EPTDisconnects Today
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Cell.cell
United States46 Posts
| ||
|
KebertXela
United States322 Posts
| ||
|
Chronopolis
Canada1484 Posts
| ||
|
Thunderfist
Poland159 Posts
The infection came from EU and passed onto US ! | ||
|
sushiko
197 Posts
| ||
|
littlechava
United States7221 Posts
| ||
|
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
I disconnected about 4 times, each counted as a lose, I could care less about the ladder but it is still annoying especially at like 1400~ diamond T_T | ||
|
gogogadgetflow
United States2583 Posts
| ||
|
peachsncream
United States289 Posts
| ||
|
Kyhol
Canada2575 Posts
I have 10mb internet so it has nothing to do with that. | ||
|
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
On September 26 2010 06:24 peachsncream wrote: 1400 diamond is nothing, try being at 1800-1900 and getting +2-4 for a win and -20+ for a lose, but ya i been discing like 5 games I wasn't bragging it is just annoying as I would like to practice without getting disconnected. | ||
|
Dionyseus
United States2068 Posts
On September 26 2010 06:29 Khol wrote: since the new patch has came out I disconnect almost everygame. It's really irritating. It''s gotten to the point where I can't even go to search for games anymore because i get disconnected when I go to the screen that lets you choose 1v1 2v2 3v3 4v4 FFA. I have 10mb internet so it has nothing to do with that. Tried repairing the install yet? | ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
Hooray for bnet 2.0 and terrible players getting undeserved results | ||
|
tok
United States691 Posts
| ||
|
kyarisan
United States347 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On September 26 2010 06:38 kyarisan wrote: what was the tourney / players, orb? just out of curiosity DC/MD Cyberground Tourney IsAi had 1/3 of the income I had and was all in off one base. I was on two base with an equal army, 3x the income, higher tech, and better positioning when the disconnect happened. The admins ruled a regame. To give a history of the match, IsAi literally did the exact same build all three games (all in infantry off one base). First game I lost, second game I easily held it off after I knew what was coming and took a shit on his face. Third game was going even better than the second game (laughed at his first push with 7 SCVs and killed it all without losing a unit) and then it disconnected. On the re-game he fast expanded (might have been 14CC, was extremely early) since he had all in'd off one base the first 3 games. He wouldn't've had that opportunity to change his playstyle and fake me out without the disconnect as it was a bo3 not bo5, and thus since he had already lost the bo3 he lost the tournament. However, since the admins ruled for a regame and he abused this opportunity, he beat me with the fast expansion and proceeded to trash talk profusely and advance to the semifinals where he got absolutely man-handled by gretorp anyways since his all-in playstyle is truly awful | ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On September 26 2010 06:43 iCCup.Diamond wrote: We are having problems here at the Sparty LAN Party. Some people can play fine while people 15 feet away are lagging and getting dc'd. tt every single time someone hosts a LAN there are problems with SC2. Blizzard is a bunch of assholes for not giving us LAN play. At this point the argument for not having LAN it is so outmatched by the argument to have LAN. Their promise was that we wouldn't need LAN because bnet 2.0 would be so amazing, but thus far even after release of the game it's causing problems constantly | ||
|
tok
United States691 Posts
On September 26 2010 06:44 -orb- wrote: every single time someone hosts a LAN there are problems with SC2. Blizzard is a bunch of assholes for not giving us LAN play. At this point the argument for not having LAN it is so outmatched by the argument to have LAN. Their promise was that we wouldn't need LAN because bnet 2.0 would be so amazing, but thus far even after release of the game it's causing problems constantly Blizzard wants LAN to happen, but they can't just poof it into the game over night. Stop raging and get over it, you lost. | ||
Kinky
United States4126 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On September 26 2010 06:47 tok wrote: Blizzard wants LAN to happen, but they can't just poof it into the game over night. Stop raging and get over it, you lost. 1: They don't want LAN. You think they're busy programming it? They already have LAN play in official blizzard licensed events like MLG etc. They just refuse to give it to normal players and tournaments that aren't officially licensed 2: I didn't lose. I won 2-1. | ||
|
Weavel
Finland9223 Posts
| ||
|
Denizen[9]
United States649 Posts
| ||
|
Squirrel
United States1099 Posts
On September 26 2010 06:50 -orb- wrote: 1: They don't want LAN. You think they're busy programming it? They already have LAN play in official blizzard licensed events like MLG etc. They just refuse to give it to normal players and tournaments that aren't officially licensed . Hmm? | ||
|
SONE
Canada839 Posts
| ||
|
zak
Korea (South)1009 Posts
| ||
|
Tenshik
124 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
Instead of just saying "hmm?" which accomplishes nothing and makes you seem ignorant (which you are), why don't you go look up interviews with blizzard where they said we won't get LAN play but that a special LAN-enabled client would be used at blizzard-sanctioned tournament events. | ||
|
KebertXela
United States322 Posts
On September 26 2010 07:08 -orb- wrote: Instead of just saying "hmm?" which accomplishes nothing and makes you seem ignorant (which you are), why don't you go look up interviews with blizzard where they said we won't get LAN play but that a special LAN-enabled client would be used at blizzard-sanctioned tournament events. That official Tournament LAN isn't even out yet AFAIK. | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
