• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:24
CET 19:24
KST 03:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2
Community News
BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion6Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)16Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 105
StarCraft 2
General
Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets When will we find out if there are more tournament SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list?
Tourneys
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC2 AI Tournament 2026 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes
Brood War
General
Video Footage from 2005: The Birth of G2 in Spain BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1311 users

Global Matchmaking and Ladder are exclusive to SCR - Page 4

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
prOxi.swAMi
Profile Blog Joined November 2004
Australia3091 Posts
August 10 2017 04:57 GMT
#61
On August 10 2017 13:32 blade55555 wrote:
Maybe, but even then SC2 was released 7 years ago. I imagine most of those players are now in their early 20's if they started playing at 13.

Yeah but plenty of kids just entering their teens now, if they pick up SC2 will likely visit here.
Oh no
Piste
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
6181 Posts
August 10 2017 07:22 GMT
#62
On August 10 2017 00:57 REDBLUEGREEN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 00:42 739 wrote:
Mmm.. i wish we had /ping option available in client and during the game. That'll also help tournament holders to verify which player is lagging.

Is that even possible in a P2P game? Shouldn't both players have the same ping?
Yeah ping command doesn't show the quality of the connection between players, but just the individual players connection to the gaming server (which won't effect the ingame, you can even lose the connection to server and still continue playing with perfect latency).
TT1
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada10012 Posts
August 10 2017 08:05 GMT
#63
If they end up making the default turn rate 12 the ladder will be unplayable, which is what koreans want. I dunno why we can't adjust the turn rate ingame, that would solve a lot of issues.
ab = tl(i) + tl(pc), the grand answer to every tl.net debate
iloveav
Profile Joined November 2008
Poland1479 Posts
August 10 2017 08:30 GMT
#64
On August 10 2017 13:31 Dante08 wrote:
So we have:

- Awesome new HD graphics
- Fixed portforwarding issues
- Cross compatibility between clients (SCR can play with 1.19)
- Automated match-making
- Support for modern OS
- No change to gameplay
- Chance to revive the Korean BW and maybe even the foreign BW scene

All the above and people complain about paying $15 for it and Blizzard being money hungry. Sometimes TL never fails to surprise.


We dont have that...yet.
We dont know if we will have that.
We know there are some issues now, like disconnects from server, having to use blizzards app, no launchers support, no bot support (for chat channels). Note I dot have personal experience with those, only relaying what I heard.

I will believe it when I see it. Also, matchmaking is a very dubious system. I much more prefer the ICCUP system where you get to basically decide yourself at what level you want to play (and so do your opponents).

Matchmaking means one thing only: That someone at blizzard thinks they know better than you who you should play against. Someone who most likely is NOT a player.

Btw, I would not complain about the 15 dollars if I could use it on Iccup or if they ONLY fixed port forwarding.
I complain because they are taking it into their ecosystem, where you either go with it or leave it.
aka LRM)Cats_Paw.
KameZerg
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Sweden1767 Posts
August 10 2017 08:34 GMT
#65
My guess is in the future blizz will make scr free for everybody but with paid ingame features, skins and w/e else to make money from it. Reason? To increase popularity and userbase outside of Korea when the hype will die.
asdasdasdasdasd123123123
[nkc]moon
Profile Joined September 2016
30 Posts
August 10 2017 08:48 GMT
#66
On August 10 2017 17:30 iloveav wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 13:31 Dante08 wrote:
So we have:

- Awesome new HD graphics
- Fixed portforwarding issues
- Cross compatibility between clients (SCR can play with 1.19)
- Automated match-making
- Support for modern OS
- No change to gameplay
- Chance to revive the Korean BW and maybe even the foreign BW scene

All the above and people complain about paying $15 for it and Blizzard being money hungry. Sometimes TL never fails to surprise.


We dont have that...yet.
We dont know if we will have that.
We know there are some issues now, like disconnects from server, having to use blizzards app, no launchers support, no bot support (for chat channels). Note I dot have personal experience with those, only relaying what I heard.

I will believe it when I see it. Also, matchmaking is a very dubious system. I much more prefer the ICCUP system where you get to basically decide yourself at what level you want to play (and so do your opponents).

