Artosis vs Louder Showmatch

On February 28 2010 04:53 blade55555 wrote:
But aren't they restricted to the servers I heard you can't switch?

On February 28 2010 04:55 FrozenArbiter wrote:

Yes, and Artosis is on the same server as Louder It's based on nationality and not location I think.

On February 28 2010 05:07 thing_one wrote:
It isn't on the schedule; does that mean it is not happening?

On February 28 2010 05:34 Jyvblamo wrote:
Artosis didn't mention his showmatch at the end of the TSL broadcast.
Maybe it's not happening? :x

On February 28 2010 05:40 Artosis wrote:
its in 6 hours

On February 28 2010 05:46 WiljushkA wrote:
is it gonna be recorded for us EU tz guys?

On February 28 2010 05:40 Artosis wrote:
its in 6 hours

On February 28 2010 05:55 FictionJV wrote:


pf, louder vs artosis > sleep

It's sunday tomorrow anyway :p

If we will have someone commentating on the match:
Who will be commentating? *hopes for tasteless*

On February 28 2010 06:14 G4MR wrote:
Can someone post an exact time?

On February 28 2010 06:15 HazMat wrote:

Around 10pm EST today

On February 28 2010 06:37 itmeJP wrote:
The showmatch between EG.Louder and Artosis will be posted tonight in parts on YouTube on the MLG Channel. Because it is MLG's first recording with Starcraft, we will not be streaming this live so if there are any hiccups we can edit them. Future events, however, will be streamed live.

Day[9] will be casting this tonight along with myself. We'll be shooting for a 7 p.m. PST (9 p.m. CST) recording time. It will be a best-of-5 series and shouldn't take longer then two hours. If there aren't any big edits then we will begin uploading them to YouTube immediately.

Map rotation for tonight is Lost Temple > Steppes of War > Desert Oasis > Kulas Ravine > Scrap Station.

I'm pretty sure we will post a more official post on TL.net after we're done recording tonight so look for that. Looking forward to it!

On February 28 2010 06:37 itmeJP wrote:
The showmatch between EG.Louder and Artosis will be posted tonight in parts on YouTube on the MLG Channel. Because it is MLG's first recording with Starcraft, we will not be streaming this live so if there are any hiccups we can edit them. Future events, however, will be streamed live.

Day[9] will be casting this tonight along with myself. We'll be shooting for a 7 p.m. PST (9 p.m. CST) recording time. It will be a best-of-5 series and shouldn't take longer then two hours. If there aren't any big edits then we will begin uploading them to YouTube immediately.

Map rotation for tonight is Lost Temple > Steppes of War > Desert Oasis > Kulas Ravine > Scrap Station.

I'm pretty sure we will post a more official post on TL.net after we're done recording tonight so look for that. Looking forward to it!

On February 28 2010 11:54 N3rV[Green] wrote:
So if the match starts...right around soonish....and it was said to probably take around a time between 1 and 2 hours, when do people think the vods will be up for the masses?

On February 28 2010 11:56 baeracaed wrote:
Anybody know if Day[9] is streaming this or just commentating for the VOD?

On February 28 2010 11:56 baeracaed wrote:
Anybody know if Day[9] is streaming this or just commentating for the VOD?

On February 28 2010 12:10 RyanS wrote:
I wish they would have done some sort of stream so we could show MLG the type of following we have.

On February 28 2010 12:50 Elec wrote:
Ne news on this?

On February 28 2010 13:31 itmeJP wrote:
We just finished recording. Expect the matches to be up in an hour or so I would think (edit) on the MLG YouTube Channel

My name is JP McDaniel and I was co-casting with Day[9]. Don't hate me because I'm affiliated with the World of Warcraft scene!

I would LOVE any feedback you guys can give me on anything about the VOD. I work directly with the producer / editor / director for the show and can implement (good) changes.

Sorry for the match not being live we just wanted to make sure everything went well and use this as a test before we start pushing content out live.

Races were...
+ Show Spoiler +

Thanks for all the interest and hopefully you guys like the video! Day[9] will make a post once all the VODs have been uploaded.

On February 28 2010 13:31 itmeJP wrote:
My name is JP McDaniel and I was co-casting with Day[9]. Don't hate me because I'm affiliated with the World of Warcraft scene!

On February 28 2010 14:17 zerglingsfolife wrote:
Does anyone have any information about MLG? I looked them up on Wikipedia and it seems interesting. Would there be any cons if MLG picked up SC2?

