EPTNo more bullshit [No MBS] - Page 3
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Ki_Do
Korea (South)981 Posts
| ||
|
LibertyTerran
Vietnam711 Posts
| ||
|
HonestTea
5007 Posts
| ||
|
Ichigo1234551
United States649 Posts
| ||
|
We Are Here
Australia1810 Posts
@OP HELL YEAH! SAY NO TO MBS | ||
|
Mikilatov
United States3897 Posts
I think we all know in the depths of our hearts that SC2 is going to be great... Just not as great as we would like and expect it to be. It's not going to be SC:BW 2.0, like we all hope it to be. It's going to be SC2. We're going to have to accept it, or just stick with regular old Brood War. | ||
|
ReiKo
Croatia1023 Posts
| ||
|
Fen
Australia1848 Posts
MBS just outlines the sad world we live in  Short Story I recently picked up RA3, not a bad game, not starcraft either of course. While reading a review (IGN) for the game, one of the things said is that the japanese team requires too much micro. And that this makes playing the japanese team not very fun. All I could think was, what is this guy smoking?, its an RTS game. However its just the state we are at in gaming. People would rather watch the battle play itself than control whats going on. Requiring skill is something games are trying to avoid these days. | ||
|
We Are Here
Australia1810 Posts
On November 02 2008 19:31 Fen wrote: i saw that review as well on youtube and was like WTF. think it was something like "the japanese have bad ground-air so it will require some micromanagement which was kind of annoying though" Yeha totally agree. MBS just outlines the sad world we live in Short Story I recently picked up RA3, not a bad game, not starcraft either of course. While reading a review (IGN) for the game, one of the things said is that the japanese team requires too much micro. And that this makes playing the japanese team not very fun. All I could think was, what is this guy smoking?, its an RTS game. However its just the state we are at in gaming. People would rather watch the battle play itself than control whats going on. Requiring skill is something games are trying to avoid these days. btw isnt it released in 3 days in aus? =/ | ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5712 Posts
 )Most reviewers are just plainly clueless. I'm going to buy a Polish magazine in couple of days to see if our reviewers are equally bad as IGN or PCGamer's. T____T | ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
| ||
|
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
On November 02 2008 18:14 clazziquai wrote: Oh well at least if MBS exists, 1) i will still stick to BW 2) i will get sc2 for the campaign, obv 3) i will be able to own the people in SC2 (the newcomers who haven't played SC 1) hihi :D One day you'll meet this random loser with 150 apm in SC2 and you'll play a very very close game with him and just barely come out on top...then you will have a fit and go back BW.  | ||
|
Ilikestarcraft
Korea (South)17732 Posts
| ||
|
Salorian
United States76 Posts
| ||
|
LazySCV
United States2942 Posts
| ||
|
hubfub
Australia352 Posts
| ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
50cent = MBS make the right decision blizzard | ||
|
Epicfailguy
Norway893 Posts
Pepsi=mbs make the right decision idd | ||
|
SlickR12345
Macedonia408 Posts
Nowdays i only play casually and rarely, but still the thing that had and has me coming to SC:BW all this years is the challenging gameplay that is easy to learn, hard to master! I think we all love a game where we can be challanged in every mean: strategicly, tacticly, mentally and physicly and SC:BW provides that to the fullest potential! The thing about MBS though is that I am prepared to give it a brake if things like auto-mine, multiple rally-points and smart-casting is removed! I think SC2 has enough potential to cover-up for MBS easyness as long as the previosly mentioned options I mentioned are removed! One thing is to make 1 sacrifice to make the game easier(such as MBS), but another when there are a lot options/mechanics that make the game easier(smart-cast, auto-mine, etc...)! I think the focus should be made towards reaching out to the SC2 developers to remove the other automations rather than MBS. With other automations removed and MBS in the game, the core skill celling will stay, but it will make the action faster for casual players who can now build units faster, while better players will still have an advantage through mechanics like warp-in, queens laying additional eggs for zerg and things like that! Overall though the devs will need to make a sacrifice from the easy game and remove some of the stuff, just as they made huge sacrifice by removing all of the skill celling that was in SC:BW! | ||
|
0xDEADBEEF
Germany1235 Posts
On November 02 2008 20:48 Plexa wrote: Mussorgsky = Starcraft 50cent = MBS make the right decision blizzard It's the opposite. Because without MBS, the "mechanical" skills (speed, multitasking, "clicky macro") make the "mental" skills (tactics, ingenious micro, creativity, experience) largely obsolete. | ||
| ||