Matchmaking means one thing only: That someone at blizzard thinks they know better than you who you should play against. Someone who most likely is NOT a player.

Btw, I would not complain about the 15 dollars if I could use it on Iccup or if they ONLY fixed port forwarding.
I complain because they are taking it into their ecosystem, where you either go with it or leave it.


Of course they know better than you who you should play against its a match making algorithm that has been nearly perfected. And im pretty sure you are still able to use the ICCUP system as well as play matchmaking.
iloveav
Profile Joined November 2008
Poland1479 Posts
August 10 2017 09:28 GMT
#67
On August 10 2017 17:48 [nkc]moon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 17:30 iloveav wrote:
On August 10 2017 13:31 Dante08 wrote:
So we have:

- Awesome new HD graphics
- Fixed portforwarding issues
- Cross compatibility between clients (SCR can play with 1.19)
- Automated match-making
- Support for modern OS
- No change to gameplay
- Chance to revive the Korean BW and maybe even the foreign BW scene

All the above and people complain about paying $15 for it and Blizzard being money hungry. Sometimes TL never fails to surprise.


We dont have that...yet.
We dont know if we will have that.
We know there are some issues now, like disconnects from server, having to use blizzards app, no launchers support, no bot support (for chat channels). Note I dot have personal experience with those, only relaying what I heard.

I will believe it when I see it. Also, matchmaking is a very dubious system. I much more prefer the ICCUP system where you get to basically decide yourself at what level you want to play (and so do your opponents).

Matchmaking means one thing only: That someone at blizzard thinks they know better than you who you should play against. Someone who most likely is NOT a player.

Btw, I would not complain about the 15 dollars if I could use it on Iccup or if they ONLY fixed port forwarding.
I complain because they are taking it into their ecosystem, where you either go with it or leave it.


Of course they know better than you who you should play against its a match making algorithm that has been nearly perfected. And im pretty sure you are still able to use the ICCUP system as well as play matchmaking.


Based on my experience? its not perfected at all. We will see once it gets out rolling in Remastered.
I am not saying its utter garbage either. I still prefer to have that choice myself rather than giving it to some automated system.

Also, what evidence do you have to say that "Of course they know better" and "has been nearly perfected?".
There is a big difference from having a subjective view of something and claiming objective knowledge of how something works. Do you know how the matchmaking system works?

Where does that blind trust come from? I am not trying to attack you just figure out why you have all that trust in an automatic system.
aka LRM)Cats_Paw.
[sc1f]eonzerg
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Belgium6802 Posts
August 10 2017 10:14 GMT
#68
On August 10 2017 17:30 iloveav wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 13:31 Dante08 wrote:
So we have:

- Awesome new HD graphics
- Fixed portforwarding issues
- Cross compatibility between clients (SCR can play with 1.19)
- Automated match-making
- Support for modern OS
- No change to gameplay
- Chance to revive the Korean BW and maybe even the foreign BW scene

All the above and people complain about paying $15 for it and Blizzard being money hungry. Sometimes TL never fails to surprise.


We dont have that...yet.
We dont know if we will have that.
We know there are some issues now, like disconnects from server, having to use blizzards app, no launchers support, no bot support (for chat channels). Note I dot have personal experience with those, only relaying what I heard.

I will believe it when I see it. Also, matchmaking is a very dubious system. I much more prefer the ICCUP system where you get to basically decide yourself at what level you want to play (and so do your opponents).

Matchmaking means one thing only: That someone at blizzard thinks they know better than you who you should play against. Someone who most likely is NOT a player.

Btw, I would not complain about the 15 dollars if I could use it on Iccup or if they ONLY fixed port forwarding.
I complain because they are taking it into their ecosystem, where you either go with it or leave it.

https://us.battle.net/forums/en/bnet/topic/20754336617
iloveav
Profile Joined November 2008
Poland1479 Posts
August 10 2017 10:21 GMT
#69
On August 10 2017 19:14 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 17:30 iloveav wrote:
On August 10 2017 13:31 Dante08 wrote:
So we have:

- Awesome new HD graphics
- Fixed portforwarding issues
- Cross compatibility between clients (SCR can play with 1.19)
- Automated match-making
- Support for modern OS
- No change to gameplay
- Chance to revive the Korean BW and maybe even the foreign BW scene

All the above and people complain about paying $15 for it and Blizzard being money hungry. Sometimes TL never fails to surprise.