On February 28 2010 14:17 zerglingsfolife wrote:
Does anyone have any information about MLG? I looked them up on Wikipedia and it seems interesting. Would there be any cons if MLG picked up SC2?

On February 28 2010 14:21 EsX_Raptor wrote:
What race has been Artosis playing? Terran?

On February 28 2010 14:21 EsX_Raptor wrote:
What race has been Artosis playing? Terran?

On February 28 2010 14:20 Zed03 wrote:


MLG deals with console gaming, so picking up something like Starcraft 2 would be... unique. They had very limited steps into the PC world.

On February 28 2010 14:26 lawjeek wrote:


Which makes me sad because i think SC and CS are the 2 most competitive gaming communities out there, i just hope SC2 adds to this, because those games are beyond ancient in the computer age... even though i love them both, SC CS are the letters magical? will the 2 fuck it up for sc2...? time will tell, the source definitely fucked it up for cs:source imo...

On February 28 2010 14:20 Zed03 wrote:


MLG deals with console gaming, so picking up something like Starcraft 2 would be... unique. They had very limited steps into the PC world.

On February 28 2010 14:28 BladeRunner wrote:


Don't forget Quake 3, and Quake Live which will should be out of beta and have a media push extremely soon (according to what Carmack was saying at QuakeCon it should have already happened I thought) I played a lot of competitive CS and Q3 growing up

On February 28 2010 14:41 BladeRunner wrote:
LOL, I like your logic Yeah Quake is good for 1v1 but I agree with you strategy is also extremely fun to watch. Q3 has that too though with CTF. The spectated/broadcasted matches at QuakeCon were extremely fun to watch when they go down to the wire.

On February 28 2010 14:45 lawjeek wrote:


Didn't know there was competitve CTF for Q3 v-v. I would just watch the pro 1v1s @ big international tournies i followed for cs anyway. I loved playing CTF and CTF instagib for UT... Any competition still go on for that?

On February 28 2010 15:03 UbiNax wrote:
guess ill just watch it when i wake up then

On February 28 2010 15:12 Tazan_0 wrote:
Whats the youtube channel itl b up on?

On February 28 2010 15:07 TryThis wrote:


nuts to that, if its on within the next hour or so ill right here watching

On February 28 2010 15:31 Elec wrote:
srry im not very familiar with youtube but for me it says

""Starcraft 2 Beta Artosis vs. Louder 2"
This video is private."

On February 28 2010 15:34 Zed03 wrote:


video isnt up yet

On February 28 2010 15:34 Zed03 wrote:


video isnt up yet

On February 28 2010 15:41 itmeJP wrote:
We're waiting to release them all at once. Be patient sirs!

On February 28 2010 15:41 itmeJP wrote:
We're waiting to release them all at once. Be patient sirs!

On February 28 2010 15:42 Elec wrote:


ahh

eta?

On February 28 2010 15:45 brn4meplz wrote:
Why not game 1. we can watch game 1, while you guys compile game 2, and etc.

On February 28 2010 15:47 lawjeek wrote:


because they are SADISTS(jp ofc )

On February 28 2010 16:20 Gallimatias wrote:
No more WL. Now we wait.

On February 28 2010 16:50 jawknee530 wrote:
Just about midnight here on the west coast. Any idea of an eta yet?

On February 28 2010 17:07 baeracaed wrote:
It's times like these that remind me how stubborn I am.

On February 28 2010 17:17 itmeJP wrote:
Yeah. I apologize guys. I was underestimating how long it takes for YouTube to process things.

Looks like one is left uploading while the others process. I'll post them tonight before I sleep though 100%.

Sorry again!

On February 28 2010 17:17 itmeJP wrote:
Yeah. I apologize guys. I was underestimating how long it takes for YouTube to process things.

Looks like one is left uploading while the others process. I'll post them tonight before I sleep though 100%.

Sorry again!

On February 28 2010 17:17 itmeJP wrote:
Yeah. I apologize guys. I was underestimating how long it takes for YouTube to process things.

Looks like one is left uploading while the others process. I'll post them tonight before I sleep though 100%.

Sorry again!

On February 28 2010 17:25 jawknee530 wrote:
Is it sad that I work at 7:30am tomorrow morning and I'm sitting here at 12:24am with a beer in my hand waiting for youtube to process HD videos?

