|
On March 31 2017 02:38 Zaros wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2017 02:03 eviltomahawk wrote:On March 30 2017 01:50 Bijan wrote:On March 30 2017 00:09 lestye wrote:On March 29 2017 22:55 KOtical wrote:
tbh i rather see new ones instead of remastered games.... so i would have rather had a starcraft 3 wich (i guess) would have alot more people pumped for the game... Regardless Team 1 (the RTS team) and the Classic team are two completely different entities. Even if you wanted a new game, this Remaster didn't take up time and resources that would have spent on a new game. I'm honestly not ready for them to jump into a new RTS. I love SC2 and I'm so pumped about SC:R and both games still have a lot of life in them. On top of that, as much as I love SC2, I think there are so many lessons that can be learned from that game's progression and development over the years and there are probably more lessons Blizzard can learn by continuing to focus on improving SC2, as long as there is still a viable competitive scene at least. That said, if they do decide to make another RTS, I think it's only fair Warcraft 4 get's a go. Overwatch RTS it is then Na, Blizzard buys the rights to the C&C Franchise and makes C&C 5.
The joke is it will work the same as C&C4.
|
To me this is a much bigger deal than just getting to play Brood War at a higher resolution. I mean that's cool too, but here's a glimmer of hope for the future of games of this type. It doesn't even need to be a huge success, we just need the right people to play it and for it to click that granular control and inefficient pathing AI makes for a style of RTS gameplay that's just as valid as that of more recent RTS games. And in many ways gameplay that's more tactile and engaging, with so much design space that hasn't been explored yet. Imagine a future where indie "BW-likes" explode in the way that action rogue-likes did. Sure it isn't likely, but it's possible.
Any issues with the new art assets aside, I can't give Blizzard enough props for doing this.Their choice to keep the gameplay (almost) exactly the same is a direct refutation of the widely held view that BW is outdated on a fundamental level.
|
On March 29 2017 23:17 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2017 14:22 lichter wrote:
With Blizzard keen to improve BW functionality and play experience, what other features, add-ons, or bugs do you think Blizzard should add to the game? Improved mapmaking tools.
I cannot second this enough
|
On March 31 2017 10:03 TheFish7 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2017 23:17 BLinD-RawR wrote:On March 26 2017 14:22 lichter wrote:
With Blizzard keen to improve BW functionality and play experience, what other features, add-ons, or bugs do you think Blizzard should add to the game? Improved mapmaking tools. I cannot second this enough
100%!
hey I think it would also be interesting if blizzard try adding any maps made by themselves?  would be interesting, for example I would like new maps that could rival hunters in quality for 2v2/3v3/4v4 stuff?^^
hunters has this irregularity to it^^
|
Any way to change your username in this game after you've made it?
|
Why does SC: RM look like a cell phone game?
The original Starcraft still looks better than the remastered version.
It's looks like Blizzard completely redone all the sprites from scratch instead of taking the old sprites and adding more detail to them + updating them to HD.
Plus, SC: RM looks too cartoony. But too realistic (like Starcraft 2) doesn't look good either.
I liked how the original Starcraft looks half cartoony and half realistic. But SC: RM looks 100% cartoony.
And why is Blizzard remastering the sound? They're probably going to make the badass sounding Protoss Zealot sound like a wimp. And they're probably going to make the Terran Ghost not sound cool anymore. If anything, all the units' voices are going to get downgraded. I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard made the Terran Siege Tank's 120mm Shock Cannon sound like a BB gun.
|
On March 31 2017 15:04 Grahf Vollmer wrote:
Why does SC: RM look like a cell phone game?
The original Starcraft still looks better than the remastered version.
It's looks like Blizzard completely redone all the sprites from scratch instead of taking the old sprites and adding more detail to them + updating them to HD.
Plus, SC: RM looks too cartoony. But too realistic (like Starcraft 2) doesn't look good either.
I liked how the original Starcraft looks half cartoony and half realistic. But SC: RM looks 100% cartoony.
And why is Blizzard remastering the sound? They're probably going to make the badass sounding Protoss Zealot sound like a wimp. And they're probably going to make the Terran Ghost not sound cool anymore. If anything, all the units' voices are going to get downgraded. I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard made the Terran Siege Tank's 120mm Shock Cannon sound like a BB gun.
You do know that you can just play with the original client with everything intact?
|
Korean PC bangs and players won't be happy. A lot of them use XP iirc. ffs koreans/chinese still mostly use Internet Explorer to browse the internet LOL
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On March 31 2017 17:31 quirinus wrote:Korean PC bangs and players won't be happy. A lot of them use XP iirc. ffs koreans/chinese still mostly use Internet Explorer to browse the internet LOL
From reading that, they aren't disabling the OLD non HD BW from working under XP right? That would be somewhat insane... but it isn't entirely clear from the link.
|
i only saw windows 7/10 in pcbangs because 99% of people in pcbangs play fifa or overwatch
|
On March 31 2017 17:42 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 17:31 quirinus wrote:Korean PC bangs and players won't be happy. A lot of them use XP iirc. ffs koreans/chinese still mostly use Internet Explorer to browse the internet LOL From reading that, they aren't disabling the OLD non HD BW from working under XP right? That would be somewhat insane... but it isn't entirely clear from the link.
