EPT
Zerg FPVod Commentary (Updated September 22nd) - Page 7
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Sewi
Germany1697 Posts
| ||
Harem
United States11393 Posts
On January 07 2008 04:42 Sewi wrote: post reps here plz +points to first post+ | ||
|
sprawlers
Norway439 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
http://teamliquid.net/staff/Chill/Zerg_Legend.rep http://teamliquid.net/staff/Chill/Zerg_Legend_2.rep | ||
|
garoth
United States51 Posts
| ||
|
sprawlers
Norway439 Posts
edit: nvm, posted before reps where up | ||
|
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
On January 07 2008 05:30 garoth wrote: chill i have a question about that longinus game, how did you spread the swarm on those defilers like that i didn't see you clone or anything like that however the swarm was situated how those defilers seemed to be grouped. How do you do that? That was actually a mistake. When I checked the Defilers, they had around 90 energy, and one had 190. I told the group to throw a swarm (3 Defilers) because I assumed the other two would not have 100 energy yet, but they did =x It's just magic boxes: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=33677 If your Defilers are close enough together, they throw the Swarms relative to where they are. So you can set them up in formation and then they will cast Swarms in that formation. If you spread them too far though (as explained in that above link) they will all cast Swarm on top on a single point. | ||
|
garoth
United States51 Posts
| ||
|
A3iL3r0n
United States2196 Posts
 | ||
|
skyglow1
New Zealand3962 Posts
| ||
|
Ryknow
Canada5 Posts
I struggle on that map as zerg. | ||
|
Polar
Swaziland274 Posts
My only gripe would be that "strategical" is not a word. =] | ||
|
DeadVessel
United States6269 Posts
| ||
|
DeadVessel
United States6269 Posts
Nice commentaries. | ||
|
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
On January 08 2008 07:08 Polar wrote: I love the commentaries. Great stuff. I hope they keep coming. My only gripe would be that "strategical" is not a word. =] Yes it is. http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=define: strategical&btnG=Search&meta= http://www.thefreedictionary.com/strategical http://www.answers.com/topic/strategic http://www.dictionary.net/strategic | ||
|
A3iL3r0n
United States2196 Posts
| ||
|
Payt
Canada582 Posts
in the tau cross zvp, you mentioned you thought he was getting fast assim for +1 weapons, and then you realized it was for tech when you spotted the cyber core. Since you never got to see his tech as far as I could tell (goon killed OL before it could see?), why didn't you put down any protection against sairs? without a den or at least a creep colony (to morph), he could have probably gotten a bunch OL kills if he'd gone sairs, no? edit: double checked, and the last building you saw was a forge before you were chased off. was that indicative? very nice commentaries. I was interested to hear you were going to show savior's 9 pool -> 3 hatch build only to have you DISAPPOINT me. But yeah if I had one request for other commentaries it would be 9 pool or 2 hatch or some other builds. | ||
|
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
On January 09 2008 06:13 Payt wrote: Chill: Why would you say the ZvT commentaries are outdated? I liked them, especially the longinus one (aside from the terran losing a ton of units to swarm somewhat needlessly). in the tau cross zvp, you mentioned you thought he was getting fast assim for +1 weapons, and then you realized it was for tech when you spotted the cyber core. Since you never got to see his tech as far as I could tell (goon killed OL before it could see?), why didn't you put down any protection against sairs? without a den or at least a creep colony (to morph), he could have probably gotten a bunch OL kills if he'd gone sairs, no? edit: double checked, and the last building you saw was a forge before you were chased off. was that indicative? very nice commentaries. I was interested to hear you were going to show savior's 9 pool -> 3 hatch build only to have you DISAPPOINT me. But yeah if I had one request for other commentaries it would be 9 pool or 2 hatch or some other builds. I was talking about my other ZvT commentaries (not in this thread) which are over a year old. They focus on HydraLurker Lair play, which doesn't work nowadays. Two things: Tau Cross is such a macro map that I'm always thinking a Protoss player wants to FE on it. Even if he's showing tech, it's so easy for me to grab 3 bases that if I start losing Overlords to a Corsair I will probably still be ahead. And yes, seeing a Forge knid of validates my thoughts. If he is doing some one base tech and has invested in Cannons, it should be late enough that simply attack moving a bunch of low tier units should handle it and let me end up ahead. | ||
|
Polar
Swaziland274 Posts
On January 08 2008 07:14 Chill wrote: Yes it is. http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=define: strategical&btnG=Search&meta= http://www.thefreedictionary.com/strategical http://www.answers.com/topic/strategic http://www.dictionary.net/strategic Did you read any of those links you posted? They all repeat what I asserted. They all redirect to a definition of "strategic": "Did you mean Strategic"' | ||
|
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
| ||
| ||