On February 28 2010 17:25 jawknee530 wrote:
Is it sad that I work at 7:30am tomorrow morning and I'm sitting here at 12:24am with a beer in my hand waiting for youtube to process HD videos?

On February 28 2010 17:39 Zed03 wrote:
stilll waiting

On February 28 2010 17:55 father_mitch wrote:
So did everyone else watching Psyonic Reaver's livestream just get spoiled?

On February 28 2010 18:02 Puosu wrote:
Is it true that MLG forbids players from wearing team unfiroms and essentially you have to "sell your soul" to MLG to become a pro in their leagues? Thats what I've been reading about the Halo 3 professional scene.

And if its going to be like that for SC2 I really don't want them to enter the scene.. I guess they really can't do that though because they definitely aren't the only source for money in SC2 like it is in Halo 3.

On February 28 2010 18:19 itmeJP wrote:
So, just got the word from higher ups. The video won't be tagged live until tomorrow (not sure what time -- waiting on an e-mail).

I apologize for all the bull$&^* teasing the past four hours but hopefully it will all be worth the wait. And I think Psyonic_Reaver did just spoil it in his stream

/flamesuiton

[B]
http://www.cinemablend.com/games/MLG-Turns-Pro-Gaming-Into-Backstabbing-Travesty-14817.html
Does this mean MLG has this kind of control over the Halo 3 teams? Lol thats terrible whattf.

On February 28 2010 18:02 Puosu wrote:
Is it true that MLG forbids players from wearing team unfiroms and essentially you have to "sell your soul" to MLG to become a pro in their leagues? Thats what I've been reading about the Halo 3 professional scene.

And if its going to be like that for SC2 I really don't want them to enter the scene.. I guess they really can't do it like that in SC2 though because they don't have the same monopoly they had in Halo.

edit:
http://www.mlgpro.com/content/page/116416/MLG-Naming-Rules-Clarification
this alone is pretty fucking harsh imo.. it reaches the same level of nazism KeSPA does, why interfere with things that wont hurt them in anyway? Why does it matter if a team is called "Team Pandemic" for example or "Evil Gamers" or something..

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/MLG-Turns-Pro-Gaming-Into-Backstabbing-Travesty-14817.html
Does this mean MLG has this kind of control over the Halo 3 teams? Lol thats terrible whattf.

On February 28 2010 18:27 InToTheWannaB wrote:

no flames, we all have bosses who like to fuck with us because they can. dance puppet dance!

On February 28 2010 18:58 Asta wrote:


well that just might be an easy way to keep sympathies. blaming it on the anonymous 'higher ups'.

On February 28 2010 19:09 kickinhead wrote:
Is this MLG this US-League which was also televised and have those hilarious team-names like football-teams and stuff? Like "The Oklahoma Mexican Staring Frog's of souther Sri-Lanka?".

On February 28 2010 19:05 zerglingsfolife wrote:
I'm glad I stayed up 2 more hours to watch the video,,, then I got the result spoiled on Psyonics stream. Then I found out the video isn't coming out tonight.

Also, those articles on the MLG don't exactly paint them in the best light either.

On February 28 2010 19:12 ven wrote:


I think you're referring to the CGS. They had team names like Carolina Core or LA Complexity.

On February 28 2010 19:26 Day[9] wrote:
ahahah my sincerest apologies to all here. I actually credit myself for the bulk of everyone's disappointment. I promoted my little heart out because I was pumped for the event! However, I misunderstood and thought the stream was going to be live. Then, it turned out it was going to be recorded and I said they'd be posted earlier. Then, I find this out! My bad!

It's a good thing this was the first test run, getting all this junk out of the way. As we found out, there were quite a few technical hiccups due to the B.net 2.0 and party systems. Still a fun event so look forward to the videos when they arrive 8]

On February 28 2010 21:08 Dyno. wrote:
I don't really understand why big gaming organizations like ESL and MLG rely on YouTube for their videos

On February 28 2010 20:34 Psyonic_Reaver wrote:
Sorry for those that were spoiled on my stream. LzGamer just couldn't keep the mouth shut. --

On February 28 2010 23:24 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
i just woke up, is the video up yet?

On February 28 2010 18:56 thopol wrote:

I think you have put down some good words here mate. The problem here is that every fucker is going to be trying to get a piece of SC2 ESPORTS bucks. If the better folks can really compete with the draconian fuckers, then we've got ourselves a situation the market's going to solve. If there isn't a lot of interest and there are only a few parties who are fronting prize money, then we've just gotta go with what works or abandon ESPORTS altogether. Now I want the SC2 scene to be competitive enough that nobody gets a KeSPA style hold over it, but now is early. I think that supporting the pro scene just by making the game competitive in the first few weeks is a good thing, whether or not the folks doing it are the idea human beings.