I'm using XP and can confirm, cannot connect to the PTR.Single player and LAN work fine.
Just on my old computer here, my newer machine has Win 7.
BW classic 1.18 will need at least Win 7 to use Bnet.
|
On March 31 2017 17:42 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 17:31 quirinus wrote:Korean PC bangs and players won't be happy. A lot of them use XP iirc. ffs koreans/chinese still mostly use Internet Explorer to browse the internet LOL From reading that, they aren't disabling the OLD non HD BW from working under XP right? That would be somewhat insane... but it isn't entirely clear from the link.
i think this is an old data,i dont remember right now where i did read it but the most popular os in Korea is w7.and i think more and more people are using chrome,but IE still strong.
|
On March 31 2017 17:42 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 17:31 quirinus wrote:Korean PC bangs and players won't be happy. A lot of them use XP iirc. ffs koreans/chinese still mostly use Internet Explorer to browse the internet LOL From reading that, they aren't disabling the OLD non HD BW from working under XP right? That would be somewhat insane... but it isn't entirely clear from the link.
what about windows 98 and windows ME??? lol j/k but XP yeah, I'm sure people still use it
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On March 31 2017 23:20 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 17:42 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On March 31 2017 17:31 quirinus wrote:Korean PC bangs and players won't be happy. A lot of them use XP iirc. ffs koreans/chinese still mostly use Internet Explorer to browse the internet LOL From reading that, they aren't disabling the OLD non HD BW from working under XP right? That would be somewhat insane... but it isn't entirely clear from the link. I'm using XP and can confirm, cannot connect to the PTR.Single player and LAN work fine. Just on my old computer here, my newer machine has Win 7. BW classic 1.18 will need at least Win 7 to use Bnet.
That's kinda... really shitty. I know XP is ancient but BW is too.
|
On April 01 2017 00:35 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 23:20 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On March 31 2017 17:42 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On March 31 2017 17:31 quirinus wrote:Korean PC bangs and players won't be happy. A lot of them use XP iirc. ffs koreans/chinese still mostly use Internet Explorer to browse the internet LOL From reading that, they aren't disabling the OLD non HD BW from working under XP right? That would be somewhat insane... but it isn't entirely clear from the link. I'm using XP and can confirm, cannot connect to the PTR.Single player and LAN work fine. Just on my old computer here, my newer machine has Win 7. BW classic 1.18 will need at least Win 7 to use Bnet. That's kinda... really shitty. I know XP is ancient but BW is too.
yes it would be nice if we can know why XP can't be supported if it really can't, older machines better run XP than 7 I think
|
On April 01 2017 00:35 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 23:20 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On March 31 2017 17:42 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On March 31 2017 17:31 quirinus wrote:Korean PC bangs and players won't be happy. A lot of them use XP iirc. ffs koreans/chinese still mostly use Internet Explorer to browse the internet LOL From reading that, they aren't disabling the OLD non HD BW from working under XP right? That would be somewhat insane... but it isn't entirely clear from the link. I'm using XP and can confirm, cannot connect to the PTR.Single player and LAN work fine. Just on my old computer here, my newer machine has Win 7. BW classic 1.18 will need at least Win 7 to use Bnet. That's kinda... really shitty. I know XP is ancient but BW is too.
Not really. You cannot compare an operating system with an application. Those people using XP on the internet are a threat not only to their own machines but to others on the internet as well. There are so many vulnarabilities that are not getting patched that allow attackers to take control over your system… Those machines become part of botnets, the bane of the modern internet.
|
Yup, anyone using a windows XP machine had better not have anything important on there like SSN, passwords or anything like that.
|
Russian Federation3338 Posts
Go to gametrics.com and in the bottom pie chart you can see hardware and software specs of registered pc bangs. Click on the 소프트웨어 tab to see OS. Koreans still use ie because a lot of security measures require IE which is sad but yeah a lot of sites were hard coded to work with and only with ie. source: im korean who lives abroad and is infuriated every time i go to korea and try to do anything made me play a lot of bw whenever i went to korea because no cell phone number to verify stuff RIP
|
On April 01 2017 00:35 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2017 23:20 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:On March 31 2017 17:42 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On March 31 2017 17:31 quirinus wrote:Korean PC bangs and players won't be happy. A lot of them use XP iirc. ffs koreans/chinese still mostly use Internet Explorer to browse the internet LOL From reading that, they aren't disabling the OLD non HD BW from working under XP right? That would be somewhat insane... but it isn't entirely clear from the link. I'm using XP and can confirm, cannot connect to the PTR.Single player and LAN work fine. Just on my old computer here, my newer machine has Win 7. BW classic 1.18 will need at least Win 7 to use Bnet. That's kinda... really shitty. I know XP is ancient but BW is too. XP no longer is supported by windows. No one should be using XP, it has nothing to protect against latest viruses, exploits etc. Ergo, no company designs with XP in mind. They arent even 0.01% of market share anymore.
|
Based on what we have seen blizz putting out this past week, is anyone else thinking its a bigger possibility now that remastered might offer a worse online UI than the original?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
