That account was created on 2010-12-23 13:49:21 and had 525 posts.
Reason: You've been banned before for being inflammatory. Stop.
Forum Index > Closed |
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 03:53 GMT
#29861
That account was created on 2010-12-23 13:49:21 and had 525 posts. Reason: You've been banned before for being inflammatory. Stop. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 05:00 GMT
#29862
That account was created on 2013-01-06 13:54:35 and had 1 posts. Reason: On January 06 2013 13:57 nakadashi wrote: ESF players are such a joke, Kespa destroying them after like 4 months of playing sc2, time to consider a LoL switch. yah if that's your first post, then you should go | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 09:04 GMT
#29863
That account was created on 2010-02-24 14:10:40 and had 514 posts. Reason: Darkren wrote: the hammer of justice had fallen Yes it has. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 09:05 GMT
#29864
That account was created on 2012-07-03 07:00:13 and had 22 posts. Reason: This thread is so bad it deserves a ban. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 10:47 GMT
#29865
That account was created on 2008-09-09 10:38:53 and had 701 posts. Reason: On January 06 2013 19:12 esla_sol wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2013 04:21 Cokefreak wrote: am i the only one who finds it annoying that some random blog is now plagued with the OP saying things like "petition: keep fantasy out of LR threads" or the classic "please keep it to yourself" and "nobody cares". please keep it to yourself. nobody cares, truly. if you think you have something interesting to say about fantasy, post about it, but keep the lr threads clean please. i love that fantasy is causing more interest in proleague, but i just find it obnoxious. you are a cancer to teamliquid and probably a terrible, possibly bed wetting, person. Wat. Last chance to stop posting like an idiot. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 10:51 GMT
#29866
That account was created on 2012-11-20 02:47:46 and had 82 posts. Reason: Previously banned user. Can't stop calling attention to himself. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 10:52 GMT
#29867
That account was created on 2010-12-20 09:37:02 and had 852 posts. Reason: On January 06 2013 18:12 MethodSC wrote: so you didn't get the movie. that's fine. A person writes a lengthy post they put effort into, and you make several posts simply dismissing them? Gtfo. That doesn't contribute to a discussion at all. Stop being a dick. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 10:53 GMT
#29868
That account was created on 2010-08-25 11:17:30 and had 334 posts. Reason: Please be less obnoxious in LR threads. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 10:54 GMT
#29869
That account was created on 2013-01-05 15:05:16 and had 2 posts. Reason: Advertising. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 10:58 GMT
#29870
That account was created on 2010-08-28 22:53:35 and had 1363 posts. Reason: On January 06 2013 14:15 Pudge_172 wrote: EG-TL = Fucking Joke Team Thanks. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 11:00 GMT
#29871
That account was created on 2011-01-19 15:34:06 and had 283 posts. Reason: On January 06 2013 13:09 JustJonny wrote: Show nested quote + On January 06 2013 12:50 Spyridon wrote: On January 06 2013 09:57 JustJonny wrote: where did i defend them? i just said i believed your assumption of dev laziness was incorrect and that i don't like the general theme of your posts. also that i like the game and am not personally furious at blizzard for it. You really have to ask where? 1) Saying anyone is entitled for expecting what the developers promised, furthermore going so far as calling their promises a "gamble", is defending their shady business practices that everyone should be upset about, whether they PvP or not. If developer promises are a gamble then how could you possibly say there is not some sort of shady business going on?? 2) Trying to point fingers at others saying people are upset because "they didnt put what YOU want in the game" is defending them by displacing the blame on to the customers (who were lied to) instead of where it belongs (on the developers who lied to us in order to get us to by the game, which in effect ripped us off). 