So, as ESPORTS as a whole goes, I have always felt that MLG is misguided. Not only that, but they have policies, which you have pointed out, that are infuriating and are stunting the growth of ESPORTS (the more sponsors that can get in on the action the better, right?). In the short term, very very short term, depending on how things end up unfolding, MLG can still be a good thing, getting people to practice and play. In the longer term, they will need to change or they will be a very bad thing. That's how I see it.

On February 28 2010 23:24 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
i just woke up, is the video up yet?

On February 28 2010 21:08 Dyno. wrote:
I don't really understand why big gaming organizations like ESL and MLG rely on YouTube for their videos (some kind of contract maybe?), unless they're going to be uploading in HD. Then it's nice to let YouTube foot the bandwidth bill, I guess.

Take a site like HoNcast (http://www.honcast.com). A small, independent site, but they're able to upload their movies as soon as the match concludes (though they rarely do it that quickly) without having to worry about a long "processing" time.

I'm not trying to talk shit or anything, just genuinely confused.

On March 01 2010 00:07 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
where's the patience?

On February 28 2010 23:53 Jazriel wrote:
MLG is a horrible company, people are only now realizing that?

Don't even get me started on their ridiculous rule-sets for the games they play. I wouldn't be surprised if they ban cheeses or rush strats or something equally lame if they decide to take on SC2.

On March 01 2010 00:24 Signus wrote:


What do you mean ridiculous rule-sets? The rules for Halo 3 are only because Bungie messed up on the game a bit and they limit the weapons to the ones that are actually used at a competitive level. I can't think of any other games where they tinker with things, so I doubt Starcraft 2 will have anything like that.

The Halo 2 rules were garbage. It's been so long I barely remember but they banned the sword? They had some really retarded variants only snipers on colossus?

Oh and what was it, starting weapon was SMG? On coag? LOL

Halo 3 I don't know anything about 'cause that game is garbage and watching "MLG Pro's" play make me cringe at wasted shots and poor play. Way too many bugs/exploits/glitches/problems to take that game seriously. I am aware though that MLG has been getting better, but the company is still pretty pathetic from my point of view (as uneducated and outdated as it is).

On March 01 2010 01:09 frog HERO wrote:


banned sword? snipers only? SMG start? this must have been in like 04 or something because those were most definitely NOT the rules during the height of halo 2's popularity. i don't see how you can think a company is pathetic when you have already admitted you are uneducated on it's policies.

simply ridiculous

On March 01 2010 01:24 Jazriel wrote:


A company that starts poorly and even today allows cheats like BXR couldn't possibly have a good/positive track record.

On March 01 2010 01:50 BladeRunner wrote:
I'm a hardcore "if it's possible it's legal" type guy heh.

On March 01 2010 01:56 HazMat wrote:

I hope you mean just in games.

Because it's possible to kill some one.

On March 01 2010 01:05 Jazriel wrote:


The Halo 2 rules were garbage. It's been so long I barely remember but they banned the sword? They had some really retarded variants only snipers on colossus?

Oh and what was it, starting weapon was SMG? On coag? LOL

Halo 3 I don't know anything about 'cause that game is garbage and watching "MLG Pro's" play make me cringe at wasted shots and poor play. Way too many bugs/exploits/glitches/problems to take that game seriously. I am aware though that MLG has been getting better, but the company is still pretty pathetic from my point of view (as uneducated and outdated as it is).

On March 01 2010 02:19 defire wrote:


We have a winner here, Coagulation was never an MLG map, every map started with a BR no secondary, and most of MLG's rules are based on the input of the pros. Now you should stop bashing a company unless you either; play under contract for them and know these things, or actually attend an event and see for yourself. Don't blindly try bashing MLG because some youtube video isn't up on their first attempt at doing something like this. At least they are actually showing interest and willing to bring us a show match, because I didn't see any other company jumping the gun.

On February 28 2010 18:02 Puosu wrote:
http://www.cinemablend.com/games/MLG-Turns-Pro-Gaming-Into-Backstabbing-Travesty-14817.html
Does this mean MLG has this kind of control over the Halo 3 teams? Lol thats terrible whattf.

