EPTStarcraft Broodwar with SC2 Unit Audio
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
elmerpogs
Philippines441 Posts
| ||
TheEmulator
28099 Posts
| ||
Falling
Canada11450 Posts
| ||
|
Ryusei-R1
United States2106 Posts
| ||
|
JohnChoi
1773 Posts
On November 08 2012 17:32 Ryusei-R1 wrote: I'd feel like SC2 with SC1 audio would be so much more orgasmic to the ears. ultralisks sound like such giant pussies in sc2 in bw they were so manly D: | ||
|
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
On November 08 2012 16:50 elmerpogs wrote: I remember watching aaF.cat's broodwar stream playing broodwar (coz now he's playing LOL) with this starcraft2 unit audios. I've been searching the web if there's any mod/ utility available but results are frustrating. no offense, but i would never do that. To me BW sounds and music are so much more iconic and fitting. | ||
|
elmerpogs
Philippines441 Posts
BW Fighting! | ||
|
Zombo Joe
Canada850 Posts
| ||
|
Hoender
South Africa381 Posts
On November 08 2012 17:35 JohnChoi wrote: ultralisks sound like such giant pussies in sc2 in bw they were so manly D: so... only use SC2 sounds when playing Cat and Mouse then? :D | ||
|
thezanursic
5497 Posts
| ||
|
elmerpogs
Philippines441 Posts
On November 08 2012 18:43 thezanursic wrote: Elmeropogs destroying Brood War since 2012!!! Really? What have I done?Im just looking for the possibility of having BW with SC2 unit audio.I love BW and destroying what?I was just amazed at how aaf.Cat (BW and LoL streamer) did that. | ||
c3rberUs
Japan11286 Posts
 I'm curious though, did he replace all the sounds (like the marine firing and "you must construct... pylons") or just the unit sounds (My wife for hireee!!!)? | ||
|
asel
Germany1601 Posts
| ||
|
TaShadan
Germany1978 Posts
| ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50653 Posts
On November 08 2012 20:42 TaShadan wrote: most bw sounds are superior to sc2 sounds eh? don't you mean all of it? | ||
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
Personally I think that the marine gun sounds better in sc2.But that's just me I guess. Other than that nothing really. | ||
Sayle
United Kingdom3685 Posts
| ||
|
elmerpogs
Philippines441 Posts
| ||
|
bjornkavist
Canada1235 Posts
| ||
|
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
| ||
|
amazingxkcd
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
| ||
|
chrisolo
Germany2609 Posts
On November 08 2012 22:13 Sayle wrote: As a protoss player I prefer the SC2 siege tank sound. The BW sound makes me shit myself. I know that feeling, bro  Anyways I think you need to edit the MPQ to do this, so you only gonna be able to play ICCup (or other non Battle.net server) with this. I think Warden registers such a big difference in the MPQ pretty easily. Dunno if Warden is still active on the original servers, tho. | ||
|
Rlentless
Hong Kong322 Posts
He plays with sc2 audio. | ||
|
saritenite
Singapore1680 Posts
| ||
|
sabas123
Netherlands3122 Posts
bw sounds are so manly and so realistic. | ||
|
TelecoM
United States10700 Posts
 | ||
|
IskatuMesk
Canada969 Posts
The cleaner way is to use a firegraft or mpqdraft executable but I don't think you can get Chaoslauncher to launch those exes, so perhaps the mpq alteration path is a better idea. If folder hotloading works you can just place them within the appropriate directory structure in sc and hope for the best. Also, I ran total conversions on BW servers for many years and never got banned. Total conversions that changed the memory and everything. This isn't a guarantee you won't get banned, just that it is immensely unlikely. | ||
white_horse
1019 Posts
| ||
|
asel
Germany1601 Posts
- BOOM | ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9107 Posts
| ||
|
Kal_rA
United States2925 Posts
and asel.. I feel you bro | ||
|
rupp_lekkens
Chile64 Posts
you can ask him | ||
|
Zergneedsfood
United States10671 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On November 08 2012 21:02 TheKefka wrote: Personally I think that the marine gun sounds better in sc2.But that's just me I guess. Other than that nothing really. They ruined every sound the marine made when they changed the stim sound tbh. | ||
|
Zergneedsfood
United States10671 Posts
On November 09 2012 12:04 arb wrote: They ruined every sound the marine made when they changed the stim sound tbh. Yeah, marines are awful in sc2. | ||
|
TheEmulator
28099 Posts
On November 09 2012 11:43 Zergneedsfood wrote: I actually like the Terran music in SC2. That's probably the only sounds in that game I approved of. I didn't even know what it sounds like, because I play with music off so I can listen to my own playlists. But I just checked, and your right, it sounds cool imo. | ||
|
hitthat
Poland2322 Posts
On November 09 2012 06:14 sabas123 wrote: sc2 sounds sucks lol...... bw sounds are so manly and so realistic. Realistic? ROTFL. Wright death sounds like revolver shot. I know that sounds (as everything in bw exept single player campaign) are better in BW, but lets dont go too far with saying that SC2 is less realistic. Realism in both games is...minimalistic at best. | ||
|
thezanursic
5497 Posts
