• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:30
CEST 06:30
KST 13:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams9Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 661 users

[Valor] Tasteless Statement - Page 3

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
SmokeMaxX
Profile Joined July 2009
United States17 Posts
July 01 2009 11:24 GMT
#41
Disagree. As a tournament, there are two interests in mind: entertaining the audience and respecting the competitors with a fair atmosphere. I'm sure the audience could care less what happened in this game as long as they saw good starcraft. However, out of all the possible outcomes, the most fair is that Game 2 be replayed. Regardless of anything else. As a competitor, you always want a good game. It's understandable if things are frustrating, but nobody deserves a free win unless rules are broken. To accept or even argue for a free win isn't right.

I have nothing against Strelok and he seems like a good guy, but inaction is sometimes just as bad as performing the wrong action. He should know in a competitive tournament that the best possible action for him to do would be to accept a Game 2 rematch or offer one. However, I can't pretend like he wouldn't be justified into feeling lucky that what was believed to be a "ref" ruled in his favor and gave him equal grounding to restart the series. But still, there is no point in later complaining about the changing of rulings.

There was a frustrating beginning, which is understandable. There was lag, which is understandable. There was a decision made that seemed to be the best thing to happen in the series for Strelok, which was later overturned (irritating and understandable). However, also understandable is that upon a disconnect, the game should be replayed as long as there is no clear winner. True, there may be some abuse of this, but is it worse to penalize a player that doesn't deserve it or let a few instances of potentially abusing the system through?

Also, I think the latest FBH vs. Flash game should show that even a game where one player has a "clear advantage" doesn't always result in a way for said player.
DTMDSK
Shauni
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
4077 Posts
July 01 2009 11:33 GMT
#42
Fenix was the lagger, Strelok had a huge advantage. Even if he didn't the one disconnecting should lose by default imo.
I'm taking whatever coverage I can get, because frankly, I'm busy working on this million dollar deal at my job. Early retirement is a good thing brotha man. - MessengerASL
Liquid`Nazgul
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
22427 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-01 11:58:24
July 01 2009 11:44 GMT
#43
The overturning of decisions is just a display of lack of integrity as an organization, where you don't have a rule that covers the case and you're evaluating on a case-by-case basis, which can result in bias. You can overturn it, and you probably have to, but the damage to your reputation is already done, and that was the whole point of Strelok's thread. Some people still think it was about the games, even after he said he wouldn't return even if they gave him the wins for free.

I'm not sure you get what happened but you really have got it backwards. Keeping the original decision shows clear 'bias', for Strelok (from going by the video interview). Overturning it shows objectivity. My argument is that your reputation will be better by overturning a bad decision instead of keeping it. I think you will find noone disagreeing that not making mistakes is the best.

Fenix was the lagger, Strelok had a huge advantage. Even if he didn't the one disconnecting should lose by default imo.

That is just an arbitrary rule set by mass-orgs such as Blizzard/WGTour etc because it is impossible to judge every game. In a well-ran smaller tournament that is definitely the worst solution. If you know which person disced, then that person should never get the win but that's about as far as it goes.
Administrator
Too_MuchZerg
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Finland2818 Posts
July 01 2009 11:45 GMT
#44
On July 01 2009 20:24 SmokeMaxX wrote:
Disagree. As a tournament, there are two interests in mind: entertaining the audience and respecting the competitors with a fair atmosphere. I'm sure the audience could care less what happened in this game as long as they saw good starcraft. However, out of all the possible outcomes, the most fair is that Game 2 be replayed. Regardless of anything else. As a competitor, you always want a good game. It's understandable if things are frustrating, but nobody deserves a free win unless rules are broken. To accept or even argue for a free win isn't right.

I have nothing against Strelok and he seems like a good guy, but inaction is sometimes just as bad as performing the wrong action. He should know in a competitive tournament that the best possible action for him to do would be to accept a Game 2 rematch or offer one. However, I can't pretend like he wouldn't be justified into feeling lucky that what was believed to be a "ref" ruled in his favor and gave him equal grounding to restart the series. But still, there is no point in later complaining about the changing of rulings.

There was a frustrating beginning, which is understandable. There was lag, which is understandable. There was a decision made that seemed to be the best thing to happen in the series for Strelok, which was later overturned (irritating and understandable). However, also understandable is that upon a disconnect, the game should be replayed as long as there is no clear winner. True, there may be some abuse of this, but is it worse to penalize a player that doesn't deserve it or let a few instances of potentially abusing the system through?

