EPT
Peter Jackson's The Hobbit - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
On December 13 2004 18:10 BroOd wrote: I guess you weren't really paying attention during the movies, seeing as the "trailer" for The Hobbit is just scenes from the films editted together by a fan, with the song used in the trailer for TTT. I realized that was what it mostly was, but there were additions, so I guess you weren't paying attention or saw a different trailer. Smog definitely wasn't in the movies. Ok, so the films didn't pander to your notions of the importance of certain elements, I'm deeply sorry for your loss. I don't think you can fully conceive how much Peter Jackson staked his career on a hunch with these films. He convinced a studio to do something that had never been done before, and to invest such an enormous ammount of money in a relatively unproven director and unfinished scripts speaks volumes about his dedication. A director looking to make a blockbuster gets $80M to make Bad Boys II, not $300M to adapt a piece of fantasy literature. No need for your sarcasm. Is that really the best you can say for him? He got people to invest in his film? Really I don't care how hard it was, and I doubt many people care about that aspect either. | ||
|
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
| ||
|
Telemako
Spain1636 Posts
I will love to see the movie of Turin Turambar, or Beren and Luthien from Silmarillion. | ||
|
Jim
Sweden1965 Posts
Hollywood should look into more dynamic books with people who actually have some feelings. George Martin with a Song of Ice and Fire is an excellent example. ps. If you know any good writers who write fantasy please post. | ||
|
racebannon
Canada1225 Posts
On December 15 2004 17:00 Jim wrote: I dont really like the Lord of the Rings. The story is way to linear. The hobbit is the same. Peter Jacksons movie is better than the book but if the script is too lousy even the best of directors will fail(not saying that Peter Jackson is that great but he did quite well with this script). Hollywood should look into more dynamic books with people who actually have some feelings. George Martin with a Song of Ice and Fire is an excellent example. ps. If you know any good writers who write fantasy please post. I'd support it but i sincerely doubt an Ice and Fire movie or series of movies would come close to capturing the perfection that the books possess the fantasy genre is pretty laden with crap unfortunately. You won't find anything near as good as Song of Ice and Fire, and the distant seconds are talentless hacks who make it readily apparent as their respective series progress (terry pratchett, that fuckbrain who writes about rand althor or whoever) your best bet is to just re-read Ice and Fire and pray George Martin actually gets the rest of the books out | ||
|
cava
United States1035 Posts
On December 15 2004 17:00 Jim wrote: I dont really like the Lord of the Rings. The story is way to linear. The hobbit is the same. Peter Jacksons movie is better than the book but if the script is too lousy even the best of directors will fail(not saying that Peter Jackson is that great but he did quite well with this script). Hollywood should look into more dynamic books with people who actually have some feelings. George Martin with a Song of Ice and Fire is an excellent example. ps. If you know any good writers who write fantasy please post. The lord of the rings story is...... linear? If by linear you mean the most thought out, developed, compelling story ever then yes it is. | ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27156 Posts
On December 15 2004 17:12 racebannon wrote: I'd support it but i sincerely doubt an Ice and Fire movie or series of movies would come close to capturing the perfection that the books possess the fantasy genre is pretty laden with crap unfortunately. You won't find anything near as good as Song of Ice and Fire, and the distant seconds are talentless hacks who make it readily apparent as their respective series progress (terry pratchett, that fuckbrain who writes about rand althor or whoever) your best bet is to just re-read Ice and Fire and pray George Martin actually gets the rest of the books out I dont agree with you about some of your taste (although robert jordan lost his way long ago..), but song of Ice and Fire is simply the best. | ||
|
Jim
Sweden1965 Posts
edit. I have had the fourth book of a Song of Ice and Fire preordered for I dont know how long time. | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
And Hautamaki, Gothmog is the first of the Baelrog of Morgoth, right? It's been 6 months since I last read the silmarillion and lotr, but... | ||
|
pfff
Belgium1352 Posts
i mean, it was a really good movie, i can understand you didnt think it was that good, but if you like the fantasy genre, you mustve like something about it, you cant have thought it was complete and utter crap, anyone who has voices this opinion just fakes it imo, trying to make himself interesting by taking a stance no one else takes. same thing for everyone who think the lotr movies/books completely own, stop kidding yourself, they werent perfect | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
| ||
|
InToTheWannaB
United States4770 Posts
| ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
iirc, Star Wars was a movie at first and later made a book as well and the movie was soo much better than the books. But when the book is first, it will be so rich, full of details and if a movie follows it just can't follow up, it can't be 20 hours long and it will just never be as good as the book. | ||
|
GroT
Belgium3003 Posts
| ||
|
RamenStyle
United States1929 Posts
| ||
|
MrIncognito
United States217 Posts
On December 16 2004 11:08 GroT wrote: rofl invincible ghost army? i'm never watching the 3rd movie The Ghost army wasn't as lame as the computer-generated, featureless Legolas running all over the elephants. But it's still worth watching. There was a charge of 7,000 cavalry that made up a lot of ground. | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
Peter Jackson has announced, via a post on his official Facebook page, that he will be shooting his adaptation of The Hobbit at the higher rate of 48 frames per second. The usual rate is 24fps, and has been since its introduction to cinema in 1927. The Hobbit will be the first major motion picture in history to feature the upgrade Jackson thinks, "after nine decades", it's time for a change. In the post, he addressed the inevitable backlash from "film purists" by saying that audience will "get used to this new look very quickly" as it will bring about a "much more lifelife and comfortable viewing experience." He also said that films will become "easier to watch, especially in 3-D", with audiences being able to sit through "two hours of footage without getting eyestrain". Jackson went onto claim that the difference between 24 and 48 fps is "significant", likening the technological evolution to when "vinyl records were supplanted by digital CDs". The Lord of the Rings director also thanked Warner Bros for their support in the advancement, before predicting over 10,000 screens would be capable of projecting 48fps by the time of The Hobbit's release. Jackson, who won an Academy Award for his work on The Return of the King, took over the directing chair after Guillermo del Toro left. He had become frustrated with the constant production delays that had thwarted the project early on. The Office's Martin Freeman has been announced to be playing Bilbo Baggins in the film, a role originally played by Sir Ian Holm in The Lord of the Rings trilogy, while Sir Ian McKellen and Andy Serkis will be reprising the characters of Gandalf and Gollum respectively. Serkis will also act as Second Unit Director on the project. The Hobbit will be split into two parts, with the first being released in December 2012. Read more: Peter Jackson is shooting The Hobbit at 48 frames per second | TotalFilm.com http://www.totalfilm.com/news/peter-jackson-is-shooting-the-hobbit-at-48-frames-per-second?ns_campaign=news&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=totalfilm&ns_linkname=0&ns_fee=0&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed: totalfilm/imdbnews (Total Film IMDb aggregate) It will be the first movie ever shooted in 48 fps. What do you guys think? If im right, this will affect somehow blue-ray watchers though. Some blueray standard wont support 48fps or smthn. | ||
|
toBe
Germany56 Posts
And The Hobbit as a movie - AWESOME. | ||
| ||
