That account was created on 2012-02-16 16:21:24 and had 115 posts.
Reason: Dont balance whine in LR threads. thx.
Forum Index > Closed |
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 21 2012 22:24 GMT
#25821
That account was created on 2012-02-16 16:21:24 and had 115 posts. Reason: Dont balance whine in LR threads. thx. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 00:04 GMT
#25822
That account was created on 2012-06-22 07:19:03 and had 3 posts. Reason: Previously banned user. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 01:52 GMT
#25823
That account was created on 2011-02-12 11:07:05 and had 35 posts. Reason: There once was a camel which was used to carry hay on its back. One day the camel's owner was just piling on more and more hay untill the camel's legs were quivering under the preassure, it was just barely able to stand up and move. But then the owner found a straw lying on the ground, he picked it up and added it to the piles on the camel's back, but just as he did he heard a defening cracking sound from inside the camel. It was the straw that broke the camel's back. tl;dr, you were warned repeatedly in the last three days for posting one liners. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 04:27 GMT
#25824
That account was created on 2011-08-04 11:44:22 and had 15 posts. Reason: Don't be a dick on bnet. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 08:11 GMT
#25825
That account was created on 2008-01-05 00:37:45 and had 133 posts. Reason: Really? Please educate yourself before making these posts oozing of ignorance. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 10:36 GMT
#25826
That account was created on 2010-02-25 13:01:04 and had 1114 posts. Reason: History of bad posts. You need to shape up. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 14:28 GMT
#25827
That account was created on 2011-07-13 06:01:16 and had 4 posts. Reason: cya (i)n a week | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 14:30 GMT
#25828
That account was created on 2012-02-23 22:32:18 and had 169 posts. Reason: I've also always wondered why you insist on using the wrong pronouns in the wrong thread. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 16:05 GMT
#25829
That account was created on 2011-07-21 10:25:31 and had 96 posts. Reason: Not acceptable | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 17:49 GMT
#25830
That account was created on 2010-06-29 07:24:46 and had 448 posts. Reason: On June 23 2012 02:23 doffe wrote: well, wouldnt it be better if it did? What else has nourished this popularity? The fact that its a Transsexual?. I mean, there are plenty of people that has beaten one Korean and does not have nearly this amount of fans. Seems a bit unfair imo :p. Its not like Scarlett won fans with some super charismatic personality (not saying the personality isnt super charismatic, just that the reason was not that). But then again, people can be fans of whomever they wish certinly, just find it funny how Scarlett have so many with so few results Just cause of a sexchange... prolly gonna get warned now, for being frank :p. I have nothing against any type of HBTq person, do what the fuck you want aslong as youre happy and dont hurt anyone. Martyr | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 18:27 GMT
#25831
That account was created on 2012-06-23 02:39:45 and had 1 posts. Reason: Inconsiderate Newb. Try harder on your next account. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 21:02 GMT
#25832
That account was created on 2011-03-01 16:46:08 and had 2923 posts. Reason: Drug addicts are pretty weird. dude come on. next time you don't read a thread and just want to make a shitty throwaway post, just don't do it. please???? thanks!! have a great day! ps your mod notes are getting long! | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 22:34 GMT
#25833
That account was created on 2011-08-06 03:31:47 and had 35 posts. Reason: Just keeping it real here, but I think your life could use some more sunshine and rainbows. You are one negative dude as your account seems to exist solely to bash other players. Ease up already. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 22:43 GMT
#25834
That account was created on 2012-06-12 14:42:46 and had 103 posts. Reason: Your posts are getting way too spammy and you were just warned about this not two hours before you spam this gem "FUCK THE HEAT,FUCK THE HEAT,FUCK THE HEAT! Most undeserved Champion of all time in the History of this Sport!" Stop shouting to yourself and join the rest of TL in meaningful conversation. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 22 2012 22:47 GMT
#25835
That account was created on 2011-06-02 20:04:09 and had 32 posts. Reason: Read the OP, the warning, or the thread. Take your pick, but if you had done any of the three you certainly would not asked for a key. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 23 2012 01:35 GMT
#25836
That account was created on 2011-09-30 14:21:39 and had 21 posts. Reason: This is an abhorrent trash post. Don't post if you're going to make replies like this. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 23 2012 03:33 GMT
#25837
