|
On June 05 2010 05:35 BeMannerDuPenner wrote:
megan fox is the most overrated girl ever anyways.
and i really dont care about the girls in transformers . all i want is a fun to watch movie with shittons of explosions and fighting robots.
Eva Mendes is more overrated than Megan Fox by a fair margin. Sure she's hot but how did she ever get number 1 anywhere.
And I think you just don't like girls if you prefer Michael Bay's ridiculous CGI.
|
On June 06 2010 05:58 Jibba wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2010 04:27 Reason wrote:Yes 7mk my point exactly. What I'm saying is that woman is pretty damn skinny yet very attractive.. I don't think it's reasonable to expect women to be slimmer in fact it's downright unhealthy and unnattractive.. If I could have that girl in that picture as she is or with 10-20lbs extra I'd choose the larger girl. On June 06 2010 03:44 AmstAff wrote:titts in spoiler + Show Spoiler +On June 06 2010 02:36 backtoback wrote:![[image loading]](http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kwv6rt9DEn1qzoaqio1_400.jpg) yaa.... ugly.. lol the animal looks so happy on that picture^^ Lol yes it does!!! I'm jealous  Just because a woman is skinny doesn't mean she starved herself to get there. Many probably do, but not all. A forum full of asian Starcraft players should be the first to realize that there's multiple ways to be skinny.
Regardless, the point is that a lot of supermodels are underweight.
1. It's not healthy.
2. It's not attractive.
|
On June 06 2010 06:07 Reason wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2010 05:58 Jibba wrote:On June 06 2010 04:27 Reason wrote:Yes 7mk my point exactly. What I'm saying is that woman is pretty damn skinny yet very attractive.. I don't think it's reasonable to expect women to be slimmer in fact it's downright unhealthy and unnattractive.. If I could have that girl in that picture as she is or with 10-20lbs extra I'd choose the larger girl. On June 06 2010 03:44 AmstAff wrote:titts in spoiler + Show Spoiler +On June 06 2010 02:36 backtoback wrote:yaa.... ugly.. lol the animal looks so happy on that picture^^ Lol yes it does!!! I'm jealous Just because a woman is skinny doesn't mean she starved herself to get there. Many probably do, but not all. A forum full of asian Starcraft players should be the first to realize that there's multiple ways to be skinny. Regardless, the point is that a lot of supermodels are underweight. 1. It's not healthy. 2. It's not attractive.
Disregard what I personally believe right, but if you think supermodels are not attractive, I would suggest you ask yourself, why are they supermodels then?
They're supermodels because they're just about as attractive as it gets as far as public opinion goes. So it's your opinion that they're not attractive. It's far from objective.
|
On June 06 2010 06:34 Djzapz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2010 06:07 Reason wrote:On June 06 2010 05:58 Jibba wrote:On June 06 2010 04:27 Reason wrote:Yes 7mk my point exactly. What I'm saying is that woman is pretty damn skinny yet very attractive.. I don't think it's reasonable to expect women to be slimmer in fact it's downright unhealthy and unnattractive.. If I could have that girl in that picture as she is or with 10-20lbs extra I'd choose the larger girl. On June 06 2010 03:44 AmstAff wrote:titts in spoiler + Show Spoiler +On June 06 2010 02:36 backtoback wrote:yaa.... ugly.. lol the animal looks so happy on that picture^^ Lol yes it does!!! I'm jealous Just because a woman is skinny doesn't mean she starved herself to get there. Many probably do, but not all. A forum full of asian Starcraft players should be the first to realize that there's multiple ways to be skinny. Regardless, the point is that a lot of supermodels are underweight. 1. It's not healthy. 2. It's not attractive. Disregard what I personally believe right, but if you think supermodels are not attractive, I would suggest you ask yourself, why are they supermodels then? They're supermodels because they're just about as attractive as it gets as far as public opinion goes. So it's your opinion that they're not attractive. It's far from objective.
Did I say super models weren't attractive?
Super models are picked for their figure and often quite abnormal looks, not because the majority of the public thinks that girls who look anorexic with masculine faces are the most attractive.
Regardless the point I'm making is that most supermodels are attractive despite their unnatural thinness, not because of it.
I am obviously well aware of the shift in perception of beauty over the centuries from larger to smaller women... however this has gone too far and I'm pretty damn sure this isn't a minority opinion.
There was a series of images recently I guess you didn't see it.. it was supermodels without their makeup and fancy clothes and basically a lot of them were quite ugly.. very angular/odd faces.
This is what flies with fashion, not 100% attractiveness.
|
On June 05 2010 05:35 BeMannerDuPenner wrote:
megan fox is the most overrated girl ever anyways.
and i really dont care about the girls in transformers . all i want is a fun to watch movie with shittons of explosions and fighting robots.