On March 01 2010 01:05 Jazriel wrote:


The Halo 2 rules were garbage. It's been so long I barely remember but they banned the sword? They had some really retarded variants only snipers on colossus?

Oh and what was it, starting weapon was SMG? On coag? LOL

Halo 3 I don't know anything about 'cause that game is garbage and watching "MLG Pro's" play make me cringe at wasted shots and poor play. Way too many bugs/exploits/glitches/problems to take that game seriously. I am aware though that MLG has been getting better, but the company is still pretty pathetic from my point of view (as uneducated and outdated as it is).

On March 01 2010 02:53 baeracaed wrote:
So much nerd sweat. anyway, at least we have the USA vs Canada match to watch 2 hours to pass some time.

On March 01 2010 03:20 oberon wrote:

I really, really, hope you're joking. You can't think of anything that starts an hour earlier that you might also watch?

--oberon

On March 01 2010 03:11 [p]Drake wrote:
I completely agree with OverShield. I have followed/been involved with the MLG Halo community since 2004-5 and it has grown by leaps and bounds since then. In a recent interview they said they now get about 500k unique views on their streams over the course of a tournament weekend. That is an IMPRESSIVE feat for an eSport. They have major sponsors: ESPN, Old Spice, Dr Pepper, BIC, Doritos, etc. I recently attended the finals in Orlando, FL and the events are very well run and professional.

MLG would probably be the best vehicle to give SC2 a viable pro scene. They already have a merry band of nerds waiting to watch hours of coverage and a big pool of money to offer up. I don't think that something like teamliquid will ever be replaced because it is THE place for starfcraft, but MLG is bringing eSports to the mainstream. Hopefully if this move happens the key people already in the SC community will take a lead role so it can be as successful as possible.

On March 01 2010 03:20 oberon wrote:


I really, really, hope you're joking. You can't think of anything that starts an hour earlier that you might also watch?

--oberon

On March 01 2010 03:31 baeracaed wrote:


Well the hockey match is going to be going way past TSL. I wouldn't miss it for the world man.

Edit: hmm maybe not.. Well I can't miss TSL final, you're right.

On March 01 2010 03:29 Mannerheim wrote:


Isn't MLG pretty much an exclusive deal for the teams, forbidding them to play for other organizations? I can't see many prominent SC2 players (from BW and Wc3) signing that.

On March 01 2010 03:29 Mannerheim wrote:


Isn't MLG pretty much an exclusive deal for the teams, forbidding them to play for other organizations? I can't see many prominent SC2 players (from BW and Wc3) signing that.

On March 01 2010 03:35 blade55555 wrote:


Yeah that and who cares about hockey?

On March 01 2010 03:45 Bosu wrote:

You don't think they would sign a contract for what MLG pays out? Because they pay A LOT. NO reason people wouldn't sign with them.

On March 01 2010 03:23 _rdm_ wrote:
The problem is American players want to watch shooting games and want to play shooting games. They are quite frankly easier to understand and easier to play.

On March 01 2010 03:49 Puosu wrote:
It could be good for the people getting in but overall it would be terrible for the growth of SC2 esports if we're limited to only one source for leagues, a source that does not even have any experience in StarCraft.

I really can't see MLG even trying to do such harsh monopoly as they did in Halo 3 though, I think the only reason they really could do so in Halo 3 was because there was no really any competition for them so it came naturally and they just played it safe and made their players only play for them.

And I don't want to come off as an anti-mlg person, I really would like them to be a huge part of SC2's success but I'm just hoping they don't become another KeSPA nazi.

On March 01 2010 03:56 Mannerheim wrote:


Even if MLG signed every well known BW player in US, if it was exclusive and isolated from international competition I wouldn't give two shits about their leagues/events.

I'm not anti-MLG either if they become just another SC2 organizer. But if they want to mimic KeSPA and dictate where and when their players can play, fuck them.

On March 01 2010 03:56 Mannerheim wrote:


Even if MLG signed every well known BW player in US, if it was exclusive and isolated from international competition I wouldn't give two shits about their leagues/events.

I'm not anti-MLG either if they become just another SC2 organizer. But if they want to mimic KeSPA and dictate where and when their players can play, fuck them.