We dont have that...yet.
We dont know if we will have that.
We know there are some issues now, like disconnects from server, having to use blizzards app, no launchers support, no bot support (for chat channels). Note I dot have personal experience with those, only relaying what I heard.

I will believe it when I see it. Also, matchmaking is a very dubious system. I much more prefer the ICCUP system where you get to basically decide yourself at what level you want to play (and so do your opponents).

Matchmaking means one thing only: That someone at blizzard thinks they know better than you who you should play against. Someone who most likely is NOT a player.

Btw, I would not complain about the 15 dollars if I could use it on Iccup or if they ONLY fixed port forwarding.
I complain because they are taking it into their ecosystem, where you either go with it or leave it.

https://us.battle.net/forums/en/bnet/topic/20754336617



That sure looks like a move in the right direction. Hope I get proven wrong more often :D.
aka LRM)Cats_Paw.
shin ken
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Germany612 Posts
August 10 2017 10:23 GMT
#70
On August 10 2017 18:28 iloveav wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 17:48 [nkc]moon wrote:
On August 10 2017 17:30 iloveav wrote:
On August 10 2017 13:31 Dante08 wrote:
So we have:

- Awesome new HD graphics
- Fixed portforwarding issues
- Cross compatibility between clients (SCR can play with 1.19)
- Automated match-making
- Support for modern OS
- No change to gameplay
- Chance to revive the Korean BW and maybe even the foreign BW scene

All the above and people complain about paying $15 for it and Blizzard being money hungry. Sometimes TL never fails to surprise.


We dont have that...yet.
We dont know if we will have that.
We know there are some issues now, like disconnects from server, having to use blizzards app, no launchers support, no bot support (for chat channels). Note I dot have personal experience with those, only relaying what I heard.

I will believe it when I see it. Also, matchmaking is a very dubious system. I much more prefer the ICCUP system where you get to basically decide yourself at what level you want to play (and so do your opponents).

Matchmaking means one thing only: That someone at blizzard thinks they know better than you who you should play against. Someone who most likely is NOT a player.

Btw, I would not complain about the 15 dollars if I could use it on Iccup or if they ONLY fixed port forwarding.
I complain because they are taking it into their ecosystem, where you either go with it or leave it.


Of course they know better than you who you should play against its a match making algorithm that has been nearly perfected. And im pretty sure you are still able to use the ICCUP system as well as play matchmaking.


Based on my experience? its not perfected at all. We will see once it gets out rolling in Remastered.
I am not saying its utter garbage either. I still prefer to have that choice myself rather than giving it to some automated system.

Also, what evidence do you have to say that "Of course they know better" and "has been nearly perfected?".
There is a big difference from having a subjective view of something and claiming objective knowledge of how something works. Do you know how the matchmaking system works?

Where does that blind trust come from? I am not trying to attack you just figure out why you have all that trust in an automatic system.


It's a highly sophisticated system that uses MMR and can rate your performance better than you could yourself (if they take the system from SC2/WC3). It's easy to misjudge yourself because your either overconfident or too cautious, but MMR doesn't lie.

The system also prevents good players from deliberately stomping noobs to boost their broken ego. Unfortunately it also prevents bad players from deliberately challenging good players but if you're dedicated you should climb the ladder anyway.

Of course lobbies have many advantages as well like choosing to play only a certain matchup or a certain map or only certain players but you can really trust Blizzard in delivering a robust 1on1 matchmaker these days. They have 15 years of experience with them, probably more than most developers.