My thoughts exactly, Megan might be hot but when it comes to the actual purpose of the movie series Transformers, who cares if its her or not?
|
Transformers 1 was actually pretty good I thought. Just like 95% of the other sequels to various movies that hollywood churn out every year, Transformers 2 was no exception - it was less than horribly awful. So there was no surprise that it sucked on so many different levels; I mean even the hardcore transformers fans were like: "serioulsy?..."
By the looks of it - having a victoria's secret bimbo model(Huntington) trying to fill the shoes og Megan fox, Transformers 3 will - if possible - be even worse than it's big brother. This momentarily makes me a little sad, because transformers is so cool(if you're an oldschool transformers/power rangers/turtles nerd like me) and nostalgic. With these productions however, it sorta ruins the whole legacy of it.
BoXoFFiCe_NuMBeRs_ftW -_-
Oh yeah and, I wasn't at all saying Megan Fox is a good actor. She's not. But I mean atleast she's an actor and not merely a lingerie model with amounts of botox in her lips that makes me wonder if the girl has some kind of lipstick allergies.
|
On June 06 2010 07:40 LuckyLuke43 wrote:
Transformers 1 was actually pretty good I thought. Just like 95% of the other sequels to various movies that hollywood churn out every year, Transformers 2 was no exception - it was less than horribly awful. So there was no surprise that it sucked on so many different levels; I mean even the hardcore transformers fans were like: "serioulsy?..."
By the looks of it - having a victoria's secret bimbo model(Huntington) trying to fill the shoes og Megan fox, Transformers 3 will - if possible - be even worse than it's big brother. This momentarily makes me a little sad, because transformers is so cool(if you're an oldschool transformers/power rangers/turtles nerd like me) and nostalgic. With these productions however, it sorta ruins the whole legacy of it.
BoXoFFiCe_NuMBeRs_ftW -_-
Oh yeah and, I wasn't at all saying Megan Fox is a good actor. She's not. But I mean atleast she's an actor and not merely a lingerie model with amounts of botox in her lips that makes me wonder if the girl has some kind of lipstick allergies.
I can't argue with that, lol.
|
|
|
On June 06 2010 07:40 LuckyLuke43 wrote:
Transformers 1 was actually pretty good I thought. Just like 95% of the other sequels to various movies that hollywood churn out every year, Transformers 2 was no exception - it was less than horribly awful. So there was no surprise that it sucked on so many different levels; I mean even the hardcore transformers fans were like: "serioulsy?..."
By the looks of it - having a victoria's secret bimbo model(Huntington) trying to fill the shoes og Megan fox, Transformers 3 will - if possible - be even worse than it's big brother. This momentarily makes me a little sad, because transformers is so cool(if you're an oldschool transformers/power rangers/turtles nerd like me) and nostalgic. With these productions however, it sorta ruins the whole legacy of it.
BoXoFFiCe_NuMBeRs_ftW -_-
Oh yeah and, I wasn't at all saying Megan Fox is a good actor. She's not. But I mean atleast she's an actor and not merely a lingerie model with amounts of botox in her lips that makes me wonder if the girl has some kind of lipstick allergies.
I agree with everything except the part where Transformers 1 is pretty good. It's only OK.
|
The first transformers was terrible and I I couldn't even be bothered to watch a trailer for the second.
With that said, megan fox is hot and so is this new girl.
|
this new girl looks so upper class british lol. It's like there's a secret factory which makes girls like her and keira knightley that's set to some sort of edwardian clockwork mechanism, and then spews them into American culture or into British period films.
|
On June 05 2010 05:21 genwar wrote:
Why does there EVEN NEED TO BE A LOVE INTEREST?
for boobs retard, you really dont know hollywood do you?
|
On June 06 2010 11:13 XKiller wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2010 05:21 genwar wrote:
Why does there EVEN NEED TO BE A LOVE INTEREST? for boobs retard, you really dont know hollywood do you?
BTW i was joking i dont really think that.I dont want to start somthing
|
She was the only reason I enjoyed these movies ;( I don't like this new girl.
|
How about hiring a..I don't know...a hot looking actor
|
^yes.
imo, i found transformers one pretty cool, and the second one sorta boring. over-hyped it i guess. and love interests are apart of every hollywood movie. even if they're totally irrelevant and stupid.
|
That was the most retarded review I ever had the misfortune to listen to.
|
On June 06 2010 00:58 despite wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2010 06:43 ZeroCartin wrote:The pic on that article doesnt do her justice  ![[image loading]](http://www.listown.com/images/celebrity/200901/Rosie-Huntington-Whiteley-20090120041307.jpg) So they are going for the anorexic type looking as old as a schoolgirl again? Not a big surprise. I notice a lot of pedophilic trends in movies nowadays.
LOL
|
The 1980's Transformers were and still are the best....
|
I'm still confused how the plot can go on without megan fox.
I'll probably watch Transformers 3 and be like What?!?! doesn't add up
I have no idea how this is going to work, I hope megan fox comes back!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