Also, I think the latest FBH vs. Flash game should show that even a game where one player has a "clear advantage" doesn't always result in a way for said player.


This is why, for example, Backho vs Firefist incident was ruled badly. Why? They started to chat with players and asking their ruling. Obviously they (players) have reputation to care about and Firefist couldn't request win for him. If KeSPA would have ruled win for Firefist and then later on said that they are changing rules to not let these things happen again, it would have been proper way to handle that situation because nobody could have blame players anymore.
foeffa
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Belgium2115 Posts
July 01 2009 11:45 GMT
#45
Props for clearing up the confusion.
觀過斯知仁矣.
Danka
Profile Blog Joined January 2004
Peru1018 Posts
July 01 2009 11:46 GMT
#46
On July 01 2009 20:33 Shauni wrote:
Fenix was the lagger, Strelok had a huge advantage. Even if he didn't the one disconnecting should lose by default imo.


where are you getting these facts? I'm curious because they directly contradict what Tasteless said:

"that there was no clear indication of who was going to win the game"
Its not the size of the dog in the fight, its the size of the fight in the dog. - Mark Twain
Shauni
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
4077 Posts
July 01 2009 11:54 GMT
#47
On July 01 2009 20:46 Danka wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2009 20:33 Shauni wrote:
Fenix was the lagger, Strelok had a huge advantage. Even if he didn't the one disconnecting should lose by default imo.


where are you getting these facts? I'm curious because they directly contradict what Tasteless said:

"that there was no clear indication of who was going to win the game"


That is just playing with words. There is never a clear indication until its OVER. He just didn't say Strelok had an advantage because that'd make his statement a bit diffuse. From Strelok's own post it is clear that he had a big advantage, but he had not made the finishing move yet.
I'm taking whatever coverage I can get, because frankly, I'm busy working on this million dollar deal at my job. Early retirement is a good thing brotha man. - MessengerASL
Universalmedia
Profile Joined July 2009
United States32 Posts
July 01 2009 12:15 GMT
#48
This sort of reminds me of the F-91 vs NoNy liquidbition. When F-91 was up 1-0 and then Nony cried about lag etc. And they decided on resetting the score and play it all over again. Man F-91 was such a pimp/MAN to agree to that cause he knows he was just THAT MUCH better than Nony. Maybe starting over is a trend in the pro scene but not yet adapted to the foreign scene. Maybe?
LG)Sabbath
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
Argentina3022 Posts
July 01 2009 12:23 GMT
#49
On July 01 2009 20:44 Liquid`Nazgul wrote:
Show nested quote +
The overturning of decisions is just a display of lack of integrity as an organization, where you don't have a rule that covers the case and you're evaluating on a case-by-case basis, which can result in bias. You can overturn it, and you probably have to, but the damage to your reputation is already done, and that was the whole point of Strelok's thread. Some people still think it was about the games, even after he said he wouldn't return even if they gave him the wins for free.

I'm not sure you get what happened but you really have got it backwards. Keeping the original decision shows clear 'bias', for Strelok (from going by the video interview). Overturning it shows objectivity. My argument is that your reputation will be better by overturning a bad decision instead of keeping it. I think you will find noone disagreeing that not making mistakes is the best.

I'm not saying that the overturning makes it biased, I'm saying that if you're overturning a decision, then you didn't have a rule to cover the case in the first place, so you were deciding on a case-by-case basis, which would have allowed for bias to appear. Later in the same post I agreed that overturning it would be best, but that the damage is done already anyway and you're already looking bad... you overturn the decision in an attempt to not look even worse as time goes by and the decision is analyzed by more and more people.
https://www.twitch.tv/argsabbath/
rei
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States3594 Posts
July 01 2009 12:25 GMT
#50
On July 01 2009 19:25 LG)Sabbath wrote:
The overturning of decisions is just a display of lack of integrity as an organization, where you don't have a rule that covers the case and you're evaluating on a case-by-case basis, which can result in bias. You can overturn it, and you probably have to, but the damage to your reputation is already done, and that was the whole point of Strelok's thread. Some people still think it was about the games, even after he said he wouldn't return even if they gave him the wins for free.