And lobbies are still available anyway.
sc19980331
Profile Joined March 2017
China1609 Posts
August 10 2017 10:33 GMT
#71
Imagine: How many players active in gloabal pool after Aug 14?
Now I can see about 15k users at peak around 8pm on BN Korea.
I predict there will be 3k+ players from China will play on BN TW or Asia.
TL+ Member
Soulforged
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
Latvia935 Posts
August 10 2017 11:06 GMT
#72
Whelp, time to get a good VPN as soon as I shave off that rust.
Pretty much 3/4 games with koreans used to lag for me on iccup, no reason why it'd get better...
If matchmaking is truly global then the ratio of korean to non-korean will be really skewed.
WGT-Baal
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
France3428 Posts
August 10 2017 13:17 GMT
#73
On August 10 2017 19:23 shin ken wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 18:28 iloveav wrote:
On August 10 2017 17:48 [nkc]moon wrote:
On August 10 2017 17:30 iloveav wrote:
On August 10 2017 13:31 Dante08 wrote:
So we have:

- Awesome new HD graphics
- Fixed portforwarding issues
- Cross compatibility between clients (SCR can play with 1.19)
- Automated match-making
- Support for modern OS
- No change to gameplay
- Chance to revive the Korean BW and maybe even the foreign BW scene

All the above and people complain about paying $15 for it and Blizzard being money hungry. Sometimes TL never fails to surprise.


We dont have that...yet.
We dont know if we will have that.
We know there are some issues now, like disconnects from server, having to use blizzards app, no launchers support, no bot support (for chat channels). Note I dot have personal experience with those, only relaying what I heard.

I will believe it when I see it. Also, matchmaking is a very dubious system. I much more prefer the ICCUP system where you get to basically decide yourself at what level you want to play (and so do your opponents).

Matchmaking means one thing only: That someone at blizzard thinks they know better than you who you should play against. Someone who most likely is NOT a player.

Btw, I would not complain about the 15 dollars if I could use it on Iccup or if they ONLY fixed port forwarding.
I complain because they are taking it into their ecosystem, where you either go with it or leave it.


Of course they know better than you who you should play against its a match making algorithm that has been nearly perfected. And im pretty sure you are still able to use the ICCUP system as well as play matchmaking.


Based on my experience? its not perfected at all. We will see once it gets out rolling in Remastered.
I am not saying its utter garbage either. I still prefer to have that choice myself rather than giving it to some automated system.

Also, what evidence do you have to say that "Of course they know better" and "has been nearly perfected?".
There is a big difference from having a subjective view of something and claiming objective knowledge of how something works. Do you know how the matchmaking system works?

Where does that blind trust come from? I am not trying to attack you just figure out why you have all that trust in an automatic system.


It's a highly sophisticated system that uses MMR and can rate your performance better than you could yourself (if they take the system from SC2/WC3). It's easy to misjudge yourself because your either overconfident or too cautious, but MMR doesn't lie.

The system also prevents good players from deliberately stomping noobs to boost their broken ego. Unfortunately it also prevents bad players from deliberately challenging good players but if you're dedicated you should climb the ladder anyway.

Of course lobbies have many advantages as well like choosing to play only a certain matchup or a certain map or only certain players but you can really trust Blizzard in delivering a robust 1on1 matchmaker these days. They have 15 years of experience with them, probably more than most developers.

And lobbies are still available anyway.



It s only a good system if you play often and quite a lot. As it requires a lot if data for the system to set in. Also bear in mind the regional variations in sc2.
In sc:r the system will have to adapt to a worldwide community. In sc2 I never felt like the ranks had any meaning, granted it might just be the game being more volatile. In the end since I dont have time to play very often it was either stomping a much weaker player or getting destroyed by a much stronger one and this is one of the reasons I quit sc2.