That account was created on 2010-10-22 10:35:34 and had 10268 posts. Reason: On April 27 2012 04:09 TL.net Bot wrote: Blasterion was just temp banned for 30 days by EvilTeletubby. Reason: Ok. At this point you have two pages worth of mod notes. You were just warned earlier about the image macros and proceeded to post a few more AFTER being warned. Nearly all of your warnings/bans have been for image macros/low content posting. You have almost 10k posts, and have only been here about a year and a half. Your posts are largely filler. That needs to stop. You wont get many more warnings. Remember this? On June 23 2012 08:55 Blasterion wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 08:53 dAPhREAk wrote: she murders squid by consumption. squid rapes her mouth before said consumption. still a better love story than twilight. lol. Inb4 we have some weird ass nukige themed on this. Let's not. At this point, I don't think you plan on changing, and that's a problem. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 23 2012 04:01 GMT
#25838
That account was created on 2010-08-17 14:55:43 and had 1147 posts. Reason: On June 23 2012 03:00 Doodsmack wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 02:34 SupLilSon wrote: On June 23 2012 01:33 Doodsmack wrote: On June 23 2012 00:50 bLo0d wrote: On June 23 2012 00:27 Doodsmack wrote: On June 23 2012 00:10 SupLilSon wrote: On June 23 2012 00:04 Doodsmack wrote: On June 22 2012 23:54 SupLilSon wrote: On June 22 2012 23:11 Doodsmack wrote: On June 22 2012 22:55 CakeSauc3 wrote: [quote] Regardless of whether or not you're high masters, Zerg still benefits from the buffs. And believe it or not, all players get matched up to players who are at a similar level of play. So balance does affect gameplay even at a lower level, and even as early as high platinum are players smart enough to take advantage of these buffs that they've received. Some of us aren't out to become the best player in the world - we just enjoy playing the game, but patches like these ruin it for us. Thanks for calling the majority of Starcraft 2 players unintelligent, have a nice day. You didn't address my point. At skill levels lower than high master, an improvement in mechanics far outweighs game balance. If you're platinum then you're doing so many things wrong that balance is just one small factor in your games. I am mid master and when I play against diamond or below zergs and tosses, I crush them with mass marine 98% of the time. Why can't you do the same? Because your mechanics are FUCKING TERRIBLE. Yesterday I beat a mid master toss with mass marine on daybreak. I opened triple orbital, and powered up marines and Protoss did not have sufficient skill level to defend all 3 of his bases. Balance did not factor in at all. There's a reason why pro Terrans don't bother analyze replays of warm up games that were losses. The poor mechanics dictate that the decision making and tactics were mostly irrelevant. I cringe every time I see posts like this, oozing with self - righteousness. I looked you up and you are barely mid master so GTFO talking other people down about terrible mechanics. I guess by your logic, only TBLS can complain about balance. All these code S losers just need to get better. So you looked up my account that has like 5 ladder games the past 3 seasons and somehow determined my MMR, and implied that you have to be at a high skill level in order to understand that only high masters have near-optimal mechanics. Then you claimed that when I referred to high masters it's equivalent to referring to Code S players. Hopefully that post was a fluke and not indicative of your intelligence level No, I looked at your last season also where you were something like 400 points master, which is pretty shitty. I'm just laughing at the fact that you set some arbitrary cutoff at "high-master" as the point where people can talk about balance. I was making fun of your post by pointing out that many top SC2 players have poor mechanics in comparison to their BW counterparts, but that doesn't stop them from talking balance. The only one showing a lack of intelligence and reasoning is you. 400 points after how many games? What was my bonus pool remaining? Did you look at my opponents' points? How do you know my MMR then? Do you consider yourself a smart person? BW players are irrelevant to this discussion. I'm talking about near-optimal SC2 mechanics, not BW mechanics. And I didn't say sub-high master players can't talk about balance in general. I said they shouldn't blame their losses on balance. Reading comprehension. I don't understand how you say below high master mechanics outweigh balance, which is obviously true and is nothing new, but then say that pro terrans don't look at replays because their poor mechanics make their decision making and tactics irrelevant? Wouldn't it be the complete opposite? Also, why bother even bringing up that low level players have bad mechanics as if you brilliantly realized it and are enlightening everyone with your discovery. Everyone knows this. And why is it weird that he would think you could be talking about Code S players when the post before that you said "pro terrans"? And you're mid masters, how are you trying to use number of games and bonus pool to try to manipulate that? I said pro Terrans wouldn't analyze replays of their warm up games. And I didn't just point out that people below high master have poor mechanics. I pointed that people below high master shouldn't complain about balance in their own games because their poor mechanics are more determinative. Suplilson, I'll do you the favor of not quoting your last two posts because they clearly show that when your reading comprehension has failed so miserably your only option is to just stop addressing my points lol. You don't even have a point. Your posts were all bragging about how you can beat lower skilled player using unorthodox strategies and setting your own special guidelines for who can complain about balance and who can not. Aside from that, all you do is try to insult a few people's intelligence and reading comprehension skills. And once again you prove that you don't understand what I said. Kind of funny when you try to make an argument and someone responds with such conviction even though they actually don't comprehend the relatively simple points you're making LOL. I also specifically remember seeing posts from you in other threads where you clearly were missing the point. I guess at some point I should feel sorry for you and stop responding although if you're in high school or something I maybe can understand. Ad hominem attacks don't help anything in a discussion. Chill out and cool off for a couple days. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 23 2012 04:07 GMT
