense. | ||
a176
Canada6688 Posts
On May 30 2012 13:54 Ace wrote: so the offense that had 113.5 ORTG with Westbrook chucking was the problem...and not the defense with Ibaka + Perkins in the game? im not sure what you are trying to say here. my original point is that durant went 1 for 3 in the fourth, harden 4 for 4 ... westbrook 3 for 8. | ||
Whatson
United States5356 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:12 a176 wrote: im not sure what you are trying to say here. my original point is that durant went 1 for 3 in the fourth, harden 4 for 4 ... westbrook 3 for 8. lol your argument is faulty ![]() Westbrook shot better than Durant | ||
Glaceau
Wales333 Posts
yes i know durant outplayed him in this game. Not true for the playoffs. Durant can afford to miss a few more but westbrook cant, he needs to convert most of his drives. 10-24 just isnt good enough to win this series | ||
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
Yeh It's a good article and pretty much sums up what I think as well. The Spurs have become my favourite team to watch over the years, I found them great to watch even 5-6 years ago, not just this season. I guess people prefer watching superstars jack up bricks 1 on 5 than a team execute beautiful, team orientated basketball. Partcularly in America. | ||
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:34 AxionSteel wrote: Yeh It's a good article and pretty much sums up what I think as well. The Spurs have become my favourite team to watch over the years, I found them great to watch even 5-6 years ago, not just this season. I guess people prefer watching superstars jack up bricks 1 on 5 than a team execute beautiful, team orientated basketball. Partcularly in America. I like it when LeBron jumps and puts the ball in the hoopz. | ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
How many guys try to go 1 on 5 and shotjack in the NBA that are superstars? | ||
Glaceau
Wales333 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:37 Ace wrote: Well erm...just about every player that is considered a superstar is a tremendous team player. How many guys try to go 1 on 5 and shotjack in the NBA that are superstars? carmelo | ||
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
^^ My least favourite player right there. | ||
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:37 Ace wrote: Well erm...just about every player that is considered a superstar is a tremendous team player. How many guys try to go 1 on 5 and shotjack in the NBA that are superstars? Melo and Kobe come to mind | ||
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
![]() The Spurs have my utmost respect and the play some beautiful basketball, no question about it. But as a Heat fan I like to watch the Heat play the most, and no, not just because of LeBron's derping the ball into the circle with the net hanging from it. | ||
GhostOwl
766 Posts
On May 30 2012 13:29 icystorage wrote: im not really a fan of scoring pgs. especially chuckers. im really waiting for the day they trade westbrook I think scoring pgs are a blessing. Everyone keeps saying pg need to pass the ball, it's their role! The thing is, when your main "passer" can threaten the enemy defense with the ability to drive in and score himself, it makes defending that much harder. Look at Rose. What team wouldn't want a pg like Rose on their team? | ||
GhostOwl
766 Posts
The difference is, Kobe at least knows how to handle the ball and make his shots, while Melo gets a lot of his points from his mid-range jumpers. Melo has actually a low FG %, and was overrated and still is. The only "superstar" thing in him, is his fans elevate his name to that level. | ||
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
On May 30 2012 14:51 GhostOwl wrote: I think scoring pgs are a blessing. Everyone keeps saying pg need to pass the ball, it's their role! The thing is, when your main "passer" can threaten the enemy defense with the ability to drive in and score himself, it makes defending that much harder. Look at Rose. What team wouldn't want a pg like Rose on their team? id rather have rondo or rubio. they make other players better. edit: not much rubio, but nash or paul ![]() rubio is entertaining to watch tho | ||
itkovian
United States1763 Posts
Time to see how OKC responds on their home court. If they drop a game at home they're done for sure. | ||
| ||