EPT[Fantasy] PL R3 Final Rankings - Page 9
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
LTT
Shakuras1095 Posts
| ||
|
Pioneer
994 Posts
On January 20 2009 04:10 Hot_Bid wrote: You weren't at negative anyway, you were at 0 because skyhigh got a win point. It's really, really hard to be negative, basically all your players have to lose and your team has to be blown out. Oh yeah, woops I forgot about skyhigh. | ||
semioldguy
United States7488 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36388 Posts
| ||
|
DreaM)XeRO
Korea (South)4667 Posts
| ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
| ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36388 Posts
On January 20 2009 04:46 DreaM)XeRO wrote: lololol Your username doesn't show up on the team list, which means you didn't properly register, just letting you know. | ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8556 Posts
| ||
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
Lineup appearance: 1 Point* Game Win: 2 Points Game Loss: -1 Point 2-Game Streak Break: 1 Point** 3-Game Streak Break: 2 Points** Team Win: 1 Point*** DQ/Forfeit: -2 Point In this format the point for lineup appearance is irrelevant if you take a point off for losing a game. You could just take Lineup Appearance away, take away Game Loss and replace it with: "Finishing point" +1 point for finishing the other team off. | ||
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
 | ||
|
semioldguy
United States7488 Posts
On January 20 2009 04:55 Klive5ive wrote: In this format the point for lineup appearance is irrelevant if you take a point off for losing a game. You could just take Lineup Appearance away, take away Game Loss and replace it with: "Finishing point" +1 point for finishing the other team off. It was like that last season too. | ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36388 Posts
On January 20 2009 04:55 Klive5ive wrote: In this format the point for lineup appearance is irrelevant if you take a point off for losing a game. You could just take Lineup Appearance away, take away Game Loss and replace it with: "Finishing point" +1 point for finishing the other team off. + Show Spoiler [Confused] + I don't agree with that, because I believe wins should be valued. I don't think it should be Win = 2 and Loss =1, which is what you're essentially proposing (and Finishing Win = 3). Since it's not easy to change your team during the round, your system would make it a lot more dependent on random coaching decisions. An appearance point is good because it offsets a possible loss, but your player still has the opportunity to get a win, possibly break a streak, and possibly go on to play more games. That's plenty of incentive to be in the lineup. The mark of doing well as a fantasy owner is picking not only players who will play, but players who will play and win. It's obvious that certain players on each team will play a lot, so there's no real variance in that, other than random luck. Oh I see what you're saying, just reorganizing the point values and calling it something different. I was confused because under your system Kal still gets no points. A plus for appearance points is in the breakdown for next round too, you want to see who gets how many appearances this past round. | ||
|
semioldguy
United States7488 Posts
On January 20 2009 05:13 Hot_Bid wrote: A plus for appearance points is in the breakdown for next round too, you want to see who gets how many appearances this past round. This is why it has been listed as appearance point in the past and why it is listed as such now. | ||
|
3 Lions
United States3705 Posts
| ||
|
JoxxOr
Sweden1502 Posts
| ||
|
imperfect
Canada1652 Posts
i just realized, that spreading your players into different teams help a lot. -____- | ||
|
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
On January 20 2009 05:50 imperfect wrote: awww man i dropped like 60 spots. i just realized, that spreading your players into different teams help a lot. -____- haha oh yes, definitely. this is one thing i made sure of  | ||
|
RainmanMP
United States1698 Posts
| ||
|
Jaeden
Romania1489 Posts
On January 20 2009 05:50 imperfect wrote: awww man i dropped like 60 spots. i just realized, that spreading your players into different teams help a lot. -____- I assumed that, but I didn`t know that choosing star-players will hurt a compact team is perfect for this format, coz a lot (not all) of the stars will be playin` later on, with the possibility of not playin` at all | ||
|
deathgod6
United States5064 Posts
| ||
| ||
