• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:57
CEST 14:57
KST 21:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20257Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202577RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced24BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time I offer completely free coaching services What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 715 users

Claims of Chinese crack allowing lan mode - Page 19

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 21 25 Next All
Liquid`Jinro
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Sweden33719 Posts
March 21 2011 18:07 GMT
#361
On March 22 2011 02:15 Desutroyah wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 02:09 mmdmmd wrote:
On March 22 2011 02:05 Liquid`Tyler wrote:

So the problem is that unit responses/commands are slower in cross-continent play in SC2 than in SC1. Much slower.


This is interesting. With better internet for everyone compare to 10 years ago and a better bnet technology. The game is actually laggier? Why is this?

That is a good question, some theorize its a routing issue and the diffrent servers doesnt have a good connection towards diffrent continents. Some theorize that sc2 sends more shit over the internet.

I think both is probably partially true.

I thought it was pretty well established that its because SC2 runs the game as client-server-client whereas SC1 (and WC3) ran it Client-Client, so theres no middle-man, which is what causes the lag.
Moderatortell the guy that interplanatar interaction is pivotal to terrans variety of optionitudals in the pre-midgame preperatories as well as the protosstinal deterriggation of elite zergling strikes - Stimey n | Formerly FrozenArbiter
Matkap
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Spain627 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-21 18:09:38
March 21 2011 18:07 GMT
#362
On March 22 2011 03:01 TurtlePerson2 wrote:
Imagine if this actually works. Competitions like MLG will be torn between providing the best possible experience for players and viewers or doing what Activision-Blizzard says. It will put them in an awkward position.



No, there is no awkawrd position as using this would be illegal. This isnt a 5 year old almost forgotten game (exagerating a bit ok, but it shows my point). Big Tournaments specially in USA will never use anything different that what blizzard provides.
A man tells his stories so many times that he becomes the stories. They live on after him, and in that way he becomes immortal.
dacthehork
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States2000 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-21 18:19:38
March 21 2011 18:12 GMT
#363
On March 22 2011 03:07 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 02:15 Desutroyah wrote:
On March 22 2011 02:09 mmdmmd wrote:
On March 22 2011 02:05 Liquid`Tyler wrote:

So the problem is that unit responses/commands are slower in cross-continent play in SC2 than in SC1. Much slower.


This is interesting. With better internet for everyone compare to 10 years ago and a better bnet technology. The game is actually laggier? Why is this?

That is a good question, some theorize its a routing issue and the diffrent servers doesnt have a good connection towards diffrent continents. Some theorize that sc2 sends more shit over the internet.

I think both is probably partially true.

I thought it was pretty well established that its because SC2 runs the game as client-server-client whereas SC1 (and WC3) ran it Client-Client, so theres no middle-man, which is what causes the lag.


Yep it's client-client but with a server in the middle that it all has to go through slowing shit down. Worst possible set up for paying customers but most secure with least cost (not actually hosting servers). If any 3rd party server goes up having client-client it will fucking destroy bnet 2.0 in hours, much like ICCUP did to bnet 1.0. It's a big IF that blizzard betted on (no crack to bnet 2.0).

In actually if an ICCUP like server or LAN mode + hamachi servers come out, death knell for BNET 2.0 by anyone who likes low latency.

If it was normal client-server it would actually decrease latency much like HoN, Dota 2 (will have).

Basically Battle.net 2.0 is the worst possible settup for latency because it's still peer 2 peer but with a middle man it all goes through first.

For Example: HON has normal client-server and hosts all the dedicated servers themselves. This gives really good latency and even "acceptable" EU-NA latency. Because of this service any third party lan modes or ded servers hosted in Russia would never become popular. THey offer the best possible service to customers.

Blizzard opted to give the worst possible service to customers and hope for a monopoly. Lan Crack would open the floodgates for BNET 2.0 to become a thing of the past. Which hopefully happens.

The second a lan mode comes out, it's over. Hamachi networks, ICCUP, GARENA, can all host SC2 without worry of the legality since it's the end users they connect together.
Warturtle - DOTA 2 is KING
Gheed
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States972 Posts
March 21 2011 18:16 GMT
#364
On March 22 2011 03:07 Matkap wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 03:01 TurtlePerson2 wrote:
Imagine if this actually works. Competitions like MLG will be torn between providing the best possible experience for players and viewers or doing what Activision-Blizzard says. It will put them in an awkward position.



No, there is no awkawrd position as using this would be illegal. This isnt a 5 year old almost forgotten game (exagerating a bit ok, but it shows my point). Big Tournaments specially in USA will never use anything different that what blizzard provides.