3) Even arguing with the lazy comments are defending them somewhat, because that was just one of the likely scenarios mentioned. You and I both know I've said laziness was only one of the outcomes, yet you keep holding on to that and saying it was incorrect. Yet you ignore the fact that if it wasn't laziness, that's an even worse outcome for us all as customers. Now before I say more on this subject, don't get me wrong. I understand how this point could be easily debated and understand not everyone is going to agree, but I know first hand exactly how much work it takes to develop a TDM mode with their features. If you'd like you can PM me and I'll link you to a youtube video of a multiplayer game with a dedicated server where I designed the netcode/character controller/mode/scoreboard/the map/most the art, and I'm not even an artist, so creating my below-average art took longer than it would take an artist to create decent art. The entire thing only took me a few months (not even doing it full time), and the majority of the work was the character controller, netcode and physics. The mode itself was one of the smaller projects to create in mere weeks, and most of that was to get a couple of the scoreboard and stat bugs out. Considering they had their TDM mode fully playable with partly functional matchmaking years before release (even ready enough for the public to try in 2010), even a couple people could have had the mode fully playable in the time they had. So do I think it's laziness? Laziness is one of the most likely scenarios. If it wasn't laziness than we were betrayed even worse than if it was laziness. If they had even a few people working on the PvP for more than 2-3 months and they couldn't get it to be fun and playable, laziness is the only answer. If they did not have people working on the PvP, if they decided TDM wasnt going to be profitable enough for them, or if they decided "screw what we promised, lets just scratch the mode", that is just another example of shady business practice when they consistently led us to believe things that weren't true and screwed us in the end. Which is worse than laziness. Now, I know you got what made you happy and kept you playing. But you really should realize that a big majority of the people are just as pissed off as I am, or even more, and we have every right to be. Can you really deny that making a blog promising PvP TDM in a few months then not only failing to deliver, but canceling it completely, is shady business? It's only by a advertising technicality that what they did is even legal, since it was said in a blog session... straight up there is no chance i'm reading any of that. ttyl. Then get the fuck off a message board. What the hell. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 11:03 GMT
#29872
That account was created on 2013-01-06 09:28:05 and had 1 posts. Reason: Malicious user. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 06 2013 18:39 GMT
#29873
That account was created on 2013-01-07 03:28:13 and had 1 posts. Reason: pbu | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 07 2013 06:45 GMT
#29874
That account was created on 2013-01-07 15:39:31 and had 1 posts. Reason: Advertising. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 07 2013 08:20 GMT
#29875
That account was created on 2012-12-24 00:53:11 and had 54 posts. Reason: Lol. What the hell did I just read when I looked through your terribad posting history. -_- | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 07 2013 08:33 GMT
#29876
That account was created on 2010-10-14 03:45:55 and had 2786 posts. Reason: By request | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 07 2013 09:15 GMT
#29877
That account was created on 2013-01-07 18:09:10 and had 1 posts. Reason: Advertising. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 07 2013 09:45 GMT
#29878
That account was created on 2013-01-07 18:43:57 and had 1 posts. Reason: Advertising. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 07 2013 11:12 GMT
#29879
That account was created on 2010-08-23 12:35:39 and had 6059 posts. Reason: Bye Request. Goodbye everypony. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net125 Posts
January 07 2013 11:59 GMT
#29880
That account was created on 2011-11-10 16:06:29 and had 458 posts. Reason: No caster bashing please. Couldn't doubt it. SNM is a fucking idiot. | ||
| ||
SC Evo Complete
SEL Fall '24 Group A/B
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney 33507 Dota 2Rain 6002 Horang2 1092 Stork 422 ggaemo 287 ZerO 273 BeSt 231 hero 108 Mind 108 HiyA 97 [ Show more ] Mong 72 Backho 67 sSak 51 Killer 49 Barracks 33 Sexy 26 ToSsGirL 25 SilentControl 24 Free 22 zelot 22 [sc1f]eonzerg 16 IntoTheRainbow 13 910 3 Counter-Strike Other Games singsing2833 B2W.Neo2044 crisheroes572 shoxiejesuss518 gobbtv354 DeMusliM265 Mew2King264 Hui .169 XaKoH 153 RotterdaM125 Trikslyr46 ZerO(Twitch)20 Organizations StarCraft 2 Dota 2 StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Adnapsc2 17 StarCraft: Brood War• Legendk 15 • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • sooper7s League of Legends |
Online Event
OlimoLeague
BSL: ProLeague
Dewalt vs XuanXuan
Cross vs Xin
CSO Cup
Acropolis
Acropolis
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SOOP
ByuN vs Rogue
SC Evo Complete
WardiTV Invitational
[ Show More ] PassionCraft
Online Event
BSL: ProLeague
Mihu vs kogeT
Sziky vs JDConan
Acropolis
Acropolis
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
SC Evo Complete
|
|