On November 08 2012 18:57 elmerpogs wrote: Really? What have I done?Im just looking for the possibility of having BW with SC2 unit audio.I love BW and destroying what?I was just amazed at how aaf.Cat (BW and LoL streamer) did that. I think you can change the audio pretty easily all you have to do it is access the audio files in whatever folder that they currently are. | ||
|
chrisolo
Germany2609 Posts
On November 09 2012 15:22 hitthat wrote: Realistic? ROTFL. Wright death sounds like revolver shot. I know that sounds (as everything in bw exept single player campaign) are better in BW, but lets dont go too far with saying that SC2 is less realistic. Realism in both games is...minimalistic at best. How can you even say that the Broodwar campaign is worse then the WoL campaign. It was so flat and and no story involved. I nearly puked, when (major WoL campaign spoiler) + Show Spoiler + Raynor had Kerrigan in his arms at the end. Seriously WTF. Cannot think of anything what is better in SC2, but matchmaking. Everything else is far inferior, including sounds and music. | ||
|
hitthat
Poland2322 Posts
On November 09 2012 20:09 chrisolo wrote: How can you even say that the Broodwar campaign is worse then the WoL campaign. It was so flat and and no story involved. I nearly puked, when (major WoL campaign spoiler) + Show Spoiler + Raynor had Kerrigan in his arms at the end. Seriously WTF. Cannot think of anything what is better in SC2, but matchmaking. Everything else is far inferior, including sounds and music. Story is not all. Story in SC2 sucks cock, but gameplay in single was more fun and missions are as much diversed. And it was much harder to win campaign in SC2 than campaign(s) in BroodWar | ||
|
Ethoex
United States164 Posts
| ||
|
thezanursic
5497 Posts
On November 09 2012 20:09 chrisolo wrote: How can you even say that the Broodwar campaign is worse then the WoL campaign. It was so flat and and no story involved. I nearly puked, when (major WoL campaign spoiler) + Show Spoiler + Raynor had Kerrigan in his arms at the end. Seriously WTF. Cannot think of anything what is better in SC2, but matchmaking. Everything else is far inferior, including sounds and music. I hate to say it, but both of you are right in a way. If you look at the way missions were designed I can honestly say that SC2 had the best RTS campaign. I have never seen as much mission variety and the cutscenes were pretty good to. If you look at BW in comparison the missions were very similar to each other and while the cutscenes were amazing as well because they conveyed an amazing story to the audience, but they obviously weren't as amazing in terms of graphics and you must understand that different people prioritize different aspects some don't even care about the story as long as the gameplay is amazing and SC2 has better gameplay (Meaning more noob friendly and if you just pick up the game it is a lot more enjoyable) So BW is better than SC2 in terms of story and how it was told SC2 is better than BW in terms of graphics, gameplay and mission variety (And if SC2 didn't do this right after 14 years the game would have been a disaster) | ||
|
Darksoldierr
Hungary2012 Posts
And the zerg ones are definitely superior to their counterpart. | ||
|
thezanursic
5497 Posts
On November 10 2012 21:25 Darksoldierr wrote: The funny comments from units if you keep constantly clicking on them is a bonus point for Sc2, but i agree, most of the BW voices are better And the zerg ones are definitely superior to their counterpart. I agree they have a special feel to them AND surprisingly the BW ones are pretty HQ for the year that they were recorded in! | ||
|
TheBJ
Bulgaria906 Posts
On November 10 2012 21:38 thezanursic wrote: I agree they have a special feel to them AND surprisingly the BW ones are pretty HQ for the year that they were recorded in! Not suprising at all. In older times , quality of sound was much easier to produce in a game compared to graphics , thus why older blizzard games have much superior sounds compared to their new editions. e.g. sc:bw->sc2 d2->d3 etc | ||
|
chrisolo
Germany2609 Posts
On November 10 2012 17:23 thezanursic wrote: I hate to say it, but both of you are right in a way. If you look at the way missions were designed I can honestly say that SC2 had the best RTS campaign. I have never seen as much mission variety and the cutscenes were pretty good to. If you look at BW in comparison the missions were very similar to each other and while the cutscenes were amazing as well because they conveyed an amazing story to the audience, but they obviously weren't as amazing in terms of graphics and you must understand that different people prioritize different aspects some don't even care about the story as long as the gameplay is amazing and SC2 has better gameplay (Meaning more noob friendly and if you just pick up the game it is a lot more enjoyable) So BW is better than SC2 in terms of story and how it was told SC2 is better than BW in terms of graphics, gameplay and mission variety (And if SC2 didn't do this right after 14 years the game would have been a disaster) Sorry but this is dumb to me , tbh (no offense). The campaign IS the story. And one should not care about the gameplay, if the story is as amazing as SC/BW's was. Anyways, this is quite offtopic now, so I will quit it. | ||