Blizzard: You can't run those modified clients at your tournament.
Tournament: Why not?
B: They violate the terms set out in the EULA.
T: But we're creating a functionality that the unmodified game does not allow us to do, i.e. play in a lag free environment without risk of disconnection.
B: Too bad.
T: Well, could you add in your own LAN mode for us, then?
B: No.
T: Then how are we supposed to get LAN conditions for our players?
B: You don't need LAN, you have battle.net 2.0.

Would be such a lovely PR move by Blizzard.
andiCR
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Costa Rica2273 Posts
March 21 2011 18:17 GMT
#365
So, reading through all 19 pages and I still don't know if this has been confirmed (didnt read thoroughly though). Has it been confirmed?
Nightmare1795 wrote: I played a guy in bronze who said he was Japanese. That was the only game I ever dropped a nuke, which was purely coincidental.
RoarMan
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada745 Posts
March 21 2011 18:20 GMT
#366
On March 22 2011 03:16 Gheed wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 03:07 Matkap wrote:
On March 22 2011 03:01 TurtlePerson2 wrote:
Imagine if this actually works. Competitions like MLG will be torn between providing the best possible experience for players and viewers or doing what Activision-Blizzard says. It will put them in an awkward position.



No, there is no awkawrd position as using this would be illegal. This isnt a 5 year old almost forgotten game (exagerating a bit ok, but it shows my point). Big Tournaments specially in USA will never use anything different that what blizzard provides.


Blizzard: You can't run those modified clients at your tournament.
Tournament: Why not?
B: They violate the terms set out in the EULA.
T: But we're creating a functionality that the unmodified game does not allow us to do, i.e. play in a lag free environment without risk of disconnection.
B: Too bad.
T: Well, could you add in your own LAN mode for us, then?
B: No.
T: Then how are we supposed to get LAN conditions for our players?
B: You don't need LAN, you have battle.net 2.0.

Would be such a lovely PR move by Blizzard.

xD Make love to me please.

On March 22 2011 03:17 never_toss wrote:
So, reading through all 19 pages and I still don't know if this has been confirmed (didnt read thoroughly though). Has it been confirmed?

Yea I'm curious, hopefully this does force a move on Blizzard towards some sort of LAN. As of now the website in OP seems to be down.
All the pros got dat Ichie.
SDream
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Brazil896 Posts
March 21 2011 18:25 GMT
#367
This won't "force" Blizzard to do anything other than sue whoever made it maybe.

In the same way that people modifying the game files to play in English have not "forced" Blizzard to offer a language pack.

So cut your hopes!
Omgzpwnd
Profile Joined May 2010
Poland59 Posts
March 21 2011 18:26 GMT
#368
yeah wondering how blizz response will look like.
'We didnt add lan support because...ummm...ooom.... Take a while and think: Do you Really want Lan support?"

Also its funny how one asian guy can make so much people happy , like blizz couldnt do this earlier.


aimaimaim
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Philippines2167 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-21 18:28:00
March 21 2011 18:26 GMT
#369
On March 22 2011 03:17 never_toss wrote:
So, reading through all 19 pages and I still don't know if this has been confirmed (didnt read thoroughly though). Has it been confirmed?


It was because some guy was derailing the thread spewing shit.

OT:

I think we will just have to wait. I was patiently waiting for the cracked beta when SC2 was still in beta stage and the wait was worth it back then :p

On March 22 2011 03:25 SDream wrote:
This won't "force" Blizzard to do anything other than sue whoever made it maybe.

In the same way that people modifying the game files to play in English have not "forced" Blizzard to offer a language pack.

So cut your hopes!


They can't sue chinese dudes .. Well from my understanding. There are so many ripped-off products from westered companies that has been modified by china to be like the real thing (Car models for example).
Religion is a dying idea .. || 'E-sport' outside Korea are nerds who wants to feel like rockstars. || I'm not gonna fuck with trolls on General Forum ever again .. FUCK!
jimmyjingle
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States472 Posts
March 21 2011 18:27 GMT
#370
I think it's pretty important that more tournaments give blizzard the middle finger on this issue. Take wow for example, horrible community and typically the only way things get changed is if the unreasonable majority complains enough.

LAN is more important than small PvE changes though.
I get brain like a skull
Matkap
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Spain627 Posts
March 21 2011 18:30 GMT
#371
On March 22 2011 03:16 Gheed wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 03:07 Matkap wrote:
On March 22 2011 03:01 TurtlePerson2 wrote:
Imagine if this actually works. Competitions like MLG will be torn between providing the best possible experience for players and viewers or doing what Activision-Blizzard says. It will put them in an awkward position.