something may be up.. | ||
|
Tenshik
124 Posts
 Sorry the referees suck and couldn't see the clear advantage (from what you said). | ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On September 26 2010 07:11 Tenshik wrote: Btw orb, you were playing at the DC/MD LAN? Thought about going but work :/ good thing I didn't, I see gretorp and you were there, I'd get roflstomped Sorry the referees suck and couldn't see the clear advantage (from what you said).Replay's up in the thread if you want to see Everyone that has seen it has said the terran was either at a large disadvantage or plain didn't have a chance. Either way in a disconnect situation the win should be awarded to such a large advantage. These retarded rules support people just pulling the plug when they start to get a disadvantage. | ||
|
SiN]
United States540 Posts
| ||
|
Cammalleri
Canada190 Posts
On September 26 2010 06:42 -orb- wrote: DC/MD Cyberground Tourney IsAi had 1/3 of the income I had and was all in off one base. I was on two base with an equal army, 3x the income, higher tech, and better positioning when the disconnect happened. The admins ruled a regame. To give a history of the match, IsAi literally did the exact same build all three games (all in infantry off one base). First game I lost, second game I easily held it off after I knew what was coming and took a shit on his face. Third game was going even better than the second game (laughed at his first push with 7 SCVs and killed it all without losing a unit) and then it disconnected. On the re-game he fast expanded (might have been 14CC, was extremely early) since he had all in'd off one base the first 3 games. He wouldn't've had that opportunity to change his playstyle and fake me out without the disconnect as it was a bo3 not bo5, and thus since he had already lost the bo3 he lost the tournament. However, since the admins ruled for a regame and he abused this opportunity, he beat me with the fast expansion and proceeded to trash talk profusely and advance to the semifinals where I guarantee he will get his face shit on by literally anyone else in this tournament as his crappy all in playstyle doesn't fly with players like gretorp and lastshadow Just saw that noob losing to a one scv harass so i know how you feel :p | ||
|
Squirrel
United States1099 Posts
On September 26 2010 07:08 -orb- wrote: Instead of just saying "hmm?" which accomplishes nothing and makes you seem ignorant (which you are), why don't you go look up interviews with blizzard where they said we won't get LAN play but that a special LAN-enabled client would be used at blizzard-sanctioned tournament events. Alright, how about instead you read the interviews saying they don't have one made? Here is where the rumor was started. http://www.sc2blog.com/2010/06/14/starcraft-ii-professional-edition-with-lan-support/ Here is where is was proven false. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=132653 ChrisSi: any rumors you've heard about a "pro edition" are just rumors. We've made no official announcements about that. We will address the needs of pro tournaments and eSports in a patch in the months after the release of SC2. (Guest 200) The first was June 14th, the second July 15th. Plus, the GSL is not on LAN. Neither was IEM. Both Blizzard sanctioned. Ball is in your court, Orb. | ||
|
Sanguinarius
United States3427 Posts
| ||
|
Thunderfist
Poland159 Posts
MLG uses battle.net like everyone else. | ||
|
Slago
Canada726 Posts
| ||
|
Williowa
129 Posts
Edit: Yes, I got dropped unexpectedly today, but something I've been noticing in custom games is people who are "pending" but don't ever get into the game, but the game starts without them anyways. Also been seeing blank screens with nothing in the place where players usually are, but I can still talk in chat. That might be on my end though. | ||
|
FreeZEternal
Korea (South)3396 Posts
| ||
|
Rjay
Canada73 Posts
| ||
|
Tazza
Korea (South)1678 Posts
| ||
|
SlowBlink
United States102 Posts
| ||
|
jroc242
Canada22 Posts
| ||
|
Jermstuddog
United States2231 Posts
I initially thought it was my internet connection, so I did what any computer nub does. "run cmd, ping -t yahoo.com" Sure enough, I'm spiking into the 500s and 1000s VERY often. Then I was like, ok, this game is unplayable... As soon as I close SC2, 70ms all day long. Opening up other games doesn't do anything, but SC2 is killing my intarwebs right now... | ||
|
Misanthrope
United States924 Posts
Guess I met my goal of reaching 800 rating. YEEEAAAH! | ||
|
CheeseGrater
United States290 Posts
| ||
|
Phanekim
United States777 Posts
| ||
|
rally_point
Canada458 Posts
| ||
|
Flavalanche
United States164 Posts
| ||
|
Daozzt
United States1263 Posts
| ||
|
Toxiferous
United States388 Posts
On September 26 2010 06:50 Kinky wrote: I got the "Waiting for Server" popup in the middle of a game with the surrender button, first time I've ever seen it. Good thing it was only a custom game. I got this too, and those odd mini-freezes where it freezes for a second then fast forwards through what you missed Figured it was my stuff overheating or something, but now I dunno | ||
|
rockslave
Brazil318 Posts
Even considering it was a hacker.. | ||
|
kentonator
Vatican City State95 Posts
| ||
|
DethAdder
United States164 Posts
On September 29 2010 02:45 kentonator wrote: i cant even open starcraft, once it gets to the log on screen it just shuts down Same here. Was like wtf? . Was expecting the updater to come up or something, but then,,, nothing. grrr. | ||
|
Steelflight-Rx
United States1389 Posts
On September 29 2010 02:59 DethAdder wrote: Same here. Was like wtf? . Was expecting the updater to come up or something, but then,,, nothing. grrr. same problem here T_T looks like US server is down? can anyone confirm otherwise? | ||
|
electronicJustice
United States6 Posts
| ||
|
awu25
United States2003 Posts
| ||
|
DethAdder
United States164 Posts
| ||
|
Bensio
United Kingdom621 Posts
On September 29 2010 03:22 DethAdder wrote: ooo patching now Yay! nop | ||
| ||