There are a lot of advantages to matchmaking but it s not a perfect system, especially considering the age of the veteran players who dont have a lot of time to regularly.
Also the problems caused by lag in a worldwide laddee system is real. I m in Canada now but it s better to pkay koreans than latin Americans in that regard... How will those freeloss/freewin affect the mmr system is still unknown. We ll have to see it in action.
Horang2 fan
ProMeTheus112
Profile Joined December 2009
France2027 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-10 13:38:02
August 10 2017 13:33 GMT
#74
For me in sc2 matchmaking was not so much the problem as the difficulty to read the ranking system and the game itself, in w3 there was matchmaking, it involved quite a bit of grinding to get to the "levels" where you'd match against good players, so it rewarded grinding I think, that's the only part I didn't like but I think there were few resets? so
In Iccup I got tired of the resets because the system requires a lot of playing to get to your level, on the way there the experience is kinda erratic because you'd play against players of your skill, or higher+, or lower+, at any rank in different proportions before the one that represents ur skill level where you will play ppl your level + stronger, so every time there is a reset you have to reclimb there takes lot of time.. I got tired of that, so I'm expecting something that matches ppl better from the matchmaking and from the experience playing w3 or sc2 ladder yeah I think the matchmaking did that part better (than Iccup)
not to mention on iccup it takes a little while to find a game, its a private server there will always be less people... and the low ranks are not well represented maybe (I mean D+/C- have always been way farther beyond beginner which D- is supposed to represent?) so the incentive is prob low for newcomers to play there?_? wonder how easy it is to get (good) games at D- nowadays
Drake
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany6146 Posts
August 10 2017 15:08 GMT
#75
On August 10 2017 17:05 TT1 wrote:
If they end up making the default turn rate 12 the ladder will be unplayable, which is what koreans want. I dunno why we can't adjust the turn rate ingame, that would solve a lot of issues.


matchmaking could do it auto
same server vs same server 12 or 16
different servers vs each other 8

easy peasy as a programmer i wanna see the programmer telling me it cant be done i mean teh game will see where the players come from xD
Nb.Drake / CoL_Drake / Original Joined TL.net Tuesday, 15th of March 2005
Ragnarork
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
France9034 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-10 15:49:56
August 10 2017 15:49 GMT
#76
On August 10 2017 13:32 blade55555 wrote:
Maybe, but even then SC2 was released 7 years ago.


I just took a big punch right in the face.

As for the price, I'll happily spend $15 to get SC:R if it's released and there's no major issues.

Why are people so mad about the pricetag though? I sense it's mostly because some feature that wasn't supposed to be exclusive to SC:R is now exclusive to SC:R.

I would like to know why exactly are people complaining that they could have had new stuff for free, but for some reasons (no idea which exactly) Blizzard switched and now that stuff costs money. Well, that's unfortunate, but at the same time not unreasonable to make people pay for work they've done instead of just putting it out for free, is it?
LiquipediaWanderer
WGT-Baal
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
France3428 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-10 16:46:59
August 10 2017 16:46 GMT
#77
On August 11 2017 00:49 Ragnarork wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 13:32 blade55555 wrote:
Maybe, but even then SC2 was released 7 years ago.


I just took a big punch right in the face.

As for the price, I'll happily spend $15 to get SC:R if it's released and there's no major issues.

Why are people so mad about the pricetag though? I sense it's mostly because some feature that wasn't supposed to be exclusive to SC:R is now exclusive to SC:R.

I would like to know why exactly are people complaining that they could have had new stuff for free, but for some reasons (no idea which exactly) Blizzard switched and now that stuff costs money. Well, that's unfortunate, but at the same time not unreasonable to make people pay for work they've done instead of just putting it out for free, is it?


The issue is that Blizzard said for a long time it would be free (ladder) and it suddenly changed without warning or explanation. Then they explained a bit but it felt more like PR. There is no problem with the price or anything, just the way it happened. In a sense, some people think that since they didnt keep that promise, what else can they go back on ? Skins, gameplay...
Horang2 fan
craz3d
Profile Joined August 2005
Bulgaria856 Posts
August 10 2017 18:18 GMT
#78
On August 11 2017 01:46 WGT-Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2017 00:49 Ragnarork wrote:
On August 10 2017 13:32 blade55555 wrote:
Maybe, but even then SC2 was released 7 years ago.


I just took a big punch right in the face.

As for the price, I'll happily spend $15 to get SC:R if it's released and there's no major issues.

Why are people so mad about the pricetag though? I sense it's mostly because some feature that wasn't supposed to be exclusive to SC:R is now exclusive to SC:R.

I would like to know why exactly are people complaining that they could have had new stuff for free, but for some reasons (no idea which exactly) Blizzard switched and now that stuff costs money. Well, that's unfortunate, but at the same time not unreasonable to make people pay for work they've done instead of just putting it out for free, is it?