|
elmerpogs
Philippines441 Posts
| ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
On November 10 2012 03:45 Ethoex wrote: why would you want the sc2 unit audio? Personal taste, started playing SC2 first, want something different but not so different as to be unnerving (I would make my marines sound like Sylvestor Stallone if I could) | ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
| ||
|
JungleTerrain
Chile799 Posts
| ||
|
Garmer
1286 Posts
On November 10 2012 17:23 thezanursic wrote: I hate to say it, but both of you are right in a way. If you look at the way missions were designed I can honestly say that SC2 had the best RTS campaign. I have never seen as much mission variety and the cutscenes were pretty good to. If you look at BW in comparison the missions were very similar to each other and while the cutscenes were amazing as well because they conveyed an amazing story to the audience, but they obviously weren't as amazing in terms of graphics and you must understand that different people prioritize different aspects some don't even care about the story as long as the gameplay is amazing and SC2 has better gameplay (Meaning more noob friendly and if you just pick up the game it is a lot more enjoyable) So BW is better than SC2 in terms of story and how it was told SC2 is better than BW in terms of graphics, gameplay and mission variety (And if SC2 didn't do this right after 14 years the game would have been a disaster) what? did i heard it right? sc2 has better gameplay? lol, it's not better is just more simple. | ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
On December 06 2012 04:12 Garmer wrote: what? did i heard it right? sc2 has better gameplay? lol, it's not better is just more simple. I think the discussion is about the respective campaigns. Only a small percentage of what makes BW the greatest RTS of all time is in the "Kill every building on this giant map including that one fucking turret by itself in the middle of nowhere" mission of vanilla SC1. BW's campaign actually had much more variety in its level design than SC1. There's a Terran mission where you keep getting spellcasters and have to use them smartly to get past enemies. That's a cool level! There's also a level where you have a fleet of scouts and there are literally 1000+ turrets on the map. That level is terrible. I hate that level so goddamn much. The installation levels generally, I didn't care for at all in SC1/BW. Most of BW's missions are "Make dudes and a-move". I really wish there was a campaign for BW that really required you to use the cooler BW tricks. Actually, now that I think about it, the smartest thing I ever heard Dustin Browder say was him noting that most BW missions were passively macroing and a-moving, leading to players going into multiplayer with an NR15 mindset, and so the SC2 campaign was designed so that you have to hit at various timings, teaching you the "proper" way to play for when you got to multiplayer. I'd really like to see a BW campaign that was set up to teach you the proper way to play the multiplayer, actually. That might be a fun project, if I only knew the proper way to play multiplayer ;_; That's an idea for its own thread, though. | ||
|
AssyrianKing
Australia2116 Posts
 | ||
|
DreamChaser
1649 Posts
On November 08 2012 17:10 Falling wrote: ...does not compute. ERROR:ERROR SYSTEM SHUTDO.... | ||
|
Garmer
1286 Posts
On December 06 2012 04:50 Ribbon wrote: I think the discussion is about the respective campaigns. Only a small percentage of what makes BW the greatest RTS of all time is in the "Kill every building on this giant map including that one fucking turret by itself in the middle of nowhere" mission of vanilla SC1. BW's campaign actually had much more variety in its level design than SC1. There's a Terran mission where you keep getting spellcasters and have to use them smartly to get past enemies. That's a cool level! There's also a level where you have a fleet of scouts and there are literally 1000+ turrets on the map. That level is terrible. I hate that level so goddamn much. The installation levels generally, I didn't care for at all in SC1/BW. Most of BW's missions are "Make dudes and a-move". I really wish there was a campaign for BW that really required you to use the cooler BW tricks. Actually, now that I think about it, the smartest thing I ever heard Dustin Browder say was him noting that most BW missions were passively macroing and a-moving, leading to players going into multiplayer with an NR15 mindset, and so the SC2 campaign was designed so that you have to hit at various timings, teaching you the "proper" way to play for when you got to multiplayer. I'd really like to see a BW campaign that was set up to teach you the proper way to play the multiplayer, actually. That might be a fun project, if I only knew the proper way to play multiplayer ;_; That's an idea for its own thread, though. oh if we are referring, to the campaign, then yes, i agree, SC2 offer much more variety. | ||
|
Existential
Australia2107 Posts
| ||
| ||
