EPTOn November 02 2008 16:52 x89titan wrote:
i pity the foo who votes NO
i pity the foo who votes NO
Clearly everyone else does too.
It's a pretty good writeup, but i'm not sure that blizzard will listen ><;;
No more bullshit [No MBS] - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
GHOSTCLAW
United States17042 Posts
Clearly everyone else does too. It's a pretty good writeup, but i'm not sure that blizzard will listen ><;; | ||
|
hubfub
Australia352 Posts
PLEASE | ||
|
village_idiot
2436 Posts
But to make an e-sport they need to stop making a great game for my mom. | ||
|
Centric
United States1989 Posts
On November 02 2008 17:01 village_idiot wrote: The thing is... Blizzard can make a great game with MBS, automine and all that crap. But to make an e-sport they need to stop making a great game for my mom. Well said. | ||
|
inlagdsil
Canada957 Posts
It would be cool if SC2 could be a competitive e-sport and fun for Jim the Lumberjack (or whoever that bearded guy is). | ||
|
Augury
United States758 Posts
This is a horribly formed argument, but I couldn't find a way to word it correctly. The summary is that casual players shouldn't care if the game has MBS or not. The players that care and want MBS, want it so that they can achieve a skill level that they couldn't without it. Really hoping that makes sense, also I think it's dumb when people want to put less hours into a game and expect to be better than someone else, because they're simple smarter. Football for example: Smart player: Use intelligence to make plays. 'Physical' player: Uses speed and strength to make plays that he has developed through hard work. SC players should be able to work harder to overcome a lack of strategic knowledge through better macro/micro and smarter players should be able to use their brains to make up for weaker macro/micro. The best players will have both skillsets. | ||
|
Eben
United States769 Posts
| ||
|
ambit!ous1
United States3662 Posts
| ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
On November 02 2008 17:09 inlagdsil wrote: This is hilarious, but I thought we were done with MBS threads. It would be cool if SC2 could be a competitive e-sport and fun for Jim the Lumberjack (or whoever that bearded guy is). are you a progamer? is sc not fun for you? they are not mutually exclusive, manual macro and control do not make the game suck for low level players. | ||
|
Augury
United States758 Posts
On November 02 2008 17:47 IdrA wrote: are you a progamer? is sc not fun for you? they are not mutually exclusive, manual macro and control do not make the game suck for low level players. Agreed, removing MBS and Automine doesn't make the game harder to learn or less accessible to 'casual' players. The only thing it does is make it harder for them to be a 'progamer'. It's absurd that people are hoping to be the best with minimal effort, practice, dedication, etc.. | ||
|
timchi
United States57 Posts
NO on MBS. | ||
|
nujabes
United States286 Posts
agree with it 100% | ||
|
eth0x
Canada208 Posts
| ||
|
Manbear
Canada306 Posts
| ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
hihi :D | ||
|
lokiM
United States3407 Posts
| ||
|
GinNtoniC
Sweden2945 Posts
Some parts of this should in one way or another be forced to the workdesk of mr Dustin Browder. | ||
boesthius
United States11637 Posts
| ||
|
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
|
Meiya
Australia1169 Posts
| ||
| ||