On March 01 2010 03:59 Rothbardian wrote:Also, the top Halo players make more than the top SC players...so take that as you will :p

On March 01 2010 04:02 dacthehork wrote:


yes I support MLG if they do good tournaments/etc. But if it becomes some sort of monopoly, nazi contract (even worse than Kespa), or this whole "you have the name we want, team name we want, no personal sponsors" then fuck that. I don't want 1 show in town with control over a group of gamers. Because ultimately it exists to promote ITSELF and not the game/players.

We all know what happens when a monopolizing organization sees a new tournament/org (see how Kespa/SKT1 etc sought to undermine gomtv and keep pro gamers from playing in it?) They have their own interests way above that of expanding the sport/players/etc.

Also, the top Halo players make more than the top SC players...so take that as you will

By attending the Combine, each Player authorizes MLG and Combine Entities to film, record and/or photograph his or her voice and likeness ("Image"), and also grants MLG and Combine Entities the irrevocable right to use any footage, recordings or photographs of him or her recorded or taken during the Combine, or any reproduction or modification thereof (collectively, the "Recordings") in any manner and medium throughout the world an unlimited number of times in perpetuity for advertising, trade, promotion, exhibition or any other lawful purpose except where prohibited by law. By attending the Combine, except where prohibited by law each Player further waives any right of inspection or approval of the uses to which MLG may put the Recordings, and releases MLG from any and all claims arising out of or in connection with the Recordings, the Player’s Image or MLG’s use thereof.

Team Name Rules

1. No websites.
2. No use of “Major League Gaming” or its abbreviation (MLG).
3. No use of the word "Team".
4. No use of the words "Gamer" or "Gaming".
5. No derogatory, suggestive, or otherwise inappropriate Words/Meanings.
6. No corporations, company, sponsor, or product names.
7. Teams may not register for a Combine Competition or Pro Circuit Competition with a Team Name that closely resembles that of a current or former Pro Player or Pro Team.
8. Team Names are limited to 20 characters, including spaces.
9. Teams found violating any of the Team Name Rules will have their Team Name changed and will be instructed to rename their Team immediately.

On March 01 2010 04:12 dacthehork wrote:
LOL

so if boxer showed up to one of their events they would use his image on the box of porn videos or for every future advert. Is that even legal in most stateS?

Also sorry for pretty much every team (mouz/eg/etc), get ready to rename if you want in on MLG

I expect 0 koreans to attend unless they get special permission to use team name and not release their likeness/pictures for being used for eternity.

That is some really shady shit or over the top crap. Switch up the rules on company = team name as 99% of SC2 gamers will be in sponsored teams, and switch up this "release" of likeness for ANY advertising for all time.

By attending the Combine, each Player authorizes MLG and Combine Entities to film, record and/or photograph his or her voice and likeness ("Image"), and also grants MLG and Combine Entities the irrevocable right to use any footage, recordings or photographs of him or her recorded or taken during the Combine, or any reproduction or modification thereof (collectively, the "Recordings") in any manner and medium throughout the world an unlimited number of times in perpetuity for advertising, trade, promotion, exhibition or any other lawful purpose except where prohibited by law. By attending the Combine, except where prohibited by law each Player further waives any right of inspection or approval of the uses to which MLG may put the Recordings, and releases MLG from any and all claims arising out of or in connection with the Recordings, the Player’s Image or MLG’s use thereof.

On March 01 2010 07:59 Bosu wrote:
What is there to get pissed about lol? You people are ridiculous.

On March 01 2010 08:01 Puosu wrote:

Some people set their clocks to ring over 12 hours ago so they would wake up to watch the games.. instead they were told to wait for the commentated games to be uploaded to youtube. The videos get uploaded but remain private, apparently some genious from upper management of MLG wants to delay the release for some god forsaken reason.

What is there not to be pissed about?

On March 01 2010 08:13 Nebbs wrote:
That doesn't explain why they would delay releasing the videos, I cannot imagine a reason to keep them private once they are ALREADY on YouTube. I think that's the majority of whats pissing people off. It doesn't take 12hours for YouTube to process a video to HD either.

Also the lack of a response to even try to explain why we still don't have the videos. IMO it's very bad publicity for MLG as this is causing a lot of early hate for them and SC2 isn't even released yet..

On March 01 2010 08:16 hacpee wrote:
Probably has to do with blizzard and the fees it wants to collect.

On March 01 2010 08:19 [p]Drake wrote:
How do you know they are already on YouTube if you can't watch them?

On February 28 2010 15:35 icydergosu wrote:


It is, but as the guy prior said, its private. (they need to make it public)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54W2SB4YpYk