So the promise of a professional tournament run by a professional organization was clearly broken... it is understandable that Strelok is disappointed. Maybe he's just not in for the money, maybe he just wanted to be part of the pro scene for a while here and, the tournament being not what was promised, he had no reason to continue, as the prestige of winning it would be mostly if not completely gone.


What is integrity? is it fairness? lack of integrity as an organization means lacking in fairness?
What are rules? is it to protect fair play in the context of games? rules of iccup for not allowing maphack is to protect fair play right? rules of iccup for now allowing people to abuse the ladder is to protect fair play right?
When savior got reset by iccup because he played the same dude 20times in one day was because admins were following the rules to protect fair play. The admins would be right if savior had the need to abuse to get #1 rank on iccup.

When Gorush typed ppp instead of pp and the rule says that's a disqualification. What rule was applied here? the same rule that trying to protect fair play right? typing all game long to distract the other guy is not fair play, and hence there is a need of no typing rules.

What happens when the very same rule we created trying to protect fair play themselves are impeding fair play? the very same reason we created them in the first place? We should fucking ignore the rules. Rules are created by people, they are just guidelines in which the true value lies on the reason of why we needed the rules, not the rules themselves.

Integrity is something along the line of holding high standard on fairness, not sticking to the decision even knowing it is wrong. I hope you learned something for my effort
GET OUT OF MY BASE CHILL
hacpee
Profile Joined November 2007
United States752 Posts
July 01 2009 12:38 GMT
#51
There's been a lot of mis-communication and I feel tasteless's video response just added to it. He stated that there was no final decision, yet strelok provided an email response with the words final in it. He said there was no way to show a winner, but strelok said that he was winning at the time. He should have addressed those issues instead of dodging them.

Obviously, Tasteless and Daniel thought they made the correct decision, and I personally agree with them, but the video response did nothing to help the situation. It just fanned the flames TBH.
Severedevil
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4838 Posts
July 01 2009 12:50 GMT
#52
If the first two games were laggy shit, why wouldn't they replay the series? I certainly wouldn't want to be judged by how well I play when the game isn't working...
My strategy is to fork people.
LG)Sabbath
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
Argentina3022 Posts
July 01 2009 13:25 GMT
#53
On July 01 2009 21:25 rei wrote:
What happens when the very same rule we created trying to protect fair play themselves are impeding fair play? the very same reason we created them in the first place? We should fucking ignore the rules. Rules are created by people, they are just guidelines in which the true value lies on the reason of why we needed the rules, not the rules themselves.

No, you should change the rules, but not in the middle of the tournament. After it's over, before the next one.

In this context I would consider "integrity" as applying the same rule equally for everyone. If the rule gets a pro gamer banned from the ladder, then you should probably change it.

This isn't really a complex situation, either you have a rule that says that disc = instant loss, or one that says that disc = replay the game, or whatever, but you don't make the rule up when the situation appears, you need to have it in place before the tournament begins. If you don't, then don't call yourself an experienced tournament admin or a pro-gaming organization or anything like that.
https://www.twitch.tv/argsabbath/
floor exercise
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Canada5847 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-07-01 15:27:45
July 01 2009 15:27 GMT
#54
I still don't understand why this demanded a video be made instead of just writing an explanation
Foucault
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Sweden2826 Posts
July 01 2009 15:30 GMT
#55
On July 02 2009 00:27 floor exercise wrote:
I still don't understand why this demanded a video be made instead of just writing an explanation


perhaps because tasteless likes to be in the limelight just talking about anything. I think Tasteless should stick to commentating and not be a judge, because he seems a bit whimsy.
I know that deep inside of you there's a humongous set of testicles just waiting to pop out. Let 'em pop bro. //////////////////// AKA JensOfSweden // Lee Yoon Yeol forever.
JWD
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States12607 Posts
July 01 2009 15:51 GMT
#56
On July 02 2009 00:27 floor exercise wrote:
I still don't understand why this demanded a video be made instead of just writing an explanation

Videos are more entertaining than text. Why would you bash Tasteless for making one?

That said, I agree with Nazgul that the explanation Tasteless gave in the video was really unsatisfying. "Final decision" versus "decision" is semantics. It would have been much more tactful and honest for Tasteless simply to acknowledge that a decision (mistake) was made and then corrected.
✌
PaeZ
Profile Joined April 2005
Mexico1627 Posts
July 01 2009 16:29 GMT
#57
On July 02 2009 00:30 Foucault wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 02 2009 00:27 floor exercise wrote:
I still don't understand why this demanded a video be made instead of just writing an explanation


perhaps because tasteless likes to be in the limelight just talking about anything. I think Tasteless should stick to commentating and not be a judge, because he seems a bit whimsy.