The issue is that Blizzard said for a long time it would be free (ladder) and it suddenly changed without warning or explanation. Then they explained a bit but it felt more like PR. There is no problem with the price or anything, just the way it happened. In a sense, some people think that since they didnt keep that promise, what else can they go back on ? Skins, gameplay...


I have an inkling feeling that they never intended for it to be compatible with the original game, meaning they outright lied about the issue in order to fuel the hype surrounding the remastered game.
Hello World!
arb
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Noobville17921 Posts
August 10 2017 18:18 GMT
#79
On August 11 2017 00:08 Drake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 17:05 TT1 wrote:
If they end up making the default turn rate 12 the ladder will be unplayable, which is what koreans want. I dunno why we can't adjust the turn rate ingame, that would solve a lot of issues.


matchmaking could do it auto
same server vs same server 12 or 16
different servers vs each other 8

easy peasy as a programmer i wanna see the programmer telling me it cant be done i mean teh game will see where the players come from xD

I would say some country 12 and other countries 8 tbh.

Koreans will probably have the final say after all, they will end up being the majority and are the best players by far
Artillery spawned from the forges of Hell
CHEONSOYUN
Profile Joined August 2017
562 Posts
August 10 2017 18:29 GMT
#80
On August 11 2017 03:18 craz3d wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2017 01:46 WGT-Baal wrote:
On August 11 2017 00:49 Ragnarork wrote:
On August 10 2017 13:32 blade55555 wrote:
Maybe, but even then SC2 was released 7 years ago.


I just took a big punch right in the face.

As for the price, I'll happily spend $15 to get SC:R if it's released and there's no major issues.

Why are people so mad about the pricetag though? I sense it's mostly because some feature that wasn't supposed to be exclusive to SC:R is now exclusive to SC:R.

I would like to know why exactly are people complaining that they could have had new stuff for free, but for some reasons (no idea which exactly) Blizzard switched and now that stuff costs money. Well, that's unfortunate, but at the same time not unreasonable to make people pay for work they've done instead of just putting it out for free, is it?


The issue is that Blizzard said for a long time it would be free (ladder) and it suddenly changed without warning or explanation. Then they explained a bit but it felt more like PR. There is no problem with the price or anything, just the way it happened. In a sense, some people think that since they didnt keep that promise, what else can they go back on ? Skins, gameplay...


I have an inkling feeling that they never intended for it to be compatible with the original game, meaning they outright lied about the issue in order to fuel the hype surrounding the remastered game.


is there anyone who based their decison to purchase the remaster based on original game's compatibility with the remaster?

it's ridiculous to imply or state that blizzard intentionally misled people... because it's such an insignificant issue for the majority of their customers.
JAEDONG...!!! EFFORT IS ANGRY. ZERG...?!
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 36m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
elazer 422
mouzHeroMarine 295
IndyStarCraft 217
MindelVK 73
Vindicta 47
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2609
Shuttle 835
Light 200
Mini 150
Hyun 50
910 35
Sexy 22
Movie 21
ivOry 9
Dota 2
Gorgc6899
qojqva3129
LuMiX2
Counter-Strike
fl0m2667
byalli1282
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor474
Liquid`Hasu374
Other Games
Grubby3242
Liquid`RaSZi2480
FrodaN1272
B2W.Neo491
crisheroes445
Harstem205
KnowMe169
ToD145
ArmadaUGS142
Mew2King24
Railgan1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2689
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 1357
Other Games
EGCTV1296
StarCraft 2
angryscii 11
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Kozan
• Laughngamez YouTube
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 11
• FirePhoenix8
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos3330
• TFBlade981
Other Games
• imaqtpie999
• Shiphtur197
Upcoming Events
BSL 21
1h 36m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs XuanXuan
eOnzErG vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs DuGu
Dewalt vs Bonyth
IPSL
1h 36m
Dewalt vs Sziky
Replay Cast
14h 36m
Wardi Open
17h 36m
Monday Night Weeklies
22h 36m
OSC
1d 16h
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
Big Brain Bouts
4 days
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
5 days
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: W4
Big Gabe Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.