#25839
That account was created on 2011-10-08 10:33:08 and had 1426 posts. Reason: On June 23 2012 00:45 SupLilSon wrote: Show nested quote + On June 23 2012 00:27 Doodsmack wrote: On June 23 2012 00:10 SupLilSon wrote: On June 23 2012 00:04 Doodsmack wrote: On June 22 2012 23:54 SupLilSon wrote: On June 22 2012 23:11 Doodsmack wrote: On June 22 2012 22:55 CakeSauc3 wrote: On June 22 2012 22:50 Doodsmack wrote: Would love to see the replays of the people crying in this thread. Their minerals probably skyrocket to 2000 when theyre doing things with their army on the map on only 2 bases LOL. Yeah the reason you lost was because of balance, not your horrible mechanics. If you're not high master, then shut the fuck up about balance and get better because at your level, player skill level is far more determinative than balance. Only when both players possess near-optimal mechanics does balance become determinative. It's how Starcraft fucking works, if you don't understand that the sorry but you're unintelligent. Regardless of whether or not you're high masters, Zerg still benefits from the buffs. And believe it or not, all players get matched up to players who are at a similar level of play. So balance does affect gameplay even at a lower level, and even as early as high platinum are players smart enough to take advantage of these buffs that they've received. Some of us aren't out to become the best player in the world - we just enjoy playing the game, but patches like these ruin it for us. Thanks for calling the majority of Starcraft 2 players unintelligent, have a nice day. You didn't address my point. At skill levels lower than high master, an improvement in mechanics far outweighs game balance. If you're platinum then you're doing so many things wrong that balance is just one small factor in your games. I am mid master and when I play against diamond or below zergs and tosses, I crush them with mass marine 98% of the time. Why can't you do the same? Because your mechanics are FUCKING TERRIBLE. Yesterday I beat a mid master toss with mass marine on daybreak. I opened triple orbital, and powered up marines and Protoss did not have sufficient skill level to defend all 3 of his bases. Balance did not factor in at all. There's a reason why pro Terrans don't bother analyze replays of warm up games that were losses. The poor mechanics dictate that the decision making and tactics were mostly irrelevant. I cringe every time I see posts like this, oozing with self - righteousness. I looked you up and you are barely mid master so GTFO talking other people down about terrible mechanics. I guess by your logic, only TBLS can complain about balance. All these code S losers just need to get better. So you looked up my account that has like 5 ladder games the past 3 seasons and somehow determined my MMR, and implied that you have to be at a high skill level in order to understand that only high masters have near-optimal mechanics. Then you claimed that when I referred to high masters it's equivalent to referring to Code S players. Hopefully that post was a fluke and not indicative of your intelligence level. No, I looked at your last season also where you were something like 400 points master, which is pretty shitty. I'm just laughing at the fact that you set some arbitrary cutoff at "high-master" as the point where people can talk about balance. I was making fun of your post by pointing out that many top SC2 players have poor mechanics in comparison to their BW counterparts, but that doesn't stop them from talking balance. The only one showing a lack of intelligence and reasoning is you. 400 points after how many games? What was my bonus pool remaining? Did you look at my opponents' points? How do you know my MMR then? Do you consider yourself a smart person? BW players are irrelevant to this discussion. I'm talking about near-optimal SC2 mechanics, not BW mechanics. And I didn't say sub-high master players can't talk about balance in general. I said they shouldn't blame their losses on balance. Reading comprehension. No, I don't consider myself a smart person, but in comparison to you, I'm a damn genius. You're not helping either. Knock off the insults/ad homs. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
June 23 2012 04:45 GMT
#25840
That account was created on 2012-06-23 13:43:34 and had 0 posts. Reason: yawn | ||
| ||
Next event in 10h 12m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • mYiSmile1 192 StarCraft: Brood War• davetesta66 • musti20045 39 • RyuSc2 12 • -Miszu- 8 • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel • intothetv • Laughngamez YouTube • IndyKCrew Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
BSL: ProLeague
DragOn vs rasowy
Tech vs izu
Wardi Open
Kaelaris Steadfast Rott…
BSL: ProLeague
Cross vs LancerX
StRyKeR vs JDConan
PiGosaur Monday
OlimoLeague
The PondCast
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] Korean StarCraft League
OlimoLeague
SC Evo Complete
PassionCraft
|
|