No, there is no awkawrd position as using this would be illegal. This isnt a 5 year old almost forgotten game (exagerating a bit ok, but it shows my point). Big Tournaments specially in USA will never use anything different that what blizzard provides.


Blizzard: You can't run those modified clients at your tournament.
Tournament: Why not?
B: They violate the terms set out in the EULA.
T: But we're creating a functionality that the unmodified game does not allow us to do, i.e. play in a lag free environment without risk of disconnection.
B: Too bad.
T: Well, could you add in your own LAN mode for us, then?
B: No.
T: Then how are we supposed to get LAN conditions for our players?
B: You don't need LAN, you have battle.net 2.0.

Would be such a lovely PR move by Blizzard.



without the risk of a disconnection? you mean less risk right?

You can hope all you want, but It amazes me if people really think something like this would happen, specially in USA.
A man tells his stories so many times that he becomes the stories. They live on after him, and in that way he becomes immortal.
dacthehork
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States2000 Posts
March 21 2011 18:32 GMT
#372
On March 22 2011 03:25 SDream wrote:
This won't "force" Blizzard to do anything other than sue whoever made it maybe.

In the same way that people modifying the game files to play in English have not "forced" Blizzard to offer a language pack.

So cut your hopes!


just like they can sue all the 2 million people who pirated single player.

Once it's out, it's out.
Warturtle - DOTA 2 is KING
goiflin
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1218 Posts
March 21 2011 18:33 GMT
#373
On March 22 2011 03:25 SDream wrote:
This won't "force" Blizzard to do anything other than sue whoever made it maybe.

In the same way that people modifying the game files to play in English have not "forced" Blizzard to offer a language pack.

So cut your hopes!


They can send C&D's, but they can't actually sue anyone in china for trademark infringement.

Also, I wish that they would release language packs for the game That'd be fun, to replay the campaign in a different language.
TrainFX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States469 Posts
March 21 2011 18:47 GMT
#374
On March 22 2011 03:25 SDream wrote:
This won't "force" Blizzard to do anything other than sue whoever made it maybe.

In the same way that people modifying the game files to play in English have not "forced" Blizzard to offer a language pack.

So cut your hopes!


lol how is blizzard going to sue some obscure Chinese programmer?

Depending on the popularity of this or similar future clients it absolutely will at the very least force blizzard to rethink their position on LAN, it all depends on what their numbers people figure out.
RHMVNovus
Profile Joined October 2010
United States738 Posts
March 21 2011 18:54 GMT
#375
On March 22 2011 03:26 aimaimaim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 03:17 never_toss wrote:
So, reading through all 19 pages and I still don't know if this has been confirmed (didnt read thoroughly though). Has it been confirmed?


It was because some guy was derailing the thread spewing shit.

OT:

I think we will just have to wait. I was patiently waiting for the cracked beta when SC2 was still in beta stage and the wait was worth it back then :p

Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 03:25 SDream wrote:
This won't "force" Blizzard to do anything other than sue whoever made it maybe.

In the same way that people modifying the game files to play in English have not "forced" Blizzard to offer a language pack.

So cut your hopes!


They can't sue chinese dudes .. Well from my understanding. There are so many ripped-off products from westered companies that has been modified by china to be like the real thing (Car models for example).


That's the question I have. The OP mentions Taiwan specifically, but I heard mentions of the Chinese (probably PRoC). If it's the former, Blizzard's fine, if the latter, there's no recourse for Blizzard. Cool, let's sue Chinese nationals. Good luck with that.

It should be noted: no major tournaments are going to give Blizzard the finger on this. MLG, GSL, TSL, NASL: they're going to do what Blizzard allows them to do and nothing more. The reason for this? They're major organizations. They have something *major* to lose.

What this *does* mean, however, is that those with less to lose, such as the sort of servers mentioned above - Hamachi, what have you - will grow. The proliferation of this means that SC2 isn't just restricted to large BW tournaments, but also to the sort of gigantic underground scene that exists in (well, BW, but also) TF2. And... it's gonna be difficult for Blizzard to stop that.

This is not a normative judgment or an endorsement of piracy. Truth be told, I'm genuinely conflicted. While I am seriously annoyed by all manner of DRM bullshit, I cannot consider piracy of this new a game remotely close to good. Very torn.

If the cat's not yet out of the bag, it soon will be. Blizzard either adapts, sees their work consumed by piracy, or launch a futile crusade against pirates.