Cant believe you said this crap..
Ilvy
Profile Joined September 2002
Germany2445 Posts
July 01 2009 16:32 GMT
#58
On July 01 2009 21:25 rei wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2009 19:25 LG)Sabbath wrote:
The overturning of decisions is just a display of lack of integrity as an organization, where you don't have a rule that covers the case and you're evaluating on a case-by-case basis, which can result in bias. You can overturn it, and you probably have to, but the damage to your reputation is already done, and that was the whole point of Strelok's thread. Some people still think it was about the games, even after he said he wouldn't return even if they gave him the wins for free.

So the promise of a professional tournament run by a professional organization was clearly broken... it is understandable that Strelok is disappointed. Maybe he's just not in for the money, maybe he just wanted to be part of the pro scene for a while here and, the tournament being not what was promised, he had no reason to continue, as the prestige of winning it would be mostly if not completely gone.


What is integrity? is it fairness? lack of integrity as an organization means lacking in fairness?
What are rules? is it to protect fair play in the context of games? rules of iccup for not allowing maphack is to protect fair play right? rules of iccup for now allowing people to abuse the ladder is to protect fair play right?
When savior got reset by iccup because he played the same dude 20times in one day was because admins were following the rules to protect fair play. The admins would be right if savior had the need to abuse to get #1 rank on iccup.

When Gorush typed ppp instead of pp and the rule says that's a disqualification. What rule was applied here? the same rule that trying to protect fair play right? typing all game long to distract the other guy is not fair play, and hence there is a need of no typing rules.

What happens when the very same rule we created trying to protect fair play themselves are impeding fair play? the very same reason we created them in the first place? We should fucking ignore the rules. Rules are created by people, they are just guidelines in which the true value lies on the reason of why we needed the rules, not the rules themselves.

Integrity is something along the line of holding high standard on fairness, not sticking to the decision even knowing it is wrong. I hope you learned something for my effort



So wrong, you just said that if Gorush could abuse and play same person 20 times because its obvious that he is too good and doesn´t need to "abuse" but other ppl are not allowed to do same because they are not that good and it would help them so its a "real abuse"?
Rules do not work like that, you either got rules should apply for everyone same way, no matter who he is, who are you that you take out the right to judge who needs to follow them and who not? So the value of every good tournament are the rules and the admins that follows them 100%.
Oh and the admin should have at least a knowledge about the game/sport whatever he works with.
Geo.Rion
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
7377 Posts
July 01 2009 16:35 GMT
#59
On July 01 2009 17:09 Etherone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2009 16:11 Strelok. wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
1. Subject: Re: btw
Date: 6/26/09 13:19
SDM's final ruling:
Replay both game 1 and game 2. So go ahead and tell Fenix, I just emailed him too.

Do you see word final here or it's only mine vision?

2. During the game vs Fenix we had very many issues i didn't want to talk previously, since i didn't want to discuss that game, but about which i talk now:
a) We couldn't arrrange games during more then 2 weeks.
b) He wanted to play only between 23:00 CET and 04:00 CET. He coudldn't play other time due to his univercity. This time was unacceptable for me, because i usually sleep this time. Admin didn't do anything to deal with the problem.
c) When we, at last, met - we got straight lag in both games (even Fenix talked about that in the replay). Drop table appeared several times, so that is why i said the games are EVEN. Because if i dropped him game N1 when he got lead, he would have complainted either.
d) the last thing is about this game. I don't want to break out Valor rules, so i won't post replay here. Anyway i will just point out on our final position. If they cast replay you will see it yourself.
- upgrades. i have 1-1, he has 1-0. Both making 2 more.
- limits. I have 170, protoss has 142.
- high tech. His arbiter still not out, though his storms should be ready in 10 seconds.
- number of bases. I had 3 and 4-th just incoming. He had 3 and 2 just incoming. Though he had problems with probes, so some bases wouldn't work properly anyways.
- final point. In just 1 minute i collect 185 limit and go straight to 8 and 7 o clock bases. He would have had maximum 160-165 limit at this time, no statis, 3 stormers. It's not enough to hold such push. He can't counter with recall. Ofc such limit is not enough to counter just by ground. The game would be finished in 3 or 5 mins maximum i'm pretty sure about that. So just... watch replay, make your own opinion.

and LG)Sabbath Argentina. July 01 2009 13:52. Posts 2268
I won't return to the tournament even if they give me 1-0 lead or autowin. I already made decision.


pretty much what i expected, thank you for clarifying.