Hopefully they make the right choice.
Droning his sorrows in massive amounts of macro
Chux
Profile Joined June 2009
Peru255 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-21 19:07:29
March 21 2011 19:07 GMT
#376
The link now throws a 404 error. Blizzard already working on it?
MSL 2052-2053, here we go!
dkim
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States255 Posts
March 21 2011 19:08 GMT
#377
On March 22 2011 02:58 aimaimaim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 02:51 veE wrote:
Honestly who cares... battlenet is strong enough to support us anyway... I havent seen many problems with live tourneys and events or online ones.... why fix something that isnt broken?


Boxer Disconnecting During TSL?

comments like these are kinda dumb. sure I am up for lans and all but in order for TSL to be LAN, boxer and his opponent would have had to meet up and some pc bang or some thing. so without online matches, boxer n his opponent may not have even played -_-
disconnects at GSLs or tourneys that play locally are what could have been prevented with lan.
Essentia
Profile Joined July 2010
1150 Posts
March 21 2011 19:11 GMT
#378
Even if there was LAN, TSL would be played through Bnet anyways, so dumb argument.
Gheed
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States972 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-21 19:11:41
March 21 2011 19:11 GMT
#379
On March 22 2011 04:08 dkim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 02:58 aimaimaim wrote:
On March 22 2011 02:51 veE wrote:
Honestly who cares... battlenet is strong enough to support us anyway... I havent seen many problems with live tourneys and events or online ones.... why fix something that isnt broken?


Boxer Disconnecting During TSL?

comments like these are kinda dumb. sure I am up for lans and all but in order for TSL to be LAN, boxer and his opponent would have had to meet up and some pc bang or some thing. so without online matches, boxer n his opponent may not have even played -_-
disconnects at GSLs or tourneys that play locally are what could have been prevented with lan.


On March 22 2011 04:11 Essentia wrote:
Even if there was LAN, TSL would be played through Bnet anyways, so dumb argument.



For the tenth time a LAN setting would allow the use of hamachi or other p2p program to bypass battle.net and reduce ping between players. Would that get rid of all connection problems? No, but it would get rid of some of them and would improve unit response time for both players.
DirtYLOu
Profile Joined May 2010
575 Posts
March 21 2011 19:11 GMT
#380
On March 22 2011 04:08 dkim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2011 02:58 aimaimaim wrote:
On March 22 2011 02:51 veE wrote:
Honestly who cares... battlenet is strong enough to support us anyway... I havent seen many problems with live tourneys and events or online ones.... why fix something that isnt broken?


Boxer Disconnecting During TSL?

comments like these are kinda dumb. sure I am up for lans and all but in order for TSL to be LAN, boxer and his opponent would have had to meet up and some pc bang or some thing. so without online matches, boxer n his opponent may not have even played -_-
disconnects at GSLs or tourneys that play locally are what could have been prevented with lan.



Boxer was complaining after the games on 2 SEC DELAY .

If u don't know how much that is then the one dumb is u.

How you wan't to participate in tournaments that are worth $10k++ with that huge latency?

Blizzard is crazy.
http://sc2ranks.com/c/9051/slayersteam/ <-- SlayerS players in Grandmaster !
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 21 25 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
Clem vs Krystianer
uThermal vs SKillousLIVE!
Reynor vs MaNa
Lambo vs Gerald
RotterdaM1393
ComeBackTV 1371
IndyStarCraft 400
WardiTV179
CranKy Ducklings169
Rex121
3DClanTV 76
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1393
IndyStarCraft 400
Rex 121
ProTech65
BRAT_OK 64
MindelVK 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 49956
Horang2 7925
Hyuk 2159
EffOrt 1729
Barracks 1113
Larva 794
BeSt 788
firebathero 515
Hyun 470
Mini 456
[ Show more ]
Stork 437
Soulkey 294
Rush 278
Last 277
Shine 99
Sharp 61
Shinee 55
Dewaltoss 49
sorry 46
sSak 41
sas.Sziky 38
Movie 38
Free 36
zelot 19
Icarus 15
yabsab 12
Terrorterran 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Dota 2
qojqva3155
XcaliburYe668
Counter-Strike
sgares298
oskar161
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor294
Other Games
B2W.Neo1967
Beastyqt743
Hui .309
DeMusliM246
Fuzer 169
QueenE42
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH328
• tFFMrPink 18
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3500
• WagamamaTV905
League of Legends
• Nemesis2059
• Jankos1266
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1h 4m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5h 4m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 21h
WardiTV European League
2 days
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.