Valor staff dropped the ball imo, and sadly although i know tasteless was trying to do what should have been done in the first place, he never should have retracted SDM's decision, even if it was the wrong one.

all they can do now, is apologize to both players for the debacle and make sure this never happens again, or work something out with both players, although highly unlikely.


that's pretty much what i wanted to say
"Protoss is a joke" Liquid`Jinro Okt.1. 2011
IdrA
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
United States11541 Posts
July 01 2009 16:49 GMT
#60
On July 02 2009 01:32 Ilvy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 01 2009 21:25 rei wrote:
On July 01 2009 19:25 LG)Sabbath wrote:
The overturning of decisions is just a display of lack of integrity as an organization, where you don't have a rule that covers the case and you're evaluating on a case-by-case basis, which can result in bias. You can overturn it, and you probably have to, but the damage to your reputation is already done, and that was the whole point of Strelok's thread. Some people still think it was about the games, even after he said he wouldn't return even if they gave him the wins for free.

So the promise of a professional tournament run by a professional organization was clearly broken... it is understandable that Strelok is disappointed. Maybe he's just not in for the money, maybe he just wanted to be part of the pro scene for a while here and, the tournament being not what was promised, he had no reason to continue, as the prestige of winning it would be mostly if not completely gone.


What is integrity? is it fairness? lack of integrity as an organization means lacking in fairness?
What are rules? is it to protect fair play in the context of games? rules of iccup for not allowing maphack is to protect fair play right? rules of iccup for now allowing people to abuse the ladder is to protect fair play right?
When savior got reset by iccup because he played the same dude 20times in one day was because admins were following the rules to protect fair play. The admins would be right if savior had the need to abuse to get #1 rank on iccup.

When Gorush typed ppp instead of pp and the rule says that's a disqualification. What rule was applied here? the same rule that trying to protect fair play right? typing all game long to distract the other guy is not fair play, and hence there is a need of no typing rules.

What happens when the very same rule we created trying to protect fair play themselves are impeding fair play? the very same reason we created them in the first place? We should fucking ignore the rules. Rules are created by people, they are just guidelines in which the true value lies on the reason of why we needed the rules, not the rules themselves.

Integrity is something along the line of holding high standard on fairness, not sticking to the decision even knowing it is wrong. I hope you learned something for my effort



So wrong, you just said that if Gorush could abuse and play same person 20 times because its obvious that he is too good and doesn´t need to "abuse" but other ppl are not allowed to do same because they are not that good and it would help them so its a "real abuse"?
Rules do not work like that, you either got rules should apply for everyone same way, no matter who he is, who are you that you take out the right to judge who needs to follow them and who not? So the value of every good tournament are the rules and the admins that follows them 100%.
Oh and the admin should have at least a knowledge about the game/sport whatever he works with.

he is not saying that rules shouldnt apply to some people, hes saying that the rule should be applied intelligently to everyone. rules cannot be written to address every specific situation, that is why we have referees and judges and administrators, to judge how a rule should be applied under various circumstances. the game limit on iccup is to prevent players from cheating the system and gaining points without earning them. but when 2 high ranked players play each other 20 times in a row and go 10-10 its obviously not abuse, just practice. so they are technically violating the rule, but anyone with an ounce of common sense can see that they arent violating the purpose of the rule and so should not be punished.
rules are not perfect, they are guidelines. you cannot follow them 100% and expect to have a well run tournament.
http://www.splitreason.com/product/1152 release the gracken tshirt now available
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 30m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 267
Livibee 85
ProTech48
StarCraft: Brood War
Nal_rA 2847
Zeus 325
Sharp 271
HiyA 118
NaDa 71
Sexy 70
Icarus 7
Noble 6
Britney 0
League of Legends
JimRising 775
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K265
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox536
Other Games
summit1g11884
shahzam892
ViBE233
RuFF_SC2128
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 54
Other Games
BasetradeTV20
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta50
• practicex 28
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush459
• Stunt428
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
6h 30m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
9h 30m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 5h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 9h
CSO Cup
1d 11h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 13h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.